SpamapS | ahammond: indeed.. tweaks here and there just make them simpler | 00:11 |
---|---|---|
SpamapS | expect exit should also eliminate some unsightly post-start's | 00:12 |
bradleyayers | i'm using ubuntu 10.04 lts, but i want to use upstart 1.4, is this possible? | 02:25 |
SpamapS | bradleyayers: in theory it would work fine | 03:21 |
bradleyayers | i'm cherry picking the dependencies from 11.10 | 03:22 |
SpamapS | bradleyayers: the package might not work without some mods, but the upstream bits would probably be fine. | 03:22 |
bradleyayers | Plesk is installed on the server, so i'm concerned it might break that, since it does all sorts of stupid shit | 03:22 |
SpamapS | hah yeah .. plesk + anything different == immolation of your entire business | 03:23 |
bradleyayers | it's horrible D: | 03:23 |
bradleyayers | uhh how do i get dpkg to install two things that depend on each other: http://dpaste.com/690059/ :( | 03:25 |
bradleyayers | oops, i should really ask in ubuntu | 03:27 |
brodock | can someone please take a look at this question: http://serverfault.com/questions/337198/upstart-output-pre-start-script-content/351124 ? Is there a better way to do it? | 07:34 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
=== sadmac is now known as sadmac_food | ||
=== sadmac_food is now known as sadmac | ||
SpamapS | jodh: Hey, I'm working on an upstart cookbook fix and I noticed this language ... | 17:32 |
SpamapS | The advantage of using `start-stop-daemon(8)`_ is that is simply changes the | 17:32 |
SpamapS | user and group the command is run as. However, there is a problem with | 17:32 |
SpamapS | using ``start-stop-daemon`` in that Upstart cannot track the PID for jobs | 17:32 |
SpamapS | which use it | 17:32 |
SpamapS | I don't see why that would be the case | 17:32 |
SpamapS | running that way drops user privs, then execs the requested command.. so upstart should be able to handle it just fine | 17:33 |
tmike | Hello. I'm trying to build upstart for an LFS environment and having some issues with failing the tests. | 20:43 |
SpamapS | tmike: pastebin your failure maybe? | 20:54 |
tmike | http://pastebin.com/rZmbnhDa | 20:54 |
tmike | Sorry got distracted setting up pastebincl on the vm | 20:54 |
tmike | test_job_process sees the wrong output for the /this/command/does/not/exist bits | 20:56 |
tmike | that's the first error | 20:56 |
tmike | That 'wrong content' part, with the test_job_process is not the first error of that variety. I went and changed the test to look for "No such file or directory" and then started to wonder if there's a reason it wants 1: /this/blah: not found instead of the "No such" | 20:58 |
tmike | Actually, if I don't run the tests as superuser, those are the only errors I get. | 20:59 |
tmike | Should I just ignore the failures, or is there a reason to expect the "not found" errors vs the "No such" errors | 21:09 |
tmike | ? | 21:09 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!