Laney | broder: bet you're happy about UDS :-) | 00:37 |
---|---|---|
broder | i was initially disappointed about not getting to travel, but i'm over it now and pretty stoked | 00:38 |
Laney | tour guide hat at the ready | 00:38 |
broder | yep | 00:38 |
=== cdbs is now known as bilal | ||
ScottK | Be careful where you tour in Oakland. You may not come back. | 02:22 |
nigelb | Heh | 02:29 |
broder | psh. it's cool - the hotel is right by the bart station, so the temptation to go into oakland is minimal | 02:42 |
ScottK | That would be true BART station or not. | 02:44 |
=== bkerensa is now known as bkerensa|AFK | ||
ScottK | broder: If you're still around, would you please sync unbound from unstable for me? | 04:31 |
=== Aaron_ is now known as TiMiDo | ||
micahg | ScottK: I can sync unbound for you if you like | 05:21 |
ScottK | micahg: Yes. Please. syncpackage isn't working for me. | 05:21 |
ScottK | I'm about to have a mess of security debdiffs too. | 05:21 |
micahg | ScottK: well, I'll add this sync to that bug you opened so it has everything | 05:22 |
ScottK | micahg: Great. It's CVE-2011-4528 | 05:22 |
ubottu | Unbound before 1.4.13p2 attempts to free unallocated memory during processing of duplicate CNAME records in a signed zone, which allows remote DNS servers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a crafted response. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4528) | 05:22 |
ScottK | Urg. | 05:22 |
ScottK | Bug 907983 | 05:22 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 907983 in unbound (Ubuntu Precise) "Multiple security issues with unbound [DSA 2370-1]" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/907983 | 05:22 |
micahg | ScottK: done | 05:28 |
ScottK | Thanks. | 05:28 |
micahg | sorry, I haven't updated ubuntu-dev-tools to the version where it says in the bug who it's sponsored for | 05:28 |
micahg | but you're in the precise-changes mail | 05:28 |
* micahg knows you don't care about the paperwork :) | 05:29 | |
ScottK | No. | 05:30 |
ScottK | But if you want to make it up to me you can upload the fix for lucid-security. | 05:30 |
ScottK | (debdiff in the bug) | 05:31 |
micahg | last time I tried that, I killed several hours and still didn't get it done, I"ll try to get someone to look at it in the morning though | 05:31 |
ScottK | Thanks. | 05:32 |
ScottK | micahg: If you have time, I'd appreciate it if you could look at oneiric for unbound. There's a configure error where it can't find the python headers and I've no idea why (I think I'm just too tired) | 05:43 |
micahg | ScottK: ok, will see if I have time | 05:44 |
ScottK | Thanks. | 05:44 |
micahg | ScottK: looks like a missing build-dep, works fine on a live system | 06:03 |
ScottK | Weird. | 06:03 |
ScottK | It build-depends on python-all-dev which was the first obvious choice. | 06:03 |
ScottK | So that's not it. | 06:04 |
ScottK | libpython2.6/2.7 are also pulled in. | 06:07 |
* micahg is getting the chroot build log | 06:08 | |
ScottK | Missing -lssl | 06:08 |
micahg | ah | 06:08 |
ScottK | What about that? | 06:09 |
* micahg is getting the chroot to not purge to check | 06:09 | |
ScottK | Dunno why that would work on a live system though. | 06:09 |
micahg | BTW, the release version won't build either | 06:11 |
micahg | I guess that's obvious considering the patch | 06:11 |
micahg | wow, a whole bunch of stuff is broke | 06:14 |
* micahg has no idea why this would work on a live system | 06:15 | |
ScottK | It built at one point. | 06:18 |
micahg | in July when we had the autosync | 06:21 |
micahg | not sure, it seems to think my installed python env is fine, but the chroot env is not | 06:23 |
micahg | ah, it doesn't seem to be multiarch ready, but still that shouldn't work on the live system either unless I have some old hack installed | 06:24 |
micahg | it also won't build twice in a row which is annoying, but that's for another discussion (happening on debian-devel) | 06:26 |
ScottK | The next version (the one you just sync'ed over_ is multi-arched. | 06:27 |
micahg | right | 06:28 |
* ScottK is going to go to bed. | 06:28 | |
ScottK | Good night. | 06:28 |
micahg | good night | 06:29 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
dholbach | good morning | 08:04 |
ajmitch | morning dholbach | 08:10 |
dholbach | hi ajmitch | 08:11 |
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
ondras | hi there | 09:56 |
ondras | what can I do to get my packages to ubuntu? I already have a working PPA... | 09:58 |
tumbleweed | ondras: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages | 10:20 |
ondras | tumbleweed: ah, thanks! | 10:21 |
ondras | tumbleweed: the bug should be filed even if the software is already packaged? | 10:22 |
ondras | tumbleweed: with [needs packaging] prefix? | 10:22 |
tumbleweed | ondras: did you miss the bit about going through debian? | 10:36 |
tumbleweed | that really is the beast approach | 10:37 |
ondras | yeah, I already sent them a RFS email | 10:38 |
ondras | but according to #debian-mentors, this can take months or years | 10:38 |
ondras | :/ | 10:38 |
tumbleweed | it's normally a lot faster than that | 10:41 |
tumbleweed | what are you packaging? | 10:41 |
ondras | tumbleweed: http://code.google.com/p/v8cgi/ | 10:43 |
ondras | (basically a wrapper around libv8 + several modules; somewhat similar to node.js but with different architecture/usage) | 10:44 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
jporsini | tumbleweed, hum, I don't know what is the normal duration, but at least the package that I have submitted has taken ~2month to pass the debian ftpmaster step (and I was lucky to personnally know the debian sponsor which speedup a little bit the process) | 10:45 |
tumbleweed | ondras: ah, that sounds like a non-trivial package | 10:51 |
tumbleweed | jporsini: ftpmaster review is a lot faster than it used to be: http://ftp-master.debian.org/stat.html | 10:51 |
jporsini | tumbleweed, yep, I was currently on this page, and you are right, it appears to be now very fast, definitively a good news, so forget my previous sentence:) | 10:53 |
DktrKranz | just FTR, average time in Debian NEW during 2011 has been 3 days and 5 hours | 10:53 |
ondras | tumbleweed: it is a multiple binary package, yes | 10:54 |
ondras | tumbleweed: but it is a standalone software with basically no dependencies | 10:55 |
tumbleweed | DktrKranz: and we appreciate it! | 11:13 |
* Laney bakes DktrKranz a cake http://farm1.static.flickr.com/23/37895746_90c5c30ca9.jpg * | 11:35 | |
Laney | * disclaimer: I may not have baked that | 11:35 |
jpds | Looks like cheese cake. | 11:50 |
Laney | it does, and has put me right in the mood for some | 11:52 |
* Laney eyes the build queues | 11:53 | |
* Laney goes to decorate the tree instead | 11:53 | |
geser | Laney: does this imply that you would have a undecorated tree if the build queues were empty? | 11:57 |
* geser wonders if it's possible to deduce how full the build queues were from how much Laney decorated his tree? | 11:58 | |
Laney | geser: that is something we cannot know | 12:17 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
mdeslaur | ScottK: I'm uploading your unbound fixes now, just as soon as I fix the oneiric ftbfs. I've added two more older cve fixes to the lucid package also. | 13:27 |
ScottK | mdeslaur: OK. I wasn't aware I'd missed any. Thanks. | 13:27 |
ScottK | mdeslaur: Please let me know what the solution is on oneiric once you sort it out. It's got me confused. | 13:28 |
mdeslaur | ScottK: I'm still poking at it...I suspect this is the fix: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/edmonds/unbound.git;a=commitdiff;h=650df562a19e196e9acbc4898559f2fa61a8d90e | 13:31 |
mdeslaur | hrm, maybe not | 13:32 |
ScottK | micahg said he got it to build on a non-minimal system, so it may just be a missing dependency. | 13:33 |
* ScottK has NFC what though. | 13:33 | |
mdeslaur | huh | 13:34 |
ScottK | [01:03:13] <micahg> ScottK: looks like a missing build-dep, works fine on a live system | 13:36 |
ScottK | [01:03:32] <ScottK> Weird. | 13:36 |
ScottK | Based on the failure though, I'm not sure how that's possible. | 13:36 |
geser | is there a build log available somewhere? | 13:39 |
ScottK | No, but just try to rebuild the oneiric unbound package. | 13:41 |
ScottK | It dies pretty quickly in configure. | 13:41 |
ScottK | Actually, i may have one | 13:41 |
ScottK | I do. | 13:43 |
ScottK | geser: http://kitterman.com/kubuntu/unbound.oneiric | 13:44 |
mdeslaur | I think it's multiarch related, and I'm backporting a small change from the precise package | 13:52 |
mdeslaur | hrm, that didn't work | 13:55 |
* mdeslaur scratches head | 13:55 | |
geser | does the oneiric version build in a precise chroot? and does the precise version build in a oneiric chroot? (I don't have access to my pbuilders right now to test it myself) | 14:24 |
ScottK | The precise version does not build on the oneiric chroot. | 14:36 |
ScottK | The oneiric version builds on precise. | 14:37 |
ScottK | mdeslaur: That (to me) points to a bug in another package. | 14:38 |
geser | Could it be python itself? As this check tries linking with only python, on the other side (if it's really python) I wonder why no other package stumbled over it | 14:43 |
ScottK | That's what I was thinking, but no idea. It seems distinctly odd. | 14:43 |
mdeslaur | ScottK: yeah, I tried the precise package on oneiric, and it failed as well | 14:47 |
ScottK | But the other way around works (oneiric package on precise) | 14:47 |
mdeslaur | yep, so it's something with oneiric | 14:48 |
mdeslaur | I'm still poking at it | 14:48 |
ScottK | Better you than me. This is way over my head. | 14:48 |
mdeslaur | well, I'm stuck...don't know what to try next | 15:01 |
ScottK | Ask doko since it might be Python related? | 15:03 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
ScottK | Reading -devel, I don't fell bad I didn't figure that out. | 15:22 |
ScottK | fell/feel | 15:22 |
mdeslaur | ScottK, geser: we need to build it with binutils from oneiric-updates | 15:30 |
mdeslaur | ScottK: heh, I wouldn't have figured it out :P | 15:30 |
ScottK | Great news though. | 15:30 |
ScottK | It also explains why it built on micahg's system. I'm sure he has -updates enabled. | 15:31 |
mdeslaur | ScottK: yeah...thanks for suggesting I ask him | 15:34 |
ScottK | It's ironic though since I suggested him for a reason entirely unrelated to the actual answer. | 15:35 |
mdeslaur | I had tried rebuilding with -updates enabled in my schroot, but binutils wasn't updated in it | 15:35 |
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
ScottK | tumbleweed: You're famous - http://askubuntu.com/badges/40/tumbleweed | 20:03 |
tumbleweed | :) | 20:04 |
tumbleweed | now I need to ask a question so I can earn it | 20:04 |
tumbleweed | broder: maybe backportpackage should use -nc | 20:09 |
tumbleweed | (just ran across one of those package that needs all its build deps to clean) | 20:10 |
micahg | makes sense if there are no source changes | 20:11 |
* micahg had one of those last night also | 20:12 | |
* tumbleweed does that for syncpackage too | 20:13 | |
tumbleweed | oh and sponsor-patch | 20:13 |
broder | tumbleweed: makes sense to me | 20:28 |
ajmitch | ScottK: you're using askubuntu now as well? | 20:32 |
Laney | i answered some questions there a bit back | 20:33 |
* micahg thinks ScottK mistook it for as kubuntu :) | 20:33 | |
ajmitch | heh | 20:33 |
Laney | as kubuntu | 20:33 |
Laney | want points? answer http://askubuntu.com/questions/90070/how-does-the-shutdown-button-works-without-asking-for-password | 20:34 |
broder | that one's easy | 20:34 |
Laney | exactly | 20:35 |
* tumbleweed doesn't know why anyone bothers with askubuntu. jorge answers everything | 20:35 | |
ajmitch | not *quite* everything | 20:36 |
ajmitch | just 95% | 20:36 |
* ajmitch did at least get a free tshirt from them :) | 20:36 | |
=== Resistance is now known as EvilResistance | ||
Adri2000 | hmm, I'm a bit out of date on this: is requestsync completly deprecated in favor of syncpackage? | 22:16 |
Adri2000 | (given that I have the necessary upload rights) | 22:16 |
broder | yes | 22:18 |
broder | for doing your own syncs | 22:18 |
broder | for sponsoring syncs, you need to be sure to have a fairly recent version of syncpackage that supports it | 22:18 |
broder | (either from precise or ppa:udt-developers/daily) | 22:19 |
Adri2000 | ok, thanks :) | 22:19 |
EvilResistance | broder: is there an easy way to determine what build-deps or required packages are defined in the debian/control file in a source package between versions (i.e. precise vs. oneiric versions) | 22:21 |
EvilResistance | without me having to download the source packages and then diffing them | 22:21 |
EvilResistance | s/them/the control file/ | 22:21 |
Laney | packages.ubuntu.com shows it, or UDD | 22:22 |
EvilResistance | packages.ubuntu.com does show the dependent packages for the program to run, but i dont see any refs about the build-deps... what's UDD? | 22:24 |
Laney | http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/precise/libproxy | 22:25 |
Laney | UDD is the ultimate debian database, see udd.debian.org | 22:25 |
EvilResistance | ah source that's what i forgot to look at :P | 22:26 |
Laney | or they are in the Sources file in a repository | 22:26 |
Laney | which you can query with e.g. grep-dctrl | 22:26 |
nixmaniack | is there a way to get debian source via apt-get source in ubuntu? | 22:27 |
tumbleweed | it's in the Sources files | 22:28 |
tumbleweed | ah, Laney said that | 22:28 |
tumbleweed | nixmaniack: we have pull-debian-source to make it easy | 22:28 |
tumbleweed | but yes, you can have deb-src lines pointing at Ubuntu | 22:28 |
tumbleweed | err at Debian | 22:28 |
nixmaniack | tumbleweed, thanks for the help :) | 22:29 |
tumbleweed | apt-get doesn't make that particularly user-friendly, though, you have to specify which release you are downloading from, whenever you download it | 22:29 |
tumbleweed | also see chdist in devscripts | 22:29 |
tumbleweed | but for most uses, pull-debian-source | 22:29 |
nixmaniack | which default mirror it uses? | 22:30 |
tumbleweed | the primary archive. But you can configure it (see ubuntu-dev-tools (5)) | 22:33 |
nixmaniack | tumbleweed, okay, got it. | 22:34 |
EvilResistance | um... i'm getting a 500 error when trying to upload a backported package to a PPA for my use... is this a bug, or did it not upload? https://pastebin.com/aPwzfQhU | 23:39 |
EvilResistance | (using backportpackage btw) | 23:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!