RAOF | bryce: In Melbourne, yes. Not in Heathrow. | 00:08 |
---|---|---|
Sarvatt | heathrow is hands down the worst airport i've ever been to.. terminal 5 wasn't as bad as 3 though | 00:09 |
Sarvatt | telling you what gate your flight will be at 30 minutes before the gate closes, and it takes 20 minutes to get to it if you're in the wrong place? | 00:10 |
Sarvatt | then making you take a bus out to the plane and stand in the cold waiting to board on the tarmac | 00:10 |
bryce | I got stuck in chicago once where they didn't let us offload luggage. Had to scrounge up a change of clothes and toiletries from hotel gift shops. Ugh. Was a nice hotel though. | 00:15 |
bryce | ever since, I always carry a change of clothes and toothbrush in my carryon bag | 00:16 |
RAOF | I'm going to consider that. | 00:16 |
RAOF | Particularly since the lounges I've got access to often have shower facilities (the BA/Qantas lounge in Terminal 3 is really nice). | 00:17 |
Sarvatt | bryce: BA gives you toothbrushes :) | 00:18 |
Sarvatt | RAOF: which lounge did you go to in terminal 3? the new one? | 00:18 |
Sarvatt | with a spa and crap | 00:18 |
RAOF | I don't think it's new, but it does indeed have a spa and crap :) | 00:19 |
Sarvatt | there was one that was new for priority pass this year in the back of the book and not with the other heathrow ones, missed that we could use it | 00:20 |
bryce | RAOF, of course after getting all that set up, I've never needed it. But I figure the one time I don't bring it, I'll get stuck somewhere. | 00:20 |
RAOF | The nice (?) thing about travelling from Australia is that your first flight is always super-long-haul, so it's always worthwhile to change into a new set of clothes at the end of it ;) | 00:20 |
Sarvatt | sounds like me bringing all manner of medicines in case i get sick and i haven't gotten ubuflu since that first trip :) | 00:21 |
RAOF | cnd: You had some autofoo droppings in your xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse upload to ubuntu-x-swat/x-staging. There's nothing you need to do, this is just a friendly reminder to pay attention to the files dpkg says are modified :) | 00:23 |
cnd | RAOF, I don't remember uploading vmmouse... | 00:23 |
cnd | RAOF, was it just autogen.sh? | 00:23 |
RAOF | cnd: It was a log from a failed configure run. | 00:24 |
cnd | hmm... I wouldn't have ever built that | 00:24 |
cnd | so I don't know where the genesis of that is :) | 00:24 |
RAOF | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-staging/+sourcepub/2143616/+listing-archive-extra says otherwise :) | 00:24 |
cnd | yeah, I signed it and uploaded | 00:24 |
RAOF | Eh. | 00:25 |
cnd | I probably saw the message, but didn't bother to do anything because it would require a change in the packaging and I was lazy :) | 00:25 |
cnd | oh wait, I did have to change the packaging | 00:25 |
cnd | hmm.. yeah, I should have caught that | 00:25 |
cnd | thanks for pointing it out :) | 00:25 |
cnd | I guess I do need to pay a bit closer attention | 00:26 |
RAOF | You've got core-dev now, right? | 00:27 |
cnd | yep | 00:31 |
RAOF | Looks like utouch-frame needs build-dep loving. | 00:32 |
cnd | hmm? | 00:32 |
cnd | yes, looks like it does | 00:32 |
RAOF | powerpc has tried to build it before libxi and x11proto-input :) | 00:32 |
RAOF | Thanks, PPC. At least you've done *something* useful in the last year :) | 00:33 |
cnd | argh, second time I hit that today, libxi-dev is in epoch 2... | 00:33 |
RAOF | Looks like libxi also needs inputproto bump? | 00:35 |
RAOF | I can fix these up for you if you like. | 00:35 |
cnd | I fixed utouch-frame | 00:36 |
cnd | I thought libxi was set up properly | 00:36 |
RAOF | failed to build on armhf; it tried to build before x11proto-input again, and didn't dep-wait. | 00:36 |
cnd | ahh yes, it needs to be bumped to depend on 2.1.99.5 | 00:36 |
RAOF | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/90309245/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-armhf.libxi_2%3A1.5.99.2-0ubuntu2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 00:36 |
cnd | because of the 2.1.99.4 precise folly | 00:37 |
cnd | RAOF, yeah, if you don't mind, please fix up libxi | 00:37 |
RAOF | Wilco | 00:37 |
cnd | the good news is that because we are building all the arches, we get put into the "real" archive queue | 00:37 |
cnd | so we're not stuck behind all the PPA builds | 00:38 |
cnd | something like that | 00:38 |
RAOF | Pity it doesn't auto-retry dep-waits :) | 00:38 |
cnd | and IS was nice enough to bump the prio on the x11proto-input build, so that's done too | 00:38 |
RAOF | Yeah. | 00:39 |
RAOF | You haven't pushed xi 0ubuntu2 to git? | 00:40 |
* RAOF folds that in. | 00:40 | |
Sarvatt | RAOF: did you already merge intel? | 01:42 |
Sarvatt | its not in git so was wondering, experimental or unstable? :) | 01:42 |
Sarvatt | uxa is in maintenance soon to die only important fixes mode in git so experimental disabling sna might be a good idea | 01:44 |
Sarvatt | RAOF: should i get intel merged in git for ubuntu tomorrow is what i'm asking basically :) | 01:51 |
RAOF | Sarvatt: I've merged 2.17; 2.18 isn't released yet, is it? | 01:52 |
Sarvatt | nope but kibi has some git snapshots in experimental and there are only a handful of really conservative changes | 01:52 |
Sarvatt | but if you have 2.17 already done locally that works too | 01:52 |
RAOF | It's not in the ubuntu+1 branch? | 01:53 |
Sarvatt | it was just if we were starting from scratch i was asking which would be preferred | 01:53 |
Sarvatt | i didnt see it, lemme double check.. | 01:53 |
RAOF | It's been in the staging PPA forever ;) | 01:53 |
Sarvatt | theres no ubuntu+1 branch | 01:53 |
RAOF | Urgh. Apparently I didn't push it. | 01:54 |
Sarvatt | ubuntu branch has my changes at HEAD for 2.15.901 | 01:54 |
Sarvatt | ah ok | 01:54 |
Sarvatt | why +1 branch? | 01:55 |
RAOF | 2.17 pushed to git. | 01:55 |
RAOF | Because I didn't particularly want to upload it twice :) | 01:55 |
RAOF | And it wasn't clear how long the 1.11 transition was going to take. | 01:56 |
RAOF | Yay! XServer has almost built! | 01:56 |
Sarvatt | well thats orthogonal to xserver, and yay you had it using origin/ubuntu not a new branch anyway :) | 01:57 |
Sarvatt | thanks for pushing it | 01:57 |
RAOF | Well, it would have needed a rebuild against the newer server. | 01:58 |
RAOF | Ok. I'm off for lunch and errands. By the time I get back xserver should be done and I can finish pushing the world to staging. | 02:24 |
Sarvatt | LIBGL_SHOW_FPS=1 is so kick ass, being able to show speed differences between gpus in arbitrary things like webgl in chromium is really handy :) | 02:42 |
Sarvatt | wow, at this rate tomorrow i might be able to put xserver 1.12 in edgers | 03:57 |
Sarvatt | i only had it all prepared on jan 6th :) | 03:57 |
Sarvatt | darn ppa builders have been backed up since then, having upgrades broken for 8+ hours isn't an option this time | 03:58 |
Prf_Jakob | Sarvatt: cool! | 05:01 |
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
tjaalton | ricotz: I assume you meant GPL-2+ for the libwacom packaging? | 11:59 |
tjaalton | upstream has no mention on GPL on it, weird | 12:00 |
tjaalton | or any other license for that matter | 12:00 |
tjaalton | ah, MIT of course | 12:03 |
tjaalton | ricotz: meh, put GPL-3+ since I had it handy.. | 12:08 |
ricotz | tjaalton, hi, yeah please do | 12:19 |
ricotz | tjaalton, i hope you have seen 0.2 | 12:19 |
tjaalton | yep | 12:19 |
ricotz | ok | 12:19 |
tjaalton | uploaded | 12:28 |
ricotz | nice, hoping jonathan is happy now ;) | 12:32 |
tjaalton | apparently was | 12:40 |
tjaalton | seb128: libwacom is now in precise | 12:41 |
seb128 | tjaalton, I noticed, thanks! | 12:41 |
tjaalton | np | 12:41 |
jcristau | gpl packaging for mit package? | 12:41 |
tjaalton | can't be mixed? | 12:42 |
jcristau | can be mixed, but the result is gpl, so it's a bit weird | 12:43 |
tjaalton | hmm right | 12:44 |
jcristau | (that said for hysterical raisins the x packaging is at least partly gpl, so it's not like there's no precedent) | 12:45 |
tjaalton | well, now that I look at the dep5 page, "permissive" might be an alternative for the packaging.. | 12:46 |
tjaalton | ricotz: http://pastebin.com/PfifLp2K ? | 12:48 |
ricotz | tjaalton, it is fine with me | 12:50 |
tjaalton | thanks, I'll commit that change | 12:51 |
tjaalton | hm, source format 1.0 doesn't like .bz2 tarballs? | 12:54 |
tjaalton | yeah | 12:55 |
tjaalton | so it's a native package now, meh | 12:55 |
tjaalton | how hard would it be to include autogen.sh in the tarballs | 12:57 |
=== mdeslaur is now known as mdeslaur_ | ||
=== mdeslaur_ is now known as mdeslaur | ||
bhearsum | chrisccoulson: i just attached my gsd-debug-randr log - i hope it's helpful | 14:07 |
bhearsum | chrisccoulson: i also tried disbling the media keys, like you mentioned yesterday, but that mad eno difference at all | 14:07 |
ricotz | tjaalton, hmm, you changed libwacom to debsrc v1.0 :\ | 15:58 |
tjaalton | ricotz: yes, but git has it in 3.0 again | 15:58 |
ricotz | tjaalton, this is really a step backwards | 15:58 |
tjaalton | why? | 15:58 |
ricotz | good | 15:58 |
tjaalton | 3.0 is bad for vcs | 15:59 |
tjaalton | i removed autogen.sh, which isn't in the tarball | 15:59 |
ricotz | i am prefering to use the proper upstream tarball | 15:59 |
tjaalton | it is the upstream tarball | 15:59 |
ricotz | tjaalton, i am fine with using pristinetar though | 15:59 |
ricotz | ok | 15:59 |
tjaalton | with 1.0 you have the diff in diff.gz | 16:00 |
ricotz | i only saw the ubuntu upload so far | 16:00 |
tjaalton | with 3.0 in separate patch blob | 16:00 |
ricotz | i know the difference between them | 16:00 |
tjaalton | and basically, if you have other patches you're screwed | 16:00 |
tjaalton | after working with several packages in git I realize why 3.0 is making people crazy.. | 16:01 |
ricotz | hmm, works for e | 16:02 |
ricotz | `me | 16:02 |
hallyn | to switch from nvidia to vesa, can i just add 'Driver: vesa' to xorg.conf (from rescue boot)? | 16:12 |
hallyn | (i'll try in a min, but if it fails it'll take me 15 mins to reboot from livecd, so thought i'd ask first) | 16:13 |
hallyn | all right, off to go try | 16:14 |
tseliot | tjaalton: are we aiming for mesa 7.12 for precise? | 16:22 |
tjaalton | tseliot: it's 8.0 | 16:22 |
tjaalton | and yes | 16:22 |
tseliot | tjaalton: thanks | 16:23 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
cnd | woot, qt4-x11 built for armhf | 20:35 |
cnd | and it only took 14 hours, 57 minutes, 58.2 second | 20:35 |
tjaalton | I've done some work on mesa, but the current debian-experimental branch has lost all the history about debian/, and merging to ubuntu is a huge PITA because of that | 20:42 |
cnd | RAOF, what's going on with xserver-xorg-video-glide? | 23:02 |
cnd | it doesn't seem like it should be arch: any | 23:02 |
RAOF | cnd: I think that's right. It's just that its build-deps are only satisfiable on amd64 i386 ia64 alpha. | 23:03 |
cnd | so it will perpetually be in dep-wait on arm*? | 23:04 |
RAOF | Yup. | 23:05 |
cnd | ok... | 23:06 |
cnd | that seems wrong to me... | 23:06 |
RAOF | That's how it is in the main archive. | 23:06 |
RAOF | I think that's the expected behaviour for packages with arch-specific dependencies. | 23:07 |
RAOF | Which aren't arch-specific themselves. | 23:07 |
cnd | ok | 23:08 |
cnd | so we're just waiting on qt4-x11 armel | 23:08 |
RAOF | Ah, poor armel :) | 23:10 |
RAOF | Oh! | 23:10 |
RAOF | Thinking of poor armel, that's reminded me that I also need to rebuild some stuff for it. | 23:10 |
RAOF | And do the proprietary drivers, too. | 23:11 |
RAOF | I shall move out to the veranda and do those uploads. | 23:13 |
* cnd wishes he had a veranda, though he wouldn't use it today | 23:16 | |
cnd | slush all over the ground here | 23:16 |
bryce | cnd, has it finally gotten wet enough for you? | 23:17 |
cnd | ummm, yeah, you can call off the dogs now :) | 23:17 |
cnd | though I'd probably be fine if it weren't quite so cold and didn't come down as snow/sleet | 23:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!