| === elmo_ is now known as Guest53104 | ||
| _mup_ | Bug #920312 was filed: open-tunnel leaves juju unable to connect to an environment if local IP changes <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/920312 > | 07:09 |
|---|---|---|
| SpamapS | heh.. juju status | ccze -A | 07:49 |
| SpamapS | looks quite nice actually | 07:49 |
| * SpamapS opens a feature request to have ccze colorize ec2 instance ids. | 07:49 | |
| SpamapS | oh hah.. 2007 was the last release | 07:50 |
| shaon | hey SpamapS | 08:01 |
| shaon | SpamapS: did you guys manage to try juju on euca? | 08:02 |
| SpamapS | shaon: the trouble is the leading path recommended/required on walrus | 08:08 |
| SpamapS | shaon: should be possible to bypass with a reverse proxy that hosts walrus on / | 08:09 |
| shaon | SpamapS: hmm | 08:09 |
| SpamapS | shaon: I'd be surprised if we were the only ones running into this.. seeing as Euca themselves had to patch s3cmd/boto to work this way | 08:10 |
| shaon | SpamapS: so what do you suggest in this case? | 08:15 |
| SpamapS | shaon: try setting up a mod_proxy server with ProxyPass / http://your.walrus.server/with/its/path:9999 | 08:18 |
| SpamapS | shaon: you could even run it on the same box, but with a different port | 08:18 |
| shaon | SpamapS: okay, will inform you the update | 08:19 |
| shaon | SpamapS: thanks :) | 08:19 |
| SpamapS | shaon: no, thank you for testing. :) | 08:23 |
| niemeyer | Good morning! | 12:57 |
| mpl | hello | 13:14 |
| _mup_ | Bug #920454 was filed: juju bootstrap hangs for local environment under precise on vmware <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/920454 > | 14:04 |
| === Guest53104 is now known as elmo | ||
| niemeyer | Why is it so silent in here today? Everybody in their hacking hats? :) | 16:19 |
| jimbaker | niemeyer, i suppose so | 16:19 |
| m_3 | it's a monday after a big conference | 16:20 |
| nijaba | m_3: Hello. can you explain the client and server interface of mediawiki to an ignorant like me? | 16:40 |
| m_3 | nijaba: hey man... lemme take a look | 16:41 |
| nijaba | m_3: hey, I thought it was your charm. | 16:41 |
| nijaba | m_3: guess not | 16:41 |
| m_3 | nijaba: I've worked on it since it was written... but most of my changes are in a separate branch waiting for colocation to land | 16:42 |
| nijaba | k | 16:42 |
| m_3 | (things like monitoring and a shared image-store to use when spreading to multiple wiki instances) | 16:42 |
| nijaba | m_3: was it SpamapS originally? | 16:42 |
| m_3 | heck dunno... lemme look at the history | 16:43 |
| * nijaba looks too | 16:43 | |
| m_3 | I think kapil orig... then clint... then me | 16:43 |
| m_3 | what're you wondering about? I've worked with it a bunch | 16:43 |
| nijaba | m_3: why the db has 2 interfaces, client and server | 16:44 |
| m_3 | oh... db and slave? | 16:44 |
| m_3 | lemme refresh to make sure I'm looking at the most recent version of the charm | 16:45 |
| nijaba | m_3: thanks :) | 16:45 |
| m_3 | the wiki is set up to use a replicated mysql setup... that's prob what's going on | 16:46 |
| m_3 | nijaba: look in hooks/combine-dbservers | 16:49 |
| nijaba | m_3: k | 16:49 |
| nijaba | m_3: thanks, got it. Cheers | 16:53 |
| m_3 | I've got a working stack script for mediawiki using a replicated mysql setup... it's around here somewhere | 16:54 |
| * m_3 digging | 16:55 | |
| m_3 | it might be named ensemble tho :) | 16:55 |
| m_3 | so s/working/was-working/ :) | 16:55 |
| m_3 | nijaba: http://paste.ubuntu.com/814448/ | 16:57 |
| nijaba | m_3: neat | 16:57 |
| m_3 | looks _great_ in gource too btw | 16:58 |
| SpamapS | adam_g: btw, don't know if you noticed, but the precise PPA is finally up to date | 17:39 |
| SpamapS | I think its about time we updated the precise distro version actually | 17:39 |
| SpamapS | reminder to devs: feature freeze is Feb 16! | 17:39 |
| adam_g | SpamapS: ah, cool | 17:40 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: thanks, btw, for the twisted fix! | 17:41 |
| SpamapS | http://wtf.labix.org/447/ec2-wordpress.out.FAILED | 17:57 |
| SpamapS | how do we retry these? | 17:57 |
| SpamapS | just looks like maybe connectivity was compromised | 17:57 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, looks like the instance just took a while to startup up, and the test fell out of its retry loop (120 times) | 17:59 |
| hazmat | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~juju/juju/ftests/view/head:/tests/ec2-wordpress/run.sh | 17:59 |
| SpamapS | Yeah I know it works.. I've been using 447 for a while now its fine | 18:00 |
| SpamapS | Just wondering if we can tell wtf to try again or we have to wait for the next commit | 18:00 |
| hazmat | not sure afaik its a wait for new change, its setup as a cron trigger polling for new revs, alternatively perhaps niemeyer could run it again from the that machine | 18:02 |
| * SpamapS longs for jenkins in all its monstrous glory | 18:02 | |
| koolhead17 | :( | 18:03 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Be my guest :) | 18:03 |
| * SpamapS presses enter on his juju deploy of it into canonistack | 18:04 | |
| niemeyer | Meanwhile, wtf.labix.org is running 447 again. | 18:06 |
| SpamapS | cool ty! | 18:06 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: np | 18:07 |
| * SpamapS really just wants jenkins for the IRC bot and pretty graphs. ;) | 18:07 | |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: It's marking 447 as FAILED, but if you click on the FAILED, you'll see it redirects back because it doesn't exist | 18:08 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: By the time it ends, it should have ok/FAILED, and the output will be there again | 18:09 |
| SpamapS | sweet.. just wanted to make sure it passes before uploading that to Ubuntu | 18:09 |
| SpamapS | whoa.. bug listings just got like.. rainbowized | 18:11 |
| SpamapS | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju | 18:11 |
| niemeyer | :-) | 18:13 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: You got a green | 18:39 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: w00t | 18:40 |
| SpamapS | local build test passed too | 18:40 |
| * SpamapS uploads | 18:40 | |
| SpamapS | Build needed 00:05:27, 16640k disc space | 18:40 |
| SpamapS | I love eatmydata ... :) takes 16 minutes on the buildds | 18:40 |
| niemeyer | eatmydata? | 18:41 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Is that something that wraps a process to monitor it or something? | 18:41 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: http://www.flamingspork.com/projects/libeatmydata/ | 18:44 |
| SpamapS | libeatmydata is a small LD_PRELOAD library designed to (transparently) disable fsync (and friends, like open(O_SYNC)). This has two side-effects: making software that writes data safely to disk a lot quicker and making this software no longer crash safe. | 18:44 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Ah, neat | 18:45 |
| SpamapS | Good for iterating over tests | 18:45 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: That's awesome indeed, and the name is awesome too :) | 18:45 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: most of what Stewart does is quite awesome actually | 18:45 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: I guess that could be done with a ramfs int his case, tho | 18:45 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: I can see that being unfeasible for larger values of "data", though :) | 18:46 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: right, but eatmydata requires no privileges. | 18:46 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Good point | 18:46 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: tmpfs/ramfs will always outperform it.. but eatmydata is a nice way to opportunistically take full advantage of memory | 18:46 |
| * niemeyer mumbles something about plan9 | 18:46 | |
| SpamapS | when you don't care for durability | 18:47 |
| andrewsmedina | Has anyone had problems with openstack returns hostname that juju doest not can resolve? | 18:55 |
| niemeyer | jcastro: ping | 18:55 |
| niemeyer | andrewsmedina: Hmm.. sounds like a networking issue | 18:56 |
| niemeyer | andrewsmedina: Do you recognize the hostnames it can't resolve? | 18:56 |
| andrewsmedina | niemeyer: I think that it's a nova-network problem | 18:57 |
| niemeyer | andrewsmedina: Gotcha | 18:57 |
| SpamapS | man.. ccze even makes bzr logs more readable. :) | 19:00 |
| SpamapS | Though I'm not sure why it highlights Clint, but not Byrum.. hm | 19:01 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: yes, this is a common problem... I'm not sure of the best long-term solution | 19:11 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: start on a box that can hit the openstack endpoint using euca-tools or equiv | 19:12 |
| andrewsmedina | m_3: eucatools work's fine here, but the vm's create with juju doesn't | 19:13 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: then 'juju bootstrap' should come up | 19:13 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: then you have to euca-allocate-address and associate that with the bootstrap instance | 19:13 |
| andrewsmedina | m_3: hmm | 19:13 |
| m_3 | thereafter juju works fine | 19:13 |
| m_3 | when you need to "expose" a service, you'll have to attach another public address | 19:14 |
| andrewsmedina | I miss those things in the juju docs | 19:14 |
| m_3 | (I'm working on an openstack installation that only gives me two public IPs... so I have to swap them around sometimes) | 19:14 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: yeah, funny that :) | 19:14 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: not sure if they're in there atm | 19:15 |
| andrewsmedina | m_3: I'm working in a PaaS project that use juju as engine | 19:16 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: cool! | 19:17 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: I'd love to discuss details of your setup sometime | 19:17 |
| andrewsmedina | m_3: cool! :D | 19:18 |
| SpamapS | andrewsmedina: The docs for working with OpenStack are a bit obtuse because the docs we have are mostly focused on using the EC2 API for.. EC2. :) | 19:32 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: I know | 19:33 |
| SpamapS | we should definitely add notes for where openstack might differ | 19:33 |
| SpamapS | same for eucalyptus too really | 19:33 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: If I can help | 19:33 |
| andrewsmedina | tell me | 19:33 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: please, by all means keep track of what you're doing... even if it's rough notes it's valuable | 19:40 |
| m_3 | andrewsmedina: there're _lots_ of different ways to run an openstack or eucalyptus setup... | 19:41 |
| andrewsmedina | m_3: I now | 19:41 |
| andrewsmedina | OpenStack is very flexible | 19:42 |
| m_3 | it's a good thing fundamentally.. but it makes it pretty tough to target | 19:43 |
| andrewsmedina | we are wrote some charms too | 19:43 |
| m_3 | whoohoo! | 19:48 |
| SpamapS | One of the openstack core devs was at SCALE and wanted to work on an OSAPI provider | 19:51 |
| niemeyer | jcastro: ping | 19:58 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: he may be swapping today, since we all worked the weekend at SCALE | 20:02 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Thanks, I imagined that could be the case.. was just hoping to catch him passing by to ask about the docs stuff | 20:04 |
| SpamapS | still waiting on the IS ticket to build from lp:juju/docs ? | 20:05 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: It's more about how the splitting is going | 20:16 |
| * m_3 lunch | 20:16 | |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: I want to push the charm store spec to the server | 20:16 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: and it's not clear to me where things currently live | 20:17 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: seems like you still have to commit it to lp:juju and then merge to lp:juju/docs until the specs are generated from the right place | 20:18 |
| niemeyer | This is a bit weird.. it sounds like juju/docs not only offers no advantage, but is an additional burden only | 20:19 |
| SpamapS | I think the eventual goal is to have the possibility of another team owning it | 20:22 |
| SpamapS | so ~juju-docs can work on the documentation | 20:22 |
| SpamapS | (a hypothetical team I made up to support my hypothesis) | 20:23 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: once the docs are generated from lp:juju/docs directly, the double-maintenance wouldn't be necessary | 20:23 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Yeah, I understand the end goal, it just sounds like we've made a detour that isn't necessary for it | 20:24 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: We can just take the actual doc files, put in a new branch without the code, and maintain it there from now on | 20:25 |
| SpamapS | thats exactly what we did.. | 20:27 |
| SpamapS | but the step of generating the online displayed version has not completed | 20:27 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Ok, maybe I misunderstand then.. you seemed to indicate that docs were still being merged in lp:juju, and that this was merged onto lp:juju/docs afterwards? | 20:28 |
| SpamapS | Well they will need to be if you want them to be displayed on juju.ubuntu.com | 20:29 |
| SpamapS | (which is why they haven't been rm'd from lp:juju just yet) | 20:29 |
| * SpamapS checks on status of well known RT ticket | 20:29 | |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Understood.. we can publish our own docs elsewhere meanwhile | 20:30 |
| SpamapS | hmm.. not so well known.. I think hazmat opened a ticket but I can't seem to find reference to it | 20:33 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: whats the ticket to re-direct juju.ubuntu.com/docs to build from lp:juju/docs ? | 20:33 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, https://portal.admin.canonical.com/48456 | 20:34 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, i amended the original request for a cron job from october | 20:34 |
| hazmat | which was still open | 20:34 |
| hazmat | i'm a little confused as to the delay | 20:34 |
| SpamapS | OH | 20:35 |
| SpamapS | so it is that one | 20:35 |
| SpamapS | I thought I was mistaken | 20:35 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: since its your ticket, could you bump the vanguard to take a look? | 20:36 |
| SpamapS | its lamont.. he'll nail it | 20:36 |
| * SpamapS goes to find food | 20:36 | |
| hazmat | SpamapS, ok | 20:38 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: https://codereview.appspot.com/5570047 | 21:14 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: It's the same old formula store specification, but revised and cleaned up to reflect what we implemented and the whole renaming | 21:14 |
| hazmat | niemeyer, cool | 21:14 |
| hazmat | niemeyer, one thing that would be off interest is having a notion of multiple ppas per user | 21:16 |
| hazmat | right now we just have the single namespace/ppa per user | 21:16 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: Yeah, that's coming | 21:16 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: But that's a follow up | 21:16 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: There are several ways in which this spec/feature will have to be expanded | 21:16 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: But these only matter right now if they'd change what's there | 21:17 |
| niemeyer | (as in, being incompatible) | 21:17 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: And this adds .lbox to the repository, for better supporting lbox: https://codereview.appspot.com/5575046 | 21:19 |
| hazmat | nice | 21:20 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: So LGTM it there, and I'll lbox submit it :) | 21:22 |
| hazmat | niemeyer, i'll definitely have a look, but probably not till latter today or early tomorrow, i've got a few other reviews i'm trying to catch up on atm | 21:23 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: I meant the latter one | 21:23 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: It's a one liner | 21:23 |
| hazmat | niemeyer, LGTM ;-) | 21:23 |
| hazmat | niemeyer, the first one mostly looks the same on a casual review , so should be straightforward | 21:23 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: There, please | 21:24 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: Doesn't matter much for this case, but that's the workflow.. lbox submit picks up your presence in the discussion | 21:24 |
| hazmat | ah | 21:25 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: See the message now: https://codereview.appspot.com/5575046 | 21:27 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: Same message goes onto the commit | 21:27 |
| hazmat | niemeyer, nice, lbox rocks | 21:31 |
| hazmat | rust and go have some similiar high levels | 22:00 |
| === franciscosouza is now known as fsouza | ||
| pindonga | hi, I'm trying to use juju with openstack... I get it to start bootstrapping, but it never finishes. All I get is : Environment still initializing. Will wait. | 22:48 |
| pindonga | any ideas on how to debug this? | 22:48 |
| andrewsmedina | pindonga: Have you tried to run in verbose mode? | 23:01 |
| andrewsmedina | pindonga: juju -v bootstrap | 23:01 |
| _mup_ | juju/relation-already-exists-error r444 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 23:11 |
| _mup_ | Better error message | 23:11 |
| _mup_ | juju/relation-already-exists-error r445 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 23:12 |
| _mup_ | Merged trunk | 23:12 |
| _mup_ | juju/relation-already-exists-error r446 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 23:17 |
| _mup_ | Fix add-relation test | 23:17 |
| SpamapS | pindonga: do you see your instances starting up? | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!