[11:00] <afranke> Hi.
[11:00] <afranke> Am I the only one to think that something like https://answers.launchpad.net/homebank/+question/181675 is getting ridiculous?
[11:02] <czajkowski> morning
[11:02] <czajkowski> afranke: what is the question in english?
[11:03] <czajkowski> also the status could be just changed to open
[11:03] <afranke> czajkowski, isn't it already open?
[11:03] <czajkowski> ah sorry yes
[11:04] <afranke> The question is "what does the checkbox 'of notebook 2' mean?".
[11:05] <czajkowski> afranke: ok, just not used to homebank
[11:05] <afranke> The question being in French shouldn't really be a problem since the homebank maintainer is French.
[11:06] <afranke> czajkowski, I was not expecting anyone here to answer the question. I just find it irritating that launchpad won't be as patient as I am when it comes to this question being answered.
[11:07] <afranke> The ping pong game between janitor and me is what I find ridiculous.
[11:07] <czajkowski> afranke: well it;s not closed it, it's just doing a clean up on  questions that have not been commeneted on. You dont necessarily need to keep replying, perhaps ping the maintainer and ask them to have a look at the question though?
[11:08] <tumbleweed> is it just me, or are ubuntu uploads not being picked up?
[11:08] <afranke> Well, I wanted to avoid adding noise for the maintainer. Being myself a maintainer of another piece of software, I know that sometimes you just don't have time to process things right now.
[11:10] <czajkowski> tumbleweed: let met find out for you
[11:12] <tumbleweed> czajkowski: normally it's every 5 minutes. I was just suprised to see something uploaded 20 mins ago wasn't in my inbox yet
[11:12] <czajkowski> nods
[11:14] <czajkowski> tumbleweed: there are some issues at present and they are being looked into
[11:14] <tumbleweed> I see so
[11:39] <czajkowski> afranke: I've filed a bug re the janitor to see if there can be something done about it, but the janitor has cleared up other projects and people are usually happy with the notices. sorry for the inconvience.
[11:41] <afranke> Thank you.
[11:42] <afranke> In the meantime I contacted the maintainer, we'll see if that makes him answer faster.
[11:42] <czajkowski> afranke: no problem if you'd  like to keep track of the bug it's #932007
[11:42] <czajkowski> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/932007
[11:43] <afranke> Great, I'll CC myself.
[14:06] <ricotz> hello, is there a way to look up PPAs which uses a specific PPA as its build dependency?
[14:07] <czajkowski> ricotz: let me find out for you, what PPA in paricular?
[14:08] <ricotz> czajkowski, hello, this would be ppa:gnome3-team/gnome3 and ppa:ricotz/testing
[14:09] <czajkowski> ricotz: let me ask, am new so dont know all the answers yet
[14:10] <ricotz> czajkowski, thanks
[14:10] <bigjools> I don;t think there is a way
[14:12] <ricotz> bigjools, hmm, so there is no way to crawl through the ppas and check their deps?
[14:12] <ricotz> bigjools, btw, hi
[14:12] <bigjools> hey :)
[14:12] <bigjools> we can do it in the DB if someone is totally desperate but it's a pain
[14:12] <ricotz> bigjools, at least the deps are visible in the ppa, so i hoped there is way ;)
[14:12]  * bigjools OTP now
[14:13] <czajkowski> bigjools: thanks for the help
[14:15] <ricotz> bigjools, i am thinking about cleaning out the natty pockets of these ppas and dont want to hit people too hard by just doing it
[17:43] <blueyed> The current layout with wide text+colors for prio+status is very distracting. I have commented on the launchpad blog about it, but wonder if there's a bug number / intention to fix this?
[17:52] <czajkowski> blueyed: let me find out for you
[17:52] <czajkowski> blueyed: mrevell may know more about this
[17:53] <mrevell> Can you repeat the question, please? I got disconnected and didn't see it.
[17:54] <czajkowski> mrevell: 7:43 < blueyed> The current layout with wide text+colors for prio+status is very distracting. I have commented on the launchpad blog about it,  but wonder if there's a bug number / intention to fix this?
[17:54] <mrevell> thanks czajkowski
[17:55] <czajkowski> np
[17:56] <mrevell> blueyed, Actually, this change has been surprisingly well received. Yes, there are certainly things we can do to tweak the new layout. I'm having a call with Huw, our designer, later today and we're going to come up with a plan for where to take the new layout.