=== dzan is now known as dzan|away | ||
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
Sarvatt | RAOF: so the spinning at 100% cpu usage bug with the newer X is utouch-geis, downgrading to the oneiric one fixes that | 08:51 |
---|---|---|
RAOF | Whee! | 08:51 |
tjaalton | great | 08:51 |
Sarvatt | RAOF: apparently cnd's unity in the PPA also works after downgrading utouch geis with x-staging, woohoo | 09:15 |
tjaalton | confirmed! | 09:15 |
RAOF | Wooo! | 09:15 |
Sarvatt | now who to bug about utouch-geis | 09:15 |
tjaalton | chase?? :) | 09:16 |
tjaalton | -? | 09:16 |
ricotz | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/utouch-geis/+bug/879348 | 09:16 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 879348 in utouch-geis (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "evince segfaults (affects: 9) (dups: 2) (heat: 36)" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 09:16 |
ricotz | so i guess https://launchpad.net/~bregma | 09:16 |
ricotz | hello | 09:16 |
tjaalton | yeah | 09:17 |
ricotz | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/utouch-geis/+bug/898175 | 09:18 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 898175 in utouch-geis (Ubuntu) "uTouch hangs using XCB back end if X server does not support gesture protocol (affects: 6) (heat: 28)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 09:18 |
Sarvatt | yep thats the one | 09:18 |
Sarvatt | ricotz: i see what you mean about acceleration being different in newer synaptics :) | 09:18 |
tjaalton | .xsessionrc isn't read on startup, meh | 09:21 |
Sarvatt | ricotz: heh that was close, almost uploaded git xserver when there's abi breaks that are going to get reverted | 09:29 |
ricotz | Sarvatt, oh, 1.11 branch or master? | 09:30 |
Sarvatt | ricotz: master http://www.mail-archive.com/xorg-devel@lists.x.org/msg27845.html | 09:30 |
ricotz | oh | 09:31 |
ricotz | i was hoping to push an update too | 09:32 |
ricotz | Sarvatt, so 1.12 for edgers ;) | 09:32 |
Sarvatt | yeah was about to upload it when timo pointed that out :) | 09:32 |
ricotz | i guess you need to push some deps first | 09:33 |
Sarvatt | got them locally | 09:33 |
ricotz | like x11proto-input 2.1.99.5 | 09:33 |
ricotz | ok | 09:33 |
Sarvatt | guess i'll just push the proto and copy your xserver actually | 09:33 |
Sarvatt | and reupload all drivers | 09:34 |
ricotz | you can copy the proto too | 09:34 |
Sarvatt | oh thought you had 2.1.99.3, even easier | 09:34 |
ricotz | jammed ppa builders doesnt make it easy | 09:34 |
Sarvatt | wow hardly any builders atm | 09:35 |
Sarvatt | yeah better off waiting | 09:35 |
ricotz | tjaalton, hi, could you update libwacom and maybe upload, they released 0.1 | 10:37 |
ricotz | tjaalton, to debian | 10:37 |
tjaalton | ricotz: upload to debian? no | 10:38 |
tjaalton | oh libwacom | 10:39 |
ricotz | tjaalton, yes, is this possible? | 10:39 |
tjaalton | i can update git, but not upload there | 10:40 |
ricotz | and to ubuntu? | 10:40 |
tjaalton | ubuntu yes | 10:40 |
ricotz | this would be nice! | 10:41 |
ricotz | g2g, bye | 10:41 |
seb128 | ricotz, tjaalton: you guys packages libwacom? | 10:44 |
tjaalton | seb128: it's not uploaded yet, but packaged yes | 10:45 |
seb128 | grrr | 10:45 |
seb128 | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/89491492/libwacom_0.1-0ubuntu1_source.changes | 10:45 |
tjaalton | oh it was :) | 10:45 |
seb128 | robert_ancell did package it today | 10:45 |
tjaalton | ah | 10:45 |
seb128 | tjaalton, no, it's work duplication | 10:45 |
seb128 | <- bit annoyed | 10:45 |
tjaalton | why not ask before? :) | 10:45 |
seb128 | we asked bryce and RAOF here at the platform rally before starting on it | 10:46 |
tjaalton | ok | 10:46 |
seb128 | they didn't know that you were working on it apparently | 10:46 |
seb128 | well anyway, it's done | 10:46 |
tjaalton | yeah ok | 10:46 |
tjaalton | it was discussed here mid-december'ish | 10:46 |
seb128 | it's just annoying that people get stuff in ppas and other redo the same work in the archive | 10:47 |
tjaalton | forgot about it due to the holidays | 10:47 |
seb128 | no worry | 10:47 |
tjaalton | we've forked all of wacom by now, since it's not maintained in the xsf git on debian | 10:47 |
tjaalton | so I pulled ricotz's package and pushed it to my personal git space (writable by pkg-xorg) | 10:48 |
tjaalton | (like -wacom) | 10:48 |
tjaalton | seb128: do you want to maintain it? there was some confusion about what the consumers were, since the driver didn't need it at that point | 10:49 |
tjaalton | and probably still doesn't | 10:49 |
tjaalton | but will | 10:49 |
seb128 | tjaalton, we don't especially want to maintain it ;-) | 10:49 |
seb128 | robert_ancell wanted to build g-c-c from git | 10:49 |
seb128 | which requires it | 10:49 |
tjaalton | yeah | 10:49 |
seb128 | so it was a "scratch an itch" | 10:49 |
jcristau | gnome requires wacom? | 10:50 |
jcristau | wow... | 10:50 |
tjaalton | jcristau: the capplet does, libwacom | 10:50 |
seb128 | jcristau, they are a wacom configuration capplet | 10:50 |
tjaalton | it's the source of all the model->feature mappings, and the driver will end up using it too | 10:50 |
jcristau | you'd think the driver would expose what features are there, so the clients wouldn't need to guess | 10:51 |
jcristau | or, well, s/you/i/ | 10:51 |
tjaalton | hmm, maybe I should adjust the packaging to match the libwacom upload then | 11:17 |
tjaalton | libwacom0 vs libwacom-0 for instance | 11:17 |
Sarvatt | ricotz: mind copying mesa from edgers to your unstable ppa? | 11:19 |
Sarvatt | tempted to binary copy the proto and 2 libs and xserver from your ppa but that'd still mean edgers would be broken for 5 hours before i could upload drivers then another 5 hours waiting for those to build | 11:21 |
Sarvatt | also yay OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 7.12-devel | 11:21 |
tjaalton | seb128: would robert mind if I merged some of the changes and reuploaded that instead? | 11:23 |
seb128 | tjaalton, go for it | 11:23 |
tjaalton | seb128: ok thanks | 11:24 |
seb128 | tjaalton, he just wanted to see that in so we can build g-c-c easily | 11:24 |
tjaalton | seb128: well, I'm going to revert the libwacom-0 package name to just libwacom0, seems more "correct" to me, and multiarchify it too | 11:24 |
seb128 | ok | 11:24 |
seb128 | tjaalton, what's the lib name on disk? | 11:25 |
tjaalton | not sure :) | 11:25 |
tjaalton | I need to build it first to see | 11:26 |
tjaalton | but I think it's libwacom.so.0 | 11:26 |
tjaalton | good that he added the symbols file | 11:26 |
tjaalton | seb128: can you drop the package from NEW? | 11:27 |
tjaalton | I'll get it done before lunch | 11:27 |
seb128 | tjaalton, done | 11:28 |
tjaalton | seb128: nice thanks | 11:28 |
seb128 | yw | 11:28 |
tjaalton | ./usr/lib/libwacom.so.0.0.0 | 11:29 |
seb128 | I wonder why he added a "-" then, seems wrong | 11:30 |
tjaalton | yeah, but in any case it wasn't all for nothing, I'll merge the good bits :) | 11:31 |
seb128 | good | 11:32 |
tjaalton | seb128: meh, some issues with the git repo having stuff the tarball doesn't, so I need to look at that before uploading, after lunch for sure :) | 11:54 |
seb128 | tjaalton, ok | 11:57 |
Sarvatt | tseliot: nvidia is defaulting to nvidia-173 in precise? | 14:48 |
tseliot | Sarvatt: no, I don't think so, unless someone else changed its priority to something bigger than nvidia-current's. update-alternatives --display x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf should show what's going on | 14:49 |
tseliot | or -display i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf if your system is i386 | 14:50 |
Sarvatt | bryce was saying there is a flood of bug reports where jockey is defaulting to nvidia-173 instead of nvidia-current | 14:50 |
Sarvatt | in precise | 14:50 |
tseliot | Sarvatt: maybe the card is not marked as supported? What bug reports are you referring to? | 14:52 |
tseliot | oh boy, I forgot to patch the drivers to build against linux 3.2... | 14:52 |
tjaalton | :) | 14:55 |
bryceh | yeah, 2 bugs | 15:06 |
bryceh | a. nvidia-173 doesn't build against the new kernel | 15:06 |
bryceh | b. for some reason jockey defaults to nvidia-173 a lot when it shouldn't | 15:07 |
bryceh | a. is lp #576648 | 15:08 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 576648 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates (Ubuntu) (and 4 other projects) "package nvidia-* failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (Unable to determine the target kernel version.) (affects: 213) (dups: 195) (heat: 1502)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/576648 | 15:08 |
bryceh | b. is lp #876499 | 15:09 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 876499 in jockey (Ubuntu Precise) (and 2 other projects) "Incorrect Nvidia driver installed by checking 3rd party box (affects: 8) (dups: 6) (heat: 60)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/876499 | 15:09 |
tseliot | bryce: oh, there's a merge request for a) already. I wasn't notified though... | 15:10 |
tseliot | bryceh: I'll take care of both bugs. Thanks | 15:12 |
bryceh | tseliot, great | 15:12 |
bryceh | tseliot, I suspect b. is something wrong in jockey's nvidia internal selection logic. | 15:14 |
bryceh | tseliot, comment #17 describes as far as I got analyzing it | 15:15 |
tseliot | bryceh: the weird thing is that, according to the bug report, nvidia-common makes the right choice, so I'm wondering what's going on in Jockey... | 15:15 |
bryceh | tseliot, I wonder if it is something peculiar with the installation environment | 15:15 |
tseliot | bryceh: maybe something else is pulling nvidia-173 in? | 15:16 |
tseliot | so yes, it could be the environment | 15:16 |
bryceh | tseliot, don't think so; it seems to be jockey specifically deciding it's the driver it wants | 15:16 |
tseliot | bryceh: but it's designed to pick whatever nvidia-common says it's best for the card | 15:17 |
bryceh | ironically, one of the community folks has been dutifully duping all these bugs together, but since he's duping against a really old bug report, that has kept it off my radar | 15:18 |
tseliot | too bad | 15:18 |
tjaalton | seb128: uploaded libwacom to the queue, btw | 15:36 |
seb128 | tjaalton, thanks | 15:36 |
FernandoMiguel | evening | 20:44 |
Sarvatt | bryce: funny because I was digging through 9xxxxx bugs trying to find it and didn't, no wonder :) | 20:49 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!