[07:33] <joelesko> micahg: thanks for pulling in the 2.6.1 seamonkey branch
[16:24] <alex_mayorga> Any chance to get chromium on precise? Shall I volunteer? =P
[16:26] <chrisccoulson> volunteers welcome :)
[16:27] <chrisccoulson> i'm still catching up from having nearly 3 weeks off, and anything chromium related generally appears at the bottom end of the pile ;)
[16:27] <alex_mayorga> chrisccoulson: Fill me up please, my laptop is already running precise FWIW
[17:22] <micahg> alex_mayorga: it's on my list, but currently fails to build, a merge proposal to fix would be welcome (lp:chromium-browser/stable)
[17:33] <alex_mayorga> micahg: n00b here, what's "a merge proposal"?
[17:34] <micahg> alex_mayorga: a bzr branch with the change proposed to be merged into the parent branch
[17:58] <micahg> alex_mayorga: actually, someone just commented that the fix is already in another branch, I'll pull it in later today and try another test build
[18:07] <alex_mayorga> micahg: is that comment publicly available?
[18:07] <micahg> yes
[18:08] <micahg> bug 910561
[18:08] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 910561 in chromium-browser "Chromium PPA builds failing: Stable and Beta channels (chromium_useragent.patch does not apply)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/910561
[18:08] <micahg> let me start that test build now, so it builds during lunch
[21:40] <chrisccoulson> wow, seems my neighbours are having another domestic
[21:40] <chrisccoulson> always brightens the evenings up :-)
[21:43] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: do you take sides?
[21:44] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, no, i just sit here and enjoy the entertainment
[21:45] <chrisccoulson> being able to listen to my neighbours arguments is probably the only decent thing about this house ;)
[21:46] <mdeslaur> hehe
[22:07] <micahg> chrisccoulson: 702,305,008 -- page-faults-soft in about:memory, worth a bug?
[22:08] <chrisccoulson> micahg, no, why?
[22:08] <micahg> idk, just seems high
[22:09] <alex_mayorga> chrisccoulson: call the cops for even heightened fun
[22:10] <alex_mayorga> you might even get some taser action
[22:10] <micahg> ah, I went back to 9.0.1 somehow, I thought I was on 10 already :)
[22:11] <alex_mayorga> chrisccoulson: if location==.us that's it
[22:11] <chrisccoulson> alex_mayorga, it's not
[22:11] <chrisccoulson> my location is even worse than that
[22:12] <chrisccoulson> i certainly wouldn't trust the police around here to use a taser ;)
[22:12] <alex_mayorga> does police even care about domestics there?
[22:12] <chrisccoulson> they'd probably leave it on top of their car in a supermarket car park or something stupid like that :)
[22:13] <chrisccoulson> alex_mayorga, no, generally the police won't come out to violent domestics, burglaries or any other similar types of crimes
[22:13] <chrisccoulson> the only thing they are useful for is obtaining a crime reference number to make an insurance claim ;)
[22:15] <alex_mayorga> chrisccoulson: .mx?
[22:15] <chrisccoulson> alex_mayorga, no, uk ;)
[22:15] <alex_mayorga> I see
[22:16] <chrisccoulson> of course, i'm probably exaggerating the truth a little there. but from experience, the police are pretty useless at catching criminals around here ;)
[22:17] <alex_mayorga> they'd just politely ask them to stop I'd guess
[22:18] <alex_mayorga> they're good at kettling judging by the footage I've seen
[23:58] <chrisccoulson> excellent, i've got the new jsctypes mozvoikko working on lucid's stoneage libvoikko :-)