[06:05] <achiang> hello, is there a nautilus plugin that lets you just directly copy files into U1?
[09:13] <JamesTait> Morning all!
[09:27] <czajkowski> ello ello
[09:28] <mandel> morning all!
[09:28] <mandel> czajkowski, morning, first day, right?
[09:29] <czajkowski> yup
[09:29] <czajkowski> :)
[09:30] <mandel> czajkowski, then is mainly setting email clients, mumble, reading wiki + other boring stuff :P
[09:30] <czajkowski> got the irc bit sorted working on the rest
[11:15] <gatox> hi!
[11:26] <mandel> gatox, morning!
[12:05] <facundobatista> gatox, mandel, can I get a windows test of https://code.launchpad.net/~verterok/ubuntuone-client/use-available-reactor/+merge/92495 , please? (thanks)
[12:05] <facundobatista> (buen día)
[12:05] <mandel> facundobatista, certainly, on it
[12:05] <gatox> facundobatista, yes, on it
[12:20] <gatox> mandel, are you reviewing facundo's branch?? only need one review more..... to know if i do it or don't
[12:20] <mandel> gatox, I'm running the tests as he asked, I've not looked at the code yet
[12:20] <nessita> hola!
[12:20] <gatox> mandel, ah ok
[12:20] <gatox> nessita, hi
[12:20] <mandel> facundobatista, I suppose you just need us to run the tests, right?
[12:21] <mandel> nessita, buenos dias!
[12:21] <nessita> gatox, ralsina: buenas! saw my email from Sat?
[12:21] <mandel> nessita, can you look at this whenever you have time: https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-sso-client/support-user-name-url/+merge/92467
[12:21] <gatox> nessita, yes yes! i take a qiuck look about the bugs on sat..... i'm working on that now
[12:21] <nessita> mandel: did you answer my comment there? I tried re-review on Sat and couldn't
[12:22] <ralsina> nessita: good morning! saw it, yes
[12:22] <nessita> ralsina: I'll work half day today and will replace that with taking half day tomorrow, if that's ok....
[12:22] <ralsina> nessita: noproblem for me
[12:23] <nessita> ralsina: or perhaps less than half day since I worked on Sat (but surely until the criticals are fixed)
[12:23] <ralsina> nessita: lo dejo a tu critero :-)
[12:23] <nessita> :-)
[12:24] <gatox> ralsina, hi, do you have any time to review this? https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/qt-signals/+merge/92580
[12:24] <ralsina> nessita: later file swaps as needed and we'll put it in order
[12:24] <ralsina> gatox: sure!
[12:24] <gatox> ralsina, thanks°!
[12:24] <nessita> ralsina: so I file a half day swap from today to tomorrow?
[12:25] <ralsina> nessita: if you already have tomorrow as vacation, yes. Or we just keep it in our heads :-)
[12:25] <nessita> ralsina: no, in the papers I have today as holiday. WIll add a half day swap?
[12:25] <nessita> sorry, that last was !
[12:25] <ralsina> nessita: I was thinking more about saturday. If you worked, then you have to swap it (or, again, we just do it "de palabra")
[12:26] <mandel> nessita, alecu and I answered on irc, but I can answer it in the mp, fancy that?
[12:26] <nessita> mandel: I did not read the answer in IRC, so yes please anwser the MP
[12:26] <mandel> nessita, sure
[12:28] <facundobatista> mandel, yes, just the tests... the code works really well, I just wanted to be sure that it doesn't break windows development
[12:28] <facundobatista> mandel, feel free to approve the branch if all is ok
[12:28] <mandel> facundobatista, ok
[12:28] <mandel> facundobatista, all tests pass great on my windows 7 devel machine!
[12:29] <facundobatista> mandel, awesome, thanks
[12:30] <mandel> facundobatista, for the future, we don't use the make file on windows, so changes in that will not usually brake anything unless the code generation changes, which is not very common
[12:31] <facundobatista> mandel, great!
[12:33] <mandel> ralsina, so, what do we do with the dialog, we nearly landed everything but we have to carefully think about how the password is stored in the keyring
[12:33] <mandel> ralsina, also, merges where blocked because there was a needs info in the very first branch :(
[12:33] <ralsina> mandel: since the keyringuses urlencode, it has to be bytes. You can use str(whatever, utf8) I suppose
[12:33] <ralsina> mandel: I meant unicode(whatever).encode(utf8)
[12:33] <ralsina> mandel: whose needsinfo?
[12:34] <mandel> ralsina, ah, I was going to say.. :P
[12:34] <mandel> ralsina, https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-sso-client/support-user-name-url/+merge/92467
[12:34] <ralsina> IT'S EARLY FOR UNICODE ;-)
[12:34] <mandel> ralsina, not a big deal, but since the branches depend on each other the cascade merge was blocked
[12:34] <ralsina> mandel: ok, you answered nessita, ask for the needsinfo to be lifted :-)
[12:35] <mandel> ralsina, done already :)
[12:35] <ralsina> mandel: we  may have to put guards on the keyring so that only utf8 gets in...
[12:35] <mandel> ralsina, my concern is that we are late..
[12:35] <ralsina> mandel: then let's merge the suckers today
[12:35] <mandel> ralsina, do we have to ask for an exception?
[12:35] <ralsina> mandel: so just do the easy part, and file a bug
[12:36] <ralsina> mandel: we are not late, the release is tomorrow. We are just  very very close to late
[12:37] <mandel> ralsina, ha, I though it was on friday..
[12:37] <ralsina> mandel: well, we hoped to have it all inonfriday so we were not rushing
[12:38] <ralsina> mandel: but you know how these things go
[12:38] <mandel> ralsina, ah.. I was rushing thinking I was late.. so it worked hehe
[12:38] <mandel> ralsina, yeah.. unexpected problems like the one from qtnetwork :(
[12:38] <ralsina> mandel: right
[12:43] <nessita> mandel: ping
[12:43] <mandel> nessita, pong
[12:43] <nessita> mandel: you answered "Yes, there is." to the first question I asked... so I think we need to avoid the possibility of mixing an username from one config, with the password of the other
[12:44] <nessita> mandel: I don't see the point of landing a code that may mix credentials... no?
[12:44] <mandel> nessita, sorry I uderstood to have both..
[12:44] <mandel> nessita, mea culpa, I meant to answer, there is the case where we have both, but if we have gsettings, gesettings will have both username and password
[12:45] <nessita> mandel: can you please re-read the question and re-answer? :-) (otherwise is confusing in my head)
[12:45] <mandel> nessita, sorry, read to fast..
[12:45] <nessita> (in the MP)
[12:45]  * mandel is stupid 
[12:46] <nessita> gatox: did you have a chance to review my Critical branch? (so I can land it and nightlies build with the fix)
[12:46] <gatox> nessita, yes, +1 already
[12:46] <nessita> gatox: nice! thanks
[12:47] <nessita> ralsina: I added the half swap day in the admin. Also, any chance you do the review of my critical branch? (so I can land it and nightlies build with the fix)
[12:47] <nessita> gatox: any question from the things you need to fix?
[12:47] <ralsina> nessita: will do it right after gatox's
[12:47] <nessita> gatox: want me to point you to the gtk code that does the code returning and the ping adding?
[12:47] <gatox> nessita, not right now
[12:47] <nessita> ack
[12:48] <gatox> nessita, it seems pretty clear
[12:48] <mandel> nessita, sorted, I answered inline my previous answer.. sorry for the confusion
[13:01] <ralsina> nessita, gatox: +1 each
[13:01] <nessita> yey
[13:01] <gatox> ralsina, great!
[13:06] <ralsina> nessita: remember your branch that bounced on tarmac because of an error? Just happened to gatox's branch: "g_dbus_connection_real_closed: Remote peer vanished with error: Underlying GIOStream returned 0 bytes on an async read (g-io-error-quark, 0)"
[13:07] <nessita> ralsina: yeah, we have no idea what that is. Re approve....
[13:07] <nessita> will land eventually
[13:07] <ralsina> nessita: done
[13:08] <alecu> hello all!
[13:08] <ralsina> hello alecu!
[13:09]  * ralsina has learned that alecu is an evil person. At least playing cards.
[13:09] <alecu> I soooo am
[13:10] <ralsina> we need to play again soon :-)
[13:15] <ralsina> Argh, what's "No proposals found for merge of lp:~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/qt-refactor into lp:ubuntu-sso-client." supposed to mean? Re-re-approving :-/
[13:20] <nessita> ralsina: that's nerged already
[13:21] <ralsina> nessita: NOW it is :-)
[13:21] <nessita> ralsina: you mean qt-signals?
[13:21] <nessita> (qt-refactor landed on Fri I think)
[13:22] <ralsina> nessita: yes, qt-signals. I have no idea why I got that mail about qt-refactor (except that it's requisite for qt-signals)
[13:22] <ralsina> but that mail made qt-signal bounce again (it wasback to needs-review)
[13:23] <ralsina> anyway, it's all merged now
[13:30] <mandel> ralsina, ha, I got the same: No proposals found for merge of lp:~mandel/ubuntu-sso-client/support-user-name-url into lp:ubuntu-sso-client.
[13:31] <mandel> ralsina, yet is merged..
[13:31] <ralsina> oh well
[13:33] <ralsina> mandel: if you see the email, it's about the merge of creds-dialog. It's trying to  merge the requisite branch even though it's already merged
[13:34] <ralsina> mandel: or something broken like that
[13:34] <mandel> ralsina, yeah, I tried to re-approave, lets see what happens..
[13:34] <nessita> ralsina: may I help?
[13:34] <ralsina> and qt-signals bounced again
[13:34] <ralsina> nessita: tarmac seems to be confused
[13:35] <ralsina> mandel: if that branch is merged, maybe edit the MP to remove the prerequisite?
[13:35] <nessita> ralsina: between what and what?
[13:35] <ralsina> nessita: it's trying to do something with branches that are already merged
[13:35] <ralsina> nessita: check the latest email about creds-dialog for instance
[13:36] <nessita> ralsina: looking
[13:37] <nessita> ralsina: if you approved (and thus tarmac tried to land) a branch that has an approved pre-requisite that will land in the same, that will not work
[13:37] <nessita> ralsina: you need to land pre-requisites in one tarmac run, and in the next one, the branch that depends on that. Perhaps that was the issue here?
[13:37] <ralsina> nessita,mandel:  ithas a merged pre-requisite, but tarmac says it's not merged, tries to merge it and fails
[13:37] <nessita> ah, hum
[13:37] <nessita> let's see
[13:38] <ralsina> nessita: or maybe the tarmac run was slow and both got in the sameone
[13:38] <nessita> yeap
[13:39] <nessita> mandel: perhaps you can resubmit the proposal without the prerequisite, like ralsina proposes
[13:39] <mandel> nessita, will do right now
[13:40] <mandel> nessita, if I re-submit, do I loose the +1 ?
[13:40] <nessita> mandel: they will have to vote again, I think. Try using the button "resubmit proposal" and do not click on 'start fresh'
[13:41] <mandel> ok
[13:42] <mandel> ralsina, alecu can I have the +1 again: https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-sso-client/creds-dialog/+merge/92769
[13:42] <ralsina> mandel: done
[13:42] <mandel> ralsina, thx!
[13:44] <ralsina> argh, everyone stop sending things totarmac for 20 minutes to see if it gets its act together?
[13:44] <ralsina> ha! qt-signals finally merged. Yay
[13:45] <mandel> ralsina, ok, then I'm off to lunch :)
[13:45]  * mandel lunch
[13:45] <ralsina> mandel: buen provecho :-)
[13:49] <nessita> ralsina: so, I kinda understand why we're landng these branches today... but let's try keep landing to a minimun
[13:49] <nessita> (what is absolutely necessary to FF and we know is not breaking anything)
[13:50] <nessita> mandel: the new proposal has conflicts... at least according to LP
[13:50] <nessita> 1232 lines (+1055/-17) 6 files modified (has conflicts)
[13:50] <nessita>  Text conflict in ubuntu_sso/qt/gui.py
[13:50] <nessita>  Text conflict in ubuntu_sso/qt/tests/test_qt_views.py
[13:50] <nessita>  Text conflict in ubuntu_sso/utils/ui.py
[13:51] <ralsina> nessita: ack
[14:04] <popey> dobey: is u1ms broken in rb at the moment? I cant preview any tracks on 12.04.
[14:05] <dobey> popey: it seems preview is broken, yeah. there's a bug open already. will get to it after all the feature freeze work is done
[14:05] <popey> dobey: in addition I can't file a bug because "ubuntu-bug rhythmbox" tells me "Package rhythmbox does not exist"
[14:05] <popey> ah ok
[14:05] <popey> thanks
[14:05] <dobey> that's odd, but rhythmbox-ubuntuone is for our plug-in
[14:05] <popey> ii  rhythmbox                             2.95-0ubuntu2                         music player and organizer for GNOME
[14:06] <popey> un  rhythmbox-ubuntuone-music-store       <none>                                (no description available)
[14:06] <popey> not that package?
[14:06] <popey> oh I see rhythmbox-ubuntuone is installed..
[14:06] <popey> thanks
[14:06] <dobey> sure
[14:07] <gatox> nessita, mandel if you have a minute..... a quick review: https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/930724/+merge/92773
[14:07] <nessita> gatox: yesssss
[14:17] <Chipaca> davidcalle: ping
[14:19] <aquarius> oof, n9 is still £300+ on ebay. I can buy a phone that people care about for that :)
[14:26] <dobey> aquarius: heh. i was looking for a bike mount for my phone last night, and some bluetooth sensors, so i could just use teh phone. but if you don't have an iphone, apparently the world hates you.
[14:27] <dobey> aquarius: also, why is it so bloody cold here? i'm pretty sure it's your fault.
[14:29] <aquarius> heh. It's equally cold here :)
[14:32] <dobey> but *there* is middle of nowhere in the uk. *here* is much further south. it's not supposed to be this cold here.
[14:49] <nessita> ralsina: would you have 15 to do one of the Critical's review? https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/930724/+merge/92773
[14:49] <ralsina> nessita: of course!
[14:49] <ralsina> nessita: looking
[14:53] <mandel> nessita, ok, I'll take a look
[14:53] <nessita> mandel: hum?
[14:54] <mandel> nessita, > <nessita> mandel: the new proposal has conflicts... at least according to LP
[14:55] <nessita> mandel: ah, sorry! forgot about that message :-)
[14:55] <mandel> nessita, so problem :)
[14:59] <ralsina> gatox, nessita: global approve on that one
[14:59] <gatox> ralsina, great! thanks
[15:00] <alecu> me
[15:00] <gatox> me
[15:00] <nessita> ne
[15:00] <briancurtin> me
[15:00] <nessita> me
[15:00] <mandel> me
[15:00] <nessita> ralsina, dobey, meh?
[15:00] <dobey> meh
[15:00] <ralsina> meh too1
[15:01] <nessita> alecu: go!
[15:01] <alecu> DONE: lots of reviews for mandel, resumed branch for bug #929207
[15:01] <alecu> TODO: keep working on the tunnel
[15:01] <alecu> BLOCKED: no
[15:01] <alecu> NEXT: gatox
[15:01] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 929207 in ubuntuone-client "Proxy "tunnel" for syncdaemon (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/929207
[15:01] <gatox> DONE:
[15:01] <gatox> Some reviews for nessita, Proposed 2 refactoring branches for SSO. Propose a branch to fix login and validate_email with ping in SSO.
[15:01] <gatox> TODO:
[15:01] <gatox> Fixing some critical and high bugs about UI in SSO.
[15:01] <gatox> BLOCKED:
[15:01] <gatox> No
[15:01] <gatox> nessita, go
[15:01] <mandel> DONE: Worked on how to get the AuthIssue working with the qnetwork implementation of the webclient, got some issue making the retry.
[15:01] <mandel> TODO Get all the previous branches that I proposed on Friday merged in trunk. Continue with the QNetwork client issues.
[15:01] <mandel> BLOCKED: no.
[15:01] <nessita> mandel: ?
[15:01] <mandel> shit! sorry, I saw my name..
[15:01] <gatox> mandel, alecu just mentionn you
[15:01] <gatox> jeje
[15:01] <mandel> from alecu :P
[15:01] <nessita> DONE: got UI spawnning working (BIG YEY), submitted all those branches, made some QA on Saturday, found a couple of Criticals which are either fixed or being fixed as we speak
[15:01] <nessita> TODO: working half day on Holiday (will not work half day tomorrow), be sure Criticals lands and sso works like a charm
[15:01] <nessita> BLOCKED: nopes
[15:01] <nessita> NEXT: briancurtin
[15:01] <briancurtin> DONE: put readonly/readwrite on the shelf for now, got my VM issue cleaned up and merged, looked into the rename failure that showed up friday, looked into 851810
[15:01] <briancurtin> TODO: work on bug #851810
[15:01] <briancurtin> BLOCKED: none
[15:01] <briancurtin> NEXT: mandel
[15:01] <nessita> :-)
[15:01] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 851810 in ubuntuone-windows-installer (and 2 other projects) "Notify clients when volumes info from server is ready (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/851810
[15:01] <mandel> ok, again:
[15:01] <mandel> DONE: Worked on how to get the AuthIssue working with the qnetwork implementation of the webclient, got some issue making the retry.
[15:01] <mandel> TODO Get all the previous branches that I proposed on Friday merged in trunk. Continue with the QNetwork client issues.
[15:01] <mandel> BLOCKED: no.
[15:01] <mandel> dobey, please
[15:01] <dobey> λ DONE: more gwibber poking, started to move some code around
[15:02] <dobey> λ TODO: finish gwibber pokery, twisted docs, move more code around, prepare for releases, feature freeze, decide what to do about code moving
[15:02] <dobey> λ BLCK: none.
[15:02] <dobey> ralsina
[15:02] <ralsina> DONE: reviews, reviews, reviews, helped a bit here and there, talked with Zach about the future mac client, misc stuff, some 1-1s TODO: help around, reviews, think, administrivia BLOCKED: no
[15:02] <mandel> ralsina, me and you 1-1?
[15:02] <mandel> ralsina, we ignored it on friday..
[15:02] <ralsina> mandel: yes, that one is still missing :-)
[15:02] <ralsina> mandel: want to do it? Will be 5'!
[15:02] <mandel> ralsina, lets do it now, right?
[15:03] <ralsina> mandel: yes
[15:03] <mandel> ralsina, I'm launching mumble atm
[15:03] <ralsina> mandel: after your lunch
[15:03] <ralsina> mandel: no mumbling with the mouth full please
[15:03] <mandel> ralsina, already had lunch :)
[15:04] <mandel> ralsina, che, I heard you like mumble so I mumble in mumble
[15:04] <nessita> ok, any comments anyone?
[15:04] <gatox> nop
[15:05] <ralsina> EOM?
[15:05] <mandel> ralsina, let me try to fix mumble
[15:05] <nessita> eom!
[15:05] <gatox> nessita, i don't know when is your eod since you are working half day today.... but i'm about to propose the branch for the other critical issue
[15:05] <nessita> gatox: I will eod when these critical are landed
[15:05] <gatox> in a few minutes
[15:05] <gatox> okassssss
[15:05] <nessita> gatox: no rush
[15:06] <mandel> ralsina, let me kill the vm, maybe is doing something funny with the soundcard
[15:06] <ralsina> mandel: ok
[15:06] <alecu> nessita, congrats on the car, btw!
[15:07] <nessita> alecu: did you see me run by that other car? :-/.
[15:07] <nessita> jk, thanks!!!
[15:07] <alecu> :-)
[15:08] <mandel> nessita, wait, you have a car?
[15:08] <nessita> mandel: since last friday, yes :-)
[15:08] <ralsina> nessita: congrats!
[15:08] <mandel> nessita, congrats!!!
[15:08] <nessita> thanks! be careful when you walk or drive in Córdoba!
[15:09] <mandel> ralsina, shall we try skype?
[15:09] <ralsina> mandel: yes please
[15:09] <mandel> ralsina, on it.. are you using linux?
[15:10] <ralsina> mandel: yes
[15:10] <mandel> ralsina, ah.. might not be me then, I use the mac for this things..
[15:10] <ralsina> mandel: I live in mumble so I know it works :-)
[15:19] <dobey> nessita: what is this "use the qt ui" bug in u1client about exactly?
[15:21] <nessita> dobey: the com.ubuntuone.credentials dbus service (proxied in the CredentialsManagementTool python helper) must pass to the sso underlaying service to use the Qt UI if a UI is needed
[15:22] <dobey> nessita: why?
[15:23] <dobey> nessita: shouldn't sso just run whichever UI is available, based on which environment the user is under?
[15:23] <nessita> dobey: as far as I know, no. U1 wants to always have the Qt UI to provide a consistent UI experience
[15:24] <gatox> nessita, the other one: https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/930718/+merge/92780
[15:24] <dobey> by breaking consistency with the system? :(
[15:25] <nessita> dobey: yes
[15:25] <gatox> ok, quick lunch for me......
[15:25] <dobey> that is not consistency. it's hogwash. :-/
[15:26] <ralsina> dobey: the SSO dialog pops as if it were part of the U1cp
[15:26] <ralsina> dobey: having one gtk dialog in a qt app is jarring
[15:26] <nessita> dobey: we'll "break consistency" anyways with the controlpanel, so we prioritize to have an integrated UI for the whole U1 experience. So, since we will have the Qt controlpanel, is good to have the Qt SSO
[15:27] <nessita> ralsina: right. Also, even if we're popping the sso dialog from syncdaemon directly (ie using the -c switch, and the user has no credentials), we also want the same UI experience that if we'd go thru the controlpanel
[15:27] <dobey> ralsina: eh? only if you're in the control panel. not in syncdaemon itself
[15:28] <ralsina> dobey: getting different SSO login windows depending on how you get it is also trange
[15:28] <ralsina> s-trange
[15:28] <dobey> ralsina: not really.
[15:28] <dobey> ralsina: think of all the third party apps.
[15:28] <nessita> dobey: you mean like software center will use the gtk sso and u1 the qt sso?
[15:28] <ralsina> dobey: name me 2 third party apps that use SSO ;-)
[15:29] <dobey> software-center, deja-dup
[15:29] <nessita> dobey: is worth noting that is very likely that software center will move to the qt sso, since we'll drop support on the gtk and they can't take it over
[15:29] <dobey> that makes no sense
[15:30] <nessita> dobey: and as per deja-dup, from my POV, it makes sense that since deja-dup is authing with U1, the user gets the same "familiar" Qt UI
[15:31] <dobey> so it doesn't make sense to have a gtk dialog pop up on 1 qt app, but it makes sense to pop a qt dialog on many more gtk+ apps instead?
[15:32] <dobey> i don't see the logic :)
[15:32] <nessita> dobey: not any qt dialog on top of any gtk dialog. An U1 auth dialog on top of any app, yes.
[15:33] <nessita> the Qt app does not look like either gtk or qt, is an U1 specific look... so even if it was gtk or qt, you will get a very custom UI
[15:33] <nessita> and we want to preserve that looks so it can be associated with U1 all the time
[15:33] <dobey> …
[15:34] <dobey> where are the screenshots for this auth dialog?
[15:38] <nessita> dobey: we have none yet
[15:38] <nessita> dobey: also, we have no style them yet, will do that this week before UI freeze
[15:39] <nessita> dobey: I mean we have the UI and is working, I have no screenshot at hand
[15:39] <dobey> there's no mock-up from design or anything?
[15:41] <ralsina> dobey: yes there are, let me give it to you
[15:45] <ralsina> dobey: I will take a few minutes to switch into unity before I take the screenshots
[15:46] <dobey> oh and i was refreshing google docs page waiting for the design doc to pop up in the list
[15:47]  * nessita -> lunch and some errands, will be back to check on branches status
[15:57] <ralsina> dobey: there is a design doc but it's wireframes
[15:59] <dobey> it's wireframes all the way down
[16:06] <dobey> meh, i am still freaking cold here. i think i'll go grab some lunch and hopefully the metabolizing will help
[16:20] <mandel> alecu, may I have a +1 for this: https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-sso-client/creds-dialog/+merge/92769
[16:20] <alecu> mandel, looking
[16:20] <mandel> alecu, I already had one but had to resubmit due to tarmac issues with the dependency
[16:22] <alecu> mandel, +1
[16:22] <mandel> alecu, thx!
[16:22] <alecu> mandel, should I change the Status to Approved too?
[16:22] <mandel> alecu,sure thing
[16:22] <alecu> done
[16:25] <mandel> ralsina, can you look at: https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-sso-client/keyring-integration/+merge/92532
[16:25] <mandel> ralsina, is the one related to the keyring
[16:25] <mandel> alecu, thx!
[16:35] <ralsina> mandel: will get to it eventually
[16:35] <mandel> ralsina, eventually thx ;)
[16:35] <ralsina> damn, I must be missing some package,my unity looks weeeeeeird
[16:44] <achiang> hi, is there a way for nautilus to directly copy files into U1?
[16:55] <mandel> achiang, what do you mean?
[16:56] <mandel> achiang, in your file are in a ubuntu one synced folder they will be uploaded to the servers
[16:56] <achiang> mandel: right. i know about sync'ed folders; i think it would be really cool if i could just copy a single file from local file system into U1
[16:57] <achiang> ... without sync'ing the entire folder
[16:57] <achiang> the use case is, imagine i've got a lot of data in U1, and I have a single file i want to upload from a borrowed computer or something
[16:58] <achiang> i don't really want to sync the entire folder down, i just want to get that one file into U1 so i can see it later
[16:58] <mandel> achiang, there is a rest api that will allow you to that.. the normal behaviour cannot work on single files due to the way we interact with the file system, we can just watch folder, no files
[16:59] <achiang> mandel: right, my question was, has anyone written a nautilus plugin that uses the rest api, or do i have to do that myself? :)
[16:59] <mandel> achiang, AFAIK no one, sounds like a cool idea though
[17:00] <achiang> ok, add that to the extremely long TODO list. :)
[17:00] <achiang> thanks
[17:04] <mandel> achiang, no worries, if you need any help, let us know
[17:04] <achiang> mandel: yes, can you take all my mtgs and action items so i can go hack on something fun like this? ;)
[17:05] <ralsina> achiang: you can upload it via the web UI to a UDF you are not syncing anywhere
[17:05] <achiang> ralsina: hm, yeah. i could do that
[17:06] <mandel> achiang, if you wanna fix all the bugs I have in my list, you are welcome :)
[17:06] <gatox> nessita, ralsina if you are SO KIND :P can you review this branch too? https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/930722/+merge/92802
[17:06] <ralsina> gatox: queued
[17:06] <gatox> ralsina, thanks
[17:07] <ralsina> mandel: no commit message! https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/ubuntu-sso-client/creds-dialog/+merge/92769 (I fixed it now)
[17:08] <mandel> ralsina, thx! I cannot believe I forgot that..
[17:09] <ralsina> mandel: +1 on keyring-integration but don't approve globally until creds-dialog merges please
[17:10] <mandel> ralsina, ok
[17:14] <nessita> gatox, ralsina: could you please re-review? https://code.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntu-sso-client/ui-command-line-params/+merge/92785
[17:14] <nessita> sorry, is not re-review, just "review" :-)
[17:14] <gatox> nessita, :P ok!
[17:14] <gatox> on it
[17:17] <ralsina> nessita: gotit
[17:23] <dobey> mandel: i don't know if disabling the menu in the WebSettings will work or not. guess you'd have to try
[17:24] <mandel> dobey, yeah, I'll give it a shot, using an eventbox sounds weird..
[17:24] <mandel> dobey, although is a valid workaround..
[17:24] <mandel> valid == works
[17:24] <dobey> mandel: you don't need the eventbox, even the way you're doing it
[17:24] <gatox> nessita, +1
[17:24] <mandel> dobey, can I just apply the mask then?
[17:26] <dobey> mandel: what mask? you can just connect to button_press_event on the webview and disable the default menu via the settings.
[17:26] <dobey> mandel: also, you could just inject javascript to overwrite the default menu with a JS one
[17:26] <mandel> dobey, I want to use js as little as possible..
[17:26] <dobey> mandel: what are you even doing with webkit anyway?
[17:27] <mandel> dobey, I guess there is ofcourse already a button_press_mask, otherwise the rigth click would not work, I'm stupid..
[17:27] <mandel> dobey, experiments during the afternoons :)
[17:28] <dobey> grr. stupid weather indicator. stop crashing!
[17:28] <briancurtin2> its too cold for it to work
[17:33] <ralsina> gatox: +1 on 930722 but you need a 2nd
[17:33] <ralsina> gatox: oh, wait, it's claimed, nevermind
[17:33] <gatox> ralsina, ok, thanks!
[17:39] <dobey> sigh
[17:58] <ralsina> I am taking a lunch break. Will be back in 1 hour or so.
[18:06] <gatox> ralsina, ack
[18:07] <nessita> dobey: hey, any idea about this build failure? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92784535/buildlog.txt.gz
[18:07] <nessita> this sounds odd: /bin/sh: 1: pkg-config: not found
[18:07] <nessita> I guess dependency issues?
[18:09] <gatox> nessita, ralsina when you can (another one bites the dust) https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/930720/+merge/92815
[18:11] <gatox> brb! need to buy something to eat :P
[18:15] <dobey> nessita: build log for what exactly?
[18:15] <nessita> dobey: u1client
[18:16] <nessita> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntuone-hackers/+recipe/client-dailies
[18:16] <dobey> oh the recipe failed
[18:16] <dobey> nessita: looks to me like the world is broke
[18:17] <nessita> dobey: ack, will request another build then to see if the world unbreaks :-)
[18:30] <mandel> all, EOD in spain, catch you tom!
[18:36] <gatox> mandel, bye
[18:43] <nessita> dobey: boo, build keeps failing. Seems like there is some issue with some gir-foo packages. Care to take a look when you have a few minutes? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92797260/buildlog.txt.gz
[18:45] <dobey> nessita: i don't think that's the only problem. and it seems like either the chroot, or the internal mirror, are broken
[18:45] <dobey> nessita: i think you'll have to bug a losa
[18:46] <dobey> "WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!" is also a slight troubling
[18:47] <nessita> dobey: ack, thanks. Another quick question.... the u1client dailies are not building in amd64 because it says it can't satisfy the dependency on ussoc. Which kinda makes sense since as per https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntuone-hackers/+recipe/sso-dailies we're not building for and64. WOuld you point me to the doc about building to a specific arch? is puzzling (to me) since ussoc is not arch-dependent...
[18:52] <dobey> nessita: i don't know why that's happening. ussoc should be arch all, and thus installable
[18:53] <gatox> nessita, done: https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/930718-bis/+merge/92826
[19:22] <popey> Hello!
[19:22] <popey> Which of the following directories is the 'right' place for my music to be?
[19:22] <popey> alan@wopr:~/.local/share/ubuntuone
[19:23] <popey> alan@wopr:~/.ubuntuone/
[19:23] <popey> because i have a symlink (for some reason) in the first one pointing to the second which means rhythmbox sees two of every track
[19:24] <dobey> popey: the rhythmbox library should only have one of them, and it should be the one that's not a symlink
[19:25] <popey> so I should just bin the symlink?
[19:25] <popey> i suspect this is because I was an 'early adopter' of U1MS
[19:26] <dobey> i don't know why you have two of everything
[19:26] <dobey> if you look at the properties on two of the same song, do they point to different paths, or the same path?
[19:26] <popey> same
[19:26] <popey> oh, no
[19:26] <popey> to each of those places
[19:26] <popey> I'll just tidy it all up ☺
[19:27] <dobey> weird
[19:27] <dobey> oh. there may actually be a bug with that
[19:28] <dobey> popey: can you file that as a bug please?
[19:28] <popey> yeah, will do it on another machine, i think it happens on all my machines
[20:17] <alecu> uhhh.... it's time to go to kinder!!!
[20:17] <alecu> see you later folk!
[20:50] <dobey> brb, gonna get some snacks
[21:04] <ralsina> nessita: in no-u1-nowhere, shouldn't we be using the appname parameter in things like "you will need to be connected to set up Ubuntu Single Sign On"?
[21:14] <nessita> ralsina: yeah, we should. Can you please open a bug for that?
[21:14] <ralsina> nessita: indeed
[21:16] <ralsina> nessita: bug #931706 created and assigned to gatox
[21:16] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 931706 in ubuntu-sso-client "In the Qt UI, the appname is not used (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/931706
[21:16] <nessita> ralsina: awesome
[21:17] <ralsina> nessita: and since that is a separate bug, +1
[21:17] <nessita> yey!
[21:20] <gatox> nessita, ping
[21:20] <nessita> gatox: pong
[21:21] <ralsina> I am EODing now. Will do a pass of reviews ~midnight, so queue them if you need'em
[21:21] <dobey> ralsina: another asado today?
[21:21] <gatox> nessita, i'm a little confuse.... i fix the problem with the forgotten password page.... but after you receive the email with the confirmationn code....  which page should be the one to be shown?
[21:22] <nessita> gatox: the page named (let me look for it)
[21:22] <ralsina> dobey: worse, tomorrow is st. valentine and I have no gift yet!
[21:22] <nessita> gatox: reset_password_page
[21:22] <nessita> ResetPasswordPage
[21:22] <gatox> nessita, thaanksssss
[21:22] <nessita> gatox: :-)
[21:23] <gatox> ralsina, make something by your own and said that you put all your effort on that.... noone can critize that! :P
[21:23] <gatox> ralsina, is a good excuse jeje
[21:26] <dobey> nessita: images 3 and 4 are the exact same picture, in that share
[21:26] <nessita> dobey: oh, let me fix that
[21:28] <ralsina> gatox: "here, dear, I made you a RSS reader!"  is not romantic
[21:29] <gatox> jejejeje
[21:29] <dobey> people still write RSS readers?
[21:29] <gatox> ralsina, a rss reader that only reads romantic news :P jejee
[21:29] <ralsina> dobey: only to test other stuff that needs lots of test data quickly
[21:30] <dobey> heh
[21:32] <nessita> dobey: screenshot 3 updated, and added a 5-congrats
[21:32] <nessita> ok, I'm off to pilates
[21:32] <gatox> nessita, bye
[21:32] <nessita> see ya later crowd! (remember I working half day tomorrow, so I will start working at 5pm UTC - 2pm ART)
[21:32] <dobey> :-/
[21:32] <dobey> later
[21:34] <nessita> briancurtin: hey there! loved your comment on my MP, sorry I saw it too late (the branch was merged already)
[21:35] <nessita> briancurtin: but will keep the suggestion in mind :-)
[21:35] <briancurtin> nessita: cool, no worries
[21:36] <nessita> dobey: any idea why sso-dailies are not requested to build on each merge?
[21:37] <dobey> they should be
[21:37] <nessita> dobey: this is the second time I do it by hand
[21:37] <nessita> ok, we'll debug later
[21:37] <nessita> thanks!