[04:55] pangolin called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic (bootris) [04:56] EvilResistance called the ops in #ubuntu (bootris) [04:56] on #ubunntu check bootris comments please [04:57] #ubuntu [05:57] morning [05:57] [06:53:13] --> flamoot has joined this channel (~flamoot@69-196-191-74.dsl.teksavvy.com). <- probably the same machine as bootris about an hour ago, same ISP anyway, and still talking random stuff [05:57] [06:55:18] [CTCP] Received CTCP-VERSION reply from flamoot: ircbot.py by Joel Rosdahl . [06:01] <- out again; ping me in #ubuntu or #ubuntu-offtopic for any questions [06:07] so we have a return it seems of a banned user earlier they mention bootris their nic is now flamoot and they are just mimicing post and posting nonesense [06:07] mimicking [06:07] in #ubuntu [06:18] ActionParsnip called the ops in #ubuntu (flamoot) [06:30] urlin2u called the ops in #ubuntu+1 (bot flamoot) [07:45] In #ubuntu, c31r2g said: ubottu:my processor is celeron m and higher versions lag a bit [07:48] Can i get unbanned. [07:51] how did you get banned? [07:51] Off topic. [07:52] I was banned in the past for off topic by a op that considered something dealing with ubuntu and getting help on ubuntu off topic... [07:57] 2012-02-02T09:42:37 I dare you to recover data from a puddle of metal. [07:58] Thats not what i was talking about. [07:58] stuff like that is not appropriate, nor is it dealing with ubuntu nor is it getting help on ubuntu [07:58] you were talking about albino peacocks instead, right before the ban [07:59] I understand that and thats why I am banned right now. [07:59] But thats not what I was talking about. [07:59] elky, just curious, can a #ubuntu op insult people in other channels? [08:00] even in #ubuntu [08:01] what incident specifically are you talking about? [08:01] A mutch older one now [08:02] Its to late now, the op said they consider it oftopic and if I didnt stop i'd be banned... :| and i was for that [08:02] Anyways, may I get unbanned? [08:03] depends if you can convince me that you're aware that offtopic things are not allowed in #ubuntu, even from people who are helping [08:03] I understand they ain't allowed and I am using #ubuntu-offtopic when told [08:04] and you've read the guidelines and the code of conduct? [08:04] yes [08:04] iToast: I hope you don't rely on others telling you when -offtopic is used [08:04] Perhaps for disclosure you should mention that you were banned from other channels, too [08:04] mrmist, How does that coun't remotly here? [08:05] It shows a pattern of behaviour [08:05] By inserting a comment like that your changing a outcome. [08:05] Yes, I'm aware of that possibility [08:05] mrmist, Most of my bans are involved with psi-jack. [08:05] He doesn't like me. He judeges me harder and takes everything as breaking rules. [08:05] As i've stated in the past, he stoped me from getting help but when someone else was going to help and i was trying to talk to them, he threated to ban me. [08:06] He wasen't able to provide help but another person could. but I should google everything :| [08:07] He doesn't consider the fact that I state "I've googled for about 2 hours and got nothing accurate before coming here for help" [08:07] I don't see any bans in any other channels, just #ubuntu. (past or present) [08:08] there's bans for #ubuntu-ops in our tracker, from previous times he's tried to get unbanned and given cheek and attitude instead of cooperation [08:08] Ops often expect a user to listen and take being insulted or suffer their power. [08:08] ok, of course the ops here are free to make their own decisions, and it's probably not important. [08:08] I was called a "moron" by a op in here. [08:08] also, according to our tracker, he's effectively dodging bans. [08:08] mrmist: Are you talking about non #ubuntu channels? [08:09] elky, how am I dodging bans? [08:09] iToast, there's numerous webchat bans for "iToast" [08:09] How is that dodging? [08:09] I've had my head ripped off by about 800+ people for using webchat. [08:10] I'm now using xchat and enjoying it, and not getting my head ripped off! [08:10] Flannel: yes. [08:10] elky: I don't think those are bans, unless I'm doing it wrong. [08:10] mrmist: Ah, that's not terribly applicable then. [08:11] Flannel: Indeed probably not [08:12] mrmist, your bringing gasoline to firefighters to put out a fire. [08:12] iToast: you can choose to deflect the discussion at me, or you can continue towards getting unbanned. One of those is productive. [08:12] iToast: He's not. We're perfectly capable of looking at information and disregarding non-relevant bits. [08:13] iToast, the size of our channels mean we take advice from staff occasionally. [08:13] Looking for other stuff about a user to bring it up will alter the outcome of the result in a unfavourable whay when the information isn't requested. [08:14] hardly. "being arrested meant i was held accountable for that stuff i would have gotten away with" is silly logic [08:15] now, lets talk about the ban [08:15] Thats comparing a disscussion to a legal action [08:16] elky, would it be possible to contact you any other way? I enjoy speaking with you. [08:16] No. [08:16] :/ [08:17] iToast: Is this a social call? or are we trying to come to some sort of resolution? [08:17] mrmist, has agreed to not say anything more in this discussion providing you don't address him. Ok? [08:17] elky, ty [08:17] How about we proceed with the discussion here. [08:17] ok [08:18] iToast: I hope you don't rely on others telling you when -offtopic is used [08:18] now, if you could respond to that, it'd be great [08:19] I know not to rely on them but sometimes people consider something ontopic offtopic. [08:19] I was told i was offtopic and waned for it for telling the person helping me the guide I was following [08:20] you were told you were offtopic for stuff unrelated to helping anyone [08:21] elky, The person was helping me and so they know what I did accuratly adn what i was following i sent them the guide [08:21] Thats like me telling you to goto alaska without a map or a gps, just vauge instructions how to get their [08:23] that's not what happened. [08:24] wer [08:24] we've roamed offtopic again. [08:24] no, we're discussing how to behave in #ubuntu, and you're claiming things that didn't happen. [08:25] It is entirely ontopic that i make sure you know how to behave before letting you back in there [08:25] elky everyone has a different view on ontopic / offtopic. [08:25] the topic is: your behaviour in #ubuntu. [08:25] My view is to give who ever is helping you the same resource your using to prevent confusion, it ends in a solution quite fast [08:26] and what does that have to do with you being banned for telling people to melt harddrives and recover data from them, and you talking nonsense about peacocks in a video you were watching [08:27] elky, thats not what i was talking about with my last statement. [08:27] then please do talk about it. I want assurance that you can moderate yourself without needing someone to watch you and tell you specifically when you're offtopic [08:28] To be honest it was a stupid aciton on my end. [08:28] what thread of conversation in particular are you referring to now? [08:28] O [08:28] I'm refering to my actions being offtopic in general. [08:29] ok, and can you assure me that you know what is offtopic and don't need a watcher? [08:29] Isn't that what you wan'ted me to understand? Being offtopic will result in actions from a op in order to keep the channel helpfull and usefull [08:29] yes [08:29] ok, that's all i wanted to hear. i don't know why it took so long to get it. [08:29] I said yes earlyer? [08:30] elky, how long have you been with ubuntu? [08:30] since 2005 [08:30] "* Cannot join #ubuntu (You are banned)." [08:30] earlier you said yes, but you tried to throw in a strawman argument [08:31] you might want to have patience for me to find you in the ban list first [08:31] Isn't it just a command for ops? [08:31] !unban...? [08:31] iToast: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [08:31] O.o [08:31] i can't type here and in #Ubuntu at the same second ;) [08:31] Dual screens and keyboards would let you :P [08:31] i'm on a netbook [08:31] O.o [08:31] they don't make them that advanced yet [08:32] running ubuntu? [08:32] yes [08:32] I'm a early adopter of netbooks. [08:32] i don't have any non-ubuntu computers [08:32] Dont tell me how advancethey are :P [08:32] I'm a early win 7 beta tester early netbook user... [08:32] they don't have 2 screens and 2 keyboards yet [08:32] Thats a design flaw. [08:32] Not eneugh productivity [08:32] i think we need to reinvent physics first [08:33] anyway, the ban is now lifted [08:33] Ty [08:33] lol [08:33] Why reinvent physics? thats like reinventing the wheel... [08:33] so that my hands can move fast enough to use 2 keyboards at the same time [08:34] 1 hand per keyboard. [08:34] too much resistance in flesh for that at present [08:34] You're doing it wrong. [08:34] Use the most logical answer, 1 hand per keyboard [08:34] if we revent physics, gravity.deb might crash. [08:35] in which case we'd be able to fly and nobody would give a toss [08:35] anyway, lets not pollute the logs of this channel with that [08:35] Hope you enjoy flying into the vacume of space :P [08:36] i'll run out of oxygen before i turn inside out, the view will be worth it. [08:36] iToast: anything else we can help you with? (: [08:37] * elky points to the channel topic === iToast_ is now known as iToast [08:41] iToast: anything else we can help you with? (: [08:41] a broken server? [08:41] :) [08:41] iToast: we have this thing called channel topic, take a read (; [08:42] Tm_T, I forgot how to read ;) [13:33] what the hell [13:33] n00bs [13:34] ok [13:38] ahhh, he was a pain yesterday, can't remember what for [13:39] ahhh I remember him [13:39] the guy with the impossible hotspot setup [13:39] and then started calling people names [13:39] found him in BT [13:48] dnsmasq? that one? [13:49] right, then started calling people "retard" or something similar [13:51] thats the guy [13:51] good memory [13:57] Tm_T: he actually gave the support answer [13:58] Tm_T: he then offered a bit of advice, that you could find it with google, I don't think he gave google as a support answer [13:58] it's not like he said "google it" [13:59] he said "here is the URL, you can find it with google also" [13:59] I know [13:59] why would ubuntu need qt 4.8 [14:00] just curious then, I'm not a big fan of some of BluesKaj's support, but I didn't see an issue with what he said [14:00] thought that was a kde necessity [14:00] bazhang: using some QT apps [14:00] bazhang: there are non-kde apps that are QT [14:00] (I can't think of any, they are obscure) [14:00] ikonia: maybe I'm getting a bit too edgy of the constant "google it" attitude I see /: [14:00] it's odd silex would want qt 4.8 with 10.10 ubuntu ? [14:10] ask him directly ? [16:25] Hi! Could a #ubuntu+1 operator add this to the topic: "Binary nvidia drivers not working with new eglibc-2.15: http://pad.lv/929384" ? [16:25] Launchpad bug 929384 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) "nvidia drivers broken by the recent libc update" [High,Confirmed] [16:26] done [16:26] Thanks, pangolin [16:26] welcome [16:26] Cya laters [17:28] I'm taking a break from work (IT), to help someone with networking. [17:28] I need more hobbies [17:28] hehe [17:29] but this will be much more appreciated I think [17:30] not when it comes time to buy food [17:31] food is overrated [17:32] ^ this is true, two lines up. [18:09] !no gnash is Gnash is an open-source Flash replacement. It is still beta software. For current status or for more info http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ [18:09] I'll remember that pangolin [18:10] thank you [18:58] I remember gnash. [18:59] FloodBotK1 called the ops in #kubuntu-ops-monitor (sandy appears to be abusive and has been muted, will need to be UNMUTED MANUALLY) [19:00] false positive [19:00] that should be fixed [19:00] a repeat after 10 minutes is hardly abusive [19:00] yeah [19:01] pangolin: although, why not ];= [19:01] because it is mean :( [19:55] uhm it simply shouldn't do that for repeating [19:56] i don't know why it did that, will check [19:59] i cannot really seem to reproduce it, maybe it's some quirk specific to the K bots [20:04] LjL: are the K bots still running the older code? [20:06] pangolin: i don't know, but i suspect so === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat [23:48] urlin2u called the ops in #ubuntu (Tammis)