[10:06] <cousin_luigi> Greetings.
[12:50] <chrisccoulson> did the addressbar autocomplete stuff get backed out? i've just noticed it's not working on my nightly builds now
[12:56] <chrisccoulson> ok, i think i answered my own question: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/63757aa2e629 :)
[15:45] <jlebar_> Hey, guys.  Wanted to give you a heads-up that in FF13, Flash with npwrapper may not work everywhere.
[15:45] <jlebar_> SEe https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723164
[15:45] <ubot2`> Mozilla bug 723164 in Plug-ins "Pandora does not fully load" [Normal,Resolved: invalid]
[15:46] <jlebar_> At least some of the documentation I read recommended this as the best way to use Flash.
[15:48] <mdeslaur> jlebar_: thanks for the heads up...the precise flashplugin-nonfree package now installs the native 64bit one
[15:48] <jlebar_> mdeslaur, Excellent.  I'm not sure how I got into the mess I did, but I may have done something silly to get the 32-bit version installed.
[15:49] <mdeslaur> jlebar_: well, if you're running oneiric and older, that's still what gets installed
[15:50] <jlebar_> mdeslaur, Ah, that explains it then.  :)
[15:51] <jlebar_> Sounds like you guys are upgrading just in time then!
[15:51] <jlebar_> FF13 is scheduled for release on June 5.
[15:52] <chrisccoulson> hah, i love bsmedberg's comment in that bug
[15:52] <chrisccoulson> i have basically the same opinion of nspluginwrapper ;)
[15:52] <mdeslaur> hrm, I do have flash packages for lucid-oneiric that update to the native 64bit version, but have resisted pushing them for fear of introducing regressions...
[15:52] <mdeslaur> guess that's going to force my hand :P
[15:52] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, yeah, i guess we should start planning to do that then :)
[15:53] <chrisccoulson> which is what https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-next is designed for ;)
[15:53] <mdeslaur> ok, I'll stick them in my flash ppa when I have a minute
[15:53] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[15:53] <chrisccoulson> we can push them to the firefox beta PPA once you're sure they're working if you want
[15:54] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: ok, let me think about that, but it's probably a good idea
[15:54] <chrisccoulson> cool
[15:55] <chrisccoulson> jlebar_, thanks for the heads-up
[15:55] <jlebar_> Sure thing!
[15:56] <chrisccoulson> it's funny that whilst we're trying to get rid of nspluginwrapper, the gnome guys now depend on it for running flash in epiphany
[15:56] <chrisccoulson> which sucks :/
[19:31] <FernandoMiguel> evening <3
[19:32] <micahg> hi FernandoMiguel
[19:33] <micahg> chrisccoulson: we should patch that out if we ship we 64 bit flash (unless they're using it like plugin-container in firefox)
[19:33] <micahg> ugh, that was about epipahny ^^
[19:33] <chrisccoulson> micahg, patch what out?
[19:33] <micahg> requiring nspluginwrapper
[19:34] <chrisccoulson> micahg, then you can't use flash in epiphany, at all
[19:34] <micahg> that sounds like a bug
[19:34] <micahg> unless they're using it like that for security reasons (i.e. process separation)
[19:34] <chrisccoulson> sure. the bug is that epiphany uses gtk3 and flash uses gtk2
[19:34] <chrisccoulson> you can't have them in the same address space
[19:34] <micahg> ah, heh, that makes sense then :)
[19:36] <knome> micahg, chrisccoulson: gotcha! so, what about a xubuntu-specific firefox start page?
[19:36] <micahg>  /away gone fishing
[19:36] <micahg> oops :)
[19:36] <knome> hahah, i know this is a sensitive subject
[19:36] <knome> but i'd really like to know if it's possible at all
[19:37] <knome> technically, we could even have a startpage that doesn't require translations
[19:38] <chrisccoulson> what would you actually want the startpage to point at?
[19:38] <knome> that could be a "local" page in the CD or a subpage in xubuntu.org, which we could create before precise release
[19:39] <knome> whatever is easier...
[19:39] <chrisccoulson> well, a local page on the CD is out of the question unless you're willing to package the page as an extension
[19:39] <knome> micahg, ?
[19:39] <chrisccoulson> CSS is blocked from file: URI's
[19:40] <chrisccoulson> well, at least when i last looked at it. our old offline page didn't work because of that
[19:40]  * micahg was wondering if start.ubuntu.com could be branded based on URL ala start.xubuntu.org
[19:41] <knome> branded, yes, easily (from a technical POV), but the question of actually changing some content (we'd like links to xubuntu.org and so) is a different thing
[19:42] <micahg> knome: right, I was more concerned with keeping the search box intact
[19:42] <knome> micahg, is that a problem with a self-managed page?
[19:42] <micahg> problem? idk
[19:43] <knome> as far as i know, google doesn't forbid using their search...
[19:43] <micahg> no, not at all
[19:43] <knome> :)
[19:43] <knome> so managing our own page at start.xubuntu.org or sth could be technically easiest
[19:43] <knome> the question is, could we even pass that page some parameters, like the lang
[19:45] <knome> like, start.xubuntu.org/lang/