[15:07] good morning [15:53] o/ [17:50] i have a question for the channel, probably will shoot it to the mailing list too [17:50] how do people feel about ubuntu studio being officially recognized as an LTS release for 12.04 [17:50] ? [17:52] Yes, we can do that. I was thinking about the same when Xubuntu had their discussion and proposal accepted just this week. [17:56] astraljava: one of my questions is...do we need to? [17:56] No, we don't need to. [17:57] canonical will already be supporting the foundation packages already for ubuntu/xubuntu/kubuntu/et al [17:57] i suppose for appearances it would be nice though....and respect [17:57] Derivates can choose to, or not to. [17:57] i don't think we can honestly expect LTS support for particular a/v/g packages though [17:58] That's the thing, we should be ready and willing to provide that support. [17:58] right [17:58] i am leaning to asking for LTS designation for ubuntu studio, unless others are oppossed to it [17:59] given the way libraries change and the development of things like ardour (and maybe jack) there is an upper boundry condition to our LTS support for a/v/g packages within two years, much less four or five though [17:59] astraljava: ^^^ [18:00] We could vote for it, if we got decent amount of contributors in one of our formal meetings. That would probably have to happen in the next January meeting, though.