[12:29] <s9iper1> hey is there a problem with karma in launchpad i guess it not updating
[12:29] <s9iper1> ?
[13:53] <Alan502> Hello, I've been trying to commit some changes to a project but I keep getting this error: bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(chroot-64962512:///%2Bbranch/classlink/.bzr/branch/lock): Transport operation not possible: readonly transport can somebody help me?
[13:54] <rick_h> sure Alan502 let's take a peek
[13:54] <Alan502> aha
[13:55] <rick_h> good news?
[14:00] <jelmer>  /win goto #randomdata
[14:00] <jelmer> argh, sorry
[14:00] <nigelb> o_O
[14:13] <smoser> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cloud-init-dev/cloud-init/trunk/files/head:/cloudinit/CloudConfig/?file_id=ec2init-20090626114035-y5ugjs1e6jkk7iid-1
[14:14] <smoser> that is giving me a infinite redirect (i think) something ticking off firefox at least.
[14:14] <rick_h> smoser: working in both FF and chrome here
[14:14]  * rick_h checks the headers going by
[14:15] <smoser> ah. wait. click on cc_resizefs.py (i dont know if the others do it also)
[14:15] <rick_h> smoser: ah ok, yea that's hitting a redirect loop in both
[14:16] <rick_h> smoser: clear the query string (everything after the ?) for now and that loads
[14:18] <rick_h> smoser: looks like: https://bugs.launchpad.net/loggerhead/+bug/770008
[14:18] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 770008 in loggerhead "Redirect loop when viewing file" [Critical,Triaged]
[15:23] <flacoste> bigjools: what do I need to do to open the q and r series for Ubuntu? is this documented anywhere on the wiki?
[15:26] <bigjools> flacoste: AFAIK just register new series, I don't know if it's documented (other than the new release cycle one)
[15:29] <flacoste> bigjools: that's it?
[15:30] <flacoste> bigjools: nothing to do to enable upload or translation for them?
[15:30] <flacoste> or that only comes later once they become the active development series
[15:31] <bigjools> flacoste: only later
[15:31] <bigjools> we don't allow uploads until the series is initialized
[17:30] <deryck> rick_h, sorry, I should have taken IRC by now.
[17:30] <rick_h> deryck: np
[18:14] <psusi> bug #923374 was changed to confirmed by launchpad janitor because it affects multiple users... only it doesn't. what gives?
[18:14] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 923374 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Windows XP boot.ini deleted by Ubuntu update" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/923374
[19:08] <deryck> psusi, was the second bug task confirmed already?  Perhaps that's why it was marked confirmed.
[19:31] <AlanBell> hi flacoste http://people.canonical.com/~flacoste/launchpad-api-doc.html appears to have gone, and the launchpad API documentation references it
[19:31] <AlanBell> links on this page https://help.launchpad.net/API/Hacking in the reference documentation section
[19:53] <psusi> deryck: nope, the janitor set them both to confirme
[19:55] <flacoste> AlanBell: thanks, i'll fix that, the new URL is https://launchpad.net/+apidoc
[19:58] <AlanBell> cool, I found that
[20:00] <deryck> psusi, hmmm, yeah, looking more closely now I can't see why it would have marked it confirmed.  Can you file a bug?
[20:01] <psusi> deryck: sure
[20:02] <deryck> psusi, thanks!
[21:03] <Forage> about https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/186189
[21:04] <Forage> I still can't upload new packages to launchpad
[21:04] <Forage> for some reason it gets rejected because my e-mail address is considered invalid
[21:04] <Forage> which it is not
[21:05] <Forage> could you please have a look at it?
[21:15] <lamalex> can someone help me figure out why my recipe builds aare failing? the build logs are bzr looking crashes, not build failures as such
[21:59] <lamalex> wgrant, ping! i need some daily builds/recipes help
[21:59] <lamalex> thumper told me to ping you
[22:00] <wgrant> lamalex: But his team implemented daily builds, not me :(
[22:00] <wgrant> What's up?
[22:00] <lamalex> haha :P
[22:00] <thumper> wgrant: it is a packing issue
[22:00] <thumper> wgrant: and you know I don't know anything about that :)
[22:01] <lamalex> wgrant, something is wrong with my recipe, it seems to be failing before it even gets to the building steps. could you help me? https://code.launchpad.net/~alexlauni/+recipe/compiz-core-daily
[22:02] <wgrant> Ah, format 0.4 :)
[22:03] <wgrant> They're broken at the moment; there's an RT about upgrading python-debian on the builders to fix it.
[22:03] <wgrant> Forage: What's the Maintainer line in your changes file?
[22:03] <lamalex> wgrant, change to 3?
[22:04] <wgrant> I think that should work, yes.
[22:06] <lamalex> heh
[22:06] <lamalex> nice
[22:06] <lamalex> love/hate those simple fixes
[22:18] <thumper> wgrant: ummm...
[22:18] <thumper> wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/compiz-testing
[22:19] <thumper> wgrant: why does it say a newer version is available?
[22:19] <wgrant> thumper: primary > ppa
[22:21] <thumper> is 0.9.7.1-2971~testingppa0~precise1 < 0.9.6+bzr20110929-0ubuntu8
[22:21] <thumper> wgrant: because that is what it links to
[22:22] <wgrant> thumper: No it's not.
[22:22] <wgrant> It links to 1:0.9.6+bzr20110929-0ubuntu8
[22:23] <thumper> ok, so what is the 1: ?
[22:23] <wgrant> Here we see the legendary Debian Epoch in its native habitat.
[22:23] <StevenK> Hahaa
[22:23] <thumper> ?!
[22:24] <lamalex> wgrant, so should i change my deb-version to 1:
[22:24] <lamalex> and then the version?
[22:24] <wgrant> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version
[22:24] <StevenK> thumper: Epoch is "This is greater than everything else, because oh crap the next version happens to be lower"
[22:24] <wgrant> But roughly, yes.
[22:25] <lamalex> hahaha
[22:25] <thumper> wgrant: so where should lamalex change it?
[22:26] <lamalex> thumper, i got it
[22:26] <lamalex> i just need to update my recipe deb-version
[22:26] <thumper> lamalex: wgrant was also pointing to some control fields, so I was wondering if it also needed changing there
[22:31] <lamalex> ah yeah maybe
[22:34] <wgrant> thumper: There shouldn't be any relevant control fields.
[22:47] <thumper> oh, ok