[00:09] <txomon|home> hi,
[00:10] <txomon|home> can anyone have a look in bug 913929 and bug 485067
[00:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 913929 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "Get back recently closed tabs (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/913929
[00:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 485067 in linux (Ubuntu) "wireless card malfunction (affects: 1) (heat: 14)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/485067
[04:36] <Resistance> i released a patch for LP Bug #900620.  Its currently marked as Wishlist and Triaged.  Should I leave those as is, or should I wait for someone on the bugs team to change that?
[04:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 900620 in php5 (Debian) (and 1 other project) "Possible Bug: php5-fpm does not listen on a socket by default (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/900620
[04:36] <Resistance> also, can someone explain what a bug's "heat" stands for?
[04:36]  * Resistance has no clear definition for that

[08:03] <hggdh> good morning to all
[14:44] <bil21al> is there any irc channel of vuze developers ?
[14:44] <bil21al> vuze software
[14:45] <ts2> bil21al: see /msg alis help list
[14:46] <bil21al> ok
[14:49] <EvilResistance> can someone explain the triaging process, that is to say, after a bug is triaged, if someone submits a patch or a fix, what happens next?
[14:49]  * EvilResistance couldnt find said answers in the page that explains bug triaging
[14:53] <bdmurray> EvilResistance: the bug will go through the sponsorship process https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess#Sponsoring
[14:53] <EvilResistance> i see... the MOTUs mentioned that it'd go through the sponsorship process, but then my system died so i didnt get time to find the page you linked me :P
[14:54] <bil21al> bdmurray: do u know any vuze developer i get their channel but no answer by them and is it still developed by upstreamer or by our ubuntu people?
[14:54] <bdmurray> bil21al: no, I don't
[14:54] <bil21al> so i just upstraem its bug ?
[14:55] <bdmurray> I'd think so
[14:56] <EvilResistance> bdmurray:  was curious because of LP Bug #900620, which i submitted a patch for.
[14:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 900620 in php5 (Debian) (and 1 other project) "Possible Bug: php5-fpm does not listen on a socket by default (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/900620
[14:56] <EvilResistance> thanks
[14:57] <EvilResistance> also, can you explain what a bug's "heat" is?  i have yet to find a clear answer anywhere :/
[14:58] <micahg> EvilResistance: https://launchpad.net/+help-bugs/bug-heat.html
[14:58] <bdmurray> EvilResistance: I'd talk to Clint since he said he'd be happy to do it
[14:58] <EvilResistance> bdmurray:  he's on the rotation next monday for the sponsors
[14:58] <EvilResistance> i poked him via IRC
[14:59] <bdmurray> EvilResistance: okay, so I think it is headed in the right direction
[15:00] <EvilResistance> micahg:  out of curiosity, i take it sync request bugs arent quickly handled?  the one i filed for ZNC actually fixes a vulnerability where the software can be DoS'd, and  i forgot to mark it as a security vulnerability fix :/
[15:01] <micahg> EvilResistance: it's in a list for sponsorship and people get to it as they can, if it's marked as security, the security team will also take a look if needed
[15:02] <EvilResistance> considering i forgot to mark it as a security fix, should i mark it as a security fix (even though i already subscribed the ubuntu-sponsors team)?
[15:02] <EvilResistance> or should i just let it take its due course?
[15:03] <micahg> EvilResistance: sure, that's fine
[15:10] <bil21al> bdmurray:is it a ubuntu's problem or vuze ? guide me
[15:10] <bil21al> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/azureus/+bug/914145
[15:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 914145 in azureus (Ubuntu) "vuze won't start for second attempt, (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[15:12] <bil21al> any other new
[15:12] <bil21al> any other
[15:12] <bil21al> om26er:
[15:14] <om26er> thats prolly a problem with vuze
[15:14] <om26er> not ubuntu fault i would say o_O
[15:16] <bil21al> ok thanks om26er
[15:16] <om26er> yw
[16:08] <charlie-tca> Do we have a monthly and weekly bugsquad meeting both now? One is scheduled today and one tomorrow on the Fridge.
[16:12] <micahg> I thought the monthly ones were abolished
[16:13] <charlie-tca> from the Fridge:
[16:13] <charlie-tca> Ubuntu Bugsquad Monthly Meeting
[16:13] <charlie-tca> WhenTue, January 10, 18:00 – 19:00
[16:13] <charlie-tca> Which I will miss since I lose internet for several hours today
[16:15] <charlie-tca> micahg: posted to the calendar by yourself. Perhaps you should delete them?
[16:15] <charlie-tca> https://www.google.com/calendar/b/0/render?eid=YmxicnVpa2ZiOXNqa25hZ2NyY2Z2cTdpNjRfMjAxMjAxMTBUMTgwMDAwWiBqNXE4NW1taTZ1anZqdGlpNXMxbjNsaTVpb0Bn&ctz=Etc/GMT&pli=1&sf=true&output=xml
[16:15] <micahg> charlie-tca: orly? heh, let me fix that :)
[16:15] <charlie-tca> Thanks
[16:16] <micahg> if I can remember my credentials for that account :)
[16:16] <charlie-tca> always a consideration :)
[17:44] <Pici> w/60
[19:05] <Cas> a user upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04 has found that Deluge disappeared on him but fixes when asked to delete deluge config. should this still be an open bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deluge/+bug/912059
[19:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 912059 in deluge (Ubuntu) "deluge not visible when opened (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Low,New]
[19:05] <Cas> and who is responsible Ubuntu or Deluge :)
[19:33] <roadmr> Cas: 12.04 is not released yet so I'd say this can be considered an open bug (migration of config data needs fixing)
[19:33] <roadmr> Cas: and I'd think it's Deluge's task to properly handle configs from an old version. I'd wager the same would happen if you had an old version of deluge and upgraded, all done from upstream's source
[19:36] <Cas> hmm normally it does handle upgrade from old versions
[19:36] <Cas> we would have seen this issue many times otherwise
[19:37] <Cas> anyway thanks ill leave it open then :)