[02:05] <Kalidarn> hey guys, not sure what Canonical's position or opinion is on the new US law being proposed SOPA, but i noticed that launchpad.net certificates are issued by GoDaddy, an apparent supporter of the controversial law https://pay.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/nmnie/godaddy_supports_sopa_im_transferring_51_domains/
[02:06] <Kalidarn> http://www.thedomains.com/2011/11/15/here-is-godaddys-statement-in-support-of-the-stop-online-privacy-act-house-hearing-tomorrow/
[02:12] <Peng> Oh geez
[02:16] <Kalidarn> though the domains appear to be registered with markmonitor not sure if they're a godaddy reseller though
[02:16] <Kalidarn> can't say i've done too much research
[02:19] <Kalidarn> it would appear they aren't, least from what i see so far.
[02:20] <Kalidarn> Peng: i found this rather amusing https://pay.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/nmnie/godaddy_supports_sopa_im_transferring_51_domains/c3aarjl
[02:22] <Kalidarn> apparently Bob Patterson has a trash can made out of an elephant's foot.
[02:23] <Kalidarn> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Parsons#Elephant_shooting_controversy
[04:32] <cnd> I uploaded a package to a ppa with an orig tarball that was different than in the ubuntu archives
[04:32] <cnd> I rebuilt using the same orig tarball, and uploaded without the orig tarball this time
[04:32] <cnd> but I still got the same error back
[04:32] <cnd> could the orig tarball I uploaded be stuck in the ppa somehow?
[04:34] <cnd> to be specific, I'm trying to upload qt4-x11 to ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/x-staging
[04:37] <wgrant> cnd: It's not possible to upload a different file with the same name.
[04:38] <wgrant> That would be a lie, and confuse people and software alike.
[04:38] <cnd> wgrant, I'm not trying to
[04:38] <cnd> I did the first time accidentally
[04:38] <wgrant> Even if the old file is no longer used by a published package in that archive.
[04:38] <wgrant> You can't upload the same filename with different contents.
[04:38] <cnd> yes, I'm not trying to do that
[04:39] <cnd> wgrant, listen to what I'm saying
[04:39] <cnd> I accidentally uploaded a different tarball
[04:39] <cnd> now I'm trying to upload again without the tarball, and the source package was built with the correct orig tarball
[04:39] <cnd> and it's still being rejected
[04:39] <wgrant> Ah, you didn't say the initial upload of the different tarball was rejected.
[04:40] <cnd> ahh, ok
[04:40] <cnd> I just tried uploading with a bumped ubuntu version
[04:40] <cnd> ~xstaging2 instead of ~xstaging1
[04:40] <cnd> we'll see if that fixes things
[04:41] <wgrant> It won't if it is complaining about the orig.tar.gz.
[04:41] <wgrant> What is the error message?
[04:41] <cnd> still rejected
[04:41] <cnd> File qt4-x11_4.7.4.orig.tar.gz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents.
[04:41] <wgrant> Can you pastebin the dsc?
[04:42] <cnd> this was the dput output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/779451/
[04:42] <cnd> the orig tarball wasn't sent
[04:42] <wgrant> That's not really relevant.
[04:43] <cnd> this is the dsc: http://paste.ubuntu.com/779454/
[04:43] <wgrant> the dsc still has the hash of whichever tarball you built against.
[04:43] <wgrant> Uploading without it won't work.
[04:43] <cnd> how can I get the hash of the tarball in ubuntu?
[04:43] <wgrant> Obtain the Ubuntu tarball, and rebuild your source package against it.
[04:44] <wgrant> No manual dsc hacking, please :)
[04:44] <cnd> arg, I have the correct orig tarball in ../
[04:44] <cnd> but it was building against ../build-area/
[04:44] <wgrant> Hah
[04:44] <wgrant> Where did the tarball of lies come from?
[04:45] <wgrant> You should probably destroy it to prevent future mistakes.
[04:45] <cnd> uscan --download-current-version
[04:46] <wgrant> o_O
[04:46] <wgrant> That generates a different one?
[04:46] <cnd> so either upstream changed it, or ubuntu's tarball isn't really the orig upstream tarball
[04:46] <wgrant> Yay :/
[04:46] <cnd> or the watch file is broken :)
[04:53] <cnd> wgrant, it worked finally
[04:53] <cnd> thanks!
[04:53] <wgrant> Excellent.
[08:16] <czajkowski> morning
[11:12] <Quintasan> jelmer: Can one change the code import url once it has been set up?
[11:33] <jelmer> Quintasan: yes, but you have to be a code import admin
[11:33] <jelmer> Quintasan: I can change one for you if you lik
[11:33] <Quintasan> jelmer: Splendid, there is more than one, actually we move whole telepathy-kde
[11:34] <Quintasan> lp:~telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm -> git url is now 	git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-kde/kde-extras/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-accounts-kcm.git
[11:34] <Quintasan> lp:~telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-approver -> git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-kde/kde-extras/telepathy-kde/telepathy-kde-approver.git
[11:35] <jelmer> Quintasan: probably easiest to file a questin in answers.launchpad.net/launchpad if there are many
[11:35] <jelmer> I'm about to head out
[11:35] <Quintasan> jelmer: Okay. Will do that
[19:30] <joancreus> i tried to login. i did receive a warning message (somebody might be impersonating you) but not a confirmation code
[19:30] <joancreus> ideas?
[19:31] <joancreus> thanks a lot
[19:34] <joancreus> ?
[19:35] <joancreus> i've retried but no luck
[19:35] <joancreus> the same happened
[19:55] <joancreus> now working