cousin_luigi | Greetings. | 10:06 |
---|---|---|
chrisccoulson | did the addressbar autocomplete stuff get backed out? i've just noticed it's not working on my nightly builds now | 12:50 |
chrisccoulson | ok, i think i answered my own question: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/63757aa2e629 :) | 12:56 |
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | ||
jlebar_ | Hey, guys. Wanted to give you a heads-up that in FF13, Flash with npwrapper may not work everywhere. | 15:45 |
jlebar_ | SEe https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723164 | 15:45 |
ubot2` | Mozilla bug 723164 in Plug-ins "Pandora does not fully load" [Normal,Resolved: invalid] | 15:45 |
jlebar_ | At least some of the documentation I read recommended this as the best way to use Flash. | 15:46 |
mdeslaur | jlebar_: thanks for the heads up...the precise flashplugin-nonfree package now installs the native 64bit one | 15:48 |
jlebar_ | mdeslaur, Excellent. I'm not sure how I got into the mess I did, but I may have done something silly to get the 32-bit version installed. | 15:48 |
mdeslaur | jlebar_: well, if you're running oneiric and older, that's still what gets installed | 15:49 |
jlebar_ | mdeslaur, Ah, that explains it then. :) | 15:50 |
jlebar_ | Sounds like you guys are upgrading just in time then! | 15:51 |
jlebar_ | FF13 is scheduled for release on June 5. | 15:51 |
chrisccoulson | hah, i love bsmedberg's comment in that bug | 15:52 |
chrisccoulson | i have basically the same opinion of nspluginwrapper ;) | 15:52 |
mdeslaur | hrm, I do have flash packages for lucid-oneiric that update to the native 64bit version, but have resisted pushing them for fear of introducing regressions... | 15:52 |
mdeslaur | guess that's going to force my hand :P | 15:52 |
chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, yeah, i guess we should start planning to do that then :) | 15:52 |
chrisccoulson | which is what https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-next is designed for ;) | 15:53 |
mdeslaur | ok, I'll stick them in my flash ppa when I have a minute | 15:53 |
chrisccoulson | thanks | 15:53 |
chrisccoulson | we can push them to the firefox beta PPA once you're sure they're working if you want | 15:53 |
mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: ok, let me think about that, but it's probably a good idea | 15:54 |
chrisccoulson | cool | 15:54 |
chrisccoulson | jlebar_, thanks for the heads-up | 15:55 |
jlebar_ | Sure thing! | 15:55 |
chrisccoulson | it's funny that whilst we're trying to get rid of nspluginwrapper, the gnome guys now depend on it for running flash in epiphany | 15:56 |
chrisccoulson | which sucks :/ | 15:56 |
FernandoMiguel | evening <3 | 19:31 |
micahg | hi FernandoMiguel | 19:32 |
micahg | chrisccoulson: we should patch that out if we ship we 64 bit flash (unless they're using it like plugin-container in firefox) | 19:33 |
micahg | ugh, that was about epipahny ^^ | 19:33 |
chrisccoulson | micahg, patch what out? | 19:33 |
micahg | requiring nspluginwrapper | 19:33 |
chrisccoulson | micahg, then you can't use flash in epiphany, at all | 19:34 |
micahg | that sounds like a bug | 19:34 |
micahg | unless they're using it like that for security reasons (i.e. process separation) | 19:34 |
chrisccoulson | sure. the bug is that epiphany uses gtk3 and flash uses gtk2 | 19:34 |
chrisccoulson | you can't have them in the same address space | 19:34 |
micahg | ah, heh, that makes sense then :) | 19:34 |
knome | micahg, chrisccoulson: gotcha! so, what about a xubuntu-specific firefox start page? | 19:36 |
micahg | /away gone fishing | 19:36 |
micahg | oops :) | 19:36 |
knome | hahah, i know this is a sensitive subject | 19:36 |
knome | but i'd really like to know if it's possible at all | 19:36 |
knome | technically, we could even have a startpage that doesn't require translations | 19:37 |
chrisccoulson | what would you actually want the startpage to point at? | 19:38 |
knome | that could be a "local" page in the CD or a subpage in xubuntu.org, which we could create before precise release | 19:38 |
knome | whatever is easier... | 19:39 |
chrisccoulson | well, a local page on the CD is out of the question unless you're willing to package the page as an extension | 19:39 |
knome | micahg, ? | 19:39 |
chrisccoulson | CSS is blocked from file: URI's | 19:39 |
chrisccoulson | well, at least when i last looked at it. our old offline page didn't work because of that | 19:40 |
* micahg was wondering if start.ubuntu.com could be branded based on URL ala start.xubuntu.org | 19:40 | |
knome | branded, yes, easily (from a technical POV), but the question of actually changing some content (we'd like links to xubuntu.org and so) is a different thing | 19:41 |
micahg | knome: right, I was more concerned with keeping the search box intact | 19:42 |
knome | micahg, is that a problem with a self-managed page? | 19:42 |
micahg | problem? idk | 19:42 |
knome | as far as i know, google doesn't forbid using their search... | 19:43 |
micahg | no, not at all | 19:43 |
knome | :) | 19:43 |
knome | so managing our own page at start.xubuntu.org or sth could be technically easiest | 19:43 |
knome | the question is, could we even pass that page some parameters, like the lang | 19:43 |
knome | like, start.xubuntu.org/lang/ | 19:45 |
=== gavin_ is now known as gavin | ||
=== FernandoMiguel1 is now known as FernandoMiguel | ||
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!