[00:30] <stgraber> wendar: around?
[00:30] <wendar> stgraber: yup
[00:30] <stgraber> wendar: i found why you don't get the icon for the calculator
[00:30] <stgraber> wendar: typo in debian/control
[00:31] <stgraber> wendar: your Icon field contains .svg where it should be .png
[00:31] <stgraber> I confirmed that here I can see all the icons in SC except for that one, so that must be the issue
[00:31] <wendar> stgraber: ah, makes sense
[00:31] <stgraber> wendar: can you fix and upload a new version to the PPA?
[00:31] <wendar> I can't see any of the icons, but probably an older version of SC
[00:31] <wendar> Yup, I'll do that now
[00:32] <stgraber> cool, thanks
[00:32]  * ajmitch wonders if we should make a general rule to push package branches to the app-review-board project after uploading to the PPA
[00:32] <stgraber> as I said, here it's not perfect either, it takes some convincing to get SC to load the icons the first time (opening the app page usually does the trick), then it uses it fine
[00:32] <ajmitch> though keeping them in sync may be problematic
[00:33] <wendar> stgraber: ah, if I do that it works for the lenses
[00:33] <stgraber> wendar: ok, same behavior I have here then, just doesn't work with the calculator because it's actually broken ;)
[00:33] <wendar> stgraber: not perfect, but a usable work around until the SC bug is fixed
[00:34] <stgraber> yeah ...
[00:34] <stgraber> I need to make a note to poke mvo on Friday about the SRU
[00:35] <ajmitch> are there any changes that really need to go into precise? I expect that as an LTS, there'll be submissions targetting precise for quite awhile
[00:36] <wendar> ajmitch: most of the changes we need are on the server side of SC
[00:36] <wendar> ajmitch: so, not so much bound by release cycles
[00:36] <ajmitch> what about development tools like quickly?
[00:36] <stgraber> I think we're mostly good in Precise, wouldn't hurt to publish an app for testing though. I usually copy one of the small apps for that (the lenses will fail because of API mismatch).
[00:36] <ajmitch> sorry if I'm drifting off-topic :)
[00:37] <ajmitch> stgraber: I'll update my LP lens for precise soon, it could be used to test breakage
[00:37]  * stgraber goes out to grab some food, bbiab
[00:37] <stgraber> ajmitch: that'd be nice
[00:56] <wendar> stgraber: fix submitted, thanks for the catch!
[07:46] <dholbach> good morning
[08:14] <ajmitch> morning dholbach
[08:14] <dholbach> hi ajmitch
[08:14]  * ajmitch just got home, tuesdays are long days :)
[17:21] <stgraber> whoever takes care of the new lenses/scopes in the queue, let me know if you need any help with apparmor
[17:22] <stgraber> (it's not strictly mandatory but really a good idea to ship a profile as it's fairly easy to do for the unity extensions)
[18:55] <wendar> why do all these app developers add "-public#" to their version numbers
[18:55] <wendar> ?
[18:56] <wendar> it's like they're all reading the same odd app development guide
[18:56] <wendar> but, no clue where they're getting it from
[18:57] <wendar> is anyone working on Revision Monitor
[18:58] <wendar> and, any opinions on whether we should require the Guallet developer to fix the translations on that one screen before we launch?
[18:58] <wendar> (it's not one of our strict criteria, but seems to fit with the idea of being "useful for general audiences")
[19:15] <ajmitch> it'd be nice to get the translation fixed before uploading
[22:41] <ajmitch> that's interesting, mixd.tv was submitted as a binary package, gpl v2, and the website download page requires logging in for a private beta
[22:50] <wendar> it may be that the GPLv2 license is a mistake
[22:50] <wendar> and, it actually belongs on the "no cost, proprietary" side
[22:51] <wendar> ajmitch: I asked him for the source anyway
[22:51] <wendar> ajmitch: I also asked Guallet to fix the translation problem
[22:51] <ajmitch> ok
[22:51] <wendar> ajmitch: if mixd.tv responds and says "I don't want to release the source" then we bounce it back to  John Pugh
[22:52] <ajmitch> fair enough, that's what I'd expect, but I don't think I've got a button to do that
[22:53] <stgraber> Submit to MyApps is supposed to do that (as weirdly as it's called ...)
[22:54] <ajmitch> oh right :)
[22:54] <wendar> ajmitch: actually, you may want to add a comment to mixd.tv asking about the private beta thing
[22:54] <wendar> https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/627/feedback/
[22:55] <wendar> ajmitch: they do say it's "open source" on the website, but, don't seem to be distributing it...
[23:03] <ajmitch> wendar: commented
[23:03] <ajmitch> I *think* that comment gets emailed to the submitter
[23:05] <wendar> ajmitch: yeah, I *think* so too, but not entirely sure
[23:06] <wendar> ajmitch: those comments don't get forwarded to the app-review-board list, which is what made me doubt
[23:06] <wendar> ajmitch: so I also emailed my comment (on crabhack) to the author, just to make sure they got it
[23:06] <wendar> ajmitch: and, he replied to my email
[23:07] <wendar> ajmitch: <shrug>