| doko | slangasek, accepted libverto, do you want to delay promotion? otoh krb5 won't be built with it | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| slangasek | doko: I have no reason for or against delaying promotion | 00:40 |
| infinity | slangasek: If we only have one "port" at this point, I'd argue that we should move both armhf and powerpc (for the britney stuff), and do away with the distinction. | 00:40 |
| infinity | slangasek: But yeah, maybe waiting on libreoffice to not vomit all over the report would be nice. | 00:40 |
| slangasek | well, even if powerpc is the only port, if there *is* a difference in who's responsible for it I think the distinction ought to be kept | 00:41 |
| slangasek | especially since powerpc is also seemingly never at 0 | 00:41 |
| infinity | slangasek: ppc was at zero until very recently, to be fair. | 00:42 |
| slangasek | ah | 00:42 |
| infinity | slangasek: And, I dunno. Having it alone on another report leads to it being ignored. It's a bit of a catch-22. | 00:42 |
| infinity | "Oh look, no one fixes problems with it, let's hide them, so no one notices there are problems to fix." | 00:42 |
| * infinity shrugs. | 00:42 | |
| slangasek | well, I don't feel strongly either way | 00:43 |
| infinity | This has nothing to do, of course, with the mirroring distinction, or the "official support" tag in LP, just for the britney reports, I think it's not worth the separation. | 00:43 |
| slangasek | the plusoners may have more relevant opinions here | 00:43 |
| infinity | I think it made more sense when -ports was more than half the arches we had. | 00:44 |
| infinity | Now it's.. One. | 00:44 |
| doko | slangasek, either the third buildd appears or we should drop powerpc. could you escalate the ticket? | 00:44 |
| infinity | (And we list it on, say, the ftbfs reports and most of our home-grown archive reports) | 00:44 |
| slangasek | doko: what ticket is this? | 00:45 |
| doko | slangasek, infinity knows the number, I need to search ... | 00:46 |
| infinity | 48569 | 00:47 |
| slangasek | ta | 00:48 |
| slangasek | I won't necessarily escalate it before I know what else is in lamont's queue ahead of it, however | 00:48 |
| doko | slangasek, and here is bug #907126 to reduce the build load as well | 00:53 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 907126 in launchpad "allow exclusion of powerpc builds from PPA's (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/907126 | 00:53 |
| infinity | That's only for non-virt anyway. | 00:55 |
| infinity | Which people are meant to be careful with. | 00:55 |
| infinity | (In theory) | 00:55 |
| doko | practice beats theory | 00:55 |
| infinity | Heh. | 00:55 |
| infinity | Still, the third machine would make things fine. | 00:56 |
| infinity | Given that PPC always catches up, just sometimes get a bit backlogged. | 00:56 |
| infinity | One more box should make it happy. | 00:56 |
| infinity | And once I finish the livefs-in-soyuz thing, we get sulfur as an lp-buildd too. | 00:56 |
| doko | yes, but it does have an impact on workflow. and things like linaro-overlays have priority on the buildds | 00:56 |
| infinity | I might also cut build time when I'm rooting around in lp-buildd too. | 00:57 |
| lamont | slangasek: that ticket needs stakeholder escalation if you want it anytime soon... 'twas #460 in the queue earlier today (and it's not just lamont's queue, thanks) | 00:57 |
| infinity | We always meant to do something with the "uninstalling build-deps failed" return code from sbuild, but we never did. So, given that no one cares anyway, we may as well skip the uninstall step. | 00:58 |
| infinity | Which shaves a ton of time off every build. | 00:58 |
| doko | slangasek, still see libev in component-mismatches | 01:00 |
| slangasek | doko: I don't - reload? | 01:01 |
| doko | ohh, not anymore. libverto promoted | 01:01 |
| doko | have to get used to the 30min intervals | 01:03 |
| * doko watches Riddell's kde mess | 01:07 | |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!