/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/01/04/#ubuntu-motu.txt

CoreyShould there be a .dsc file included in the debian/ branch?01:38
StevenKNo01:43
CoreyStevenK: Okay. What generates that?01:52
StevenKCorey: dpkg-source01:53
StevenKA .dsc is part of a source package01:53
CoreyStevenK: I'm attempting to find a (semi sane) way to have Hudson automatically build a .deb from a git repo.01:53
CoreyER, Jenkins even.01:53
StevenKCheck out the pieces, cd into it and run dpkg-buildpackage -S01:54
StevenKThat gives you a source package at least01:54
StevenKIf you can sure you have build-depends and a clean environment, just run dpkg-buildpackage01:54
CoreyStevenK: I can't be sure of any such thing, which is why I'll be running it in pbuilder.01:55
StevenKOh, then build a source package and toss it into pbuilder01:55
CoreyNeed to find a sane way to get the b-ds into pbuilder's chroot-- probably a pbuilder --login --save in my future.01:55
micahgCorey: pbuilder does that for you01:58
Coreymicahg: Unfortunately it doesn't in this case, the deps aren't in Lucid's repo.02:02
CoreyI do believe they'll be in 12.04's though.02:02
micahgCorey: oh, then how do you expect to test?  why are you testing in a lucid chroot?02:02
Coreymicahg: Because the package is going out to Lucid boxes that will also grab the deps.02:03
micahgCorey: then you need to add the repo that has those packages to the sources file for pbuilder (or use one of the flags to pass it when calling pbuilder)02:04
Coreymicahg: As of now the repo is a PPA.02:06
micahgthat's fine02:06
CoreyThat'll still work?02:06
Coreyk.02:06
Coreymicahg: What would the pbuilder line look like then, so the chroot doesn't get whiny about missing GPG keys?02:08
micahgCorey: you probably want to add the source and import the key inside the chroot if you don't want it to whine about the GPG keys02:09
micahgif you're just testing stuff, you might not care about the keys02:10
micahg(i.e. just throw away the binaries or use them in a clean env)02:11
micahgudienz: you can sync stuff yourself now using the API, try syncpackage in ubuntu-dev-tools, just please remember that in general  we're syncing from testing by default this cycle, so anything from unstable or elsewhere should have a good reason to sync before it hits testing02:17
Coreymicahg: Well the plan is to pipe this into my repository eventually so I don't have to build new packages. :-)02:18
micahgCorey: ah, so you don't intend to keep using a PPA then02:19
Coreymicahg: Right.02:19
micahgah, ok02:20
udienzmicahg, sorry it was my fault, i would like to simulate first but i submit a bugs. huh..02:21
udienzperhaps we need --simulate options02:21
* udienz will back, need to go to office02:22
Coreymicahg: I can build it faster on my hardware than Launchpad can. :-)02:23
lifelessCorey: whats your hardware?02:25
Coreylifeless: HP DL360 G702:29
lifelessnice02:34
Coreylifeless: Yeah, it's fun hardware.  Just need to get it set up to build something properly.02:38
CoreyI've got the repo working (https://github.com/saltstack/salt) but want to start doing testbuilds sanely as the next step.02:39
Coreymicahg: So the way that would play out would be what, git clone, dpkg-buildpackage, sudo pbuilder $someflags?02:45
micahgCorey: sounds about right02:46
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== chuck_ is now known as zul
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
psusianyone have any idea why stack retracer can't seem to find the symbols for libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0?  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/71632202/Stacktrace.txt16:36
psusiit looks like the -dbg package has the symbols to me: http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/i386/libgtk2.0-0-dbg/filelist16:36
psusiis there supposed to be a symlink for libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 pointing to .2400.6?16:38
psusiin the -dbg that is16:38
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
LaneyI just came across slicer: FTBFS & maintainer thinks this version shouldn't be released with Debian. Remove?17:25
tumbleweedslicer of VTK pain? remove17:26
Laneyit would be good if we could use a per-version blacklisting for something like this17:27
tumbleweedyeah17:28
ScottKRemove without blacklisting does it just fine after DIF.19:15
ScottKLaney: If you wait until after DIF to remove it, it won't come back unless it's updated.19:15
Laneyyeah I said that in the bug19:15
Laneyish19:17
=== cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville
tumbleweeddo we rebuild to make them shut up? bug 873984 (IIRC I looked and it worked fine, just displayed a warning)21:26
ubottuLaunchpad bug 873984 in proftpd-dfsg (Ubuntu) "mod_tls and mod_sftp complain about OpenSSL version mismatch" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87398421:26
micahgtumbleweed: is it actually starting up the secure service?21:28
tumbleweedI assume I checked and it was, but I'll check again21:28
micahgtumbleweed: if it does need a rebuild, that means that the package should be fixed in precise to depend on the version it's built against only (which probably means it's using private symbols and shouldn't be) or it should just be fixed to not be so strict21:30
tumbleweedat any rate it needs to be fixed to have stricter dependencies or be less noisy21:32
micahgsure, but one's a wishlist/low and one's a medium/high21:32
tumbleweedmicahg: verified that it works just fine22:09
micahgok, so idk22:09
psusiis there a way to force a hung app to crash and generate an apport crash report?  I thought sending it a SIGABRT would do that but I guess not22:58
broderSIGSEGV?22:58
psusidoesn't SIGABRT normally do the same thing?  I've seen apport crash reports where it died with SIGABRT?22:59
broderi don't know, but i know SIGSEGV works22:59
psusihrm... I'll try that next time then.. seems when I resume from suspend, banshee hangs23:00
psusistuck on pthread_cond_timedwait() according to gdb, but got no other symbols23:01
tumbleweedubuntu-bug pid?23:02
tumbleweedor will that not stack trace?23:03
EvilResistancei've always used SIGSEGV for killing when it hangs and I want a bug report23:03
psusiahh, of course23:03
* EvilResistance did that twice for 12.04 programs23:03
Laneygetting tempted to upgrade23:04
EvilResistancealthough that was from within a VM, so... :P23:04
broderi've been thinking about it23:05
Laneyeveryone goes on about how magically stable it is23:05
tumbleweedI'm seeing lots of ath9k related kernel panics with the 3.2 kernel, otherwise the world is fine23:05
EvilResistancehmm... is there any specific thing one has to do in order to throw a package's results to /usr/local/progname (where progname is the name of the program in the package)?23:08
EvilResistanceit keeps failing to build from source (pastebin coming shortly)23:09
tumbleweedpackaged stuff doesn't belong in /usr/local23:09
EvilResistancetumbleweed:  where would you recommend extracting a program to, then?  (note that i'm putting it where the program developer wants it placed :/)23:10
tumbleweedEvilResistance: /usr/share and/or /usr/lib (see the FHS)23:11
EvilResistancethanks23:11
tumbleweedthe upstream developer should use /usr/local, yes, but we don't23:11
Laneymost common build systems are capable of dealing with this, use one of those if possible23:13
psusihow does the software center decide how to categorize packages?  gparted is listed under "Themes and Tweaks" and it shouldn't be23:38
RAOFIt slurps data out of the .desktop file, right?23:40
psusiI dunno... but the desktop file says categories=GNOME;System;Filesystem;... not themes/tweaks23:41
psusireassign bug to software-center?23:42
RAOFThat'd be my starting point, yeah :)23:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!