[00:00] <yofel> if you actually want 4.7.95
[00:02] <who_me> ah, problem was that the beta ppa was disabled, fixed now :)
[00:09] <who_me> rekonq dev suggested I test the new version of the browser compiled agains qtwebkit 2.2.2 and Qt 4.8 but I don't think that is an option on oneiric :)
[01:10] <ScottK> Gurgh.  Policykit support in usb-creator-kde seems broken in oneiric.
[01:11] <ScottK> JontheEchidna: Can you check it?
[11:16] <bambee> Hi, Can I backport the patches from https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288675 ? or we need to wait the rc2 ? it should be fixed in the rc2 BUT *this is a really boring bug*.
[11:28] <Riddell> bambee: sure go ahead
[11:28] <bambee> ok ;)
[12:22] <Riddell> hmm RC 1 unhappyness on the kubuntu-users list
[12:44] <who_me> idk how RCs are supposed to be but 4.8 is still pretty much beta quality stuff. I mean the bug with kmix should not be in an RC
[12:45] <who_me> that and kmail is a mess :)
[12:46] <who_me> I used the wizard to setup a Gmail account and that made kmail crash on every start. If I used KdePIM and invoked kmail through that, the it would not crash and I could even fix the setup problems that made it crash
[12:47] <who_me> and one still can't reliably have diff setups/workspace, it bugs out :/
[12:54] <who_me> btw, there is now a patch for kde bug 288675
[12:54] <who_me> and it can be applied against RC1 :)
[14:55] <bambee> who_me: I am fixing kdemultimedia to backport this patch (until the rc2)
[14:56] <who_me> sweet, thank you
[14:56]  * bambee is back from a family diner and now builds kdemultimedia
[14:56] <who_me> family dinners are nice :)
[14:56] <bambee> it should fixed in kdemultimedia >= 4.7.95-0ubuntu2
[15:02] <bambee> who_me: yeah , mostly during end of the year festivities . Apparently my weighing machine disagrees  :p
[15:03] <who_me> so does mine, gained almost 2 kilos...
[15:04] <bambee> a kubuntu dev is around? http://paste.kde.org/179858/
[15:09] <yofel_> bambee: me, did you upload that to the PPA yet?
[15:13] <bambee> yofel: not yet, I will do it right now
[15:13] <CIA-48> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdemultimedia] Philip Muškovac * 140 * debian/ (3 files in 2 dirs) Add debian/patches/kmix_excessive_cpu_usage.diff : Fix infinite loop leading to 100% CPU usage and excessively allocating memory (LP: #908159).
[15:15] <bambee> oh thanks
[15:15] <bambee> :)
[15:15] <CIA-48> [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/kdemultimedia] Philip Muškovac * 141 * debian/changelog drop bug reference
[15:15] <bambee> ?
[15:15] <bambee> why do you drop the bug ref?
[15:15] <yofel> no point in referencing ppa bugs in the changelog
[15:16] <yofel> you can keep it for the ppa package
[15:18]  * yofel hugs bambee
[15:18] <yofel> this was annoying
[15:18] <bambee> yofel: :)
[15:19] <bambee> oh you're right, that was a ppa bug... I thought it was a "normal" bug ;)
[15:22] <yofel> bambee: btw. I would appreciate DEP-3 headers in the patch next time, here it's ok as the patch has a header that still makes it clear it's from upstream
[15:22] <bambee> ok, noted
[15:23]  * bambee searches documentation about DEP-3 headers on google
[15:23] <yofel> bambee: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
[15:24] <bambee> already found, thanks anyway 
[15:47] <Riddell> mm, I should learn to use DEP-3 at some point
[15:57]  * ScottK thinks DEP-3 is bureacratic overkill.  Some of the information is useful, but all the formating and stuff is a pointless PITA.
[15:57] <ScottK> (much like DEP-5)
[16:05] <yofel> well, most of the fields are optional thankfully, all I want to know is: wth does the patch do and where is it from 
[16:25] <ScottK> I agree that information is important and always try to include it as a comment.  That doesn't need DEP-3's complexity though.
[16:27] <who_me> any idea on when the new kdemultimedia pack will hit the beta repo ?
[16:43] <bambee> so as a summary the patch needs "where is it from" , "who did write it" and "what does it fix" and eventually "which bug it fixes"
[16:44] <Riddell> bambee: also the name of the patch should be in debian/changelog so you can grep for it later (my rule)
[16:45] <bambee> this rule is automatic for me, I mean I always put what I changed in the changelog (so if I added a new patch its name is in the debian/changelog)
[16:48] <Riddell> most kubuntu people do I think, following my good example :)
[16:49] <bambee> ;)
[16:50] <ScottK> ktorrent currently FTBFS.
[16:50] <ScottK> Anyone had a chance to look into it?
[16:57] <bambee> do you talk about ktorrent 4.1.3-1 ?
[16:57] <ScottK> Yes.
[17:03] <bambee> looking
[17:06] <yofel> bambee: did you upload kdemultimedia to beta?
[17:07] <ScottK> bambee: Bug #908460 
[17:12] <ScottK> bambee: I just checked and all the libtaskmanager4abi2 FTBFS when rebuilt with a similar error, so I assume something changed there.
[17:13] <ScottK> No idea if it's a bug or intentional.
[17:17] <bambee> yofel: my new gpg key is not synced with launchpad yet :\  (uploaded but dput says it's not a valid gpg key)
[17:18] <yofel> I'll upload it then
[17:18] <bambee> something like that http://paste.kde.org/179930/
[17:18]  * bambee reads man 5 dput.cf
[17:19] <yofel> ah, ignore that
[17:19] <yofel> launchpad's identity server is broken again (or at least was the past few days)
[17:20] <yofel> rather check if you got a rejection mail, if you didn't then the key is indeed invalid
[17:21] <bambee> yofel: accepted
[17:21] <bambee> so my key is valid... :\
[17:23] <yofel> bambee: btw. use fix released to close bugs
[17:27] <bambee> yofel: ok
[17:43] <bambee> ScottK: did it build with kde-workspace 4.7.90 ?
[17:43] <ScottK> Dunno.  I doubt it was tried.
[17:44] <bambee> because the class TaskManager does not contain a type called taskdict ... or nothing equivalent... even into another header... apparently the type has been removed in kde/4.8...
[17:48] <ScottK> Lovely.
[17:51] <ScottK> bambee: https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/network/ktorrent/repository/revisions/6d4a6ae51692966862ccb20d17cb217717519d40
[17:52] <bambee> good catch :)
[17:53] <bambee> ScottK: I confirm https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=287309
[17:55] <ScottK> Maybe you can prepare a fixed package and then perhaps yofel would sponsor it ...
[18:03] <bambee> ScottK: the fix is already done, now the package is building :)
[18:03] <ScottK> Excellent
[18:13] <bambee> the debdiff http://paste.kde.org/179948/
[18:14] <bambee> I've to go now, feel free to highlight me even if I am away.
[18:14] <bambee> Happy new year all !!!
[18:14] <bambee> ;)
[18:21] <ScottK> bambee: I'll have a look at it.  
[18:21] <ScottK> bambee: Don't mention the maintainer change in debian/changelog.  That's a given.
[18:32] <ScottK> bambee: Closing the bug in changelog is good too.  Other than that, looks good.
[18:33] <ScottK> bambee: I fixed those nits and uploaded.  Thank you for your contribution to Kubuntu.
[18:40] <Riddell> shadeslayer: how's 2012?
[19:16] <ScottK> Comments sent upstream to the other packages affected by the libtaskmanager4 changes.
[19:16] <ScottK> (none of them have fixes that I can see)
[23:36] <EagleScreen> happy new year