| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| berdario | Hello, I was reading about the move to colocated branch as default: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2011q1/071911.html | 14:44 |
|---|---|---|
| berdario | I'm quite curious, since I've never used colocated branches with bzr (though I have experience with git and hg) | 14:44 |
| berdario | in particular... I read most of the thread, but I haven't understood what was the final decision | 14:45 |
| berdario | and the roadmap seems outdated: http://wiki.bazaar.canonical.com/Roadmap | 14:45 |
| berdario | it's january 2012, and we still don't have bzr 3.0... | 14:47 |
| berdario | then, if I understood correctly, one of the main reasons for the move to colocated branches would be to avoid having to do huge recompiles in C-like projects when creating a new branch | 14:47 |
| berdario | (but there doesn't seem to be much consensus around that: some peoples were worried about under-recompiles when switching colocated branches) | 14:48 |
| berdario | I find myself comfortable with separate branches... do you suggest I should start using colocated branches instead? | 14:51 |
| wgz | nope, not if you don't have a reason to | 14:54 |
| berdario | wgz, ok... so I shouldn't worry about it at all? | 14:56 |
| wgz | I think worrying would certainly be an overreaction :) | 14:57 |
| berdario | lol, ok :) | 14:57 |
| wgz | the wiki does look like it needs a little pruning | 15:01 |
| === jave_ is now known as jave | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!