[04:37] do you people mind a new blender right before alpha2? someone is requesting a sync of 2.61 [04:42] s/mind/want/ [04:42] micahg meant: "do you people want a new blender right before alpha2? someone is requesting a sync of 2.61" [04:42] * micahg hugs kubotu [07:10] micahg: i dont know enough to comment... its an LTS, but i go with your decision on that [07:11] I don't mind it after alpha2, it's just with alpha2 freeze Monday at 21:00, I wouldn't sync it unless the ubuntu studio devs approved since it's on your image [07:12] OH... i see... i was thinking an testing version of blender.. yeah, go for it [07:14] well, if the new version breaks the image, there isn't much time to fix it, that's why I'm hesistant [07:16] holstein: Yeah, he wants someone to test the newer version, and _then_ say 'Yea we can have that!' :) [07:17] good point... theres not really a way to test it, is there? [07:17] well, more so someone taking the responsibility off my shoulders if something breaks :) [07:17] if it runs sucessful, does that mean it wont bread the build? [07:17] ailo: len: Do you have the precise installs up and running? Can you install the newer blender from sid, and give it a go? [07:17] i have a 12.04 install, assuming i can figure out how to install that version [07:17] micahg: And why would anyone do that, without the procedure I described above? :D [07:18] I'm fine writing in the bug to be sync'd after alpha2, the only reason to sync now is if you want the new version on the imge [07:18] holstein: Oh! Yeah, can you do that, then? [07:18] micahg: Understood. [07:18] astraljava: lets see if ailo / len pick it up... im slammed til wednesday looks like [07:18] I would not want to do that either, unless we have someone who knows what to do with it, to say it's trusted. [07:18] I can throw up a "backport" for precise in my PPA if you like [07:18] micahg: who asked for it?... maybe we could just ask them [07:19] Bug #915248 [07:19] Launchpad bug 915248 in blender (Ubuntu) "Please sync Blender 2.61-2 from Debian" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/915248 [07:19] Mike, you on that? [07:19] dont know that person... [07:20] I meant, can you ask on the bug? I've never used that app. [07:20] ill make some time tomorrow evening and check in... see where you guys are with it [07:20] i should have time to do it then... i gotta get horizontal [07:21] That's a bit late for Alpha-2. Ok. [07:21] i played my 2nd electric bass gig in about 15 years ;) [07:21] also, being that it hasn't migrated to testing yet worries me (RC bugs were just fixed, but the new build was uploaded yesterday) [07:21] went late [07:21] so, its gotta be tonite? [07:21] micahg: ACK [07:21] holstein: No, it's not imperative. [07:21] We don't _have to_ have it for Alpha-2. [07:22] cool... ill check in then... GN ! [07:22] * micahg will comment and subscribe and you guys can sort it out [07:22] micahg: thanks for bringing it up... [07:23] no problem [07:24] micahg: I asked on the bug, so we'll see. Thanks for the heads-up! [07:25] astraljava: you might want to subscribe to the bug so you get followup comments [07:26] micahg: Am I not automatically getting them after a comment? [07:26] nope [07:26] Oh ok, thanks! [07:26] and I wrote there that it shouldn't be syncd before alpha2 without and Ubuntu Studio dev ACK in the bug [07:27] Right. [07:32] micahg: How was the day-off? :) [07:33] heh, fine, thanks :) [07:34] Good, good. :) [16:28] micahg, i built the -settings, -look, and -icon-theme packages and installed them [16:28] micahg, i did run into a problem installing them on an existing xubuntu install [16:29] micahg, it was trying to overwrite an existing .xsessions (i think, i have screenshot) file [16:29] micahg, i imagine that i'll need to do some bash in a preinst file to see if an .xsession file exist and then rename it [16:30] micahg, along with a postrm to rename the original .xsession back to it's original name [16:31] micahg, do have have any suggestions for an example...i'm just going to dig through some of the xubuntu code in launchpad to see if i can find examples [16:31] micahg, although i seem to remember the -default-settings package had some preinst and postrm files [16:31] [16:31] micahg, as to the blender upgrade before A2... [16:31] micahg, i don't think we gain much compared to the risk we take [16:31] micahg, breaking an image is bad right before A2 [16:32] micahg, and we still have the rest of the cycle to test the new blender [16:32] micahg, for example, starting right after A2, correct? [16:32] [16:32] an interesting note about packages and building and such [16:33] i think i learned a rather valuable lesson in testing the three new packages [16:33] somehow the bzr code for -look didn't include me renaming the wallpapers directory [16:34] and it wouldn't build for me in ppa [16:52] Hi, just woke up... I don't know blender well at all. And the Iso I have won't install. [16:53] len, the mail list is showing a failure of the liveFS on the 64 bit [16:53] tomorrow morning i'll bug cjwatson about this [16:54] Well the last iso I got had a bug that has been fixed. But then yesterdays iso didn't come (no build?) [16:54] ScottL: The i386 mail says failure as well. [16:54] I figured both. [16:58] astraljava, did it, i pushed several emails for the list but only saw the 64 bit :/ [16:59] errr, did it? [16:59] Looking through that email I can't find a fail and the only error is a grub thing at the bottom [16:59] Yes, it did. [16:59] E: Unable to locate package ubuntustudio-font-meta^ [16:59] astraljava, also,i'm having trouble with the new -default-settings package and maybe you can give me some direction [16:59] http://imagebin.org/196207 [17:00] this is when i try to install the new ubuntustudio-default-settings over an existing xubuntu-defrault-settings package [17:00] i thought renaming the .Xdefaults file wouldl fix the problem and then i could install the new ubuntustudio-defaults-settings [17:00] but it still gives me this error [17:00] i'm going to remove xubuntu-defautl-settings later and see if i can isntall ubuntustudio-defaults-settings [17:01] unless someone gives me a good suggestion otherwise [17:01] Yeah. I think you need to do what you already described, since dpkg-divert is frowned upon. [17:02] astraljava, rename or remove? [17:02] The renaming thing. (sorry, on the phone..) [17:09] Will we be able to add any more apps after A2? It seems there are still some apps named in the work flows that are not there. [17:10] Yes, it's possible, although we gotta be sure that they work, so that we won't lose the milestone in build errors. What are we missing? [17:11] audacity is one, I would have to go through and check more close for more. [17:11] That one happens to be at the top of the list. [17:12] Yeah ok, that one is easy, as it's for sure in the archives. [17:12] It may be better to redefine the work flows. [17:13] len, i haven't even thought about work flows and new seeds at this point [17:13] the point is that i want to get A2 set with the xfce transition basically 99% there first and the live-dvd working [17:13] I will spend some time later and make a list... I may have to look for an older iso that I can load to check with. [17:14] len, astraljava : i have audacity on my list to add, but i wanted to clean up the audo workflow first [17:14] The live dvd seems to be working pretty good. The only thing missing is RT. [17:14] i promise it will be in there [17:14] Same on the install. [17:14] len, i have the no -rt in live and after install on a list to talk with cjwatson about tomorrow [17:15] len, is there anything else you notice that should be fixed [17:15] please discount the crappy theme, this is because the -default-settings package isn't updated yet [17:15] [17:15] I can see that. [17:15] micahg, astraljava : i removed the xubuntu-default-settings package and installed ubuntustudio-default-settings package and it worked fine [17:16] micahg, astraljava : is there a way i can handle that in the new ubuntustudio-default-settings package? in the control file or similar? [17:16] I need a new iso to check the default.desktop thing. [17:16] i've never really had to worry about removing a package per se before, just saying that it conflicts with antoher pacakge [17:16] len, you mean the lightdm bug that prevented x from starting? [17:17] yes [17:17] aye [17:17] Since it was fixed there hasn't been a new iso. [17:18] ScottL: I thought you had it figured out already. I would install an /etc/skel/.Xdefaults.ubuntustudio file, then in postinst rename the original, and then rename ours as that. [17:19] Although, I must admit, I'm not sure what is the best practice. [17:19] Tried to look at blender on 11.04.. it seg faults. Maybe that is why I don't know what it is. [17:19] astraljava, no, i meant i opened a terminal, renamed the package, and then tried to install our -defaults-settings [17:19] I would assume as that, but then of course removing xubuntu-default-settings removes the wrong file. [17:19] Hmm... [17:19] astraljava, i was doing it very, very hacky [17:20] ScottL: How exactly did you rename a package? [17:20] astraljava, but i see your point about isntalling ours as .Xdefaults.ubuntustudio then changing in postin [17:20] astraljava, i opened a terminal using 'sudo thunar', then found /etc/skel/.Xdefaults, right clicked on it, renamed to .Xdefault.original [17:21] len: Micah thought (IIRC) that it might have been about that missing -default-settings package. [17:21] ScottL: So you did not rename a _package_, but that file. And yes, obviously it would work then. [17:22] dpkg refuses to overwrite an already existing system file. [17:22] astraljava, the error was actually not saying that it didn't like overwritting a file [17:22] dpkg-divert can work around that, but I forget why it is not recommended. [17:22] it said it didn't like it because it was a file for xubuntu-default-settings (which was currently installed) [17:22] ScottL: Err... yes it does, in that imagebin screenshot. [17:23] C U later, I am playing in an hour. Have to go. [17:23] "...trying to overwrite '/etc/skel/.Xdefaults', ..." [17:23] bye len , thanks again [17:24] astraljava, ochosi is suggesting to use "replaces" in the control file...that should work no? [17:24] ScottL: Yes, of course, but that then removes the whole xubuntu-default-settings package. I guess we can do that, but that does not get reinstalled, if user then wants to uninstall ours. [17:25] But it might be a better option after all. I dunno. [17:25] Will have to talk to a MOTU about it. [17:26] ...or actually look for an example in other similar packages. [17:34] ScottL: At least neither lubuntu nor xubuntu use replaces in their control files, but use postinst scripts extensively. Granted, there's not this particular case happening, but I think we should do something similar. [17:39] astraljava, let's view this from two perspectives...1) a full install from ISO image and 2) a user "upgrading" from *buntu to ubuntu studio [17:39] 1) i don't think using replaces matters then in this case [17:40] 2) a user can remove and remove the ubuntustudio-default-settings package and then install *buntu-default-settings [17:40] but i agree that #2 isn't a very friendly or automated process [17:41] i think your suggestion about installing .Xdefaults.ubuntustudio and then renaming is a good choice [17:42] astraljava, the ironically funny thing is that the file being overwritten is the same as the file doing the overwritting [17:42] at least in this case (i.e. xubuntu -> ubuntustudio) [17:55] Isn't any other flavor doing that? [18:00] ScottL: If no other flavor needs that file, then we would test in postinst whether it exists, and if yes, then do nothing. If not, then install it. Simple as that. [18:00] If the file is exactly the same as the one Xubuntu installs. [18:03] for xubuntu it is the same because i used their packages as a starting point :-) [18:03] ScottL: Yeah ok. [18:03] i would expect others would have a .Xdefaults package though [18:04] perhaps not ubuntu at some point (maybe already) since they are using unity and will move to wayland at some point [18:04] but most likely kubuntu does i would guess [18:06] Nope. [18:06] $ apt-file search .Xdefaults [18:06] xemacs21-support: /usr/share/xemacs-21.4.22/etc/sample.Xdefaults [18:06] xubuntu-default-settings: /etc/skel/.Xdefaults [18:07] I gotta look into what it actually does. [18:07] a simple replaces would work for overwriting the file, but I think we need a more generic solution [18:09] micahg: Wouldn't replaces remove xubuntu-d-s first? It's a little overkill, IMHO. [18:09] no, breaks/conflicts would do that :) [18:10] Oh, right. [18:21] micahg: Why are we seeing this in the CD Image mail? E: Unable to locate package ubuntustudio-font-meta^ [18:21] micahg: Package seems to be there, though. [18:22] I notice there's the ^ indicating a task, but it's constructed exactly the same way as -desktop, and that seems to work fine. [18:22] I'll have a look in a bit, we missed today's image though [18:26] Yeah, it seems to have worked up until 27th, for version 0.94. Yesterday it couldn't find the 0.95 version anymore, though I'm not actually sure when it has landed into the archives. [18:47] astraljava: I think it's ok for today [18:47] micahg: Ok, there was just a random glitch, then. I suppose. Thanks! [18:48] we won't know for sure until today's images are published [18:48] Are they rolled late today? [18:48] I don't think so [18:49] Hmm... there were no directories in people.c.c/~ubuntu-archive/ for today. [18:51] are there any mails in moderation for the -devel list? [18:52] I don't think so, Scott just recently cleared the queue, and then we saw yesterday's results. [19:09] astraljava, cjwatson had set the ubuntu studio images to build later in the day for some reason, i can't remember currently [19:10] i think it was to help make sure that something built before our to make sure it would build or similar [19:12] micahg, should we install .Xdefaults.ubuntustudio, then rename .Xdefaults -> .Xdefaults.orig and .Xdefaults.ubuntustudio -> .Xdefaults? [19:12] ScottL: No, it is back to around 1800 UTC now, but it only just got published. [19:12] astraljava, oh, hmmm, maybe it was changed back when we switched to live [19:12] micahg: Sadly, the same error is there today as well. [19:12] ok, I"ll dig further [19:13] Thanks! [19:13] ScottL: I think the settings should be per login env, not per user, really both Xubuntu and US need changes for this [19:13] astraljava, just checked listadmin again and we got new emails about the liveFS [19:14] micahg, can this be done before A2? [19:15] ScottL: that I'm not sure, in the mean time, I think we should just add a replaces on xubuntu-default-settings for a2 [19:15] micahg, that i can do :) [19:15] i'll get this into my ppa and retest it [19:15] then i'll push to bzr [19:19] ah, it can't find the task, not the package [19:23] I think I got it [19:24] umm, I should probably consult with cjwatson [19:32] asked in #ubuntu-devel [19:46] Hmm... I don't fully understand the STRUCTURE file. [19:50] ok, I think we've got it, cjwatson will respin [19:51] Yeah ok. It was just a notion. :) [19:53] astraljava: I don't understand it entirely either, that's why I wanted to consult with cjwatson, my understanding is a little better now though :) [19:54] Heheh. :) Well, if you feel like sharing, please do. I didn't have such a pleasure. :) [19:58] was the discussion in #ubuntu-devel ? [19:58] so, each line has a task with a list of tasks it depends on [19:59] ^^^ the STRUCTURE file [19:59] graphics depends on font-meta in the graphics seed file, but wasn't set up that way in STRUCTURE [19:59] Oh okay, now it makes more sense. Thanks! [20:21] again, micahg , thank you very much for you help with studio! [21:04] We have a new gift from Micah and Colin! :D [21:04] Have at it, folks. I'm gonna watch the NHL All Stars game. :) [21:13] astraljava, any idea how to make changes to the ubuntustudio-meta package? [21:13] astraljava, specifically the -audio package where the rtprio.py is kept? [21:13] we need to disable it or remove it as it's adding the limits.d file [21:15] ScottL: I'll look into it, one second. Err... well, several. :) [21:15] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/ubuntustudio-meta/precise/view/head:/rtprio.py [21:16] ScottL: debian/ubuntustudio-audio.install [21:16] it's under 'ubuntu branches' [21:16] ScottL: what do you want done? [21:17] micahg, i wanted to to either remove or comment out rtprio.py [21:18] ScottL: do you still want ubuntustudio-audio-rtprio.conf installed? [21:18] micahg, it's adding lines to limits.d that have now been introduced into the jackd package but placed into a different file [21:18] micahg, i don't think we need it anymore since jackd handles it [21:18] ok, I'll comment out both lines for the time being [21:19] micahg, additionally, something has been apparently renamed the /limits.d/audio.conf file as /limits.d/audio.conf.disabled [21:19] i'm not sure what is doing that though :/ [21:20] would guess the jackd package [21:22] I am downloading todays Iso. Will try it out and make a list of any apps missing for workflows as listed on thw workflow page [21:22] len, but the jackd is what installs the audio.conf file, i wouldn't expect it to also .disable it as well, but i can look at the code though [21:22] micahg, http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/01/26/%23ubuntustudio-devel.html @04:23 is where they are talking about it [21:23] if we don't keep the audio.conf file from being renamed to audio.conf.disabled then we don't have -rt privileges for the user (in the audio group) [21:23] I think it disables it unless rt is oked at install time. ubiquity doesn't let the user do that. [21:23] * ScottL is going outside with son for a while to push on swing :) [21:23] We may want to do that with a postinstall script. [21:24] Maybe as part of a theme package? [21:25] not sure, I've got a meta upload pending, so just tell me what you need [21:29] micahg: I suppose we can just drop them both, at the moment (in Scott's absence) [21:29] ...so you get the upload done. [21:30] there's a postinst script at the moment I"m not quite sure how to clean up [21:30] Ok, let me have a look too. [21:37] micahg: It only deals with rtprio.py, which we're not installing per recent decision, so the postinst can go too. [21:37] right, I'm just wondering if we need a prerm to clean it up [21:38] Ahh... sorry. I suppose so, when upgrading. [21:43] if [ -e /usr/share/ubuntustudio-audio/rtprio.py ] [21:43] then [21:43] rm /usr/share/ubuntustudio-audio/rtprio.py [21:43] fi [21:43] micahg: Will that ^^ do? Otherwise just a copy of .postinst. [21:44] Oh, that'd be in the upgrade case. [21:44] copy postinst and add that in for upgrade, ok, sounds good since it removes itself on upgrade anyways [21:50] micahg: I have an incoming commit, but did you do changes to the branch? [21:50] which branch? I don't use branches for -meta changes like that [21:51] Ahh... ok. How does that work, then? [21:51] I just download the -meta and update it [21:51] it pulls from the seeds [21:51] Oh ok. So you'll do the changes we agreed above? [21:52] yeah [21:52] Great! Thanks! :) [21:55] astraljava: The live DVD does not allow the install of an encrypted drive/partition. It seemed there was at least one party interested in that. Should that be filed as a bug? [21:56] The alt install allowed this. [22:00] len: That sounds a bit strange. I'll ask from the Xubuntu guys first. [22:01] It does allow an encrypted home directory, but not drive/partition. [22:03] Ubiquity has three choices, use a whole disk, shrink current os partitions and use whats left or set your own partitions. [22:05] With the alt install, there were 5 or 6 choices and one was to encrypt the whole install (except for the /boot directory) [22:05] len, you were right about jackd [22:05] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/jack-audio-connection-kit/oneiric/view/head:/debian/jackd1.postinst [22:05] I took a look at the manual partitioning and there is no way that I can see to do that from there. [22:05] disables the .conf file [22:06] I figgred. [22:06] *figured [22:11] That probably also explains why the live dvd doesn't have RT [22:18] len: Micah said ubiquity has only supported encrypted home, so that's not a regression in the package, only in functionality when compared to the alternate installer. :)