| === koolhead17 is now known as koolhead17|zzZZ | ||
| hazmat | niemeyer pong | 00:30 |
|---|---|---|
| niemeyer | hazmat: Heya | 00:30 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: Was just wondering about the boolean stuff, but Clint already mentioned it's still on going | 00:30 |
| hazmat | hmm. wasn't appearing in the kanban view the other branch masked it | 00:32 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: Most of the remaining issues seem related to it | 00:34 |
| niemeyer | hazmat: Also a couple of new cases related to symlinks | 00:34 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: I've only seen basic symlinks in charms.. the kind where they link foo -> ./common.sh | 00:47 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Yeah, these are still fine | 00:47 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: We'll prevent only the symlinks pointing out of the charm | 00:48 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: The are only two occurrences in the entire repo | 00:48 |
| niemeyer | There are | 00:48 |
| SpamapS | I'd bet those are not in the reviewed charms | 00:49 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: I've sent the output of the import round to the list | 00:49 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: It's | 00:49 |
| niemeyer | ----- lp:~yellow/charms/oneiric/buildbot-slave/trunk | 00:49 |
| niemeyer | and | 00:49 |
| niemeyer | ----- lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/charms/precise/nova-cloud-controller/trunk | 00:50 |
| niemeyer | It's really unfortunate that we didn't start revisions on 1' | 01:21 |
| jimbaker | finally, reproduced bug 912812 in a simple test | 01:41 |
| _mup_ | Bug #912812: Error condition on relation hooks locks events processing <juju:In Progress by jimbaker> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/912812 > | 01:41 |
| jimbaker | (about time ;) ) | 01:41 |
| _mup_ | juju/purge-queued-hooks r454 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 01:44 |
| _mup_ | Added test to verify queued hooks are purged after error | 01:44 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker: What was it about? | 01:50 |
| jimbaker | niemeyer, per the above bug, there may be queued hooks (say -changed after a -joined) that are waiting to run. but what if -joined exits with an error? the workflow (and its underlying state machine) at this point is in an error and it cannot run any such hooks | 01:53 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker: Hmm, right.. but isn't that expected? | 01:55 |
| jimbaker | niemeyer, sure. hence the bug | 01:56 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker: Sorry, I mean.. isn't the fact that it stops event processing expected? | 01:56 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker: What's the bug? | 01:56 |
| * niemeyer reads | 01:56 | |
| jimbaker | niemeyer, the state machine freezes | 01:56 |
| jimbaker | and the unit is consequently dead | 01:56 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker: Ah, ok.. the problem isn't that it stops processing events, but that it stops processing *EVERYTHING* ;-) | 01:57 |
| jimbaker | niemeyer, correct | 01:57 |
| _mup_ | juju/purge-queued-hooks r455 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 02:24 |
| _mup_ | Ensure accompanying -changed hook does not execute if -joined fails | 02:24 |
| === hspencer is now known as hspencer[afk] | ||
| === koolhead17|zzZZ is now known as koolhead17 | ||
| === asavu_ is now known as asavu | ||
| jorge | could anyone help me with a juju test to deploy hadoop-master charm? the detailed scenario is pasted here http://pastebin.com/CrBab8RY ... Thanks! :) | 14:19 |
| m_3 | jorge: hi, I'll give it a try on my end... it looks like it can't see the ppa | 15:13 |
| jcastro | http://askubuntu.com/questions/102698/juju-wont-run-on-orchestra-due-to-ssh-error | 15:30 |
| jcastro | new question if someone has time to check it out | 15:30 |
| jorge | m_3: hum... but, when I run the same install script manually, from the same instance, it works. the instance has the proxy env variables set up (http_proxy no_proxy ....). so, i would like to understand how juju run the script. maybe this is the problem. | 15:43 |
| m_3 | jorge: yeah, I just got it to 'started' state | 15:47 |
| m_3 | and the tests have been passing for hadoop-master | 15:48 |
| m_3 | try it again if you would... destroy-service, then terminate-machine, then deploy it again | 15:48 |
| m_3 | trying to determine if it was just spurious dns fail or something else | 15:49 |
| jorge | ok | 15:54 |
| === fjlacoste is now known as flacoste | ||
| jcastro | niemeyer: heya, I'm not clear about something when you do these imports. | 18:20 |
| jcastro | do we need to have those 22 bugs fixed before the store can go live? | 18:20 |
| jcastro | basically, should I be making an effort to find people willing to help fix those? | 18:21 |
| m_3 | jcastro: I think it's more a warning that these won't be visible to the charm-store | 18:21 |
| jcastro | ok, so they're not like "we need to fix these now or we are doomed" | 18:22 |
| m_3 | jcastro: I'm watching the official "~charmers" ones closely... the rest shouldn't matter, they're just personal branches | 18:22 |
| m_3 | afaik | 18:22 |
| jcastro | ok, that clears it up for me, thanks | 18:22 |
| m_3 | I think the boolean may've landed recently... I'll verify, but once it does the remaining `~charmers` branches can be fixed | 18:24 |
| jcastro | we have a guy setting up juju with orchestra if someone wants to answer these: http://askubuntu.com/questions/tagged/juju?sort=unanswered&pagesize=50 | 18:28 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: will there be somewhere that people can go to see the reason their charm failed to import? | 18:30 |
| m_3 | SpamapS: good question... rather than waiting for reports thru email | 18:33 |
| SpamapS | even email is dicey IMO.. we don't have a contact field yet | 18:33 |
| === marrusl_ is now known as marrusl | ||
| hazmat | SpamapS, we do indirectly | 19:37 |
| hazmat | if its from a ppa, the owner is known | 19:37 |
| hazmat | and if its in charmers, the responsible group is known | 19:38 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: true. I think I'm just anti-email because I have 400 unread | 19:40 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Yo | 20:03 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Sorry, was off for a while | 20:03 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Absolutely.. the only reason I've been sending those reports to the list is because I've been working on the importer and the store itself | 20:04 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Tailoring restrictions and fixing bugs as I go | 20:04 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: So it feels like a good idea to share the whole-repo intermediate results so that the repository may be improved while we don't have the final thing | 20:04 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: In the future, juju publish will give immediate feedback | 20:05 |
| m_3 | jcastro: post sounds good.. ship it | 20:06 |
| jcastro | <3 thanks | 20:06 |
| m_3 | I think it's asking for help in exactly the right way... getting peeps to think about what sort of customizations they might already do | 20:06 |
| jcastro | right | 20:06 |
| m_3 | ... and sharing them | 20:07 |
| jcastro | so if like everyone is saying "everyone knows you use nginx with wordpress" | 20:07 |
| jcastro | then we should ship that! | 20:07 |
| m_3 | right | 20:07 |
| jcastro | of course people will argue about the nitnoid details, but even if you follow most of the things people agree on it's still better than what we have now | 20:07 |
| m_3 | and other choices that people like can just be config options | 20:07 |
| jcastro | right! | 20:07 |
| m_3 | or fork | 20:08 |
| jcastro | I should flesh out that detail better. | 20:08 |
| m_3 | that's another post :) | 20:08 |
| === fenris_ is now known as Guest25990 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!