=== 18WAALUCN is now known as jkridner_ === Guest66638 is now known as lag === Jack87 is now known as Jack87|Away [11:56] ogra_: ping [11:56] yep [11:57] ogra_: finally got around to build a pandaboard kernel as we talked yesterday. for simplicity, just using direct copy, but update-initramfs fails: [11:57] Kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-rc7-carthag+ does not match your subarchitecture [11:58] why the + ? [11:58] add -omap4 instead :) [11:58] ogra_: no idea where it comes from. [11:58] juat cp the file [11:58] just [11:58] CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=-carthag [12:00] ogra_: make modules_install tells me the kernel itself believes it has to be called "+": DEPMOD 3.2.0-rc7-carthag+ [12:01] well, the + seems odd [12:01] ogra_: yes, but the first part (searching modules) of update-initramfs only works if you keep the + [12:01] k [12:02] add omap4 to the localversion though ... [12:03] set to -carthag-omap4 now [12:03] k [12:04] ogra_: BTW, it is the tilt kernel from linaro that rsalveti pointed me to. [12:05] there should be debs of it already [12:05] and i think the ubuntu distro kernel is based on that branch (with ubuntu sauce on top though) [12:05] ogra_: i can't change the platform config in deb files ;) [12:08] ogra_: just for clarity: i use arch/arm/boot/zImage as the vmlinuz? [12:08] yep [12:09] update.initramfs is a script btw, you could also use a txt file as vmlinuz, it doesnt care [12:10] now modules_install says DEPMOD 3.2.0-rc7-carthag-omap4+ [12:14] LetoThe2nd: guess that's a problem with flash-kernel [12:14] rsalveti: but where does that "+" come from in the first line? [12:14] that requires the filename to end up with -omap or something similar [12:15] LetoThe2nd: guess that's part of the kernel scripts to generate the deb file [12:15] rsalveti: i'm not creating a deb, just dumb make. [12:16] LetoThe2nd: that's interesting [12:16] let me check here [12:16] rsalveti: its the most simple use case. native build on the panda with make. [12:17] BTW: how to git pull while i'm on the remote tilt-tracking? [12:21] ah, git pull origin tilt-tracking says up-to-date. [12:33] LetoThe2nd: here I'm still pulling the branch [12:33] rsalveti: no need to hurry, i'm playing skyrim in the meanwhile ;) [12:33] LetoThe2nd: haha :-) [12:34] * LetoThe2nd is on vacation [12:57] LetoThe2nd: yup, seems it adds + by default at the kernel name [12:58] let me check the config options [14:30] LetoThe2nd: # If CONFIG_KALLSYMS is set .version is already updated [14:31] # Use + in front of the vmlinux_version rule to silent warning with make -j2 [14:31] from Makefile [14:32] but could also be related with kernelrelease or linux_version_code [14:32] probably something saying the kernel is the tag+ a few patches [14:33] rsalveti: yeah, that was also my first guess. [16:30] GrueMaster, about bug 903695, what is needed to get the "Verification-testing" done? [16:30] Launchpad bug 903695 in kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing "linux-ti-omap4: 3.0.0-1206.14 -proposed tracker" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/903695 [16:32] Doko: Regression-testing Fix Released Undecided Tobin Davis [16:32] that means I have already tested it and blessed it from my side. Not up to me now. [16:33] Looks like it still needs sign-off from the ubuntu-armel-kernel team and the Canonical Security team. [16:34] Like I said two weeks ago, I am hardly the bottleneck on these SRU kernels. [16:37] GrueMaster, I'm just getting used to this "processes" [16:38] doko: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow [16:38] ppisati, ^^^ looks to be your task ;-) there's only one member in the team [16:45] doko: nope, sru team [16:45] ppisati, confused, you're the only member in this team [16:48] Is it me or is launchpad being extremely slow? === vila is now known as bzr-RM === bzr-RM is now known as vila [17:23] ppisati: I'm getting ready to fire some bugs your way for precise omap4 kernel. [19:36] hi [19:36] can someone help me about configuring a new sd-card [19:37] ? [19:37] for ubuntu [19:37] dogan: What are you trying to do? [19:38] thanks for reply :) [19:38] first i want to know difference between maverick and narwhall distros? [19:39] Erm, lots? What platform are you using? Panda? [19:39] yep [19:39] Pandaboard [19:39] just got it [19:39] i want to work on a pay tv application [19:39] I would recommend Oneiric (11.10). It is more tuned, and will more than likely support your board (if it is newer). [19:39] which distro has more multimedia options for example... [19:40] oneiric [19:40] ok [19:40] pls wait, i am checking the prebuild binaries [19:40] Yes, Oneiric. What rev board are you using? [19:41] REV A [19:41] is it good or bad? [19:41] 4430 or 4460? [19:41] (Rev A doesn't tell me much). [19:42] the serial number starts with 4430 so it is 4430 i think... [19:42] Ok. [19:42] U4430500... [19:42] Not sure how the serial number thing works. [19:42] are there bugs? on old version? [19:42] let me check the retail box label... [19:43] Biggest issue is supporting newer rev boards. [19:43] hım [19:43] i see [19:43] yes it is 4430 [19:43] so it is good for compatibility... right? [19:43] As sometimes the boards ship before we can get support in the u-boot/kernel. [19:43] Oneiric should suit your needs well. [19:43] fine thanks [19:44] I tested it on A1, A2, and A3 (all of the known shipping 4430 revs). [19:44] Natty Narwhal (11.04) Netbook Installation Instructions [19:44] Natty Narwhal (11.04) Headless Installation Instructions [19:44] Maverick Meerkat (10.10) Netbook Installation Instructions [19:44] what are these so? [19:44] bootloaders? [19:46] They are different spins. Maverick and Natty are 10.10 and 11.04 ubuntu releases. Headless is exactly that, it runs w/o keyboard/monitor. Netbook was what we were shipping prior to Oneiric, when the x86 netbook & desktop images converged. [19:47] so for pandaboard maverick is right choice? [19:47] Oneiric desktop installation will be identical to the Netbook release instructions as far as creating a bootable SD. [19:47] so what am i suppose to do for panda? [19:47] No, use Oneiric. Maverick was the first release for that platform, and only works on early rev boards. [19:48] and win32diskimager works for me? [19:48] ha ok these are old distros... [19:48] i see [19:48] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/release/ubuntu-11.10-preinstalled-desktop-armel+omap4.img.gz [19:48] so i downloaded oneiric [19:48] can i use win32diskimager for writing to my sd? [19:49] win32-image-writer will work if you are using windows. I just released v0.4 yesterday. [19:49] fine dude trying now :) [19:49] And I tested it quite extensively. [19:49] outstanding :) === jkridner_ is now known as jkridner [19:50] GrueMaster:is it a .net application? [19:51] No, it is a QT application. [19:51] himmm ok [19:51] The binary zip file has everything you need. Just make sure your path includes "." so that it will pull the dll files from the program directory. [19:53] I don't have an installer for the program, so you just need to extract everything to one directory. Then just double click on the .exe [19:54] A lot of pain went into testing v0.4 (I had to run Windows XP & Windows 7 - shudder). [20:27] GrueMaster:r u there? [20:29] Yes, barely (local server issues). [20:30] i just downloaded the distro [20:30] also downloaded your image writer [20:30] but file extension is different [20:30] so i wrote .raw file [20:30] will it work? eh? [20:30] You will need to uncompress the image file. Winzip (or Windows 7) should be able to do this. [20:31] win32-image-writer doesn't support file compression natively. [20:31] yes it worked man [20:31] yea i know but i meant that the file extension after extration is raw, not img [20:32] so i wrote sd by forcing to write .raw file instead of .img [20:32] and it worked yessss :D [20:32] heyooo [20:33] thank you so mych GrueMaster, you are really a master :D === robclark_ is now known as robclark