/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/12/29/#ubuntu-community-team.txt

=== ashams_ is now known as ashams
=== bkerensa is now known as hypodermic
=== hypodermic is now known as bkerensa
=== ejat- is now known as ejat
czajkowskimaco: what pleia2 said, but the fact that thye were notified back in october and only noticed this week doesnt say a lot09:40
czajkowski:/09:40
scott-workgood morning everyone :)13:49
MrChrisDruifAloha scott-work13:49
scott-workhow are you today, MrChrisDruif ?13:49
MrChrisDruifYawning already...13:50
MrChrisDruifAnd I've got to work till midnight, which is about 9 hours from now13:50
MrChrisDruifYou?13:51
MrChrisDruifI have to be at work in about an hour13:51
scott-worki'm at work myself, got here at 6:30 am, but i'm feeling good13:52
scott-workit's been very, very busy for a couple of months, especially during the last two weeks with people out on holiday/vacation13:52
scott-workbut i feel like we are pushing through it right now, it's been a very production couple of weeks (maybe because people are out and leaving me alone ;) )13:52
scott-worki wish i could say i've been as productive on ubuntu studio though :(13:52
MrChrisDruifHaha, yeah..can't have it all ^_^13:55
bkerensaczajkowski: Your busy this morning :)15:23
czajkowskiyes15:27
czajkowski35 tickets just been replied to15:28
bkerensa:)15:29
macoczajkowski: dont think kevin's ever had a bug assigned to him before, just reports them (if that?)15:45
macothere certainly wasnt a mail to the list when the bug report happened, which i think is what would happen if it was assigned to the entire team15:45
AlanBellthey only get assigned to the team contact and are private bugs (not entirely sure why that is tbh)15:47
czajkowskiAlanBell: we explained that in lots of places in the past, to  stop the bug being spammed, we had to due to teams being added and then we get we're awesome15:49
czajkowskiwhich kinda defeats the point of the bug we just want to be able to deal with some teams who cannot attend the meeting swiftly and easily15:49
AlanBellok, I knew there would be a reason :)15:50
czajkowskiwe've even blogged it and written emails on it15:50
czajkowskiteams can also see when they are due by looking on http://loco.ubuntu.com/loco-council/approved15:51
macoi know i didnt bother checking to see if we were on teh list since i thought it was 2 years apart15:54
macoand i thought we did it last year15:54
macobut then i still sometimes think hardy was last year so15:54
macoalso probably because i dont really care anymore15:54
macolooking at the old reapproval wiki page for the team, it was 2010 last time we wrote an application so im a bit confused how dec 2011 is two years after january 2010 but oh well15:58
bkerensa=o16:08
Pendulummaco: so that the reapproval can happen before it's actually expired?16:08
macoPendulum: but if the application was filled out in early 2010, then the actual meeting for reapproval wouldve been a bit later than that right, so why would our expiration be dec 31 2011, only a year and halfish after?16:09
macoapril 2010 was our reapproval meeting16:10
* Pendulum shrugs16:10
Pendulumit may also be done more by cycle than month16:10
czajkowskishall loook into it16:10
czajkowskiagain the team contact should have noticed this at least in october....16:11
czajkowskianyways16:11
maco(i actually dont really give a crap whether the team gets reapproved. as i said yesterday, its just free shit)16:12
czajkowskimaco: ok16:12
pangolinmaco: everything ok?16:13
macosure16:13
macoive just thought the whole approval thing was weird since it started16:14
pangolinI agree.16:14
macothis loco's older than the approval thing. afaik, it was one of the first16:15
macobut i would be unsurprised if it didnt get reapproved. as ubuntu gets worse, it gets deader16:16
pangolinI don't think it is getting deader, I think that the new users are not as interested in improving ubuntu, the community, and just want stuff to work magically.16:18
pangolinthe old guard is not being supplemented/replaced.16:18
pangolinmaking many of us reach a point of "I don't give a crap"16:19
Pendulumpangolin: I think maco was talking about the loco specifically16:20
Pendulumalthought I went to one of their meetups in May so they can't be completely dead16:20
pangolinright. but that boils over to the general community16:20
pangolinor maybe it boils over from the general to the loco16:20
pangolinnot sure to be honest and not so interested anymore in figuring out why :(16:21
macoPendulum: meetups tend to happen when someone needs key sigs to become a DD or DM16:25
macobetween you being in town and some Debian cross-collaboration, a meetup was needed16:25
macobut if nothing needs to happen, it doesnt16:26
macopangolin: i just want stuff to work now. i like my boyfriend's macbook pro.16:26
macohe can use netflix16:27
pangolinI hear you. I almost installed Windows the other night to get my camera to work.16:29
pangolindecided not to because I    don't want to do 12 hours of   updates.16:29
pangolinalso my  space bar is acting crazy heh16:29
PendulumI have seen enough linux geeks move to macos on the desktop in the last 4+ years that I'm starting to think someone should do a study on it...16:30
macomacbooks have really awesome power cords16:31
macomy boyfriend's laptop wouldve been on the ground SO many times if not for that cord16:32
scott-workhi czajkowski maco20:01
jussinice that people in here were so super positive today </sarcasm>20:30
* pleia2 hugs jussi 20:31
jussithanks, needed that20:32
pleia2:)20:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!