[10:06] Greetings. [12:50] did the addressbar autocomplete stuff get backed out? i've just noticed it's not working on my nightly builds now [12:56] ok, i think i answered my own question: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/63757aa2e629 :) === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [15:45] Hey, guys. Wanted to give you a heads-up that in FF13, Flash with npwrapper may not work everywhere. [15:45] SEe https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723164 [15:45] Mozilla bug 723164 in Plug-ins "Pandora does not fully load" [Normal,Resolved: invalid] [15:46] At least some of the documentation I read recommended this as the best way to use Flash. [15:48] jlebar_: thanks for the heads up...the precise flashplugin-nonfree package now installs the native 64bit one [15:48] mdeslaur, Excellent. I'm not sure how I got into the mess I did, but I may have done something silly to get the 32-bit version installed. [15:49] jlebar_: well, if you're running oneiric and older, that's still what gets installed [15:50] mdeslaur, Ah, that explains it then. :) [15:51] Sounds like you guys are upgrading just in time then! [15:51] FF13 is scheduled for release on June 5. [15:52] hah, i love bsmedberg's comment in that bug [15:52] i have basically the same opinion of nspluginwrapper ;) [15:52] hrm, I do have flash packages for lucid-oneiric that update to the native 64bit version, but have resisted pushing them for fear of introducing regressions... [15:52] guess that's going to force my hand :P [15:52] mdeslaur, yeah, i guess we should start planning to do that then :) [15:53] which is what https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-next is designed for ;) [15:53] ok, I'll stick them in my flash ppa when I have a minute [15:53] thanks [15:53] we can push them to the firefox beta PPA once you're sure they're working if you want [15:54] chrisccoulson: ok, let me think about that, but it's probably a good idea [15:54] cool [15:55] jlebar_, thanks for the heads-up [15:55] Sure thing! [15:56] it's funny that whilst we're trying to get rid of nspluginwrapper, the gnome guys now depend on it for running flash in epiphany [15:56] which sucks :/ [19:31] evening <3 [19:32] hi FernandoMiguel [19:33] chrisccoulson: we should patch that out if we ship we 64 bit flash (unless they're using it like plugin-container in firefox) [19:33] ugh, that was about epipahny ^^ [19:33] micahg, patch what out? [19:33] requiring nspluginwrapper [19:34] micahg, then you can't use flash in epiphany, at all [19:34] that sounds like a bug [19:34] unless they're using it like that for security reasons (i.e. process separation) [19:34] sure. the bug is that epiphany uses gtk3 and flash uses gtk2 [19:34] you can't have them in the same address space [19:34] ah, heh, that makes sense then :) [19:36] micahg, chrisccoulson: gotcha! so, what about a xubuntu-specific firefox start page? [19:36] /away gone fishing [19:36] oops :) [19:36] hahah, i know this is a sensitive subject [19:36] but i'd really like to know if it's possible at all [19:37] technically, we could even have a startpage that doesn't require translations [19:38] what would you actually want the startpage to point at? [19:38] that could be a "local" page in the CD or a subpage in xubuntu.org, which we could create before precise release [19:39] whatever is easier... [19:39] well, a local page on the CD is out of the question unless you're willing to package the page as an extension [19:39] micahg, ? [19:39] CSS is blocked from file: URI's [19:40] well, at least when i last looked at it. our old offline page didn't work because of that [19:40] * micahg was wondering if start.ubuntu.com could be branded based on URL ala start.xubuntu.org [19:41] branded, yes, easily (from a technical POV), but the question of actually changing some content (we'd like links to xubuntu.org and so) is a different thing [19:42] knome: right, I was more concerned with keeping the search box intact [19:42] micahg, is that a problem with a self-managed page? [19:42] problem? idk [19:43] as far as i know, google doesn't forbid using their search... [19:43] no, not at all [19:43] :) [19:43] so managing our own page at start.xubuntu.org or sth could be technically easiest [19:43] the question is, could we even pass that page some parameters, like the lang [19:45] like, start.xubuntu.org/lang/ === gavin_ is now known as gavin === FernandoMiguel1 is now known as FernandoMiguel === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away