[03:07] <apachelogger> alpha \o/
[04:01] <micahg> is there a reason why qt3-designer is in the kubuntu supported seed?
[04:08] <apachelogger> micahg: leftover I guess
[04:08] <apachelogger> yeah, doesn't even seem to have rdeps
[04:08] <micahg>  * qt3-designer #may as well, qt3 is in LSB
[04:08] <apachelogger> oh yes, LSB and their old cruft ^^
[04:09] <apachelogger> though I am not sure why designer would be part of the spec
[04:09] <micahg> I was thinking of asking to demote the rest of the binaries in qt-x11-free to universe that isn't needed by LSB
[04:10] <micahg> it's not, it's just seeded in main as "supported" since we have to keep qt3 there
[04:11] <apachelogger> well, so put qt3 there, but designer makes no sense :P
[04:11] <apachelogger> http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/i386/qt3-designer/filelist
[04:11] <apachelogger> it doesn't even contain stuff you'd need at either build or runtime
[04:11] <micahg> right, I think it was just a ride along
[04:11] <apachelogger> probably
[04:11] <micahg> mind if I remove it?
[04:12] <apachelogger> nope
[04:15] <micahg> done, thanka
[04:15] <micahg> *thanks
[04:25] <apachelogger> afiestas: about your patch... is that stuff meant to be string based? :O
[04:26] <apachelogger> it's like pulseaudio on drugs then ;)
[09:56] <Riddell> micahg: yes qt3-designer should be demonted,thanks for looking into it
[09:57] <Riddell> I'm away to fosdem today so can't do the release team meeting, ask skaet how to help if you can (it's easy)
[09:59] <Riddell> "Felix Geyer (debfx) renewed their own membership"  thanks for still loving us debfx!
[11:57] <ScottK> Riddell: I will likely be around and can be present for the meeting.  Can you send the status mail out before you go?
[13:28] <shadeslayer> yofel_: apachelogger we don't install translations because the buildd automatically puts them in lang packs right?
[13:42] <apachelogger> what?
[13:42] <apachelogger> we do install translations!
[13:42] <apachelogger> via language packs
[13:42] <apachelogger> for main/restricted packages
[13:43] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: yes, what I'm saying is, we don't bundle translations with the apps themselves right?
[13:43] <Tm_T> no
[13:43] <Tm_T> actually, isn't there some exceptions?
[13:43] <apachelogger> of course there is
[13:44] <shadeslayer> ^ Don't know alot about i10n magic
[13:44] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: okay, so, in KDE telepathy, should I bundle translations together with the app or leave them for the buildd?
[13:44] <apachelogger> eh?
[13:45] <apachelogger> for achive builds you cannot bundle translations
[13:45] <apachelogger> they will be stripped away
[13:45] <apachelogger> holy automated
[13:45] <apachelogger> IIRC you can have them in your install file
[13:45] <apachelogger> but they still won't show up in the deb
[13:45] <shadeslayer> oh awesome
[13:46] <apachelogger> the stripping happens like right at deb creation or immediately before it
[13:46] <shadeslayer> I think it happens just before it
[13:46] <shadeslayer> ( from looking at the build log )
[13:49] <apachelogger> simply look at dh_binarymangler or whats its name
[13:51] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: did you find your phone?
[13:51] <apachelogger> yes
[13:51] <shadeslayer> ah okay :D
[13:52] <apachelogger> it was hiding in hydrogen's computer
[13:52] <shadeslayer> sneaky little thing eh
[14:48] <skaet> Riddell, ScottK - no actual IRC meeting today (day after a milestone release),  discussion will be held on ubuntu-release maillist instead.
[14:49] <ScottK> skaet: Thanks.  Riddell's off on his way to FOSDEM.
[14:50] <skaet> ScottK,  Thanks.  :)  if there's anything that's of concern for the Kubuntu team,  please send it to the mail list,  folks should be monitoring/responding for there today. 
[15:03] <shadeslayer> Quintasan: Riddell https://launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/nightly/+packages : ktp-accounts-kcm is final as well, ktp approver pending review
[15:22] <Quintasan> k
[17:16] <micahg> Riddell: I'll work on getting the rest of that stack except for what lsb-desktop needs demoted later
[19:27] <shadeslayer> whoops
[19:27] <shadeslayer> yofel: huh, we have kdevelop  packages in staging
[19:49] <yofel> shadeslayer: uh, didn't you use staging for the backports?
[19:49] <shadeslayer> yofel: yep, and we forgot to finish them off
[19:49] <shadeslayer> I'm finishing it off right now
[19:49] <shadeslayer> and I think it has a slight problem
[19:50] <shadeslayer> http://paste.kde.org/199496/ 
[19:50] <shadeslayer> Didn't have it on precise
[19:52] <yofel> seems right though looking at the install files
[19:52] <yofel> the old one had a broken pattern
[19:53] <shadeslayer> hmm ... I'll have to add break/replaces in kdevplatform-dev then
[19:53] <shadeslayer> yofel: do we need this fix in precise as well ? Or just oneiric?
[19:53] <shadeslayer> I don't remember seeing the issue on precise
[19:54] <yofel> should be needed for both
[19:54] <yofel> apt probably just upgraded the packages in a different order there
[19:54] <shadeslayer> possibly
[20:03] <shadeslayer> yofel: http://people.ubuntu.com/~rohangarg/kdevelop/kdevplatform_1.2.81-0ubuntu2.dsc < Please review and upload :)
[20:06] <yofel> shadeslayer: up
[20:07] <shadeslayer> thanks