=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [00:45] aquarius: hey? [00:45] dobey, heya [00:45] dobey, If I've got a webview inside a Gtk3 window, and I drag a file onto the webkit widget, the webkit widget gets to interpret the dropped file and my window doesn't. Can I make it so that the webkit widget gets it (so I can trap the HTML drop event in JavaScript) *and* my gtk window gets it (so the drag-data-received signal fires on my window)? [00:46] sure [00:46] i think anyway [00:47] if you set up the drag/drop on the GtkWindow, (or whatever parent widget of the WebView), you should be able to handle the call yourself, and then just call the drop event on the DOM, or just let the event pass through [00:52] aquarius: did you set up the appropriate drag target on the window? [00:52] hmm, i don't guess i would be able to get any more reviews tonight :-/ [00:52] dobey, yep. If I stick a Label in the window instead of a webkit.webview, then the window fires the signal fine [00:53] if I replace the label with a webview, then my window no longer gets the signal :( [00:54] oh, maybe i have the event ordering backward then, and webkit isn't passing it through to the parent [00:54] but why do you want to have both the window and the widget, get it? [00:59] because the widget needs to get it to report *which* HTML element it actually got dropped on [00:59] but the window needs to get it because it's a real gtk thing and can get much more information out of a drop than a webkit in-JavaScript DOM event gets [01:00] so why aren't you binding to the drag-data-received signal on the webview? === gatox is now known as gatox_dinner === gatox_dinner is now known as gatox === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [07:29] any idea when the contacts and notes is going to be fixed, this was the only thing i had planned to use ubuntuone for... [09:52] dobey, what did I not do? [09:56] aloha [10:08] czajkowski, morning, how are the legs/back going? [10:12] Good morning all! :D [10:12] mandel: getting there thanks [10:13] every day is an improvement [10:13] czajkowski, glat to hear that [10:13] JamesTait, morning! [10:13] ok, time for my daily coffee, will be back in 10' [11:06] good morning! [11:09] gatox, buenas! [11:09] mandel, hi! [12:02] hello everyone! [12:03] nessita, hi [12:05] nessita, i've just sent you the e-mail...... i only found 2 problems that we couldn't resolve nicely [12:05] all the situation is explained in the e-mail [12:05] nessita, buenos dias! [12:05] gatox: do we have bug number for each one? [12:05] hola mandel! [12:05] nessita, let me check [12:08] nessita, for the first one about read_link, yes...... for the second one no, because it was something that we said that was going just to be documented [12:08] but maybe brian know how to resolve it in the proper way [12:09] nessita, i sent you another email with the bug number [12:10] gatox: thanks. Can I ask you a couple of more things, to resolve during the day? [12:10] good morning! [12:10] nessita, yes [12:10] ralsina, hi [12:10] gatox: bug! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918127 [12:10] Launchpad bug 918127 in ubuntuone-client "U1 for Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] [12:10] ralsina, yes.... i saw it..... i need to propose the u1-cp branch [12:11] gatox: ack [12:12] nessita, which things? [12:12] gatox: 1- Add a little detail to the bug #907336 explaining that we're using comtypes, and what problem do we need to resolve (to be able to desreference a link). Assume that Brian will read that and he has to understand what's going on :-) [12:12] 2- Can you please report the bug for the path_exists issue, with the same goal in mind? (that Brian can read it and understand the problem) [12:12] Launchpad bug 907336 in ubuntuone-client "Fix read_link to use a more appropiate api (affects: 1) (heat: 31)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/907336 [12:12] hola ralsina [12:12] buen dia nessita [12:13] nessita, did you read my e-mail?? just to know if you want what it says there or something more [12:14] gatox: I did, something like that works, but please make sure you mention what library are we using and why (ie why the "standard" ones are not enough) [12:14] nessita, of course..... doing that now [12:15] thanks! [12:20] ralsina: would you be able to do a review? https://code.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntu-sso-client/gtk-ui-executable/+merge/88777 [12:20] nessita: sure! [12:20] I may be a little on and offin the morning: kid is puking [12:21] nessita, I can take a look if you want [12:21] mandel: you do one, I do the other [12:21] mandel: please! [12:22] nessita, on it :) [12:26] nessita, any reason for using argparse instead of optparse? specially when optparse is in stdlib [12:27] are we using positional arguments? [12:27] mandel, i don't think so.... i check the same thing once [12:27] i think we could use optparse [12:28] mandel: argparse as well, an is the recommended library to use since python 2,7 [12:28] (is in the stdlib as well) [12:28] sorry [12:28] argparse is better [12:28] nessita, yes [12:28] mandel: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/argparse.html [12:29] je, I'm getting old even for python.. [12:30] mandel: is ok, in reviews we learn as well :-) [12:30] mandel: so, like jdo say, keep asking! [12:30] nessita, I always ask, is my preferred way of reviewing :) [12:30] mandel: if you feel like knowing more, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3217673/why-use-argparse-rather-than-optparse [12:31] nessita, i sent you the e-mail with the bug reports....... [12:31] gatox: thank you!!! [12:31] nessita, please let me know when you have a moment for some reviews [12:31] gatox: I have a moment for some reviews [12:32] gatox: links pliz? [12:33] nessita, let me check first for conflicts and everything before giving you the links :P [12:33] nessita, line 1027 that setUp is not needed, is it? [12:33] gatox: great [12:33] mandel: looking [12:33] mandel: True, I delete something that was there. Removing! [12:33] ok [12:36] mandel: fixed and pushed [12:37] mandel: made another push since I have to remove an unused import for defer [12:37] ok [12:39] nessita, this one need a re**9-review: https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntuone-windows-installer/network-detect/+merge/77049 [12:40] gatox: re**9-looking! [12:41] nessita, a small idea: http://paste.ubuntu.com/808523/ [12:41] nessita, but it might not bring much to the code [12:42] mandel: I can add that if you want :-) [12:42] nessita, as you prefer, is a coding style thing more than anything.. I though, well if we are writing all the time the same, lets be lazy ;) [12:42] nessita, at your discretion, I'm not going to add a needs fixing for that :) [12:43] mandel: the only thing I guess is better from the current approach is "explicitness", but I also like your way [12:43] ralsina: wanna untie this? [12:44] reading backlog... [12:44] nessita, I think both have their pros and cons, your is more explicit, mine is pure lazyness hehe [12:44] the setattr is ok with me [12:45] ok, changing that [12:45] but really, it saves about 50 characters by making the code obscure-r [12:45] so +0 [12:45] ok, not changing it [12:45] sorry at the failure to untie :-) [12:45] :-) [12:45] nessita, mandel this one is ready for review too: https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntuone-client/network-detect/+merge/88545 [12:45] I will not change it just because I'm with "fiaca" [12:46] mandel: also, the setattr doesn't do the same thing as the other code (login_only is missing) [12:46] nessita, fiaca? I don't know that term [12:46] ralsina, yeah, is because login_only has a bool, it was more an example than anything else :P [12:46] mandel: fiaca is... http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltGUIBusUsual?LEMA=fiaca [12:47] "desgana" [12:47] mandel: I know, butthat makes the saving even less :-) [12:47] nessita, ah, ok, new word :) [12:47] Now, if we had kwargs and did self.__dict__.update(kwargs) that would save cde! ;-) [12:47] nessita, smaething can be done for 388 with tuples, but who cares :P [12:48] ralsina, and at some point we start being perl developer playing golf code :P [12:48] mandel: which is why I am not proposing ways to write shorter code ;) [12:48] mandel: right [12:49] nessita, all the code looks good now, I just need some explanation for lines 472 and 473 [12:51] mandel: in the backend mocker, I want to keep trac of signals connection and disconnection so I can assert that all the signals have been connected when needed and disconnected when needed. In 472, if no handler remains connected to a signal name, I pop the signal out of the internal dict [12:51] mandel: so I can assert callbacks == {} [12:51] meaning that every handler was disconnected [12:52] makes sense? [12:52] nessita, processing the info :) [12:52] nessita, ok, got it, makes sense [12:53] (notice that callbacks is a defaultdict, so callbacks['foo'] will always return, at least, the empty list) [12:53] yes, got that detail at the beginning [12:53] nessita, let me run the tests and will add a +1 [12:54] nessita, just linux, or windows too? [12:54] mandel: should run OK in both, but this code will not work on windows (no gtk support on windows in our end) [12:55] nessita, I can of depend on this branch for my work, can you take a look: https://code.launchpad.net/~alecu/ubuntu-sso-client/and-post/+merge/88949 [12:55] nessita, ok, running them on both just incase [12:55] mandel: yes! right after gatox's [12:55] thx [13:07] nessita, I get the following when running the tests on windows: paste.ubuntu.com/808555 [13:08] nessita, I suppose you have to change something in run-tests.bat to ignore the tests that use gtk [13:10] mandel: looking [13:10] nessita, I'll add it to the review, that way is easier to find [13:10] mandel: ack [13:11] nessita, added [13:12] Hallå #ubuntuone! [13:13] alecu, hi! [13:14] hola alecu! [13:15] buen dia alecu [13:15] gatox, I gave you a very stupid needs fixing because I went to the wrong tab in chrome, sorry [13:16] alecu, hola! [13:16] mandel, ok..... no problem! [13:16] alecu, the first review for https://code.launchpad.net/~alecu/ubuntu-sso-client/and-post/+merge/88949 is done, I think we can reuse the dic from twisted [13:16] gatox, well, that will force me to do the review ;) [13:16] mandel, please!!! :P [13:17] mandel: fixed the gtk thingy, IRL tested as well [13:17] nessita, let me pull, run tests and give a +1 :) [13:17] mandel, using the dict from twisted sound like a good idea. I'll take a look. [13:19] mandel, btw: sorry about your teeth. I found chad's suggestion a good solution for that. [13:20] alecu, haha don't worry, is not the first time :) [13:20] alecu, most of my bottom teeth are broken already :P [13:20] mandel, please, post some photos so we can all laugh too. [13:21] gatox: so, now when running the windows-installer, I get the "network-detect" page even if I have connection. Clikcing on Try again will fix it... but any idea why that page is shown? [13:21] alecu, hahaha I'm not doing that [13:21] nessita, weird..... that is not happening here [13:21] gatox: can I send any log to help debug? [13:21] nessita, ahhhhh maybe because i'm testing it with --install [13:21] mandel, luckily your head is not being hit that hard in order for your neurons to start deteriorating faster, right? [13:21] gatox: run it with no params [13:22] alecu: how can you tell? :-P [13:22] mandel, oh, right, I forgot: "sports are healty" [13:22] nessita, ....... ¬¬ sorry about that..... [13:22] please guys, remind me about that sooner, because I'll probably forget. [13:22] gatox: can you reproduce? [13:23] nessita, yep..... was the --install... i need to change the order of a page [13:23] gatox: ack! [13:23] alecu, yeah, that's it [13:26] nessita, you have a +1 [13:27] mandel: awesome [13:28] gatox, where did ubuntuone/platform/windows/network_manager.py go? [13:28] gatox, I mean, did we change the project? [13:28] mandel, away... i didn't like that file [13:28] jejee [13:28] mandel, no..... we are using the one from sso [13:28] that code was repeated [13:28] and the one inside u1-client wasn't working [13:28] gatox, ack [13:31] mandel, so, I've taken a look at the twisted InsensitiveDict, and we won't be able to use it. [13:31] nessita, i've updated the branch of the wizard.... it was just moving one line [13:31] alecu, why? [13:31] mandel, since my class is in fact an insensitive "defaultdict" [13:31] gatox: did you add a test for that? :-) [13:31] mandel, and the other is "just a dict" [13:32] gatox: that fails without having the line in the proper place? [13:32] alecu, oh, how insensitive! hehe [13:32] mandel, so, I may able to do some changes and use it if we think it would be less code... let me take another look. [13:33] nessita, the problem was the order of the wizard pages... i moved before the network page to be added before the sign in page and it was needed to be added later....... [13:33] just that [13:33] alecu, not really a big things, is just that when reviewing the code I remembered that the HttpClientFactory uses the insensitive dict for the headers [13:33] to have the proper order [13:33] gatox, FYI running tests on linux for that branch [13:33] gatox: can you add a test that the network page is not the first one? [13:34] nessita, yes [13:34] mandel, what? [13:34] mandel, which branch? [13:34] gatox, network detect one [13:35] mandel, what happend? [13:35] mandel, ahhhhhh you were telling me that you are running the test [13:35] jejeje i think that you had a problem running the tests [13:35] gatox, hmm did you stay up 'til late playing games? :P [13:35] mandel, jejeje no.... i dont have my xbox until next wednesday [13:37] mandel, gatox: do I owe you guys some reviews? now's the perfect time to force me into doing some reviews [13:37] alecu, I think you do, let me check [13:37] alecu, just one: https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntuone-windows-installer/network-detect [13:38] alecu, yes: https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntuone-client/add-virtual-watches/+merge/88726 [13:38] alecu, that is an evil one [13:38] mandel, gatox: ack, thanks. [13:39] mandel, so, what should I do about that branch? Should I use the twisted dict, or should I keep mine? [13:40] alecu, I have no preference, I just though that since there was something very similar in twisted we could use it, but if you need a default dict rather than a dict, we keep it :) [13:41] nessita: +1 [13:42] mandel, the thing is that *I can* simulate a default dict from the code in each webclient, by checking for existence of the element and creating it just before using it. But I think the code would be repeated but slightly different in each webclient, so I think it looks better this way. [13:43] ralsina: thanks! [13:43] alecu, then just write that in the comment and I'm happy :) [13:43] great. [13:45] alecu, I'm off to lunch I'll continue the review once I'm back [13:46] mandel, I've added the comment, have a great lunch and enjoy the comments. [13:47] nessita, test added [13:47] gatox: thanks! [13:49] I've just uploaded some sample Java code for interacting with the Ubuntu One Files API at http://thomshutt.com/UbuntuOneTest/ for aquarius and anyone else that's interested, feel free to read through and give me a gentle bollocking for anything I've misunderstood / done wrong [13:53] \o. [13:53] ThomS, that's awesome [13:54] beuno: thanks! [13:55] ThomS, karni is working on splitting out an android library to do the same [14:12] nice one, ThomS [14:20] alecu: ping [14:21] nessita, pong [14:22] alecu: when you coded is_qt4reactor_installed, were you meaning to check only for a qt app instance? or you mean to check for also the reactor? [14:22] nessita, alecu, mandel, dobey, briancurtin: I am going to take my kid to the doctor. He's with fever and looks dehydrated, and it's hot, so it's dangerous. I am not going to be here for the team call, so let's reschedule that for tomorrow, and have a standup today? [14:22] gatox: ^ [14:22] hello all [14:23] ralsina, ohhh ok..... hope he get better [14:23] nessita, yes, I forgot about a qt-only app [14:23] ralsina: but is Wed today... the team meeting is tomorrow, no? [14:23] ralsina: hope he gets better [14:23] Oh, thought it was thursday! [14:23] ralsina: did you happen to catch the message I left for you ate yesterday? [14:23] Ok,sono need to reschedule the call ;-) [14:23] ralsina: right. Good look with your kid. [14:23] ralsina, hope tato gets better! [14:24] nessita, luck, right? [14:24] aquarius: oh, wanted to say i enjoyed the email you sent about CES. Very interesting/ informative [14:24] ralsina: uh, today is wednesday. :) [14:24] alecu, nessita: thanks, it's just something he ate, probably, but ...better safe than sorry [14:24] dobey: you are right and late ;-) [14:24] ralsina: anyway, lots of water [14:24] alecu: yes! also I hope the doctor has a good look (?) [14:25] duanedesign: got it, but I seem not to have RT access! [14:25] ralsina: i thought that might happen :/ [14:25] ralsina: we do have 1-1- now, but we can reschedule that for later today [14:26] ralsina: let me see if i can email it you if that is ok [14:27] nessita, so: probably I'll need to change that "qt" detection code in a nearish branch [14:27] alecu: ack re: qt4, I will add another one, and hopefully we can remove the reactor one when we nuke it :-) [14:27] nessita, since that bit will work inside trial, but will not work with just the qt mainloop. [14:28] nessita, right. [14:28] duanedesign: sure, email me [14:28] nessita: yes, I'll ping you about the 1-1 when I come back [14:28] In the meantime, this needs a review or two: https://code.launchpad.net/~ralsina/ubuntuone-control-panel/fix_917322/+merge/89041 [14:28] very simple branch that one [14:28] alecu: I already have it coded, let me know if you agree to it: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/808621/ [14:29] alecu: ignore the indentation error in line 45 [14:29] ralsina: I'll add a comment to do the same in the linux script, yes? [14:30] unless that's already the case [14:30] nessita: the qss loading? It's correct in linux already [14:30] awesome then [14:31] ralsina: then we should not have that code in each windows/linux file, no? [14:31] nessita, I'm not keen on importing the qt libs when we are running inside gtk... surely some of the qt stuff will remain in memory all the time while the gtk app runs [14:31] nessita: couldn't find a clean way to move it out (but didn't look very hard) [14:31] ralsina: I'll add a comment [14:31] nessita, so I think we should think about this a bit more, and perhaps have different main scripts that import one or the other. [14:31] nessita: plus: we will surely have different qss files on linux soonish [14:32] nessita, if we end up using that function only during tests then I'm ok with it. [14:32] ralsina: then we should make the name of the qss a constant in each windows/linux file, but the load a unique code [14:32] nessita: makes sense [14:32] alecu: it will not be only for tests... it will be run IRL, to decide, for example, how to spawn a process [14:33] gatox, mandel: either of you feel up to making a bundle for elopio to test? [14:33] alecu: but we need to resolve the following: at any point during program execution, be able to know which mainloop are we running [14:33] nessita, then we should definitely think of another way. [14:33] ralsina, let me finish with the u1-cp branch for unicode and i'll try [14:33] gatox: cool [14:33] is that ok? [14:33] ok [14:33] :P [14:34] nessita, gatox, we have two reports saying that bug #890990 is still present in 2.0.3. [14:34] alecu: I'm still not quite sure I understand the problem with that function [14:34] Launchpad bug 890990 in ubuntuone-client "Error: UnicodeDecodeError ascii (affects: 20) (dups: 11) (heat: 121)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/890990 [14:34] ralsina: is 2.0.3 our 2.99.1? [14:35] nessita: roughly [14:35] is that fix released, but not yet on the windows installer? [14:35] ralsina: any reason not to name it with the same release number we do on linux? [14:35] nessita: we will do that now [14:35] ralsina: awesome [14:35] elopio: yes, that was not in 2.0.3 [14:35] nessita, the problem: if the user has the qt lib installed, but is running the gtk control panel, then the qt libraries will remain imported in memory for the execution of the app. [14:36] ralsina: ok, I'll answer that. [14:36] elopio, i think that needs the branch for u1-cp that i'm working right now [14:36] it says u1-client.... any log? [14:37] alecu: I see... I don't think there will be any issue, but I'll think an alternative [14:37] and.... taxi is here. See you all in a while [14:37] gatox: cool. [14:48] nessita, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_factory_pattern [14:48] nessita, (you may need to disable js today to reach wikipedia, or hit esc just before it blacks out) [14:49] alecu: but to decide which factory we use we need to do a "check", and that's the issue [14:50] nessita, we already do that at the initialization of the script [14:50] alecu: which script? [14:50] nessita, the main script. ubuntu-sso-login, right? [14:50] alecu: but we do that based on sys.plaltform [14:51] alecu: this should be based on main loops, since we may be using the qt4 main loop in linux [14:51] nessita, great. Then at that point we will create a "global" instance of the factory. [14:51] yuck! [14:51] no global instances, please! [14:51] nessita, global in this case is good [14:52] alecu: I'm not sure about that... [14:52] alecu: what if I pop the qt library from sys.modules after detecting a False result? [14:52] nessita, we have a global reactor already! [14:53] alecu: and that causes tremendous amount of troubles! :-) [14:53] nessita, I'm not sure if that it will "unload" the pyqt and qt libraries. [14:53] ralsina, I can try if you need me to :) [14:53] alecu: anyways, we will not have a global reactor anymore, just a global mainloop [14:53] what are you two arguing about? [14:54] nessita, right. we'll have a global mainloop. And that's fine too. [14:54] dobey: how to detect at runtime which mainloop we're running [14:54] why does it matter? [14:54] alecu: is fine because we have no other option. So, since we already have a global mainloop, let's try to reuse that and not add another global thingy of our own... you think is possible? [14:54] dobey: yes :-) [14:54] ubuntu-sso-login can run either one? [14:55] yes what? [14:55] nessita, in any case, a global instance of a factory is *much better" than a thousand "if platform" scattered all around. [14:55] alecu: leaving that discussion aside, since we're not solving if platform thingies right now [14:56] nessita, no: that is a central part of this discussion. [14:56] alecu: would you please explain that? [14:56] dobey: it seems like the u1lint.bat and u1trial.bat didn't actually get added in that 2.99.2 you gave me. setup chokes on finding them, they're not in bin\ [14:56] briancurtin: ah crap [14:56] nessita, the method "is_qt_reactor_installed" can only be called by a piece of coding doing an "if" [14:57] briancurtin, dobey , those where correctly added in the setup.py, I'm 100% sure of that [14:57] nessita, and that's ugly and non-oop [14:57] *coding -> code. [14:57] briancurtin, dobey ralsina and gatox did IRL for that [14:57] alecu: why? I don't see that [14:57] mandel: setup.py yes, but not the MANIFEST [14:57] dobey, ah puta! Do I have to add them to the MANIFEST too? Dorry I had no idea [14:58] dobey, was that what you were talking about last night? [14:58] MANIFEST.in [14:58] dobey: MANIFEST will be automatically built by distutils-extra, if you do not supply one [14:58] no, last night we were talking about the (C) date [14:58] dobey, the (c) date? [14:58] nessita, grep for the usage of is_qt4reactor_installed [14:58] ralsina: sent the email. i hope it somes out ok. RT has no way of easily fwd tickets with attachments. I recreated it in gmail. Sorry all the screenshots are at the bottom and not inline. I put labels where the relevant screenshot should be [14:58] mandel: the year is no longer 2011 [14:58] mandel: don't worry about it [14:59] dobey, ah, ok [14:59] nessita: it's not using distutils-extra [14:59] dobey, I sometime can be very thick.. [14:59] alecu: ah, I see what you mean, I understood you said "is_qt_reactor_installed" can only be called from "inside" an if [15:00] nessita, right, I meant as the condition of the if. [15:00] me [15:00] alecu: but it makes sense, is_qt4reactor_installed() returns a bool ergo it will be used, usually, as a conditional [15:00] me [15:00] me [15:00] alecu, nessita: i have no idea what you're dooing exactly, but it sounds crazy [15:00] me [15:01] dobey: we're crazy! :-) [15:01] nessita, so we ideally want to get rid of those conditionals, and have them replaced by inheritance [15:01] alecu: let's mumble after the standup? I have no idea where are you going :-) [15:01] nessita, cool [15:01] me [15:02] dobey, standup? [15:02] mandel, go! [15:02] DONE: Workded on bug 916029 Done several reviews for gatox, alecu and nessita. Late yesterday, mumble with alecu and lisette regarding the dialog requirements. Broke two teeth druing rugby training :P [15:02] TODO: More on bug 916029. re0review alecus branch, run tests to give a +1 to gatox. Add some bugs regarding the run-test.bat of all projects to fix python path for lint and skip lint on jenkins. [15:02] BLOCKED: no [15:02] alecu, please [15:02] Launchpad bug 916029 in ubuntu-sso-client "Proxy authentication dialog (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/916029 [15:02] i'm trying to be last [15:02] DONE: branch with timesync, POST, response.headers & other fixes for proxywebclient; needs reviews: https://code.launchpad.net/~alecu/ubuntu-sso-client/and-post/+merge/88949 [15:02] TODO: reviews, finish use-restclient branch [15:02] BLOCKED: no [15:02] NEXT: nessita [15:02] me [15:03] DONE: reviews, release day, finished fix for bug #917373 and proposed for review (is landed now!) [15:03] TODO: more reviews, 1-1 with ralsina, make sso be able to run a process whitin a specific mainloop [15:03] BLOCKED: nopes [15:03] NEXT: gatox [15:03] Launchpad bug 917373 in ubuntu-sso-client "Make UI's be a separated process (affects: 1) (heat: 490)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/917373 [15:03] DONE: [15:03] Propose branch to stop creating folders on user home during tests. Fixed some branches. Almost complete branch for u1-cp unicode problems. Created report about win problems for nessita. [15:03] TODO: [15:03] Finish u1-cp branch, minor refactor u1-client branch, keep fixing bugs. [15:03] BLOCKED: [15:03]