[02:21] hi guys [02:21] been few days [02:21] any of you running on an hp touchpad? [02:26] What is your real question? [02:28] that was it. [09:25] hiiii [10:00] rbasak, I got openmpi from experimental building. [10:05] janimo, awesome, thank you! [10:05] rbasak, sending you the debdiff [10:05] it needs more thought on the packaging side [10:07] rbasak, sent. [10:07] * rbasak looks [10:21] janimo, if you're still there: looks good, thanks for getting to the bottom of it! Debian experimental is FTBFS as well, how do you feel about sending this to debbugs? [10:21] janimo: then maybe we could keep the delta small? === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson === doko_ is now known as doko [12:25] ppisati: I uploaded a fix for Bug #917264 [12:25] Launchpad bug 917264 in linux-ti-omap4 "HDMI resolutions are not detected on Pandaboard A4 (Omap 4430 ES2.3 silicon)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/917264 [12:26] It applies exclusively to Oneiric, but I am not sure how to specify that on the bug report? [12:28] sebjan: you nominate it just for the Oneiric series [12:28] sebjan: i'll do that [12:30] ppisati: I just can't find the option for that :) where is it? [12:31] sebjan: i did it for you, but the next time just press the "Nominate for series" link [12:31] and from there choose to which series this bug apply [12:37] sebjan: btw, you marked it as "fix ommitted", where did you send/apply it? [12:38] ppisati: I can't find this option on the bug page... [12:38] sebjan: i mean, is it for the ubuntu oneiric/ti-omap4 branch? and if yes, do you plan to send it to the kernel mailing? or do you want me to apply it? [12:38] sebjan: wait [12:38] ppisati: I attached the patch to the bug description, is this enough for fix commited? [12:39] (and it was tested on top of 1206.15 on a Panda A4 board) [12:40] ppisati: it is for ti-omap4 branch only and yes, it's for applying it to this branch only [12:42] sebjan: http://people.canonical.com/~ppisati/sebjan-promote.png [12:43] ppisati: I don't have this link :'(. I must be missing some privileges? [12:43] sebjan: ah, good question... [12:55] sebjan: do you know if this patch is also applied at the linaro tilt tree? [12:56] I wonder if we should also ask agreen to apply it at his 3.1 branch [12:56] rsalveti: it is not, I just recently pushed it to my tree. And yes, it shall go to Andy's tree. I'll email him right now (I have some other updates for him) [12:57] sebjan: great, can you also add me at cc? I want to make sure these fixes are included at our 12.01 release that will be out next week [12:57] rsalveti: sure! [12:57] sebjan: thanks! [12:58] ndec: are we having the call today? [12:58] * ogra_ thinks we do [12:58] yes [12:59] * ndec wonders if i forgot to setup the conference call number... [12:59] great, joining [12:59] there was a new passcode in my mail [12:59] looks like it's working. [13:00] can't find the new passcode, can anyone post it to in pvt? thanks [13:02] ppisati, posted in the other channel === jkridner__ is now known as jkridner === plars is now known as plars-away === sebjan is now known as 64MAAJJ6J === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [16:27] yo === doko_ is now known as doko === utlemming_afk is now known as utlemming [21:07] what is the best way to get sources for a particular program on ubuntu-arm (in my case ifdown) [21:08] I get an error message with ifdown on this line in /etc/network/intefaces (server 11.10 on omap4, same line works on server 11.10 x86): [21:08] iface default via 192.168.123.1 dev eth0 proto static [21:08] too many parameters [21:11] eFfeM: Err, that works on x86? Really? [21:11] yes [21:12] eFfeM: But "default via 192.168.123.1 dev eth0 proto static" is iproute output. [21:12] Like, what you'd see from "ip ro show | grep default" [21:12] It looks nothing like an interfaces(5) stanza. [21:12] infinity: you are right, tried ifdown on the x86 box and it is indeed not recognized [21:13] trying to migrate some sw from x86 to omap and ran into this [21:13] I assure you that ifupdown on arm and x86 are identical. :) [21:13] So, yes, as you've noted, that's an illegal stanza for both. [21:14] infinity: they are not really identical: [21:14] The sources are. [21:14] x86: /sbin/ifdown: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped [21:14] arm: /sbin/ifdown: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped [21:14] But sure, anything compiled can be different if the toolchain breaks it. :P [21:15] 2.6.15 vs 1.6.16 might be different src [21:15] No... [21:15] but guess I need to work on the interfaces file [21:15] Just different toolchains. [21:15] dpkg -l ifupdown [21:15] You should have the same version on both. [21:16] jcrigby: I haven't had a chance to play with your mx5 kernels yet. Have you booted either of them yourself? [21:16] infinity: yeup, boht are 0.7-alpha5 [21:44] infinity: the bug was indeed in the code I was trying to port. fixed it. Thanks for your info as that pushed me into the right direction! [22:09] Hi, does anyone know of a howto in installing ubuntu arm on a Pogopug (Sheevaplug/Dockstar NAS device) via usb? [22:12] kkerwin: Is the device armv7? I don't think they are. [22:15] kkerwin: these are armv5 devices I think the latest ubuntu version supported is 9.04 or so [22:15] Ok. [22:15] so either use the latest version of ubuntu that supports armv5 or use debian as that is still supports armv5 [22:16] Do I have to build packages on a separate computer, or are their pre-built packages for most things (file servers, etc). [22:16] kkerwin: which device exactly? [22:16] PogoplugV2 [22:16] s/their/there/ [22:16] dropbear on arm gives me: /scripts/init-premount/dropbear: line 32: ipconfig: not found [22:17] grep tells this lives in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions [22:17] functions: ipconfig -t ${ROUNDTTT} "${DEVICE}" [22:17] how do I get to ipconfig in a linux shell script ??? [22:19] kkerwin: https://wiki.xkyle.com/PogoplugV2 [22:19] `ifconfig -a` ? [22:19] k1l: Oh thank you. Google hasn't been very helpful. Thanks so much. [22:19] I'll brb. [22:23] nevdull: ipconfig is in this script, not in my code [22:27] kkerwin: The PogoplugV2 is ARMv5te. We only support armv7. Sorry. [22:35] GrueMaster: No worries. Would you recommend that I use Debian for the long run, or is ARMv5 support improving? [22:36] kkerwin: ubuntu decided to stop supporting v5 [22:37] Armv5 support is not on the the table for Ubuntu. We simply do not have the manpower/resources to maintain & validate it. It is a very hard strain right now supporting armel & armhf (both ar armv7). Armel is slated to die after 12.04, if we can ensure armhf stability (we're very close). [22:37] GrueMaster: thanks, didn't know that (didn;t try armhf yet) [22:37] Supporting armv5 would be like supporting x86 486 code. [22:37] true :-) [22:37] GrueMaster: Do you happen to know what Debian's outlook is on armv5? [22:37] Longterm? [22:38] I'm personally not a debian person, but I understand they plan on supporting armv5 & armhf (armv7 only). [22:38] I could be wrong though. [22:39] GrueMaster: Thank you. I'll see if I can find a simiar debian channel to this and ask there. [22:39] (on the debian part, not on ubuntu). [22:40] wheezy is running ootb on my dockstar. and the page i posted looks like its easily running on your device. i am quite sure that is very well documented over the web [22:41] k1l: Thank you. What services are you running on the dockstar, if you don't mind me asking?