[04:51] <Tuckborough> hi
[04:52] <Tuckborough> wich version of lubuntu do you recommend?11.10?
[04:54] <Unit193> As long as your hardware doesn't require older
[04:55] <Tuckborough> i  have core duo, but supports 64 bits
[04:55] <Tuckborough> i runs fine arch with penbox
[04:55] <Tuckborough> it*
[04:55] <Tuckborough> openbox*
[04:56] <Unit193> Like the typo ;)
[04:56] <Tuckborough> :)
[04:58] <Tuckborough> archlinux is sooo boring
[04:58] <Tuckborough> i was wondering, wich kind of dev has so much time to spend with conf files?
[04:59] <Unit193> There are few devs for Lubuntu, but I don't think Ubuntu has a greatly limited amount
[05:00] <Tuckborough> sure, i just came here cauze i like openbox, why not have it by default?make life easier is not a bad thing
[05:01] <Unit193> LXDE is basically default, but it uses Openbox
[05:01] <Tuckborough> yes.that is nice
[05:02] <Unit193> I don't see how Lubuntu would be "Fun" compared to Arch (unless you just don't want to poke at things)
[05:02] <Tuckborough> hhow do you see the "oneric" in apoint of view of ubuntu, not talking about the desktop ,xorg etc.would you rate it "stable" overall?
[05:02] <Tuckborough> "fun"...what do you mean by it?
[05:03] <Tuckborough> i don't consider arch much fun, to be honest.everything is an issue.don't have the time for that
[05:03] <Unit193> Well, normally an LTS is more "stable", and I was just going off your.... Ah
[05:06] <Tuckborough> alright then, so oneric will be
[05:06]  * Tuckborough is downloading
[05:06] <Unit193> I'm on it now anyway
[05:07] <Tuckborough> thanks
[05:07] <Tuckborough> cya
[12:45] <ryannathans> Is anyone able to help with/confirm this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/919885   I'd really appreciated just a confirmation it's a bug
[13:58] <atomarche> hello / hallo!
[13:59] <MrChrisDruif> Aloha atomarche
[14:00] <Timo_> hi lads
[17:44] <smile> hoi MrChrisDruif :)
[18:20] <recalcat1> good morning
[18:22] <recalcat1> I have installed lubuntu from the 11.10 desktop. I arrived to "installation complete", no errors, after instead some errors appear (flash) . I answered yes in order to report the bug, the text browser opened, I logged in in launchpad, but now I don't know what to do
[18:22] <recalcat1> the previoud 11.10 were broken and ran only in console mode
[18:23] <recalcat1> previous
[18:23] <recalcat1> any help
[18:23] <recalcat1> ?
[18:23] <holstein> recalcat1: i need more information
[18:23] <holstein> consider that its something with maybe your graphics card and linux support
[18:23] <recalcat1> maybe some info is already on launchpad (see lamiaposta71@gmail.com)
[18:24] <holstein> recalcat1: im confused with some of the terminoligy here... "no errors, after some errors"
[18:25] <holstein> i just need a little clarification, and feel free to link to a bug report
[18:28] <recalcat1> sorry, the actual pc is a little far. I could try irssi from the lubunut itself. anyway: where can I find the installation logs?
[18:29] <recalcat1> now I logged in with another console ALT+F2 on lubuntu pc and appear the message "restart needed"
[18:31] <recalcat1> but the point was the installing with do-release-update -d from a broken only textual 11.10 I had many errors on pixbuf (not found ...) . then it arrives to nvidia_173 installation
[18:31] <recalcat1> then with flash it has pb and asked me to send reports.
[18:32] <recalcat1> so I answered yes, it opened the textual browser and I didnd't know what to do with it
[18:33] <recalcat1> about Terminology "no errors, after some errors": reading the installation coming somewhere was written installation finished and no errors reported, but, after it, it tries to install flash and ...
[18:37] <recalcat1> holstein: if you want I send you to pastebin the log, tell me the file
[18:45] <recalcat1> so, what's going on? I save the /var/log on another pc and after I restart the lubuntu pc
[18:53] <recalcat1> guessing no insterest on this topic, I'll try to post on launchpad describing the situation, bye
[19:00] <recalcat1> holstein: here the logs http://paste.ubuntu.com/813453/
[21:13] <rich3> is there a Lubuntu-devel mailing list, or does everyone just use  lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com?
[21:14] <holstein> rich3: mibht be on the way... try asking in #lubuntu-offtopic
[21:14] <Unit193> We just use that
[21:14] <Unit193> There was talk in a meeting, but for now anyway
[21:15] <holstein> Unit193: and OT is the 'dev' channel kind of?
[21:15] <holstein> that infrastructure is forthcoming
[21:15] <Unit193> holstein: Yep, but not all devs hang out there (or do full time) as they aren't on IRC full time
[21:17] <rich3> so devs use both lists?  I was looking for the lubuntu-devel list and can't find it
[21:18] <AmberJ> rich3, I guess they^ mean that there's "no" lubuntu-devel-list
[21:18] <rich3> k thanks amberj
[21:19] <AmberJ> Though you 'also' might find #lubuntu-offtopic interesting as some devs lurk in there...
[21:19] <AmberJ> rich3, that^
[21:19] <rich3> i'm trying to join the lubuntu dev group on launchpad
[21:19] <rich3> anyhow you answered my question thanks
[21:20] <Unit193> The dev group is for the devs
[21:22] <rich3> i want to help with development.  although i'm used to smaller teams, I hope learning the process won't be too hard.
[21:23] <MrChrisDruif> rich3; come join #lubuntu-offtopic I'd say
[21:23] <rich3> k