[01:35] <wzssyqa> I'am building our own launchpad now, and confusing about how to work with dak?
[01:37] <mwhudson> dak?
[01:37] <mwhudson> launchpad is entirely separate from dak
[01:40] <wzssyqa> mwhudson: what tool is used to manage ubuntu archive?
[01:40] <mwhudson> wzssyqa: that part of launchpad is called soyuz
[01:40] <mwhudson> wzssyqa: https://dev.launchpad.net/Soyuz/HowToUseSoyuzLocally has some documentation
[01:40] <mwhudson> but it's not the friendliest thing ever
[01:41] <dpb_> hi all -- is there some trick to deleting a revno on a recipe?  I delete it, and it keeps coming back.  I can change it to another number, but not delete it
[01:43] <wgrant> dpb_: What do you mean by deleting a revno?
[01:43] <dpb_> so I put a revno:<num> after the branch, to temporarily test something
[01:43] <wgrant> Can you link to the recipe?
[01:44] <dpb_> wgrant: yes, I think so...
[01:44] <dpb_> https://code.launchpad.net/~landscape/+recipe/commandant-daily-trunk-lds
[01:44] <dpb_> wgrant: tell me if that is visible
[01:45] <wgrant> dpb_: Ah, on the initial branch.
[01:45] <wgrant> It removes from a "merge" directive fine
[01:45] <wgrant> Hmmmm
[01:45] <wgrant> Could you file a bug?
[01:45] <dpb_> wgrant: sure, against launchpad project?
[01:45] <wgrant> Yep
[01:45] <dpb_> wgrant: so, should I just delete this recipe and recreate?
[01:47] <wgrant> dpb_: You can probably replace 'revno:HEAD' with '-1' to use the latest rev.
[01:48] <dpb_> wgrant: #929938, fyi
[01:48] <wgrant> dpb_: Thanks.
[01:48] <dpb_> wgrant: great, will try the build again with -1
[01:48] <dpb_> thx
[02:15] <blair> i made a small mess with a new team and new ppa for the team, if i delete the ppa it appears to not be fully deleted, so i deleted the team.  can i then make a team with the same name again?
[02:16] <wgrant> blair: Yes.
[02:16] <blair> wgrant, thanks!
[08:06] <pabs3> a couple of my mails to bug 844306 gave me some oopses, anyone able to help? OOPS-9753a47081192ce223e3f728ba34fb0b OOPS-c7dd1a8d47d6d8e1c35474494e884449
[08:06] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 844306 in dwarfutils (Ubuntu) "dwarfdump crashes on malformed input" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/844306
[08:06] <ubot5`> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=9753a47081192ce223e3f728ba34fb0b
[08:06] <ubot5`> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=c7dd1a8d47d6d8e1c35474494e884449
[08:29] <wgrant> pabs3: You can't currently use email to change the privacy status of a bug with attachments.
[08:29] <wgrant> Bug #796733
[08:29] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 796733 in Launchpad itself "Changing private status of bug report per mail violates DB permissions" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/796733
[08:30] <pabs3> wgrant: I didn't think I was changing the privacy status. I only set security yes importance high
[08:31] <wgrant> pabs3: Hm, reasonable point.
[08:33] <wgrant> pabs3: ugh, setting security to true through the API also makes it private. That's meant to happen if it's set at the time the bug is filed, but not later.
[08:33] <pabs3> aha, lp bug I guess?
[08:33] <wgrant> Yeah
[08:33] <wgrant> x2
[08:33] <pabs3> could you file those?
[08:34] <wgrant> One is already filed, the other will be solved when we finish our complete rework of privacy in a couple of months.
[08:34] <pabs3> cool
[09:10] <tsdgeos> robert collins around?
[09:36] <geser> tsdgeos: his nick is lifeless
[09:36] <tsdgeos> geser: oki, tx
[09:36] <tsdgeos> lifeless: answered the bug about the merge request thing
[09:37] <tsdgeos> lifeless: other people is getting it, since someone just told me
[09:37] <tsdgeos> "tsdgeos: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-2d-team/unity-2d/MultiMonitor-Shell/+register-merge"
[09:37] <tsdgeos> unaware that the url had not refreshed
[10:09] <pmjdebru1jn> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92489393/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.dansguardian_2%3A2.10.1.1-1unnet12~lucid_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz
[10:09] <pmjdebru1jn> does anybody have a clue what's going on there?
[10:09] <pmjdebru1jn> seems like a signature issue?
[10:09] <pmjdebru1jn> is that because I have a "local" customized eglibc version there?
[10:15] <wgrant> pmjdebru1jn: Something (probably the customized eglibc, indeed) is causing e2fsprogs and hostname to be removed.
[10:15] <wgrant> Perhaps try in a chroot locally, with your PPA enabled.
[10:17] <pmjdebru1jn> wgrant: the change I made is VERY minor
[10:17] <pmjdebru1jn> I did up the epoch though
[10:17] <pmjdebru1jn> do those packages have if version < checking?
[10:20] <pmjdebru1jn> nis (<< 3.17-30)
[10:20] <pmjdebru1jn> there my problem
[10:20] <pmjdebru1jn> :(
[10:20] <pmjdebru1jn> the thing is, I can't upload an epochless version now
[10:20] <pmjdebru1jn> since the PPA will only take newer versions
[10:20] <pmjdebru1jn> is there a way to have to PPA reset? or do I just need to make a new PPA?
[10:21] <pmjdebru1jn> anyhow, mistery solved
[10:21] <wgrant> If you delete the package and wait a few hours it should let you.
[10:22] <wgrant> But this is one reason why you should never use an epoch unless you are absolutely sure.
[10:24] <pmjdebru1jn> wgrant: yeah
[10:24] <pmjdebru1jn> makes sense now
[10:24] <pmjdebru1jn> I was trying to use epoch as a nasty way to "pin" stuff :D
[10:24] <pmjdebru1jn> in my very particular case that actually makes sense to a degree
[10:38] <czajkowski> Aloha
[12:09]  * czajkowski waves at mrevell_ 
[12:09] <mrevell_> czajkowski, hi
[12:20] <matsubara> czajkowski, hey team mate!
[12:21] <czajkowski> matsubara: hey hey :)
[12:21] <mrevell> :)
[12:37] <benji___> I just heard the news, czajkowski.  It's very exciting to have you on the front lines of LP support!
[12:37]  * benji wonders when he grew a tail.
[12:39] <czajkowski> heh
[12:40] <StevenK_> And you just chopped it off!
[12:40] <StevenK_> Argh, when did *I* grow one?!
[12:40] <benji> ha!
[12:48] <czajkowski> freenode has some issues this morning
[12:55] <StevenK> s/ this morning//
[13:00] <rick_h> adeuring: so I guess that's your last irc duties now that czajkowski is here to be awesome!
[13:01] <czajkowski> :)
[13:01] <adeuring> rick_h: seems so.
[13:01] <adeuring> czajkowski: welcome in the LP team!
[13:01] <czajkowski> ah monday is going to be fun!
[13:01] <czajkowski> adeuring: thanks folks
[13:01] <rick_h> czajkowski: is never going to have to buy a drink next time we all get together :)
[13:23] <jelmer> welcome czajkowski :)
[13:24] <czajkowski> jelmer: cheers
[14:06] <dobey> czajkowski: oh you are joining the lp team?
[14:08] <czajkowski> dobey: yup
[14:08] <dobey> czajkowski: cool. in what capacity. lp is a pretty big thing ;)
[14:10] <czajkowski> dobey: launchpad support
[14:10] <dobey> czajkowski: cool. i'll fill your ear with complaints ;)
[14:10] <czajkowski> dobey: I'll continue to file U1 issues ;)
[14:11] <dobey> hehe
[14:12] <davmor2> dobey: just tickle czajkowski she loves it, /me runs for cover
[14:12] <dobey> lol
[14:16] <czajkowski> davmor2: one of these days mister!
[14:19] <sinzui> wgrant, I added a ^null rule to https://launchpad.net/+nameblacklist to stop users from recreating the null project
[14:41] <wgrant> sinzui: aha, thanks!
[14:41] <wgrant> Forgot we could do that.
[14:41] <sinzui> wgrant, We might be the only two developer who remember that we control all the anmes
[14:42] <sinzui> names
[15:43] <johnl> hi, my builds on launchpad have been failing with "tar... Cannot open: Permission denied" errors regarding .pc directory. Am I doing something wrong, or is it a bug?
[15:43] <johnl> https://code.launchpad.net/~brightbox/+recipe/deb-ruby1.8-ee
[15:44] <rick_h> hi johnl let me see
[15:45] <johnl> I found a post on answers about something similar and applied a workaround, but it didn't seem to workaround it :)
[15:45] <johnl> ah, looks like my workaround didn't get imported. might have mis-pushed it. will check
[15:46] <rick_h> johnl: k
[15:48] <johnl> ok, I pushed to wrong git repository. I've pushed and imported now and am running another build.
[15:48] <johnl> fyi, the workaround is this: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~brightbox/brightbox/deb-ruby1.8-ee/revision/34
[15:56] <johnl> heh, so that works. finally ask for help only to notice I didn't push a commit. sigh. sorry to bother!
[15:57] <rick_h> johnl: no problem, my favorite issues :)
[16:00] <deryck> rick_h, Ima take IRC from ya
[16:00] <rick_h> deryck: ty
[16:39] <blair> ouch, a 5 hour wait for a PPA build :)
[16:40] <johnl> rick_h: hi, actually, my workaround only worked on maverick and up. didn't work on lucid: https://code.launchpad.net/~brightbox/+recipe/deb-ruby1.8-ee
[16:41] <rick_h> johnl: darn...
[16:42] <rick_h> jelmer: bigjools around for a hand ? ^^
[16:42]  * rick_h needs to poke at this recipe stuff and figure it out
[16:42] <johnl> ah ha, I knew I'd commented on this bug the other day. It got marked as a dupe and I didn't get a notification. https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/921213
[16:42] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 760735 in Launchpad Auto Build System "duplicate for #921213 Daily recipe: failure because of Permission denied accessing build/patch directories" [Critical,Triaged]
[16:44] <rick_h> johnl: ah ok, so jelmer thought he had it licked...bummer
[16:44] <rick_h> johnl: yea, so I'd say monitor that bug. With the weekend might not hear back for a bit
[16:44] <rick_h> just to set expectations
[16:47] <johnl> ta :)  I've set myself as to be notified.
[17:18] <mgz> when did this system wide thing for launchpad api clients land?
[17:20] <mgz> making me type a password three times is cute.
[17:20] <mgz> having an error about due to the Referer header is less so.
[17:33] <deryck> mgz, I think that's been out for awhile now.  lucid or maverick, I think.  I could be recalling wrong though.
[17:34] <mgz> is this a known issue? <http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/836804/>
[17:35] <mgz> I wasn't getting the fun with 1.6.2 ... okay, that was an old version
[17:35] <deryck> mgz, I haven't seen that before.  But hard to be sure without trolling the bugs.
[17:35] <mgz> but updated to packaged 1.9.12 recently
[17:35] <mgz> will try moving the credentials dir out of the way
[17:39] <mgz> no good. the credential string in binary junk, no idea why it's trying to encode it as utf-8
[17:40] <mgz> bad porting to py3k attempt?
[17:40] <mgz> why's it only borked for me...
[17:41] <mgz> different keyring version
[17:41] <mgz> python-keyring is at 0.2 not 0.7
[17:41] <mgz> no, 0.6.2
[17:42] <mgz> so not that far behind, but apparently with api breakage
[17:43]  * mgz updates
[18:08] <mgz> upgrading python-keyring to 0.7.1 worked, after I deleted ~/crypted_pass.cfg
[18:08] <mgz> clearly launchpadlib in now incompatible with earlier versions,
[18:09] <mgz> the package says depends >= 0.5 though, which is all lies.
[19:06] <deryck> abentley, over to you, cool?
[19:07] <abentley> deryck: cool.
[19:42] <bitplane_> Hi. I've got a (small?) feature request but don't want to code it myself. Is the correct way to request it a bug report or a blueprint?
[19:44] <lifeless> a bug
[19:44] <lifeless> blueprints are for project planning and so on; until a feature request is about to be worked on, there is no point doing detailed planning
[19:48] <bitplane_> excellent, thanks
[19:57] <bitplane_> added, thanks again :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/930368
[19:57] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 930368 in Launchpad itself "Add XFN profile link to user profile pages" [Undecided,New]
[20:57] <smoser> is rabbitmq fixable at http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/ ?
[20:59] <jelmer> smoser: hi
[20:59] <jelmer> smoser: probably best to send an email to the udd list about it
[21:00] <smoser> well, that one was "lock contention"
[21:01] <smoser> seemed like simply something broken
[21:17] <lamalex> i'm trying to copy from a PPA into another from a jenkins job, a python script seems best (but if there's a better way please let me know!)
[21:18] <lamalex> but i dont see how to get the ppa of a team that im a member of
[21:19] <lamalex> I see getPPAByName
[21:21] <lamalex> but teams dont seem to have that method
[21:23] <lamalex> no i am just a doofus.
[21:23] <Ampelbein> lamalex: lp.people[team].ppas_collection is a index of all archives
[21:34] <lamalex> nice, got it- thanks
[21:41] <john_doe_jr> I'd like to download a previous build of Chromium....I think the archive is stored @ https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/dev/+build/2677755 but I don't know for sure...I'm new
[21:43] <john_doe_jr> anybody in here?
[21:50] <dobey> john_doe_jr: i don't think all builds ever get left around; especially not 6 month old builds in a daily builds archive :)
[21:50] <john_doe_jr> dobey: do you have any idea how I could get a previous version of chromium on ubuntu?
[21:52] <dobey> john_doe_jr: it depends on what exactly you mean by previous version i guess. in the PPAs i think generally only the last successful build is kept around in the archive. or maybe last 2 builds, for a particular arch/series.
[21:52] <dobey> and why would you even want an 6 month old build of it?
[21:52] <john_doe_jr> dobey: testing something
[21:53] <dobey> i guess you might be able to find an old version somewhere, or for an older ubuntu series perhaps, and try to use it
[21:54] <john_doe_jr> dobey: do you mean install an old image of ubuntu?
[21:54] <dobey> you could use a vm; or grab the chromium from ubuntu itself for an older series and try to install it
[21:55] <dobey> you could pull an old revision of the code out of the source repo for chromium, and compile it, too
[21:58] <john_doe_jr> dobey: what is this website hosting? http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html?path=Linux_ChromiumOS/
[21:59] <dobey> john_doe_jr: no idea; i guess something related to chromiumos
[22:00] <john_doe_jr> dobey: so it's not chromium browser...its the actual Chrome OS?
[22:00] <dobey> well, the open bits of it i would guess
[22:01] <dobey> you'd have to ask whoever manages that exactly what it is. clicking on a zip file in there gave me a 403
[22:01] <dobey> it's not related to launchpad
[22:02] <john_doe_jr> dobey: alright