| === elmo_ is now known as Guest53104 | ||
| Anon783 | hello? | 01:25 |
|---|---|---|
| Anon783 | ANybody there?/ | 01:25 |
| Anon783 | Who likes movies? | 01:25 |
| === panda is now known as Guest71075 | ||
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| ppisati | cking: did you ever use sshfs with any of our builders? | 10:52 |
| cking | ppisati, nope | 11:14 |
| * cking slips offline- really feeling rough today | 11:18 | |
| diwic | tgardner, hi there, would you mind doing me a favour and install "nano" on tangerine? Still haven't got accustomed to vi ;-) | 12:39 |
| diwic | tgardner, ah wait, it's just in the chroots there are no nanos | 12:40 |
| * diwic takes back the previous question. | 12:40 | |
| tgardner | diwic, well, I just installed nano in the normal login. does that work for you? | 12:41 |
| diwic | tgardner, it seems to work now at least, so thanks! | 12:42 |
| === Guest53104 is now known as elmo | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| tgardner | bouncing tangerine in 5 | 15:00 |
| htorque | diwic: hi! what's new in your latest jack detection kernel (i.e., should we re-test)? and: what's the default value for 'model' parameter? if i don't set it to 'auto', jack detection doesn't work on my thinkpad. | 15:25 |
| diwic | htorque, hi! thanks for testing the jack detection kernel! | 15:26 |
| htorque | diwic: thanks for providing one ;-) | 15:26 |
| diwic | htorque, in short, do you notice any regressions of any input/output when you use the model=auto approach? | 15:27 |
| diwic | htorque, in short, model=auto is the future, so we would like to move as many machines as possible over to using model=auto | 15:27 |
| diwic | htorque, there are news for realtek machines, but you were having a conexant IIRC, so for you it does not matter | 15:28 |
| htorque | diwic: no, but i don't use any fancy stuff like audio over hdmi and alike. mic works, sound from the speakers work, sound from the headphone works, PA is not acting up - i'm happy with it. :) | 15:28 |
| * diwic looks at htorque's alsa-info | 15:29 | |
| htorque | yeah, it's conexant | 15:29 |
| diwic | htorque, cool, I'll submit a patch upstream to move your machine over to model=auto. How would you like to be credited in the patch (something like Tested-by: John Doe <john@doe.com> ) | 15:31 |
| htorque | diwic: do i need to show up at all? i'd prefer not to. ;-) | 15:32 |
| diwic | htorque, that's ok as well. | 15:32 |
| htorque | great, thanks for your efforts, jack detection is a really useful feature! :-) | 15:33 |
| diwic | htorque, sent. http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2012-January/048315.html | 15:40 |
| htorque | \o/ | 15:40 |
| === bladernr_ is now known as bladernr_afk | ||
| tgardner | apw, see /var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf | 16:07 |
| apw | tgardner, ok for me it contains ipv4 DNS from my local router, and ipv6 from my tunnel | 16:08 |
| tgardner | apw, right. I guess my point is that its NM thats doing all this. | 16:09 |
| apw | tgardner, yeah it used to run /etc/resolv.conf and now does this new file ... hmmm | 16:09 |
| tgardner | apw, well, it still uses /etc/resolv.conf 'cause thats a libresolv thing, right? | 16:10 |
| apw | tgardner, i meant it used to write over /etc/resolv.conf and now it writes over this new one | 16:10 |
| tgardner | apw, it still writes the default domain info into /etc/resolv.conf (as I would expect) | 16:11 |
| apw | tgardner, ahh i don't have that in mine, but i prolly don't have one | 16:11 |
| tgardner | no matter. I think the reason for the change must be for ipv6 support (as you said earlier). | 16:12 |
| apw | yeah perhaps so | 16:12 |
| vanhoof | tgardner: any idea if there are plans for cw-3.2 in oneiric? digging around I found a bug filed against lucid | 16:28 |
| tgardner | vanhoof, no plan. leann has only done Lucid LBM. Is there a need ? | 16:28 |
| vanhoof | tgardner: there is, new uCode just landed for the 6235, 2200, 2230, 105, and 135 series cards, which are all supported in 3.2 | 16:30 |
| tgardner | vanhoof, I am coincidentally looking at the ucode updates | 16:30 |
| vanhoof | tgardner: would a new bug be preferred or just a series nomination on the existing lucid bug | 16:30 |
| vanhoof | tgardner: yeah just saw they were posted friday evening | 16:30 |
| tgardner | vanhoof, new bug I think | 16:31 |
| brendand | bjf - hi | 16:31 |
| bjf | brendand: hi | 16:31 |
| tgardner | vanhoof, do you have a need for Maverick or Natty ? | 16:31 |
| vanhoof | tgardner: nope, none | 16:32 |
| tgardner | k | 16:32 |
| brendand | bjf - is the next oneiric kernel in the pipeline soon? | 16:32 |
| bjf | brendand: yes, why | 16:32 |
| brendand | bjf - trying to get a rough idea of when we need to test it | 16:33 |
| brendand | bjf - it's being prepared? | 16:33 |
| bjf | brendand: if you look at the interlock schedule, it shows that this week is a "prep" week, next week will be verification and the following regression testing | 16:34 |
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| === bigbash is now known as zz_bigbash | ||
| === bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_ | ||
| borudev | Hello, how is everyone? I had a quick question troubleshooting my ubuntu 11.10 server installation. I installed the same OS on 2 different servers and I'm experiencing the same problem. What happens is I turn on the server, it's ok for few hours, and then when I try to SSH to it, it get a time out, when I plug in the keyboard, and type something then I can connect to it again. Seems that | 17:42 |
| borudev | it's going to some kind of sleep mode. Note, no desktop was installed just pure server OS. Anyone had this issue before? what could cause it? Thanks | 17:42 |
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| * tgardner --> lunch | 19:07 | |
| apw | bjf, ok oneiric should be all sorted out | 19:21 |
| bjf | apw, thanks | 19:22 |
| apw | borudev, i have not seen that on any of my servers. the default for suspend after a bit did change due to the fixing of a bug somewhere, but i thought that was in gnome somewhere | 19:23 |
| ogasawara | tgardner: want me to do cw-3.2 for oneiric? or have you already started. | 19:45 |
| tgardner | ogasawara, that would would be great. I just uploaded linux-firmware for precise, so we need to think about getting those firmware bits into oneiric. | 19:46 |
| tgardner | I'm gonna ask if dropping Precise linux-firmware into Lucid/Oneiric -backports is appropriate. if so, then I'll have you add an install dependency on CW-3.2 | 19:47 |
| ogasawara | tgardner: ack | 19:47 |
| ogasawara | tgardner: I also saw 3.3-rc1 is out. I started prepping the Q repo on thursday before I bailed, so I'll try and get that finished up in the next day or so as well. | 19:48 |
| tgardner | ogasawara, cool. I also messed with a bit, but lost interest after grinding through a bazillion new config options | 19:49 |
| * ogasawara twitches at the thought of more config review | 19:49 | |
| tgardner | I did more then twitch. it was more of a violent recoil... | 19:50 |
| lamont | did we possibly mess around with tickspersec or other time related stuff in lucid? I have some wierd ntp behavior that I'm seeing | 19:55 |
| tgardner | lamont, IIRC there was a stable update patch that prevents div by 0 after 200+ days. herton ? | 19:59 |
| tgardner | bjf, herton doesn't seem to be around. do you remember that one ? | 20:00 |
| bjf | tgardner: no, i don't remember that | 20:00 |
| bjf | tgardner: herton is on a swap day | 20:00 |
| tgardner | lamont, is it frequent enough that you can determine when it began ? | 20:01 |
| lamont | http://paste.ubuntu.com/814622/ <-- tgardner, using 2.6.32-37-server #81-Ubuntu | 20:01 |
| lamont | next you'll want to know what the kernel rev was before it was rebooted, huh? | 20:02 |
| tgardner | lamont, uh huh | 20:02 |
| lamont | that'll take a bit more digging | 20:03 |
| tgardner | gaining 2 secs every few minutes seems like a bad thing | 20:03 |
| tgardner | lamont, please start a bug using 'ubuntu-bug linux' and I'll get the stable team looking at it. | 20:27 |
| lamont | tgardner: let me see how well that works there | 20:28 |
| tgardner | lamont, I suppose its so firewalled it doesn't even know the outside world exists | 20:28 |
| lamont | The program 'ubuntu-bug' is currently not installed. To run 'ubuntu-bug' please ask your administrator to install the package 'apport' | 20:29 |
| tgardner | lamont, well, we really need the HW and BIOS info, as well as http://paste.ubuntu.com/814622/ attached to the bug. | 20:31 |
| lamont | tgardner: cool. I'll grab that pile. front end of lshw for the hw/bios info, I expect? | 20:31 |
| lamont | and then marked as affecting lucid? or just filed against linux/lucid? | 20:32 |
| lamont | tgardner: bug 920649 | 20:40 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 920649 in linux "ntp keeps resetting system time, losing sync" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/920649 | 20:40 |
| tgardner | lamont, ack | 20:40 |
| jsalisbury | lamont, you'll probably be asked to run the following from our bug bot: apport-collect 920649 | 20:42 |
| lamont | jsalisbury: yeah, trying to avoid actually installing apport on that machine. | 20:42 |
| lamont | so I may need to dig into apport enough to find what that command would actually gather | 20:43 |
| jsalisbury | lamont, ahh, ok. | 20:43 |
| jsalisbury | lamont, The following would be helpful if you can't run apport: | 20:43 |
| jsalisbury | 1) uname -a > uname-a.log | 20:43 |
| jsalisbury | 2) dmesg > dmesg.log | 20:43 |
| jsalisbury | 3) sudo lspci -vvnn > lspci-vvnn.log | 20:43 |
| jsalisbury | 4) cat /proc/version_signature > version.log | 20:43 |
| * tgardner -> EOD | 21:07 | |
| hallyn | is it possible to use /etc/apport/blacklist.d/ to blacklist kernel oopses? (i get a ton of in_atomic ones. apport won't let me report them anyway. sick of popups) | 22:01 |
| hallyn | according to teh readme i'd need to do it by executable name... | 22:01 |
| === emma is now known as em | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!