[02:21] <nOStahl> hi guys
[02:21] <nOStahl> been few days
[02:21] <nOStahl> any of you running on an hp touchpad?
[02:26] <twb> What is your real question?
[02:28] <nOStahl> that was it.
[09:25] <tapemachine> hiiii
[10:00] <janimo> rbasak, I got openmpi from experimental building.
[10:05] <rbasak> janimo, awesome, thank you!
[10:05] <janimo> rbasak, sending you the debdiff
[10:05] <janimo> it needs more thought on the packaging side
[10:07] <janimo> rbasak, sent.
[10:07]  * rbasak looks
[10:21] <rbasak> janimo, if you're still there: looks good, thanks for getting to the bottom of it! Debian experimental is FTBFS as well, how do you feel about sending this to debbugs?
[10:21] <rbasak> janimo: then maybe we could keep the delta small?
[12:25] <sebjan> ppisati: I uploaded a fix for Bug #917264
[12:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 917264 in linux-ti-omap4 "HDMI resolutions are not detected on Pandaboard A4 (Omap 4430 ES2.3 silicon)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/917264
[12:26] <sebjan> It applies exclusively to Oneiric, but I am not sure how to specify that on the bug report?
[12:28] <ppisati> sebjan: you nominate it just for the Oneiric series
[12:28] <ppisati> sebjan: i'll do that
[12:30] <sebjan> ppisati: I just can't find the option for that :) where is it?
[12:31] <ppisati> sebjan: i did it for you, but the next time just press the "Nominate for series" link
[12:31] <ppisati> and from there choose to which series this bug apply
[12:37] <ppisati> sebjan: btw, you marked it as "fix ommitted", where did you send/apply it?
[12:38] <sebjan> ppisati: I can't find this option on the bug page...
[12:38] <ppisati> sebjan: i mean, is it for the ubuntu oneiric/ti-omap4 branch? and if yes, do you plan to send it to the kernel mailing? or do you want me to apply it?
[12:38] <ppisati> sebjan: wait
[12:38] <sebjan> ppisati: I attached the patch to the bug description, is this enough for fix commited?
[12:39] <sebjan> (and it was tested on top of 1206.15 on a Panda A4 board)
[12:40] <sebjan> ppisati: it is for ti-omap4 branch only and yes, it's for applying it to this branch only
[12:42] <ppisati> sebjan: http://people.canonical.com/~ppisati/sebjan-promote.png
[12:43] <sebjan> ppisati: I don't have this link :'(. I must be missing some privileges?
[12:43] <ppisati> sebjan: ah, good question...
[12:55] <rsalveti> sebjan: do you know if this patch is also applied at the linaro tilt tree?
[12:56] <rsalveti> I wonder if we should also ask agreen to apply it at his 3.1 branch
[12:56] <sebjan> rsalveti: it is not, I just recently pushed it to my tree. And yes, it shall go to Andy's tree. I'll email him right now (I have some other updates for him)
[12:57] <rsalveti> sebjan: great, can you also add me at cc? I want to make sure these fixes are included at our 12.01 release that will be out next week
[12:57] <sebjan> rsalveti: sure!
[12:57] <rsalveti> sebjan: thanks!
[12:58] <rsalveti> ndec: are we having the call today?
[12:58]  * ogra_ thinks we do
[12:58] <ndec> yes
[12:59]  * ndec wonders if i forgot to setup the conference call number...
[12:59] <rsalveti> great, joining
[12:59] <ogra_> there was a new passcode in my mail
[12:59] <ndec> looks like it's working.
[13:00] <ppisati> can't find the new passcode, can anyone post it to in pvt? thanks
[13:02] <ogra_> ppisati, posted in the other channel
[16:27] <tapemachine> yo
[21:07] <eFfeM> what is the best way to get sources for a particular program on ubuntu-arm (in my case ifdown)
[21:08] <eFfeM> I get an error message with ifdown on this line in /etc/network/intefaces (server 11.10 on omap4, same line works on  server 11.10 x86):
[21:08] <eFfeM> iface default via 192.168.123.1 dev eth0  proto static
[21:08] <eFfeM> too many parameters
[21:11] <infinity> eFfeM: Err, that works on x86?  Really?
[21:11] <eFfeM> yes
[21:12] <infinity> eFfeM: But "default via 192.168.123.1 dev eth0  proto static" is iproute output.
[21:12] <infinity> Like, what you'd see from "ip ro show | grep default"
[21:12] <infinity> It looks nothing like an interfaces(5) stanza.
[21:12] <eFfeM> infinity: you are right, tried ifdown on the x86 box and it is indeed not recognized
[21:13] <eFfeM> trying to migrate some sw from x86 to omap and ran into this
[21:13] <infinity> I assure you that ifupdown on arm and x86 are identical. :)
[21:13] <infinity> So, yes, as you've noted, that's an illegal stanza for both.
[21:14] <eFfeM> infinity: they are not really identical:
[21:14] <infinity> The sources are.
[21:14] <eFfeM> x86: /sbin/ifdown: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
[21:14] <eFfeM> arm: /sbin/ifdown: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped
[21:14] <infinity> But sure, anything compiled can be different if the toolchain breaks it. :P
[21:15] <eFfeM> 2.6.15 vs 1.6.16 might be different src
[21:15] <infinity> No...
[21:15] <eFfeM> but guess I need to work on the interfaces file
[21:15] <infinity> Just different toolchains.
[21:15] <infinity> dpkg -l ifupdown
[21:15] <infinity> You should have the same version on both.
[21:16] <infinity> jcrigby: I haven't had a chance to play with your mx5 kernels yet.  Have you booted either of them yourself?
[21:16] <eFfeM> infinity: yeup, boht are 0.7-alpha5
[21:44] <eFfeM> infinity: the bug was indeed in the code I was trying to port. fixed it. Thanks for your info as that pushed me into the right direction!
[22:09] <kkerwin> Hi, does anyone know of a howto in installing ubuntu arm on a Pogopug (Sheevaplug/Dockstar NAS device) via usb?
[22:12] <GrueMaster> kkerwin: Is the device armv7?  I don't think they are.
[22:15] <eFfeM> kkerwin: these are armv5 devices I think the latest ubuntu version supported is 9.04 or so
[22:15] <kkerwin> Ok.
[22:15] <eFfeM> so either use the latest version of ubuntu that supports armv5 or use debian as that is still supports armv5
[22:16] <kkerwin> Do I have to build packages on a separate computer, or are their pre-built packages for most things (file servers, etc).
[22:16] <k1l> kkerwin: which device exactly?
[22:16] <kkerwin> PogoplugV2
[22:16] <kkerwin> s/their/there/
[22:16] <eFfeM> dropbear on arm gives me: /scripts/init-premount/dropbear: line 32: ipconfig: not found
[22:17] <eFfeM> grep tells this lives in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions
[22:17] <eFfeM> functions:			ipconfig -t ${ROUNDTTT} "${DEVICE}"
[22:17] <eFfeM> how do I get to ipconfig in a linux shell script ???
[22:19] <k1l> kkerwin: https://wiki.xkyle.com/PogoplugV2
[22:19] <nevdull> `ifconfig -a` ?
[22:19] <kkerwin> k1l: Oh thank you. Google hasn't been very helpful. Thanks so much.
[22:19] <kkerwin> I'll brb.
[22:23] <eFfeM> nevdull: ipconfig is in this script, not in my code
[22:27] <GrueMaster> kkerwin: The PogoplugV2 is ARMv5te.  We only support armv7.  Sorry.
[22:35] <kkerwin> GrueMaster: No worries. Would you recommend that I use Debian for the long run, or is ARMv5 support improving?
[22:36] <eFfeM> kkerwin: ubuntu decided to stop supporting v5
[22:37] <GrueMaster> Armv5 support is not on the the table for Ubuntu.  We simply do not have the manpower/resources to maintain & validate it.  It is a very hard strain right now supporting armel & armhf (both ar armv7).  Armel is slated to die after 12.04, if we can ensure armhf stability (we're very close).
[22:37] <eFfeM> GrueMaster: thanks, didn't know that (didn;t try armhf yet)
[22:37] <GrueMaster> Supporting armv5 would be like supporting x86 486 code.
[22:37] <eFfeM> true :-)
[22:37] <kkerwin> GrueMaster: Do you happen to know what Debian's outlook is on armv5?
[22:37] <kkerwin> Longterm?
[22:38] <GrueMaster> I'm personally not a debian person, but I understand they plan on supporting armv5 & armhf (armv7 only).
[22:38] <GrueMaster> I could be wrong though.
[22:39] <kkerwin> GrueMaster: Thank you. I'll see if I can find a simiar debian channel to this and ask there.
[22:39] <GrueMaster> (on the debian part, not on ubuntu).
[22:40] <k1l> wheezy is running ootb on my dockstar. and the page i posted looks like its easily running on your device. i am quite sure that is very well documented over the web
[22:41] <kkerwin> k1l: Thank you. What services are you running on the dockstar, if you don't mind me asking?