| micahg | pitti: would it be better for me to release Firefox 10.0.1 in the next few hours, sometime later today, or does it not make a lot of difference? | 05:38 |
|---|---|---|
| pitti | micahg: it's all the same to me, so whatever fits you best | 05:39 |
| micahg | pitti: was wondering specifically WRT 10.04.4 | 05:40 |
| pitti | micahg: the earlier the better, I'd say | 05:40 |
| pitti | but a few hours don't matter much | 05:40 |
| pitti | I'll rebuild images after it's in | 05:41 |
| pitti | with that we still have plenty of time for testing them | 05:41 |
| micahg | pitti: well, it'll either be ~09:00 UTC or ~19:00 UTC | 05:41 |
| micahg | i.e. I can stay up tonight if it'll help | 05:42 |
| pitti | oh -- then 9 UTC please | 05:42 |
| pitti | 1900 UTC is essentially "tomorrow" for Daviey, QA, and me | 05:42 |
| micahg | ok, thanks, will endeavor to accommodate then barring system issues | 05:43 |
| micahg | that's why I asked :) | 05:43 |
| pitti | thanks muchly | 05:43 |
| === jodh is now known as jhunt | ||
| === rickspencer3_ is now known as rickspencer3 | ||
| micahg | pitti: still working, probably another 30-45 minutes until I'm ready to release Firefox | 08:57 |
| pitti | micahg: thanks | 09:00 |
| micahg | pitti: done, could you please copy firefox/{lucid-oneiric} from ubuntu-mozilla-security to $RELEASE-{security,updates} | 09:42 |
| pitti | micahg: i. e. lucid maverick natty oneiric? | 09:46 |
| micahg | pitti: yes, please | 09:46 |
| pitti | micahg: should be all done now | 10:00 |
| === rickspencer3_ is now known as rickspencer3 | ||
| micahg | pitti: thanks | 10:05 |
| * ogra_ wonders why his manual ubuntu-core build doesnt return, i see it in the processlist and it doesnt seem to have failed, but i cant imagine it can take 1h | 13:08 | |
| ogra_ | s/1h/more than 1h/ | 13:09 |
| ogra_ | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-core/precise/ doesnt seem to have a 13.1 log either | 13:11 |
| * ogra_ checks nusakan | 13:11 | |
| ogra_ | hmm, nothng there either | 13:12 |
| cjwatson | you need to look on the builder | 13:12 |
| ogra_ | oh, hmm | 13:13 |
| cjwatson | however it was probably waiting for the kubuntu-mobile build to finish | 13:13 |
| ogra_ | well, the livefs build was done in a few mins, i'm actually waiting for the second part | 13:13 |
| ogra_ | but yeah, might be | 13:13 |
| cjwatson | the livefs build is still in progress | 13:14 |
| cjwatson | 9117 pts/8 S+ 0:00 \_ ssh -t -o StrictHostKeyChecking no -o BatchMode yes buildd@annonaceae.buildd /home/buildd/bin/BuildLiveCD -l -f plain -d precise ubuntu-core | 13:14 |
| ogra_ | funny, i have feedback from all builders in my terminal | 13:14 |
| cjwatson | I can see progress in http://annonaceae.buildd/~buildd/LiveCD/precise/ubuntu-core/latest/livecd-20120213.1-armel.out | 13:14 |
| cjwatson | so just wait | 13:14 |
| ogra_ | yeah, will do | 13:14 |
| cjwatson | I bet you don't have feedback from all *builds* | 13:15 |
| ogra_ | essentially i just want to see if my changes to make-web-indicies worked | 13:15 |
| cjwatson | then why did you do a buildlive run? | 13:15 |
| ogra_ | oh, right, 3 out of 4 | 13:15 |
| ogra_ | because i was lazy and just copy/pasted from crontab without proper thinking | 13:15 |
| cjwatson | 'build-livecd-base ubuntu-core daily' would have been sufficient - there's a reason those are separate commands :) | 13:15 |
| cjwatson | too late now of course | 13:15 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 13:15 |
| ogra_ | well, i'm not in a hurry | 13:16 |
| ogra_ | (was just wondering why it took so long, and didnt take kubuntu into account) | 13:16 |
| === bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_ | ||
| === jodh is now known as jhunt | ||
| Riddell | what will it take to make a kubuntu-active? | 15:21 |
| Riddell | we now have a late addition of working packages I want to upload | 15:22 |
| Riddell | kubuntu-active is the replacement for kubuntu-mobile | 15:22 |
| Riddell | so it'll take adapting the seeds | 15:22 |
| Riddell | adapting the livefs build script | 15:22 |
| Riddell | adapting the cd build script | 15:22 |
| Riddell | other things? | 15:23 |
| cjwatson | probably a bunch of bits and bobs, do it well clear of a milestone so we can remember them all :) | 15:24 |
| skaet | Riddell, it there someone lined up to test it? also, will it be armhf or armel? | 15:35 |
| Riddell | skaet: there is probably someone lined up to test it, I need to work out what arm machines we can test on but I have a pandaboard needing set up here | 15:44 |
| Riddell | skaet: it would also have large labels saying "technology preview" or similar all over it | 15:44 |
| cjwatson | do we get to stop building kubuntu-mobile at the same time? | 15:45 |
| * ogra_ hopes so ... else we would need more live builders at some point | 15:47 | |
| ogra_ | they already are close to build images back to back 24/7 | 15:48 |
| ogra_ | (yes, i know that we will start using the package builders for that at some point, but until thats ready we're stuck with what we have) | 15:50 |
| cjwatson | do you know how that project is going, incidentally | 15:51 |
| cjwatson | ? | 15:51 |
| ogra_ | nope, all adams baby .... | 15:51 |
| ogra_ | and he was at linaro connect last week so we didnt talk much | 15:51 |
| ogra_ | (and i guess he didnt get much done for it alongside) | 15:51 |
| Riddell | cjwatson: yes kubuntu-mobile will be replaced | 16:29 |
| cjwatson | then can we just transfer over all the existing testers? | 16:31 |
| skaet | cjwatson, RIddell - it was built and not tested all through Oneiric, so not sure how many testers there really are for it. :/ | 16:58 |
| Riddell | cjwatson: yes | 17:00 |
| Riddell | skaet: depends on how much of a mood rbelem has for rounding up volunteers it but this release at least has me as backup | 17:00 |
| Riddell | skaet: he wouldn't have been in a mood for it during oneiric because upstream for -mobile had moved on to -active | 17:01 |
| Riddell | it would be good if we can keep up | 17:01 |
| Riddell | we'd be the first distro to have a community made tablet UI if we can do it | 17:02 |
| skaet | Riddell, what I'm weighing it against is that we don't have adequate resources for the other arm image builds right now during respins. | 17:02 |
| Riddell | skaet: maybe best if we just start on i386 only then | 17:02 |
| cjwatson | skaet: I think that concern is removed by replacing the existing kubuntu-mobile build | 17:02 |
| cjwatson | skaet: if it's a one-for-one swap we shouldn't have build time concerned | 17:02 |
| cjwatson | *concerns | 17:02 |
| Riddell | like -mobile it'll need only testing live image running, not installs | 17:03 |
| skaet | cjwaton, arm builds are main slow down right now on the respins, so since the kubuntu-mobile ones weren't being tested they weren't built for the last 2 releases. | 17:04 |
| skaet | Riddell, restricting it to just i386 might be a solution if there are testers. | 17:04 |
| skaet | s/releases/milestones/ | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | skaet: fine, but that isn't changed by renaming it to something else :-) | 17:05 |
| skaet | cjwatson, :) true. The concern over the arm builder bottleneck is still there, just less if there are fewer images to build. ;) | 17:07 |
| Riddell | we'll start off with i386 then and exand to arm if we know we have testers and builders | 17:09 |
| skaet | Riddell, ok. | 17:10 |
| skaet | Riddell, so I'll add i386 Kubuntu active to the manifest, no support (tech preview only) - that suit? | 17:11 |
| Riddell | yep | 17:12 |
| Riddell | (a blocker might still turn up, we've only just got the packages working) | 17:13 |
| * skaet nods | 17:15 | |
| * tumbleweed adds an opencv transition tracker (I see it started) | 17:19 | |
| jaustin | can someone please clarify what the process for getting packages synced from Debian before FeatureFreeze? | 18:59 |
| jaustin | Is it as simple as raising a bug (that's what cjwatson said last year[1], but I can't see an equivalent message for 2012) | 19:03 |
| jaustin | [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2011-January/thread.html | 19:03 |
| cjwatson | same | 19:03 |
| cjwatson | best to use requestsync | 19:03 |
| cjwatson | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess | 19:04 |
| cjwatson | jaustin: ^- | 19:04 |
| jaustin | cjwatson: Thanks. I presume for the actual package maintainer, using the (new?) syncpackage tool is adequate? | 19:06 |
| cjwatson | if the package maintainer has upload privileges to that package in Ubuntu, yes | 19:06 |
| cjwatson | that isn't necessarily the case for the package maintainer in Debian | 19:07 |
| jaustin | cjwatson: great, thanks. | 19:07 |
| cjwatson | and yes, syncpackage will need to be fairly current | 19:07 |
| === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!