[10:13] <micahg> knome: if you want the tech board to consider the Xubuntu LTS proposal at their next meeting (time permitting), then might I suggest you file one?
[10:18] <raevol> https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/204536/comments/61 my workaround for now
[10:18] <raevol> woops meant to be in #xubuntu
[10:33] <knome> micahg, ah, so when was that meeting?
[10:40] <micahg> Monday :)
[10:42] <knome> mmh
[10:42] <knome> so sending the proposal over weekend is ok?
[10:43] <knome> i'm quite busy today
[10:45] <micahg> sure, we can go for the next meeting I guess (Jan 23)
[10:45] <micahg> you can submit over the weekend and add to the agenda
[10:45] <knome> okay
[10:45] <micahg> they'll probably defer until the next meeting, but no big deal
[10:45] <knome> ah
[10:46] <knome> okay, then i'll do that on monday
[10:46] <knome> because i've scheduled whole day for foss
[10:55] <micahg> sounds good (we have a meeting as well :))
[10:55]  * micahg really needs to head for bed now
[10:56] <ochosi> micahg: any news on the tb icon-bug?
[10:56] <micahg> ochosi: nope, but I'll try to find time to send it upstream next week
[10:56] <ochosi> (just remembered because knome showed me the list of blocked issues again yesterday)
[10:56] <ochosi> thanks! and rest well ;)
[10:56] <micahg> ochosi: keep bugging me :)
[10:57] <ochosi> micahg: ok, i'll try to keep it up
[14:57] <mr_pouit> grmbl, it seems that today's alternate ships -generic and -generic-pae...
[14:57] <mr_pouit> that doesn't help to stay below 700M I suppose
[14:57] <mr_pouit> (on i386 only, amd64 is ok)
[15:20] <micahg> oh ,it's not supposed to do that
[15:43] <charlie-tca> Updating from the notification area icon does not require password authentication; all other methods require a password to update
[15:46] <micahg> no, update-manager shouldn't either
[15:47] <charlie-tca> shouldn't but does
[15:47] <charlie-tca> precise today
[15:50] <micahg> really?, that's a bug
[15:50] <charlie-tca> Okay, I will file it
[15:51] <charlie-tca> Although, TBH, it seems like a bug that updates can be run without a password
[15:51] <micahg> nope, that was discuss 6.5 months ago and there's a wiki FAQ for it
[15:51] <charlie-tca> Is the next step running them without the user's knowledge now
[15:53] <micahg> no, the idea was that people get too used to typing in their password to every prompt that comes up and there's no inherit reason to require passwords for updates since the repositories can't be modified without a password
[15:54] <charlie-tca> Oh! I guess that makes sense then
[15:55] <micahg> charlie-tca: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/FAQ#Update_Manager_doesn.27t_prompt_for_security_updates
[15:55] <charlie-tca> Will verify the update-manager bug in Ubuntu if possible, then file it
[15:55] <charlie-tca> Thank you very much, micahg. 
[15:55] <micahg> thanks for testing :)
[15:56] <charlie-tca> I don't understand why apt-get update requires the password, but maybe that is because of Debian, too
[15:57] <micahg> charlie-tca: the update-manager equivalent does not, idk if we can use policykit on the cli
[15:58] <charlie-tca> weird. But at least I know why it is happening now
[16:13] <charlie-tca> Hopefully, next week I will have better internet. Changing ISP's and going faster :)
[20:38] <charlie-tca> bug 912913  reported for update-manager requiring password
[20:40] <micahg> charlie-tca: I assume you're an admin user, right?
[20:40] <charlie-tca> yes
[20:40] <charlie-tca> but clicking the panel notification does not require the password
[20:40] <micahg> k, mvo should take a look next week then
[20:41] <charlie-tca> It needs to be consistent about it
[22:46] <ReaKOs98qwjok12> hi , where can i find the source of xubuntu?