/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/01/07/#ubuntu-tv.txt

MrChrisDruifAlright, who knew about this but didn't say anything? http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/01/ubuntu-powered-tv-to-be-revealed-at-ces/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+d0od+%28OMG%21+Ubuntu%21%29&utm_content=FaceBook13:33
ogra_there is also http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-1641513613:37
popeyhi MrChrisDruif13:39
MrChrisDruifAloha popey ^_^13:39
MrChrisDruifHow's it going popey ? Wanted to say something ? ^_^13:48
MrChrisDruif'lo?13:56
popeyMrChrisDruif: I guess we'll have to wait and see!13:57
MrChrisDruifGhehe ^_^13:57
emultibeen reading about your plans for ubuntu-tv14:16
emultiare you guys aware that a lot of large screens (e.g. Samsung) now come with a built in ARM processor that has direct access to the screen14:17
emultiexample, Samsung DE4014:17
MrChrisDruifI am at least in a way14:17
emultithese are aimed at digital signage14:18
emultibut must have a decent gfx chip so they can play 1080p video14:18
emultiand not too expensive...14:18
emultiish..14:18
emultiit would solve the problem of having to make a stb and they are distributed worldwide.14:19
MrChrisDruifstb?14:21
emultiset top box.14:22
emultiI work in TV and would like to help you guys14:22
emultithese retail for 1000 sterling http://samsunglfd.com/product/feature.do?modelCd=ME46A14:23
MrChrisDruifI don't want a stb as well, because I'm one of those minimalist guys ^_^14:34
emultifrom a purely practical point of view, you don't want to be making, shipping and supporting hardware...14:37
emultiperhaps I should ask what the aims of ubuntu-tv are14:38
MrChrisDruifemulti; if you have a definitive answer to that, I'd like to hear it as well14:43
mhall119emulti: the question is will they run Ubuntu14:43
mhall119not all ARM chips are supported14:43
* ogra_ thinks the first aim is to have something usable in SW ... and then attract a HW vendor 14:44
ogra_or several ;)14:44
popey+114:44
mhall119a la Android14:44
ogra_no matter if its STb or directly builtin14:44
popeygetting it baked into a lot of tellys is clearly a great plan, but a STB isn't unreasonable in the meantime14:45
mhall119stb is also going to be a cheaper upgrade than a new smart tv14:45
ogra_right, just have it in both .... and optionally in your phone or so ;)14:46
mhall119certainly not the TV version on your phone14:46
mhall119?14:46
ogra_so you can attach your phone to a TV dock and use it for ubuntu-tv ;)14:46
popeylike the atrix?14:46
mhall119oh, I understand you14:46
ogra_yeah14:46
mhall119hmmmm, I do have an HDMI port on my DroidX14:46
MrChrisDruifYeah, but when I buy a TV in a few years time (I hope this one I've got will last me that long) it'll have Ubuntu built-in and not some drunk-ass electronics software smack14:46
mhall119somehow I don't see Ubuntu being ported to DroidX though14:46
ogra_like the atrix .... but i rather envision an atrix that fires up the respective iface for the matching dock14:47
mhall119MrChrisDruif: that would be nice14:47
popeyyeah14:47
ogra_i.e. a tablet dock for a tablet unity14:47
popeyunplug the phone, carry on watching media on the move14:47
mhall119walk into a big-box store and see Ubuntu TVs mounted on the display wall14:47
popeyplug it back in, get the TV UI14:47
ogra_laptop dock for normal unity .... tv dock for tv unity14:47
mhall119I don't see why not14:47
MrChrisDruifOn a tablet?14:47
popeyor similar dock, but desktop unity kicks in if a keyboard is plugged in14:48
mhall119they're already doing a lot of work on detecting a device formfactor based on resolution and other display information14:48
ogra_yeah, something like that14:48
popeyso one dock with usb and hdmi is all thats needed14:48
popey(my desktop display has HDMI just like my TV)14:48
mhall119popey: you  writing all this down?14:48
popeyme!?14:48
ogra_haha14:48
ogra_its saturday !14:48
mhall119you're the one with the @ in front of you nick14:48
ogra_he's not on duty14:48
mhall119he's always on duty14:49
mhall119;)14:49
ogra_lol14:49
popeyheh14:49
mhall119unless you're going to  suggest that Canonical employees hang out here on their days off just because they're super excited about these new product developments14:49
* ogra_ does 14:50
MrChrisDruifogra_; channel is logged ^_^14:50
* MrChrisDruif says "Keep it up guys!" I'll be back in a bit after some shopping14:51
* ogra_ also needs to go and care for his car so i can drive to the sprint tomorrow14:51
popeyI just hope this concept results in a real product14:52
ogra_++14:52
popeythe guys at CES have their work cut out14:52
popeyi am _so_ excited by this.14:55
MrChrisDruifMe too15:00
tgm4883Ubuntu-TV at CES?18:35
tgm4883if that's true, kinda makes me want to hang out in this channel less18:35
MrChrisDruifGhehe, why so tgm4883 ?18:36
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, if they are showing off something at CES, it isn't hardware (technically it is but listen) it's the software side.18:37
tgm4883If they are showing it off at this CES, it's going to try and hit market late this year18:37
tgm4883which means most decisions for this have already been made18:37
tgm4883if that is the case, since almost zero has been said in this channel from the canonical side (and zero about an actual product), that means it's all been done in secret (which would appear to be canonical's MO on these types of projects)18:38
tgm4883and if all that is true, it means that we are wasting out time in this channel18:38
MrChrisDruifMO?18:38
tgm4883method of operation18:39
tgm4883it's how they do things18:39
MrChrisDruifAh, gotcha18:39
tgm4883Do I think it's cool? Yes. Do I think it would be awesome to have a Ubuntu-TV product? Yes.18:39
tgm4883But all that adds up to us doing the work we've done in this channel with zero canonical direction for absolutely nothing18:40
MrChrisDruifYeah, that topic has been raised before on this channel18:41
tgm4883Which yes, is our own fault for trying to get the ball rolling when we didn't see anything happening, but is also Canonical's fault for making a ubuntu-tv channel and leading us along when they were doing everything in secret18:41
MrChrisDruifWill *promised* and *promised* things would turn for the better, but I've not seen any action indicating he was telling the truth "Only talk the talk if you can walk the walk"18:43
mhall119tgm4883: they are showing off a prototype, not a market ready product18:43
MrChrisDruifIndeed, there should be less secrecy from Canonical18:43
tgm4883I hope for everyone in here that it isn't a TV at CES, but it's CES, so it's either a TV, Tablet, or Phone18:43
tgm4883mhall119, they aren't showing off hardware, they are showing off software18:44
mhall119tgm4883: yes, but not market-ready software18:44
mhall119only prototype software18:44
tgm4883mhall119, it's CES, so it's a little more than prototype. Even if it is only a prototype, that means they have been developing it in secret, which brings me back to "what are we doing here then?"18:45
mhall119tgm4883: we're thinking about what could be, and what we would want to have, in an Ubuntu TV18:46
tgm4883mhall119, seems like a lot of effort on our part for something we have no say in18:46
MrChrisDruifHow can they have any software to show in the first place?18:46
mhall119MrChrisDruif: well they have Ubuntu and Unity already18:47
tgm4883mhall119, they aren't showing just a box running unity connected to a TV18:47
tgm4883Heck, they had that at UDS18:47
tgm4883it ran the schedule :)18:47
mhall119yeah...I know, that was my code18:48
MrChrisDruifYes, but it's Consumer Electronics Show, not Consumer Software Show...18:48
mhall119lots of software gets shown there18:48
mhall119heck, Microsoft is one of their biggest attendees18:48
tgm4883yep18:49
tgm4883well, not after this year18:49
mhall119they'll likely still be one of the biggest18:49
popeytgm4883: sorry to hear you're feeling like that18:50
tgm4883mhall119, are you @canonical18:50
mhall119I am now, I wasn't when i started hacking on summit code though18:50
popeyfrom what I can see it's an unfinished concept that's being shown at CES18:50
tgm4883popey, it seriously feels like we've been mislead a bit here18:50
mhall119tgm4883: I understand it feels that way18:51
tgm4883I don't understand the point of this channel if it's an internal project18:51
popeythat wasnt the intention18:51
popeyand i don't think it's an 'internal project'18:51
mhall119tgm4883: it's not an internal project, there isn't even an official Ubuntu TV team that I'm aware of18:51
popeythere isnt18:51
tgm4883popey, oh, there where can I do a BZR PULL?18:51
tgm4883then*18:52
mhall119tgm4883: I can ask if it's in bzr somewhere18:52
mhall119but the main people working on it will be at CES, so I probably won't have an answer this week18:52
tgm4883mhall119, I would love an answer18:52
popeyI have already asked if what has been made can be made public18:53
popeyas in, code18:53
mhall119I would too, I want to hack on it as much as you do, trust me18:53
tgm4883popey, I know it probably wasn't the intention to mislead people, but from an outside POV, if this stays non-public it would seem to be business as usual18:53
popeyyeah, i can see that tgm488318:54
mhall119tgm4883: if it makes you feel any better, you know just about as much about it as I do18:54
mhall119and you didn't learn about it all that long after I did18:54
tgm4883mhall119, that doesn't really make me feel that much better18:54
mhall119this isn't a major company-wide project18:54
popeyas I understand it, there is a concept which has been created to show off to potential hardware partners.18:55
tgm4883that just means that it wasn't an accident that we didn't know, that it is more secret18:55
popeyi don't believe much in the way of code exists18:55
mhall119it's more of a skunk-works by a small number of people who wanted to make something that would interest manufacturers18:55
mhall119if there is any code, it's probably all throw-away anyway18:55
* tgm4883 shrugs18:55
popeybut my understanding is that what coder there is, will get either made available as a separate branch, or will be rolled into standard unity18:55
tgm4883popey, so it's part of Unity then18:56
mhall119tgm4883: we'll know more after CES, both of us18:56
tgm4883popey, cause that was a major discussion we've had in this channel multiple times18:56
tgm4883mhall119, agree, I just don't want to be wasting my time18:56
popeyi dont know if 'its part of unity' is something i can answer18:56
AlanBellit will be interesting to see what they show, and whether they are showing the best they could have achieved if they had collaborated more18:57
tgm4883popey, don't, I don't want to get you in trouble18:57
mhall119tgm4883: I don't think I'm wasting *my* time here, and this isn't part of my @canonical job18:57
popeynot for that reason tgm488318:57
popeyi just dont know ☺18:57
* popey is not a programmer 18:57
mhall119AlanBell: I get the feeling it's a closer to a non-working demo just to see if anybody is interested in the *idea* of Ubuntu/Unity on a TV18:58
MrChrisDruifAlanBell; +118:58
tgm4883mhall119, popey, it's fine if it's a secret internal project. I just want to be clear on that. If it's not, great, I'll stick around and contribute. If it is, I'll leave and go back to the mythbuntu channel and hack on that code18:58
popeyit is my understanding that it is not intended to be a secret internal project18:59
mhall119tgm4883: there should be a more official announcement at or after CES about where the project is going18:59
popeyhowever right now yeah, there was some secrecy behind _this_ concept18:59
tgm4883popey, yes there was18:59
tgm4883mhall119, I hope it's soon, otherwise I'll just theme XBMC to look like unity, ship it with Mythbuntu and beat you guys to the punch ;)18:59
mhall119popey has a point, "Ubuntu on a TV" isn't a secret project, "Ubuntu concept prototype at CES" kind of was though19:00
AlanBellsure, which is fine19:00
AlanBellbut the total lack of direction here is curious19:00
mhall119tgm4883: man if you can do that, do it!  You'll make a lot of people happy19:00
tgm4883right let me rephrase then19:00
AlanBelllike xbmc vs myth tv vs QML19:00
tgm4883at this point, Ubuntu-TV is closed-source19:00
tgm4883and that is bad19:01
MrChrisDruifAgain, how can they have any kind of concept ready without community involvement?19:01
mhall119no, at this point it's vapor-ware19:01
mhall119it's an idea19:01
tgm4883mhall119, unless they are showing off a video at CES, it's not truely vaporware19:01
AlanBellARM or Intel?19:01
mhall119tgm4883: it's close enough, an animated mockup, even an interactive mockup, but still just a mockup19:01
* MrChrisDruif hopes in a way it's just a vid with features we hope to include19:02
tgm4883mhall119, what part of that do you want? XBMC shipping on mythbuntu, or XBMC themed like Unity?19:02
AlanBellwe have been told the target output resolution is 1920x1080, but pretty much nothing beyond that as parameters to target19:02
tgm4883AlanBell, I'd guess ARM19:02
mhall119tgm4883: I don't have an HTPC anyway, so I'm not your target audience, but I'm sure you'll get a lot of interest doing either19:02
MrChrisDruifquad-hd ^_^19:02
tgm4883based on the way TV's are going internally and also Canonical's investment in Linaro19:02
mhall119AlanBell: oh?  I hadn't heard of a target resolution19:02
AlanBelltgm4883: yeah, but we don't know19:03
popeythat does make sense19:03
mhall119that's good to know19:03
tgm4883mhall119, possibly, we have a lot of interest in MythTV on Ubuntu too19:03
tgm4883I hadn't heard of a target resolution either, but 1920x1080 makes sense otherwise we're wasting our time19:03
AlanBellif it is ARM, is there an openGL GPU?19:03
mhall119if it's ARM, I hope it's something newer/more powerful than what they were using at UDS19:03
popeythe hardware doesnt exist yet19:04
mhall119AlanBell: some SoC support it, there's also Unity2d which I think has better hardware acceleration on ARM19:04
popeywe dont have a 'set top box' or a 'smart tv' yet19:04
tgm4883popey, I hope that isn't 100% true19:04
AlanBellno, but normally there would be a power budget for the hardware19:04
popeywhich bit?19:04
popeywe have no hardware vendors onside that I'm aware of19:04
tgm4883that means that there is no plan to allow people to install this on their own hardware ;)19:04
AlanBellas in "we are targetting an atom class intel chipset"19:04
popeyi have seen no hardware devices that are specifically for ubuntu tv19:04
AlanBellor "we are targetting a core i7"19:04
popeytgm4883: i didnt say that at all19:05
popeyjust to be clear19:05
popeyand i didnt imply that either19:05
tgm4883popey, I know, you don't know19:05
popeyno19:05
tgm4883err19:05
popeyi do know19:05
mhall119again, this is not going to be much more than a mockup, so the hardware they use at CES isn't necessarily goiong to resemble target hardware in any way19:05
popeyi know we dont have a hardware device right now19:05
popeythis is kinda the point of going to CES19:05
AlanBellI see19:05
tgm4883well you implied it then, if the hardware doesn't exist yet, that means we can't install it on custom hardware19:05
mhall119it may just be a PC or laptop with an HDMI out, I don't know19:05
tgm4883which means you aren't releasing an ISO19:06
popeyno19:06
popeyi did not imply that19:06
tgm4883but I see what you are getting at19:06
popeydont read into what I am saying19:06
tgm4883there is no hardware that you are shipping on19:06
tgm4883or even hardware that you have thought about19:06
popeywe have nothing to ship19:06
AlanBelltgm4883: it is way way early for that19:06
tgm4883or even hardware that you have designed for19:06
popeywhy would we have hardware?19:06
mhall119popey: so they can give me one ;)19:06
popeyoh I'm sure they've looked at various devices19:07
popeyand evaluated whats on the market19:07
AlanBellI am surprised that the openGL or not openGL question is unanswerable though19:07
popeybut we haven't got a chosen / blessed platform19:07
mhall119AlanBell: Unity doesn't care though, 3d for opengl, 2d otherwise19:07
mhall119for a tv, video decoding will be more important than 3d effects19:07
* popey imagines a 3d cube on his telly19:07
* popey shudders19:07
mhall119speaking of which, I hear Linaro is doing well on that front19:08
AlanBelldepends, zoom out to see two channels playing perhaps19:08
mhall119video decoding, not spinnig cubes on the telly19:08
popeyeach channel on the face of a cube19:08
AlanBellchannel changing effects could be pretty cool with openGL19:08
popeyyeah, I guess19:08
mhall119AlanBell: ARM chips have hardware acceleration for different things like that, even if it's not OpenGL19:08
tgm4883linaro had 1080p big buck bunny playing at UDS rather nicely19:09
mhall119I think Unity2D is preferred on ARM because QT supports non-opengl acceleration, while compiz is only opengl19:09
mhall119tgm4883: yeah, but the rest of the interface felt sluggish19:10
mhall119last I tried it anyway19:10
mhall119which was in UDS-O, so it may be way better now19:10
tgm4883alright, so we still don't really know anything. And the people in this channel don't know/can't say anything either. I'll agree to put down the pitchfork and torch until after CES19:13
popeyheh19:13
* popey hugs tgm4883 19:13
* tgm4883 picks up the pitchfork again19:13
tgm4883stand back! You're British!19:14
popey:D19:14
tgm4883I like to think that everyone in this channel is not british except for popey, who is the token British guy19:15
AlanBellwrong19:15
* MrChrisDruif understands that no-one can say anything (even if they know) but that just baffles me in terms how that mock-up even became to be without the community19:16
tgm4883AlanBell, no, you are... uh..... English19:16
MrChrisDruif^_^19:16
AlanBellMrChrisDruif: if it looks like this it will be OK http://people.ubuntu.com/~alanbell/unitytelly/pages/launcher.png19:17
tgm4883MrChrisDruif, I have a feeling we were involved to the point they took ideas from the feature list we made19:17
mhall119MrChrisDruif: have you seen the Launcher tester they just released?19:17
MrChrisDruifLooks familiar...designer AlanBell ;-)19:17
AlanBellcomplete with "BFB"!19:18
mhall119AlanBell: I hope the have nicer looking hardware than that...19:18
tgm4883popey, I'm alittle surprised Daviey doesn't hang out in this channel with the work he does for Mythbuntu19:18
AlanBellunrelated question. What is this running? -> http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/57717000/jpg/_57717084_ubuntuwebbook3.jpg19:18
mhall119AlanBell: is that the vodaphone one?19:18
AlanBellprobably19:19
mhall119in that case, I heard it's 10.?? with a backport of Unity19:19
AlanBellit is in the CES article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-1641513619:19
mhall119yeah,  I have no idea where they got that image from, or what it is19:19
AlanBellbut those 8 dash icons look like they might actually be useful to someone!19:19
mhall119it looks like the 11.04 Unity19:20
AlanBellcan't be unity :)19:20
mhall119the CoF button is in teh top panel19:20
AlanBellyes, and the search field is on a grey bar it seems19:21
MrChrisDruif11.04 with Faenza icon theme?19:23
popeytgm4883: daviey is busy with server stuff these days19:26
popeythat pic looks like a marketing one, not a real image19:29
AlanBellgrumbling asside I do think it is awesome that Canonical is going to be showing off stuff at CES, it is that kind of thing that sets Ubuntu aside from the other distros20:03
mhall119AlanBell: also awesome that the BBC is talking about Canonical and Ubuntu20:13
AlanBellyeah, and in the context of Canonical being a representative of UK industry going to CES which is interesting for the political dynamics as well20:15
MrChrisDruifAs I understand it; Ubuntu isn't a distro but a platform?21:08
mcbaine1opened ... let the chat commence :)21:32
MrChrisDruifCommence your chatting21:37
popeyhah21:56
popeyMrChrisDruif: ubuntu is a project, product, distro, and platform21:56
mcbaine1MrChrisDruif, :: ok so we were talking about an Ubuntu box for hw consideration ....21:56
MrChrisDruifAlright, a bit of everything21:56
MrChrisDruifmcbaine1; do you read any articles about Ubuntu?21:57
MrChrisDruifhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/01/ubuntu-powered-tv-to-be-revealed-at-ces/21:57
mcbaine1yes i read the omgubuntu tv article ..21:57
MrChrisDruifThey'll be showing some kind of "mock-up" apparently over there at the CES21:58
popeynot a mock-up, a 'concept' ☺21:58
* mcbaine1 thnks this has many missed opourtunities - about it21:58
popeyoh?21:58
MrChrisDruifpopey; a "working" mock-up21:59
popeyheh21:59
MrChrisDruif;-)21:59
MrChrisDruifAnyhow..21:59
MrChrisDruifSo I think this project is on hold till that has happened. We hope for an official announcement during or right after CES for some direction we'll be heading22:00
popeythere will absolutely be an official announcement22:00
* mcbaine1 thnks that Canonical is now aligning itself with the expensive purchases arena and does not allow for mobility etc..22:00
popeymobility in what sense?22:01
mcbaine1you canot carry around a 40" tv ...22:01
popeywhat if you could install the TV interface on a laptop?22:02
mcbaine1whereas a PVR is accessible for business trips/schools/and a quick nip around to your friends...22:03
mhall119mcbaine1: but you can sync your data between your 40" tv, 15" laptop, and 4" phone22:03
mhall119or 7" tabplet22:04
mhall119tablet22:04
mhall119and car, the ivi stuff comes22:04
popeyyeah, I'd love that, record something at home, take it on the train to work and watch it there, then when i get home carry on watching on the tv22:04
MrChrisDruif8" as well mhall119 ?22:04
MrChrisDruif;-)22:04
mcbaine1Canonical is becoming the Sony of the software world with little appreciation for small based power models and 3.5"hard-disk capacity PVR's etc...22:04
mhall119MrChrisDruif: no, never 8", NEVER!22:04
popeymcbaine1: you're making assumptions here22:05
mhall119mcbaine1: how's that?  They're still investing in Linaro and working on power consumption, etc22:05
popeywhich is understandable given the concept hasn't been shown yet ☺22:05
popeyARM is a key part of the Ubuntu story22:05
mcbaine1I believe i am free to express suggestions and criticisms .. this isn't a proprietory sw based company is it ??  Anyway...22:06
MrChrisDruif=|22:06
mhall119mcbaine1: you're free to be wrong, yes, and we're free to correct you22:07
MrChrisDruifmcbaine1; next release will (among other polishes) be about power usage22:07
mcbaine1It will take ARM 4 years to create a 3.2GHz chip to power Ubuntu media-centers   .. but as this is the'right' thing to do they probably will not do it.22:07
mcbaine1**they = Ubuntu ,...22:08
mhall119ubuntu is the community22:08
popeyyou dont need 3.2GHz to power a media centre22:09
mhall119so  you're just kind of insulting volunteers for not doing enough22:09
mcbaine1it's a hw issue I'm afraid .. stop being negitive in your thinking... I'm hgaving an open conversation about the future of Ubuntu-PVR devices which will 'top' Ubuntu -tv.22:10
mcbaine1The issue is not how to get Ubuntu on to the TV, but how to cable a box (media-center) to a television with a 3TB hdd.22:11
mcbaine1MrChrisDruif, :: comments so far ??22:13
MrChrisDruifWell...your comments can be viewed as offensive. It seems your already having your ideas set, which isn't always a good thing.22:14
mcbaine1What are your ideas .. plz...22:15
mcbaine1FYI .. I haven't insulted/offended anyone for months to my knowledge.. no-one has explained why anyways..22:16
MrChrisDruifSecondly, I don't agree with everything you say (I think ARM will produce within 4 year 3.2GHz if needed) and I think it's best to wait on what Canonical will present on CES22:16
popeywe dont need 3.2GHz for Ubuntu TV22:17
popeywe don't even need 2GHz for it22:17
popeywe can run Ubuntu on ARM, this is well proven, and ARM devices are already capable of 1080p playback22:17
mcbaine1fine.. the hw issue is secondary i agree.. but Canonical isn't master of the product/sw .. What TV company is it going with ??22:18
popeythe information that we even had a product concept was released today22:18
popeywe're going to CES next week to look for hardware partners22:19
mcbaine1can't you do that via email  ??22:19
MrChrisDruifThat's not really how the corporate world works22:20
mhall119not if they actually *want* a partner22:20
mhall119CES is like speed dating for technology companies22:21
popeyheh22:21
mcbaine1i thnk its contrieved  , at best .. the project needs a lab for initial hw testing... agree ?22:22
popeywe already have experience with what hardware is capable of22:23
popeythere's also a pretty big community of people who already want something like Ubuntu TV on a low power, small form factor device.22:24
mcbaine1e.g... weblinks of this ??22:24
popeysome of those people already have the devices, and just need the hardware enablement doing22:24
popeyweb links of what?22:25
mcbaine1"people who already want something like Ubuntu TV on a low power, small form factor device."22:25
popeyi talk to people in the real world who want this22:25
mcbaine1i see no evidence of this online in the community thou...22:26
popeyyou're looking in the wrong places ☺22:27
mcbaine1popey :: plz note that im am in a team/family that owns the biggest television distribution company in the country so weblinks is a good way to 'spread the word'  .. also good 4 business.22:29
* mcbaine1 is bemused over the channel's lack of interest in it's main application at this time.. 22:32
AlanBellmcbaine1: it isn't a lack of interest, it is a lack of information. There is nothing to see until CES really22:47
mhall119mcbaine1: remember that the very idea of an "Ubuntu TV" was only announced 2 months ago22:55
mcbaine1AlanBell, mhull119 :: I thought this was the place to offer up conceptions about the future of the project.... ?22:59
mcbaine1** mhall119 ... ??23:01
AlanBellsure, and we have put forward a number of concepts. They have been processed, jumbled about, built upon and we wait to see what happens next at CES23:01
AlanBellwhich is Monday, so not long to wait23:01
mcbaine1AlanBell, how does that help me (here) with the discussion.. ??23:01
mhall119mcbaine1: have you seen the mockups that have already been made?23:02
AlanBellyes23:02
mcbaine1mhall119, no .. plz be specific..23:02
mhall119we've also had numerous discussion in this channel in the last month or so23:02
AlanBellI made one (kinda)23:02
mhall119specific about what?23:02
mhall119AlanBell made the grand-daddy of them all23:02
AlanBellhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuTV/Designs23:03
AlanBellmockups ^^23:03
mcbaine1oening..23:03
mcbaine1**opening..23:03
* mcbaine1 thnks http://people.ubuntu.com/~alanbell/unitytelly/daniel/ is the only serious one ... reading rest..23:05
AlanBellmy one isn't serious, it was just to introduce the framework I had made for doing the storyboard mockups23:06
AlanBellI kind of made the telly on which to put the designs23:07
mhall119mcbaine1: they are all serious ones, please don't belittle other people's efforts23:08
mcbaine1Alan bell :: I remember this stage a decade ago .. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiF8YVmBOxg23:08
mcbaine1mhall119, :: plz stopp taking criticism so sensitively.. I'm being CONstructive not destructive... !23:10
AlanBellthere are interesting concepts on all the mockups that could be cherry picked23:10
mhall119there is nothing "CONstructive" about calling the majority of those mockups non-serious23:13
mhall119all I'm asking for is that you be respectful to the rest of the community23:13
mhall119I would do the same if somebody came in here and called your contributions non-serious23:14
mcbaine1mhall119, :: perhaps' serious' was a little too misunderstanding I meant art-realistic.23:20
AlanBellthey are concept sketches, not finished designs23:21
AlanBellmine was deliberately a bit scrappy, I wanted people to think they could do better23:22
AlanBellsadly the press picked it up and misunderstood that part23:22
mcbaine1did u use inkscape ??23:22
mhall119Pencil23:23
mhall119it's a really easy way to build mockups23:23
AlanBellhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuTV/Designs/Pencil23:23
mcbaine1k.. not familiar with that perhaps that's why ..23:23
mcbaine1k installed pencil.. but its for the children of gsoc really.. me thnks.23:27
mhall119it's the best mockup tool I've found23:28
mhall119even  wrong about it almost a year ago: http://mhall119.com/2011/04/pencil-for-easy-ui-mockups/23:29
mhall119do you know of a better one?23:29
mhall119Inkscape could make nicer visuals, sure, but it takes a lot longer to make a mockup in it than in Pencil23:30
mcbaine1mhall119, :: TWISI  pecil is southpark , Inkscape is used 4 humble indie bundle for example.. (h.i.b. =£1m+ each time)23:39
AlanBellmcbaine1: it is a sketching tool, not an art tool23:40
mhall119mcbaine1: yeah, you wouldn't develop promo art in Pencil23:41
mcbaine1art is sketching  but im not getting semantic about it... well done 4 your tries...  :)23:41
mhall119but for brainstorming layout and functionality, it's much simpler than Inkscape23:42
mcbaine1brainstorming.. yes ... functionality no... use sketchup on wine ...;)23:43
AlanBellwhich is non-free software23:43
mhall119got a link for that?23:43
AlanBelland doesn't do storyboarding23:43
mcbaine1probably.... scaning firefox hist.   ...23:44
AlanBellisn't sketchup the 3d modeling thing?23:44
AlanBellhow does that help for user experience design?23:44
mhall119AlanBell: oh, we can build a 3d UI for 3d tvs for Unity 3d!23:45
mcbaine1Alanbell :: stroryboarding... no it doesn't  .. just import your images though...23:45
AlanBellanyhow, mcbaine1 if you would like to contribute a mockup made in sketchup on wine then that would be awesome and we would be happy to link to it from the designs page23:46
mhall119hmmm, I wonder what compiz + 3d TV would be like...23:46
mcbaine1good .. lets go with that ... new topic compiz +3d TV  initiated...23:46
mhall119cube!23:47
mhall119a different show on each side23:48
mhall119wobbly *everything*23:48
mhall119ok, so that was non-serious23:49
mhall119I apologize23:49
mhall119I suppose you could make the controls float in front of the content23:49
mhall119maybe push everything back just a bit to emphasize it23:50
AlanBellchannel flipping with the shift switcher compiz plugin23:51
mhall119through what? open channels?23:52
AlanBellprobably23:54
AlanBellassuming multiple tuners I guess23:54
mhall119I think we can assume 2 tuners, but not more than that23:54
mcbaine1I thnk that although this is graphically interesting... the practical functionality eludes me , and can be best refined in a decent file manager with preview window like that of the Xreamer interface.23:55
mcbaine1**Xtreamer23:55
mhall119I think Unity + Lenses is the target content manager23:55
mcbaine1k.. how amny 'screens' can compiz usually use..23:56
mcbaine1**many ... ?23:56
mhall119you mean like workspaces?23:56
mcbaine1yes23:56
AlanBellup to quite a lot, 64?23:56
mhall119more than that23:57
mhall119I think23:57
mhall119I think I hit 128 showing it off to a windows gamer23:57
mcbaine1is that shown as a 64 sided cube-like structure in transition ?23:57
AlanBell32x3223:57
mhall119oh, I wasn't using cube23:57
mhall119was using expo by then23:58
mhall119cube is eye-catching and all, but I found it counter-productive23:58
mcbaine1yes , so the question was ... how many sides does the cube-like animation display using compiz in transistion between screens ??23:58
mhall119zooming out on my 128 or whatever workspaces made the guy decide that he wanted to try Ubuntu after all23:59
mhall119mcbaine1: I think it'll do the same number, but instead of a cube it'll be closer to a cylinder23:59
mcbaine1mhall119, is that 128 sides ??23:59
mhall119however many the limit is23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!