/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/12/23/#ubuntu-devel.txt

hallynanyone around who would considering pushing https://code.launchpad.net/~psusi/ubuntu/precise/lm-sensors/merge/+merge/85044 ?  I don't  have perms to dput it.00:08
broderhallyn: i'm hoping to have time to try and improve that upgrade path during my holiday break00:19
=== arosales is now known as antonio_afk
hallynbroder: for schroot?  cool - it's no big deal if documented, just took me awhiel (and looking through a patch you sent to debian :) to figure out where to tweak00:45
hallynthe subdirs under /etc confounded me :)  i was grepping in /etc/*00:46
elkyanyone heard from lifeless & other christchurch people in the past hour? there's been another big quake there :(01:54
=== cdbs is now known as bilal
bilaliHate changing nicks, but this is going to be my nick from now onwards. Plain and simple02:01
brycehelky, "only" 5.8 this time, hopefully only modest damage and no casualties02:04
brycehbilal, nice02:04
elkybryceh, yeah, so far no reports of toppled buildings or death, but there has been reports of injury and cracking and liquefaction. Merry christmas, christchurch :(02:06
ajmitchgreat way to finish the year02:06
elkyajmitch, yeah02:13
RAOF:(02:20
ScottKAnd ross is dead again.02:24
ScottKpowerpc may never catch up.02:24
ScottKinfinity: Any idea what's up with it (dunno if you can still look into such things)?02:25
ScottKAt least the third time today it's died.02:25
infinityScottK: I can't, no.  Gave up that access.02:27
infinityScottK: I know people have been notified, however.02:27
ScottKThanks.02:27
infinityScottK: ross lives.  Of course, the firefox build that killed it might take out adare soon. ;)02:40
ScottKIt's been that same build it died on at least two of the times.02:41
ScottKOf course it's a long build, so it may just be coincidence.02:41
* infinity nods.02:41
infinityI suspect the Xserves will be infinitely happier when we can upgrade them to precise.02:42
infinityThe older kernels we left them on weren't the happiest of pandas, if I recall.02:42
infinityAt least, back when the machines were "mine".02:42
infinityOh, no, I'm living in the past.  They're lucid now.02:43
infinityIt was hardy that they skipped.02:43
ScottKYep02:44
ScottKIIRC they ran Karmic for a little while.02:44
=== bkerensa is now known as bkerensa|AFK
psusidoko_, in xmlrpc-c (1.16.32-0ubuntu2) you wrote: * Don't use the symbols files, renamed the library packages anyway.  I assume this means you renamed the binary package to have -0 in the name.  Why?  I'm trying to install boxee and it depends on the non -0 version.  Is there an abi breakage, or could adding a provides: for the non -0 fix this?03:05
ScottKWhich is preferred (it seems they both work fine): (qreal)foo or qreal(foo)?03:10
psusiScottK, you talking about casting in C++?03:10
ScottKyes.03:10
ScottKSorry.03:10
psusiwell, the former works in C as well, in C++, I think the specific {static,dynamic}_cast<> is preferred03:11
psusitechnically the latter form instantiates a new temporary03:11
ScottKFor Qt qreal is a double on all archs except armel/armhf so it's quite common for people to interleave doubles and qreals when they shouldn't.03:12
infinitypsusi: I'm not sure if there was an ABI break, but the package should have the SOVER in the name regardless.  Can boxee not be rebuilt to get the correct dep?03:17
infinitypsusi: Oh, it's proprietary.  Yay.03:18
psusiinfinity, right.. so if there wasn't an actual abi breakage, adding a provides: for the old incorrect soname should fix things right?03:18
infinitypsusi: If.  You might want to check that.03:18
infinityIt's still "wrong" from a "packaging libraries correctly" standpoint, but...03:19
infinitypsusi: On the other hand, if doko had to disable checksymbols, that sort of points to ABI breakage.03:19
hallyn@pilot out03:20
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Development of Ubuntu (not support, not app development) | build failures -> http://bit.ly/or6CHJ | #ubuntu for support and general discussion for hardy -> oneiric | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots:
=== Aaron_ is now known as TiMiDo
micahginfinity: just noticed that libsmbclient doesn't have a SONAME in the package either04:51
jk-anyone know how the ubuntu core images are built? is it just a debootstrap?05:38
infinityjk-: It's essentially debootstrap --variant=minbase at the moment.06:18
jk-infinity: awesome, thanks.06:19
dholbachgood morning08:03
micahginfinity: can I get you to copy firefox (lucid/maverick) from ubuntu-security-proposed to {lucid,maverick}-proposed?09:18
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
bdrungtumbleweed: it seems that we have to live with the broken dh_install. do you have the patch for wrap-and-sort for me?11:12
tumbleweedbdrung: :/ http://paste.debian.net/150005/11:15
bdrungtumbleweed: do you have a commit message for that change?11:16
=== _salem is now known as salem_
tumbleweedbdrung: no, I hadn't committed it locally11:44
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
bdrungtumbleweed: pushed slightly modified12:44
Laneydoko_: do you know if that kernel fix is going to be deployed to the buildds any time soon?14:02
=== doko_ is now known as doko
dokoLaney, I assume first week of Jan, there's nobody around now, but the kernels are in -proposed and can age14:03
Laneygreat14:03
Laneywfm14:04
dokoand they are already tested14:04
mdeslaurdoko: hi! any idea why this could be happening? (unbound FTBFS on oneiric) http://paste.ubuntu.com/779905/15:11
mdeslaurdoko: line 6301+15:11
mdeslaurdoko: same package build fine on precise, and precise's package doesn't build on oneiric15:11
dokomdeslaur, configure:14781: checking python extra libraries15:12
dokoconfigure:14788: result: -lssl -lcrypto  -lssl -lcrypto      -L/usr/lib -lz -lpthread -ldl  -lutil15:12
dokobut then not linking with these ...15:12
mdeslauryeah, I tried adding -lssl -lcrypto...but I didn't add the other...thanks, I'll give it a try15:13
dokomdeslaur, hmm, it shouldn't be necessary, the conftest.c doesn't use any of these15:14
dokomdeslaur, does it work without -flto?15:15
mdeslaurdoko: let me check15:15
dokomdeslaur, is this oneiric-security?15:16
mdeslaurdoko: yes, but I tried building with -updates too15:17
dokohmm, it should be fixed in binutils from oneiric-updates15:17
mdeslauroh, interesting...ok, I'll try it again with -updates15:17
mdeslaurthanks doko15:18
mdeslaurdoko: binutils worked, thanks!15:29
dokomdeslaur, so maybe copy it to the -security pocket?15:47
mdeslaurdoko: yeah, I'm rebuilding it in -security now so we don't hit it again15:47
Riddellsladen: guy on ubuntu-users asked for monospace fonts, you may want to check if he's tried ubuntu mono15:55
dokoRiddell, according to NBS, a kdevelop upload is missing ;)16:02
Riddelldoko: I'll try a rebuild locally and upload16:21
ScottKdoko: KDE core is now fully built on armhf in the archive.18:17
roadmrSRU question. I need to re-submit an SRU that needs some code added and some removed. Should I prepare a new branch to be merged against the oneiric branch (replacing the first one), or just request a merge on the oneiric-proposed branch with the modified code?19:21
* roadmr wonders if the question is understandable19:22
micahgroadmr: #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-motu would be better for this, but oneiric-proposed would be the place to propose a merge to19:22
roadmrmicahg: ok.19:23
roadmrmicahg: btw, thanks! you're always answering my dumb SRU questions, you must hate me by now :)19:23
micahgroadmr: oops, you're in the right channel :)19:23
micahgroadmr: I'm used to seeing  you in #ubuntu-bugs19:23
roadmrmicahg: hehe well sorry if I've been asking devel stuff in -bugs, too many channels! argh19:24
micahgroadmr: there are no dumb questions :), we're all learning19:24
roadmrmicahg: ok so I'll branch the current oneiric-proposed, prepare my fixes and request a merge on that19:26
micahgroadmr: branching for the first SRU from the release branch is only out of necessity since the -proposed branch doesn't exist until the first SRU is uploaded19:27
roadmrmicahg: oh I see, well that makes sense - and subsequent SRUs, if needed, would go to -proposed then?19:28
micahgroadmr: right19:28
roadmrawesome :) thanks19:28
micahgroadmr: just keep in mind, if there's a security update, you'll need to branch from -updates or -security to get the full history (sometimes you might have to rebase -proposed onto security if the security team is forced to drop a fix in their upload)19:29
roadmrmicahg: ok, I'll be careful with that if the need arises19:30
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
infinitymicahg: Done.20:59
micahginfinity: ooh, thanks :)21:00
micahginfinity: can you copy {firefox,mozvoikko,ubufox}/natty from ubuntu-mozilla-security to natty-proposed please?21:05
infinitymicahg: Done, done, and done.21:13
micahginfinity: thanks :)21:13
micahginfinity: can we copy for oneiric and permakill the powerpc firefox build before it hangs the buildd21:26
micahginfinity: I don't want to risk hanging one of the powerpc buildds over the weekend, so if we can't, then we'll wait until monday21:30
Laneydoes it hang 100% of the time on ppc?21:31
micahgLaney: ATM, it seems to, we're disabling the tests which should in theory "resolve" the issue, but I don't want to test that w/out a safety net (i.e. someone to push the power button) either21:32
Laneyah OK. I was going to suggest p-a-sing it at least for the buildds' sake, and investigating why it builds for Debian but not us.21:35
micahgoh, i don't know if Debian's running the tests, I got the FTBFS fix from them21:35
LaneyI am trying to see but the build log killed my firefox :-)21:39
micahgcan I use p-a-s on a stable release?21:40
Laneyinfinity knows21:41
micahginfinity: if you get a chance and you can permakill the powerpc build, please copy {firefox,mozvoikko,ubufox}/oneiric from ubuntu-mozilla-security to oneiric-proposed, if not, don't worry about it, I"ll look into it Monday22:00
* micahg has to run22:00
=== EyesIsServer is now known as EyesIsAsleep

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!