[13:23] cjwatson: it looks like bug 907524 now has what you were looking for. [13:23] Launchpad bug 907524 in wubi "No Lubuntu option" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/907524 [13:37] bdmurray: ah, thanks [13:37] cjwatson: I also noticed that I can't set wubi bugs to Triaged and their importance. Perhaps the bug supervisor could be changed to ubuntu-bugcontrol? [15:24] bdmurray: Hm, yes. The previous bug supervisor (ago) is in the project maintainer team so he shouldn't lose out by being taken off bug supervisor. However, I can't do it because I'm not an admin of ubuntu-bugcontrol. I've temporarily made you an admin of ubuntu-installer - can you make that change? https://launchpad.net/wubi/+configure-bugtracker [15:25] bdmurray: (ubuntu-installer gets a fair bit of mail; I can either set you back to an ordinary member or remove you from the team altogether after you've done that, up to you ...) [15:27] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1326 lucid-proposed/ (29 files in 7 dirs): [15:27] debian-installer: Add natty and oneiric images for amd64 and i386, built with the [15:27] debian-installer: respective backported kernels (LP: #881529). [15:29] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1327 lucid-proposed/ (8 files in 2 dirs): Move to 2.6.32-38 kernels. [15:30] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1328 lucid-proposed/ (9 files in 3 dirs): Move maverick-* images to 2.6.35-32 kernels. [15:32] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1329 lucid-proposed/build/config/ (8 files in 2 dirs): Move oneiric-* images to 3.0.0-15 kernels. [15:33] debian-installer: cjwatson * r1330 lucid-proposed/debian/changelog: releasing version 20081029ubuntu102.13 [15:47] ev: could you do a fresh wubi build/upload, please? [15:48] r255 [15:48] sure thing [15:48] on it now [15:50] ta [15:50] bdmurray: ^- that should sort out the Lubuntu people [15:54] cjwatson: done [15:55] how's your one man sprint going? :) [15:55] ev: heh. trying to tick off work items with the rest of you [15:55] weird being at home with all you lot in .hu [15:55] (I'm not there either, in case that bit of information hasn't made its way to you) [15:56] oh! didn't know that [15:56] what happened? [15:56] visa renewal [15:56] ah [15:56] I'm trapped and passportless [15:56] you need a spare passport :-) [15:56] haha, apparently I'm not allowed to leave the country even if I have a passport from another nation [15:56] they've thought of every angle :) [15:56] oh, that sucks [15:57] yeah, though I'll just be happy once I have everything back and another two years of approval [15:57] very pleased to have the mountain of paperwork behind me [15:58] I can imagine [15:59] so it's heads-down crashdb week then? you probably get more done without being in Budapest then :) [16:00] http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/canonical-foundations.html is scaring me :-/ [16:02] it is indeed [16:02] and yeah, sorry about that. I assigned to the DX team for a week or two before the holiday to help with test infrastructure, then I had that month off. [16:03] Caning it through January :) [16:04] The reporting daemon is in the archive and has a MIR, and I've been trying to get ahold of James today to see where we stand on the hardware [16:09] cjwatson: that page says 'Mail about all bug activity will be sent to the supervisor by default. The bug supervisor can change the bug mail rules to limit the volume of email.' Do you know if muting the teams subscription will stop email? [16:11] bdmurray: not for certain, although I guess it should [16:17] cjwatson: okay, I've made bugcontrol the bug supervisor but would like to stay in ubuntu-installer until I know bug mail isn't going to bugcontrol [16:18] OK [16:18] feel free to follow up with test mail to that wubi/lubuntu bug [16:30] cjwatson: was 241 or 245 the final wubi for oneiric? bug 891577 [16:30] Launchpad bug 891577 in wubi "cannot install ubuntu 11.10" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/891577 [16:32] bdmurray: 245, but there was some last-minute stuff going on and I don't think we respun all the images with it [16:32] bdmurray: ev might remember better whether that matches what he fixed [16:33] * ev tries to recall [16:45] confused as to how we're seeing EINVAL on a read call there [16:47] bdmurray: outdated version as that may be, I believe there's a real bug there [16:53] hm, posix_read only sets EINVAL if the size is less than zero, or if read itself returns EINVAL