=== soren_ is now known as soren | ||
OwaisL | Can someone help me out with GtkClutter please? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9148557/gtkclutter-actor-signals-not-firing | 10:37 |
---|---|---|
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
=== artnay_ is now known as artnay | ||
micahg | jbicha: are you aware of the MIRs needed for your eximdoc4 sync? | 21:43 |
* micahg is wondering why that's in the desktop set at all, but that's for another time | 21:45 | |
jbicha | micahg: oh, I did test-build it here but my chroot has universe :( | 22:10 |
micahg | jbicha: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt | 22:12 |
=== Omega is now known as KarlMarx | ||
=== KarlMarx is now known as Troletariat | ||
jbicha | micahg: so since nothing depends on it, eximdoc4 should be dropped to universe, right? | 23:01 |
micahg | jbicha: it's seeded on the dvd, seemingly since exim4 is in a server seed | 23:03 |
stgraber | gah, micahg was faster again ... I was about to paste a grep from the seeds ;) | 23:04 |
jbicha | what do I checkout so I can grep for packages like that? | 23:04 |
* micahg is wondering if maybe we should drop it anyways, that was when exim4 was shipped on the server cd | 23:05 | |
jbicha | it takes a while to search through http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ | 23:05 |
stgraber | micahg: AFAIK exim4 isn't on a media, but it's still widely used so it's very likely in a supported seed (I know at least IS uses that) | 23:05 |
stgraber | jbicha: http://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu-seeds | 23:05 |
micahg | right, so who needs to be in the loop about dropping it from the DVD seed | 23:05 |
stgraber | jbicha: I usually have the official ones for precise locally so I can grep through them | 23:06 |
stgraber | jbicha: you can also grab them from http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ (they are bzr branches, so you can just bzr branch from there too) | 23:07 |
stgraber | micahg: I'd poke cjwatson about it, according to a quick bzr blame, he's the one who put it there (or copied/moved it from somewhere else). I don't think people really care about this though ;) | 23:08 |
micahg | right, ok, will do | 23:08 |
micahg | right, he did this almost 4 years ago :) | 23:09 |
stgraber | :) | 23:10 |
stgraber | I remember looking for when a change was introduced last week (to try and justify that "it's been there forever"), to actually find it was done in rev1 of a UDD branch with a warty changelog entry ;) | 23:11 |
stgraber | (after having to do 3-4 successive bzr blame as the code in question moved around quite a bit in all these years) | 23:12 |
micahg | yeah, I think I'll just drop it | 23:13 |
micahg | the docs don't really help if it's not on the media anyways | 23:13 |
micahg | hmm, neither package seems to be on the DVD according to the manifest | 23:18 |
* micahg saw a line in the seed that makes asking seem reasonable again | 23:22 | |
* micahg replies to the component-mismatch e-mail | 23:31 | |
RAOF | Bah! Show | 23:36 |
RAOF | Bah! Show-desktop in alt-tab is now destructive again :( | 23:37 |
micahg | ok, mail sent | 23:41 |
RAOF | Um. What the hell is the GTK change which prompted http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-control-center/commit/?id=7f5733b454e26c882d4e707b57cd03b104f57dd2 ? This also seems to apply to GTK2, and it broke applications (specifically, *my* application, GNOME Do). Why is GTK2 still receiving application-breaking changes?! | 23:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!