| blair | let's say there was a python 2.8 and ubuntu wanted to recompile all source packages to include it, how would one easily do that to ensure packages are built in the correct order? | 00:25 |
|---|---|---|
| blair | i'm wondering how to put 2.6 modules back into my PPA for precise | 00:25 |
| blair | even trying to get distribute or python-setuptools built has a number of dependencies | 00:26 |
| lifeless | the buildd system does that automatically | 00:28 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === jussi01 is now known as Guest34180 | ||
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks | ||
| === Zhenech|_ is now known as Zhenech| | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === statik is now known as 64MAAQOA7 | ||
| === kloeri_ is now known as kloeri | ||
| === kloeri_ is now known as kloeri | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 08:08 |
| === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia | ||
| === geser_ is now known as geser | ||
| === apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === jussi01 is now known as Guest59628 | ||
| === Guest5524 is now known as Zic | ||
| === Igorot is now known as Knightlust | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks | ||
| === StevenK_ is now known as StevenK | ||
| mitya57 | dholbach: I updated a branch for bug 927602, can you please look again at it? | 12:47 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 927602 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] unity-mail" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/927602 | 12:47 |
| === mrpouit is now known as mr_pouit | ||
| === ts2 is now known as tsimpson | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| pabelanger | jamespage: thanks for uploading the dahdi-linux package | 13:40 |
| pabelanger | working on seeing if I can get membership to help maintain it | 13:40 |
| jamespage | pabelanger, hey - no problem - thanks for taking the time to fix it! | 13:41 |
| === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
| === soren_ is now known as soren | ||
| === achiang` is now known as achiang | ||
| === Guest29769 is now known as tobin | ||
| achiang | hello, what is the strategy of maintaining a package in both debian and ubuntu, re: apport hooks? | 15:57 |
| achiang | (nb, i realize there aren't individual package maintainers in ubuntu ;) | 15:57 |
| micahg | achiang: only install them in Ubuntu? There's a helper, dh_apport | 16:22 |
| achiang | micahg: hm, is there an example of that? i guess my real question was, "do i need to fork this package" or can i upload the apport hook to debian but only install in ubuntu, as you say | 16:26 |
| micahg | achiang: no need to fork, idr offhand what a good example is for this though, you just check in debian/rules if you're on Ubuntu or a derivative and run dh_apport | 16:35 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| tumbleweed | Laney: sorry, was afk | 17:36 |
| achiang | micahg: interesting. is there a standard way to check if you are on ubuntu/derivatives in d/rules? that's a new one for me | 18:11 |
| === med_out is now known as med_ | ||
| micahg | achiang: take a look at #4: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/27/different-dependencies-between-debian-and-ubuntu-but-common-source-package/ | 18:14 |
| achiang | micahg: ah, nice! thanks | 18:14 |
| dupondje | jbicha: around ? | 18:44 |
| jbicha | dupondje: aloha | 18:56 |
| dupondje | jbicha: could you check ubuntu.dupondje.be/freerdp_1.0.1-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz | 18:57 |
| dupondje | packaged new version :) | 18:57 |
| micahg | dupondje: they're planning on putting it in through Debian Monday I think | 18:59 |
| dupondje | oh ok :) | 19:00 |
| === astralja1a is now known as astraljava | ||
| jbicha | dupondje: for .symbols, leave off the debian revision. In other words 1.0.1 instead of 1.0.1-0ubuntu1 | 19:20 |
| dupondje | jbicha: oh ok :) | 20:42 |
| === ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
| jtaylor | nice only 3 problematic packages for the numpy transition | 20:52 |
| jtaylor | one of them probably no problem, another has a fix in unstable | 20:52 |
| brendan0powers_1 | I'm looking to get a package into Universe, and the Ubuntu Wiki suggested I come here before filing a request to package bug | 21:03 |
| brendan0powers_1 | I realize that the feature freeze is monday, what is the chance I could get an exception? | 21:03 |
| micahg | for a new package, it shouldn't be that hard right after feature freeze unless it changes the way other apps work | 21:04 |
| micahg | but IANA release team member | 21:04 |
| brendan0powers_1 | Ok | 21:04 |
| brendan0powers_1 | I've gone through the first stage of package, run lintian with no errors, tested with pbuilder, and have a package building in launchpad now | 21:05 |
| micahg | Do you have any interest in maintaining the package in Debian? | 21:05 |
| brendan0powers_1 | At some point, I'd like to get the package into debian | 21:06 |
| brendan0powers_1 | But I'd really like to get it into Ubuntu 12.04 if I can | 21:06 |
| brendan0powers_1 | So, If I understand this right, I just file an intent to package bug, assign it to me, and wait for someone to see it? | 21:11 |
| micahg | brendan0powers_1: I'd suggest getting it uploaded to Debian, see http://mentors.debian.net/, then you can request a sync | 21:12 |
| micahg | in Debian, you only need one sponsor, in Ubuntu, you need 2 people to review it | 21:13 |
| brendan0powers_1 | Ok | 21:14 |
| micahg | there are some DDs that hang out here that might be able to help, there's also #debian-mentors on OFTC | 21:14 |
| micahg | and there's always backports even if it misses the release | 21:14 |
| jtaylor | apropo new packages: anyone know the problem he has: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=indicator-bug | 21:15 |
| jtaylor | also could need a second review | 21:15 |
| jtaylor | do new upstream versions of ubuntu only packages also need 2 reviews? | 21:16 |
| micahg | idk, maybe bad source package creation? or could be a problem on the server, maybe ask in #ubuntuwire | 21:16 |
| micahg | jtaylor: nope | 21:16 |
| jtaylor | I should do wakeup this weekend then :/ | 21:17 |
| achiang | micahg: is adding an apport hook to an existing package justifiable past FF ? | 21:17 |
| jtaylor | I'd still appreciate more eyes on that code, the current version is full of security flaws, no idea if I spotted all :/ | 21:17 |
| micahg | achiang: IMHO, sure, that's to make bug reports better | 21:17 |
| micahg | but IANA release team member | 21:17 |
| jtaylor | (most certainly not) | 21:18 |
| achiang | micahg: ok, thanks | 21:18 |
| micahg | jtaylor: ugh, that's not good, I'd suggest to keep iterating then, there's always backports (which may be open pre-release if broder ever makes it so) | 21:19 |
| ajmitch | speaking of broder... | 21:19 |
| broder | uh-oh | 21:19 |
| * broder 's irc client was flaking | 21:19 | |
| ajmitch | broder: don't worry :) | 21:20 |
| jtaylor | micahg: the currently proposed version is much better than what we have in ther archive, so that would be better than backports | 21:20 |
| jtaylor | it should not introduce new security bugs | 21:20 |
| ajmitch | introducing new security bugs is generally a bad thing | 21:21 |
| micahg | jtaylor: oh, it's already in :) | 21:21 |
| jtaylor | unfortunatly | 21:21 |
| jtaylor | needs a -sec update in oneiric at some point | 21:21 |
| micahg | I don't see it in the archive :) | 21:21 |
| jtaylor | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wakeup | 21:22 |
| micahg | oh, that one :( | 21:22 |
| broder | jtaylor: i was just looking at your svn merge, and the test suite failed: http://paste.ubuntu.com/837089 | 21:22 |
| broder | any ideas? | 21:22 |
| * ajmitch needs to go & sync a new coffeescript before it's too late | 21:22 | |
| jtaylor | broder: thats new, it succeeded for me when I did it and for one other person just a few weeks ago | 21:23 |
| jtaylor | let me try it | 21:23 |
| broder | :-/ | 21:23 |
| broder | i can try again | 21:23 |
| broder | it did do me the favor of waiting to fail until it had been churning for about 45 minutes :) | 21:23 |
| jtaylor | zzzZZZzz bzr branching takes its time | 21:30 |
| jtaylor | broder: did you try without the patch if the testsuite then succeeds? | 21:36 |
| broder | nope, not yet. i can | 21:37 |
| jtaylor | I just also started one build with patch one without | 21:38 |
| jtaylor | lets hope its not random ._. | 21:38 |
| jtaylor | the failure does not look related, its a wc test, the patch touches the authentification with the repo | 21:39 |
| broder | yeah, that's what i figured | 21:40 |
| micahg | jtaylor: you might want to talk to the security team and get CVEs assigned if appropriate (wakeup) | 21:41 |
| broder | jtaylor: build worked this time, so must be intermittent or something | 22:30 |
| jtaylor | broder: I got a successful build too, a second failed due to my disk being full :( | 22:31 |
| broder | *shrug* well, i've uploaded it | 22:31 |
| jtaylor | great thanks | 22:31 |
| === Guest55759 is now known as med_ | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!