[00:44] <chromaticwt> will the next stable release of ubuntu use python3 by default?
[00:44] <cjwatson> chromaticwt: no; we're working on ramping up the set of libraries provided, but we won't be far enough along to use 3 by default
[00:45] <cjwatson> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-p-python-versions
[00:45] <cjwatson> We hope to get to the point where at least one major desktop application is using Python 3
[00:45] <cjwatson> (for 12.04)
[00:47] <chromaticwt> so the plan is to be python3 only by 14.04LTS
[00:48] <cjwatson> ... we hope, yes
[00:48] <cjwatson> breaking the back of the major sets of libraries we use all the time this cycle should help
[04:23] <ScottK> chromaticwt: It also depends on what you mean by "by default".  If you mean /usr/bin/python being a symlink to some python3 version, I'd guess that's a decade away.
[05:01] <broder> ScottK: i desperately hope that we are never so insane as to make /usr/bin/python a py3 interpreter
[05:01] <ScottK> broder: Never is a very long time.
[05:02] <ScottK> Certainly not anytime soon.  A decade would be fast.
[06:13] <Laibsch> stgraber: we've had a few bug fixes and translation updates to pastebinit since the last release.  I think it would be good to release them to Debian in time for precise.  If you don't object, I'd like to create new upstream tarball soonish.
[06:13] <Laibsch> There's also a couple of branches proposed for merging.  I'll leave that for you, though, I'd rather not touch bzr with a ten-foot pole unless I really have to ;-)
[10:23] <nava> is canonical writing a SDK ? (for tablets , smartphones ,tv and also desktop)
[10:51] <l3on> pitti, just a ping to say I uploaded the new patch for bug 843734 (it's about ruby-sinatra, we discussed yesterday ... the versions question...)
[12:31] <apw> infinity, seems reasonable