/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/01/10/#ubuntu-x.txt

=== dzan is now known as dzan|away
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
SarvattRAOF: so the spinning at 100% cpu usage bug with the newer X is utouch-geis, downgrading to the oneiric one fixes that08:51
RAOFWhee!08:51
tjaaltongreat08:51
SarvattRAOF: apparently cnd's unity in the PPA also works after downgrading utouch geis with x-staging, woohoo09:15
tjaaltonconfirmed!09:15
RAOFWooo!09:15
Sarvattnow who to bug about utouch-geis09:15
tjaaltonchase?? :)09:16
tjaalton-?09:16
ricotzhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/utouch-geis/+bug/87934809:16
ubot4Launchpad bug 879348 in utouch-geis (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "evince segfaults (affects: 9) (dups: 2) (heat: 36)" [Undecided,Incomplete]09:16
ricotzso i guess https://launchpad.net/~bregma09:16
ricotzhello09:16
tjaaltonyeah09:17
ricotzhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/utouch-geis/+bug/89817509:18
ubot4Launchpad bug 898175 in utouch-geis (Ubuntu) "uTouch hangs using XCB back end if X server does not support gesture protocol (affects: 6) (heat: 28)" [Undecided,Confirmed]09:18
Sarvattyep thats the one09:18
Sarvattricotz: i see what you mean about acceleration being different in newer synaptics :)09:18
tjaalton.xsessionrc isn't read on startup, meh09:21
Sarvattricotz: heh that was close, almost uploaded git xserver when there's abi breaks that are going to get reverted09:29
ricotzSarvatt, oh, 1.11 branch or master?09:30
Sarvattricotz: master http://www.mail-archive.com/xorg-devel@lists.x.org/msg27845.html09:30
ricotzoh09:31
ricotzi was hoping to push an update too09:32
ricotzSarvatt, so 1.12 for edgers ;)09:32
Sarvattyeah was about to upload it when timo pointed that out :)09:32
ricotzi guess you need to push some deps first09:33
Sarvattgot them locally09:33
ricotzlike x11proto-input 2.1.99.509:33
ricotzok09:33
Sarvattguess i'll just push the proto and copy your xserver actually09:33
Sarvattand reupload all drivers09:34
ricotzyou can copy the proto too09:34
Sarvattoh thought you had 2.1.99.3, even easier09:34
ricotzjammed ppa builders doesnt make it easy09:34
Sarvattwow hardly any builders atm09:35
Sarvattyeah better off waiting09:35
ricotztjaalton, hi, could you update libwacom and maybe upload, they released 0.110:37
ricotztjaalton, to debian10:37
tjaaltonricotz: upload to debian? no10:38
tjaaltonoh libwacom10:39
ricotztjaalton, yes, is this possible?10:39
tjaaltoni can update git, but not upload there10:40
ricotzand to ubuntu?10:40
tjaaltonubuntu yes10:40
ricotzthis would be nice!10:41
ricotzg2g, bye10:41
seb128ricotz, tjaalton: you guys packages libwacom?10:44
tjaaltonseb128: it's not uploaded yet, but packaged yes10:45
seb128grrr10:45
seb128http://launchpadlibrarian.net/89491492/libwacom_0.1-0ubuntu1_source.changes10:45
tjaaltonoh it was :)10:45
seb128robert_ancell did package it today10:45
tjaaltonah10:45
seb128tjaalton, no, it's work duplication10:45
seb128<- bit annoyed10:45
tjaaltonwhy not ask before? :)10:45
seb128we asked bryce and RAOF here at the platform rally before starting on it10:46
tjaaltonok10:46
seb128they didn't know that you were working on it apparently10:46
seb128well anyway, it's done10:46
tjaaltonyeah ok10:46
tjaaltonit was discussed here mid-december'ish10:46
seb128it's just annoying that people get stuff in ppas and other redo the same work in the archive10:47
tjaaltonforgot about it due to the holidays10:47
seb128no worry10:47
tjaaltonwe've forked all of wacom by now, since it's not maintained in the xsf git on debian10:47
tjaaltonso I pulled ricotz's package and pushed it to my personal git space (writable by pkg-xorg)10:48
tjaalton(like -wacom)10:48
tjaaltonseb128: do you want to maintain it? there was some confusion about what the consumers were, since the driver didn't need it at that point10:49
tjaaltonand probably still doesn't10:49
tjaaltonbut will10:49
seb128tjaalton, we don't especially want to maintain it ;-)10:49
seb128robert_ancell wanted to build g-c-c from git10:49
seb128which requires it10:49
tjaaltonyeah10:49
seb128so it was a "scratch an itch"10:49
jcristaugnome requires wacom?10:50
jcristauwow...10:50
tjaaltonjcristau: the capplet does, libwacom10:50
seb128jcristau, they are a wacom configuration capplet10:50
tjaaltonit's the source of all the model->feature mappings, and the driver will end up using it too10:50
jcristauyou'd think the driver would expose what features are there, so the clients wouldn't need to guess10:51
jcristauor, well, s/you/i/10:51
tjaaltonhmm, maybe I should adjust the packaging to match the libwacom upload then11:17
tjaaltonlibwacom0 vs libwacom-0 for instance11:17
Sarvattricotz: mind copying mesa from edgers to your unstable ppa?11:19
Sarvatttempted to binary copy the proto and 2 libs and xserver from your ppa but that'd still mean edgers would be broken for 5 hours before i could upload drivers then another 5 hours waiting for those to build11:21
Sarvattalso yay OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 7.12-devel11:21
tjaaltonseb128: would robert mind if I merged some of the changes and reuploaded that instead?11:23
seb128tjaalton, go for it11:23
tjaaltonseb128: ok thanks11:24
seb128tjaalton, he just wanted to see that in so we can build g-c-c easily11:24
tjaaltonseb128: well, I'm going to revert the libwacom-0 package name to just libwacom0, seems more "correct" to me, and multiarchify it too11:24
seb128ok11:24
seb128tjaalton, what's the lib name on disk?11:25
tjaaltonnot sure :)11:25
tjaaltonI need to build it first to see11:26
tjaaltonbut I think it's libwacom.so.011:26
tjaaltongood that he added the symbols file11:26
tjaaltonseb128: can you drop the package from NEW?11:27
tjaaltonI'll get it done before lunch11:27
seb128tjaalton, done11:28
tjaaltonseb128: nice thanks11:28
seb128yw11:28
tjaalton./usr/lib/libwacom.so.0.0.011:29
seb128I wonder why he added a "-" then, seems wrong11:30
tjaaltonyeah, but in any case it wasn't all for nothing, I'll merge the good bits :)11:31
seb128good11:32
tjaaltonseb128: meh, some issues with the git repo having stuff the tarball doesn't, so I need to look at that before uploading, after lunch for sure :)11:54
seb128tjaalton, ok11:57
Sarvatttseliot: nvidia is defaulting to nvidia-173 in precise?14:48
tseliotSarvatt: no, I don't think so, unless someone else changed its priority to something bigger than nvidia-current's. update-alternatives --display x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf should show what's going on14:49
tseliotor -display i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf if your system is i38614:50
Sarvattbryce was saying there is a flood of bug reports where jockey is defaulting to nvidia-173 instead of nvidia-current14:50
Sarvattin precise14:50
tseliotSarvatt: maybe the card is not marked as supported? What bug reports are you referring to?14:52
tseliotoh boy, I forgot to patch the drivers to build against linux 3.2...14:52
tjaalton:)14:55
brycehyeah, 2 bugs15:06
bryceha.  nvidia-173 doesn't build against the new kernel15:06
brycehb.  for some reason jockey defaults to nvidia-173 a lot when it shouldn't15:07
bryceha. is lp #57664815:08
ubot4Launchpad bug 576648 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates (Ubuntu) (and 4 other projects) "package nvidia-* failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (Unable to determine the target kernel version.) (affects: 213) (dups: 195) (heat: 1502)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/57664815:08
brycehb. is lp #87649915:09
ubot4Launchpad bug 876499 in jockey (Ubuntu Precise) (and 2 other projects) "Incorrect Nvidia driver installed by checking 3rd party box (affects: 8) (dups: 6) (heat: 60)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87649915:09
tseliotbryce: oh, there's a merge request for a) already. I wasn't notified though...15:10
tseliotbryceh: I'll take care of both bugs. Thanks15:12
brycehtseliot, great15:12
brycehtseliot, I suspect b. is something wrong in jockey's nvidia internal selection logic.15:14
brycehtseliot, comment #17 describes as far as I got analyzing it15:15
tseliotbryceh: the weird thing is that, according to the bug report, nvidia-common makes the right choice, so I'm wondering what's going on in Jockey...15:15
brycehtseliot, I wonder if it is something peculiar with the installation environment15:15
tseliotbryceh: maybe something else is pulling nvidia-173 in?15:16
tseliotso yes, it could be the environment15:16
brycehtseliot, don't think so; it seems to be jockey specifically deciding it's the driver it wants15:16
tseliotbryceh: but it's designed to pick whatever nvidia-common says it's best for the card15:17
brycehironically, one of the community folks has been dutifully duping all these bugs together, but since he's duping against a really old bug report, that has kept it off my radar15:18
tseliottoo bad15:18
tjaaltonseb128: uploaded libwacom to the queue, btw15:36
seb128tjaalton, thanks15:36
FernandoMiguelevening20:44
Sarvattbryce: funny because I was digging through 9xxxxx bugs trying to find it and didn't, no wonder :)20:49
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!