[05:05] <yofel> uhm, does someone know what would go wrong to show "all builds successfull" for the libapogee2 build here: https://launchpad.net/~lightningstrike35/+archive/ppa/+packages ?
[05:05] <yofel> both builds failed
[08:07] <Myrth> hi, how do I install this package? https://launchpad.net/mysql-udf-regexp thanks
[08:10] <wgrant> yofel_: Bug #910482
[08:10] <yofel_> ah, thx
[08:12] <wgrant> Myrth: You'll need to contact the maintainer of that project.
[08:15] <Myrth> wgrant, thanks, i thought it as simple as ppa
[09:38] <KNRO> I'm getting a weird problem in launchpad, when I request a build, it fails upload because it says the .orig file already exists in the PPA but is being uploaded with different contents.. but I didn't change the contents at all?!! is this a bug?
[09:39] <tumbleweed> KNRO: clearly you did, or it wouldn't have given you that error :)
[09:41] <KNRO> tumbleweed: PRETTY sure I did not and this happened to several packages. Could this be an issue because it syncs the package from SVN?
[09:41] <KNRO> so may timestamp issue...etc? I don't know
[09:41] <tumbleweed> KNRO: if you are rebuilding the tarball, then yes
[09:45] <KNRO> tumbleweed: yes  the tarball is getting rebuilt by launchpad from source... so how to avoid this?
[09:46] <KNRO> Perhaps I can add a timestamp, then everytime it gets built it's unique
[09:46] <tumbleweed> KNRO: use 3.0 (native) rather than 3.0 (quilt)
[09:46] <KNRO> tumbleweed: use that where?
[09:47] <tumbleweed> although, I thought daily builds made that change automatically, these days.
[09:47] <tumbleweed> KNRO: debian/source/format
[09:47] <KNRO> and what will that do exactly?
[09:48] <tumbleweed> it won't try and share a .orig.tar.gz between upstream versions
[09:51] <KNRO> Tumbleweed: is 3.0 (quilt) default?
[09:52] <tumbleweed> no, 1.0 is. But 3.0 (quilt) is far more popular. See the dpkg-source manpage
[09:56] <KNRO> tumbleweed: Ok, just found that I didn't have debian/source to begin with, so I add 3.0 (quilt), would this avoid the 'different-content' problem?
[09:57] <tumbleweed> I think it'll force it to native during build
[10:08] <Ampelbein> Shouldn't that be "3.0 (native)" then?
[10:11] <tumbleweed> Ampelbein: that's what I origionally suggested, but I think dailydeb does quilt -> native automatically
[10:13] <Ampelbein> Ah, yes. I see now.
[10:13] <Ampelbein> Sorry for the noise ;-)
[10:20] <KNRO> Tumbleweed: well, I still get the upload error. so now I made it explicitly 3.0 (native) and will see
[11:06] <wgrant> tumbleweed: We recently deployed a new version which does orig tarballs, so there's no implicit conversion any more.
[11:07] <czajkowski> morning all
[11:10] <wgrant> lifeless: Where are you guys?
[11:11] <wgrant> In the lounge *outside* security?
[11:13] <lifeless> wgrant: priority ass lounge past passport control
[11:25] <dusf> can somebody please tell me how to unsubscribe to a bug?
[11:25] <dusf> "You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
[11:25] <dusf> duplicate bug report (726496)."
[11:28] <dusf> but when i goto the link
[11:28] <dusf> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/728745
[11:28] <dusf> it says
[11:29] <dusf> "You have subscriptions that may cause you to receive notifications, but you are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. "
[11:29] <ts2> go to the original bug page
[11:29] <dusf> ts2: how?
[11:30] <ts2> http://launchapd.net/bugs/726496
[11:30] <ts2> then you should find the option to unsubscribe (or mute)
[11:32] <iceroot> guys.... https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/184525  anyone able to fix that for me?
[11:33] <dusf> ts2: muted, thanks
[12:40] <tumbleweed> wgrant: oh, nice
[19:49] <ereslibre> hi there ! any idea why my launchpad-id is 'ereslibre-gmail-deactivatedaccount-deactivatedaccount' ? It has been a long time I don't use launchpad but wanted to give it a try
[19:50] <EvilResistance> the 'deactivated account' part seems to explain itself
[19:51] <ereslibre> EvilResistance: twice ?
[19:51] <ereslibre> thing is, how it got deactivated and why
[20:23] <maxb> ereslibre: I don't know why it got that way, but you should be able to change it to something more sensible yourself, I believe