=== Alcine is now known as jalcine [18:34] Any news on a meeting? [18:42] meeting? [18:53] mhall119, I think we need one [18:53] there was talk of one awhile back [18:54] must have been a long while back [18:54] this channel has been quite for weeks [22:49] Hai everyone [22:50] Just a small question. There are currently TWO!! mailing-lists for Ubuntu TV. I don't think it'll be a good idea to have two. Some people only might find the one mailing-list (e.g. launchpad's one) and not the other (e.g. lists.ubuntu.com's one) and people will only get half the messages. [22:51] AlanBell; popey; mhall119; tgm4883; willcooke; ^ [22:51] MrChrisDruif, there are two? [22:51] Yup [22:52] One on our launchpad page (see /topic) and one on lists.ubuntu.com [22:52] so the lists.ubuntu.com one should be deleted [22:52] doesn't look like anything is on it anyway [22:54] I don't know, nor did I want to take some kind of decision on my own. IT'S NOT A ONE-MAN TEAM! ^_^ [23:01] tgm4883: lists.u.c is generally recommended [23:02] * tgm4883 shrugs [23:02] willcooke said to use LP, that's where everyone is, doesn't make much sense to try and move everyone to l.u.c [23:03] Ghehe, that's why I was asking. [23:03] that other list is an internal one [23:03] LP is the proper mailing list [23:03] lp is only useful to people on the lp team, the list.u.c is open to anyone to subscribe to [23:03] I was thinking in the back of my head that l.u.c would be preferred [23:03] the u.c one will go away [23:03] ok, what willcooke said [23:03] :) [23:03] :) [23:03] usually I'm told to do it the other way [23:04] When I set them up it wasn't clear to me which was "best", I expect I got it round the wrong way :) [23:04] in other news: http://www.solid-run.com/products/cubox [23:05] I think I saw that on G+ a couple weeks ago [23:08] It looks like vaporware to me at the moment, hopefully we'll see some units in the real world soon. [23:08] It certainly won't run a Myth FE [23:08] but I'd be interested in seeing XBMC on it [23:14] Ah, the Cubox [23:15] willcooke; it's ARMv6 if I remember correctly? [23:18] willcooke, I'm unsure if XBMC would run well on those. Does that require gstreamer based playback software? [23:19] for 1080P? [23:20] If we would want Ubuntu ever to be on one of these devices, then they need to change their support from ARMv7+ to ARMv6+ [23:21] arm 7 say the dodgy looking specs sheet [23:22] so research suggests that XBMC has an ARM version, but IDK how well it works [23:23] Talking with one of the linaro guys at UDS, they said XBMC wouldn't work because you their hardware only worked that well (the 1080p video they were displaying) with gstreamer based software [23:24] IDK enough about XBMC though [23:27] in either case, there probably needs to be a little more direction in this project [23:29] Agreed [23:29] But without Canonical interfering (be it good or bad) also didn't happen, not really [23:29] willcooke; ^ [23:30] I know it's early, but willcooke, any updates from the canonical side? [23:34] I'm writing a document right now (or rather I was, I'm quitting for the evening seeing as it's 2330) that I hope will answer a few questions and provide some direction [23:34] I need to speak to jono and Mark and we'll get something out real soon. [23:34] I know you've heard that before [23:35] But I really am! [23:36] * MrChrisDruif hopes we'll get the drive back into this project [23:36] I understand willcooke is TL? [23:36] TL? [23:37] Team leader [23:37] right - yeah, kinda [23:37] except there isnt a team [23:37] :) [23:38] Well, not in the "standard" developer project type teams [23:38] exactly [23:38] ok, I gotta scoot [23:38] But still, in any team there should be a driving force and a direction to follow [23:38] I'll speak to Jono tomorrow [23:50] Well...at least some apparent progress tgm4883