[04:08] <benonsoftware> Hello
[05:42] <achiang> can i write a manpage inside debian/ ? the package doesn't need any patches otherwise, and the only other way i know how to do it is to create a patch that adds a manpage
[05:52]  * achiang experiments with: touch debian/foo.1 ; echo 'debian/foo.1' > debian/manpages
[05:53] <achiang> neat, that seems to work
[05:55] <achiang> another question: is it bad form if the upstream is BSD but debian/* is GPL-2 ?
[07:39] <geser> achiang: not really "bad form" but it gets interesting if you add a patch in future (assuming it would be GPL-2 too).
[07:52] <dholbach> good morning
[07:59] <geser> good morning
[08:08] <Rhonda> Alright, syncpackage for 1.10 done :)
[08:08] <Rhonda> … wesnoth.
[13:53] <tumbleweed> Laney: when are we getting build failure e-mail for synced packages?
[13:53] <Laney> now now, you know the answer to that :-)
[13:54]  * micahg just keeps an eye on +synchronised-packages for that
[13:57]  * tumbleweed keeps tabs open for the builds I'm interested in
[13:58] <tumbleweed> but I'm getting pypy timeouts on amd64, and so wan tto keep track of which buildds it timed out on :/
[13:59] <micahg> right now due to powerpc being behind, I have 2 build failures that are depwaits, once the dep builds I'll retry, but that could be next week :)
[14:02] <tumbleweed> powerpc is badly behind :/
[14:03] <Laney> where's that new buildd?
[14:03] <ogra_> vacation ?
[14:03] <tumbleweed> I suppose we should raise more concern about that at the release meeting (yay, something to mention :P )
[14:04] <Laney> come back with a nice tan ready to sweat out some packages
[14:06] <Laney> bug #862251
[14:06] <micahg> tumbleweed: re powerpc> don't bother, we've already done as much screaming as we can do about it, should be a few more weeks only hopefully
[14:07] <Laney> it is already in the escalation queue
[14:08] <tumbleweed> yeah
[14:09] <tumbleweed> arm seems to be keeping up far too well now
[14:09] <tumbleweed> time for new x86 buildds :P
[14:09] <tumbleweed> gaar pypy timed out again
[14:10] <tumbleweed> damn, and it went back to the same buildd
[14:17] <cjwatson> there's a ticket open to refresh the buildd pool in general ...
[14:19] <ogra_> see, as i said, vacation ... they all lie at the pool :)
[16:25] <bullgard4> Ubuntu 10.04.3 Synaptic notices for the DEB program package »ntop« version 1.4.3-4: "Canonical does not provide updates for sntop. Some updates may be provided by the Ubuntu community." Why does Ubuntu 11.10 not notice the same?
[16:26] <bullgard4> s/ntop/sntop/
[16:26] <tumbleweed> bullgard4: you are outside the normal support length and into LTS. That only covers a subset of the archive.
[16:26] <tumbleweed> (I'm guessing that's the reason for that notice)
[16:27] <bullgard4> Ah! Thank you tumbleweed.
[19:35] <micahg> anyone free to update libav-extra to 4:0.8ubuntu1 (bug 921765)?
[19:44] <micahg> siretart: are you planning an upload for this to Debian? ^^
[19:52] <siretart> micahg: yeah, I actually have it more or less ready. but then I noticed that fabian's simplifications needed porting, and then I got distracted :-(
[20:35] <micahg> woohoo, powerpc backlog is at 256 jobs, I wonder if we can get it up to 512 :)
[20:35] <ajmitch> please don't let it get to 1024
[20:35] <micahg> well, the i386 PPA queue is above that :)
[20:36] <ajmitch> i386 builders are slightly faster, I hope
[20:36] <ajmitch> though it can be annoying to have a backlog like that
[20:36] <micahg> powerpc is pretty fast
[20:36] <micahg> relative to arm* at least
[20:37] <ajmitch> it probably doesn't take much to be faster than arm, still
[20:46] <ScottK> It's a lot faster than arm.
[20:47] <ScottK> It's only slightly slower than amd64, but there's fewer builders.
[20:56] <Rhonda> micahg: hmmm, I could add some wesnoth to the delay …