[02:49] <anjilslaire> hey, its snowing outside, lol
[02:55] <bkerensa> :D
[21:03] <bkerensa> valorie: Ubuntu Oregon got denied approval
[21:03] <bkerensa> =/
[21:08] <Salt> srsly?
[21:09] <Salt> i wonder if we can re-apply to canonical as ubuntu-pnw, it makes WAY more sense v_v
[21:10] <bkerensa> Probably not
[21:10] <bkerensa> the funny thing is they said Ubuntu Oregon doesnt have enough history
[21:10] <bkerensa> and our LoCo existed months before any of the existing approved U.S. LoCo Teams
[21:11] <bkerensa> they said we need to show more I guess in documentation yet we do our team reports and they approved a LoCo before us that does document at all
[21:24] <Salt> that sucks
[21:25] <Salt> but yeah, here isn't the place for me to rant about canonical
[22:47] <valorie> damn it, bkerensa
[22:47] <valorie> that sucks
[22:47] <bkerensa> yeah
[22:47] <bkerensa> I don't understand it
[22:47] <valorie> sec
[22:52] <valorie> gosh, weather tomorrow is supposed to get seriously winter
[22:53] <valorie> bobby went to buy extra gasoline for the generator
[22:54] <valorie> canonical isn't the problem
[22:54] <valorie> the CC is the one doing the approving
[22:55] <bkerensa> yeah
[22:55] <bkerensa> well LoCo Council
[22:55] <bkerensa> and I pointed out that they approved a loco before us that had no documentation at all
[22:55] <bkerensa> and then they said they couldnt approve us due to lack of history
[22:55] <bkerensa> to me thats just bizarre
[22:56] <bkerensa> and unfortunately there is no way I can appeal to Community Council and even if I could I think they would just back the LoCo Council
[22:56] <bkerensa> There should be clear expectations published in a Wiki that they use in voting and they should use that for all loco's
[22:57] <bkerensa> Transparency and Fairness imho
[23:19] <valorie> just try again in a few months
[23:20] <valorie> you'll get it, 'cause you rock
[23:20]  * valorie goes off to visit dad early today
[23:20] <valorie> weather seems threatening