[11:44] <jamespage> jibel: have you done any automated reporting of test results to iso.qa.ubuntu.com yet?
[11:46] <jibel> jamespage, no, that's low priority on my side.
[11:47] <jamespage> jibel: yeah - me to - just wondered if you had anything I could nick :-)
[11:47] <jamespage> lol
[15:09] <greyback> mmrazik: hey, this is Gerry, reporting early
[15:09] <mmrazik> greyback, hi
[15:09] <mmrazik> :)
[15:25] <mmrazik> greyback, btw. there might be some confusion regarding the place. I hope we are all meeting on #ubuntu-meeting
[15:26] <gema> mmrazik: that clarifies things, I was also thinking it would be here :)
[15:27] <mmrazik> sorry for that
[15:27] <greyback> mmrazik: oh, moving now
[15:27] <mmrazik> thx
[15:36] <bdmurray> jibel: is there some way to test upgrades from lucid to precise?
[15:38] <jibel> bdmurray, what do you mean precisely ?
[15:38] <jibel> bdmurray, automatically, reproduce a failure, manually, ... ?
[15:39] <bdmurray> jibel: I want to make sure its safe to upgrade my server
[15:41] <jibel> bdmurray, ah ok. from the tests we run server are pretty safe to upgrade (https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise-upgrade-lts/) but expect the unexpected
[15:41] <jibel> bdmurray, if you want to test an upgrade, you can create a clone, restore it in a VM and upgrade from there
[15:42] <bdmurray> jibel: so aufs overlay hasn't been tested recently or worked on?
[15:42] <jibel> bdmurray, AFAIK, there is no package for apt-clone in backport yet, so you can try the code here https://code.launchpad.net/~mvo/apt-clone/lucid-backport
[15:43] <jibel> bdmurray, I haven't tested aufs overlay recently
[15:44] <bdmurray> jibel: okay, thanks
[15:46] <jibel> mvo, did you try --sandbox upgrades recently ?
[15:46] <mvo> jibel: not recently but some weeks ago, did you experience problems?
[15:47] <jibel> mvo, not me, bdmurray was asking if it is an option to test an upgrade because actually upgrading a server.
[15:47] <jibel> s/because/before
[15:48] <mvo> bdmurray: if its a valuable system I would rather test it in a vm first, it should work but I haven't tested it in a good while
[15:52] <bdmurray> When you say test in a vm that means install Lucid, restore cloned system, run dist-upgrade?
[15:52] <jibel> mvo, is apt-clone available for lucid from a PPA or as a package somewhere ?
[15:59] <greyback> mmrazik: that was the first IRC talk I've given, I hope it was ok
[16:00] <mmrazik> greyback, yes, it was a nice one.
[16:06] <mvo> jibel: I don't think so
[16:32] <txomon|home> gema, ping
[16:32] <gema> txomon|home: pong
[16:33] <txomon|home> oki, I assisted (without having any idea) to that introduction to automated testing, was it the stuff you were talking about in last meeting?
[16:34] <txomon|home> meant balloons and you
[16:34] <balloons> hello txomon|home
[16:34] <txomon|home> hi balloons
[16:35] <txomon|home> ^
[16:37] <txomon|home> and I have been testing how much time does netboot/apt-proxy-caching/automated-installation save, and the most important one, is the apt-proxy-caching. Netboot is good to get rid of CDs, and automated-installation, if you are not going to be in front of the computer
[16:50] <txomon|home> If you have any suggestions...