[00:49] where would i file a bug with xdg-open? [00:59] kanliot: ubuntu-bug xdg-utils [01:00] ty [01:16] is i915.i915_enable_rc6 still disabled on 12.04 ? [01:17] any i915 rc6 on 12.04 ? [01:23] hi === maxb_ is now known as maxb [01:25] so any idea about i915 in 12.04 ? [01:33] is i915 rc6 enabled on 12.04 ? === Logan_ is now known as eating [01:40] what about pcie_aspm ? [01:43] no news === eating is now known as log [05:07] i can't seem to figure out how to get 12.04 to use xfce by default. i've tried changing everything in update-alternatives to use it [05:08] first i tried logging out and signing in on xfce but it still booted to the default [05:11] NeonLightning, how did you install xfse? [05:11] vfce [05:11] xfce doh [07:43] wonder if nvidia drivers work ok .. === Guest97996 is now known as vega- [08:49] Is it me or is the package index screwed? [08:50] can't refresh my sources because it says it can't open the merge list. Keep getting "not a valid bzip archive" when trying to refresh the sources. [08:57] maybe it is just the gb archive [08:57] changed to fr and it seems to work === yofel_ is now known as yofel [11:03] help [11:03] update-manager wants to remove 200 packages [11:03] is that normal ??? [11:04] (mostly i386 one's . I'm on 64 bit) [11:05] on dist-upgrade? [11:05] distro upgrade, that is [11:05] think it did the same for me.. so.. yes.. [11:06] crizzy_: realy yes? I dont want a broken system [11:06] not on dist-upgrade... [11:06] just normal upgrade [11:06] in 12.04 [11:06] i386 packages can't really break your 64bit installation.. [11:06] wait [11:06] so.. i wouldn't worry too much [11:06] but there is also [11:06] the package lsb-base [11:06] p7zip and others [11:07] if unsure wait for couple days [11:07] :P [11:07] if it still wants to remove them in couple days, then it's authentic :PP [11:07] thanks [11:13] LibreOffice is failing [11:13] any work around? I so need it right now!! :D [11:17] why is ia 32 libs not available [11:17] anymore? [11:19] multiarch [11:19] you can install either verison of package by simple: apt-get install package:i386 [11:20] crizzy_: I cant install skype [11:20] becouse of that [11:21] there isnt a skype 64 bit edition out [11:21] right.....? [11:24] no idae [11:24] *idea [11:24] but you should wait for final release for real usage [11:24] i bet you can manually guess packages that skype needs [11:25] just try to launch and check what .so file it complains about.. apt-get install libsomething:i386 [11:27] crizzy_: yo I know [11:27] but than I have all this shit 32 libs... [11:30] I hate skype [11:31] :-) [12:23] Seems like I can't install any program that depeneds on i386 libs or anything [12:23] After upgrade [12:24] glosoli: correct [12:24] it's still broken [12:24] But this is definitely being fixed ? [12:24] I suppose so [12:24] but it's been broken for a week already at least [12:24] Will have a brake from stupid skype :D [12:38] glosoli: that is mentioned in the release notes as known issue.. [12:41] vega-: Pardon me, I am quite new to using developement versions, where can I see release notes ? [13:03] Having pae error on test drive of 12.04. cpu not that old any suggestions? [13:05] glosoli: http://www.ubuntu.com/testing [13:10] vega: The ia32-libs package that used to provide 32-bit libraries on 64-bit (amd64) installations has been removed in favour of multiarch. << so there won't be ia32-libs anymore, how I can install thoose multiarch ? [13:11] glosoli: not sure, but there seems to be a package named ia32-libs-multiarch [13:11] and one named multiarch-support [13:12] one would think that those two would be automatically installed on systems that had ia32-libs .. [13:14] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1880965&page=2 and so on.. [13:16] Having pae error on test drive of 12.04. cpu not that old just updated kernel as per wiki suggestions. Is this a problem with 12.04 or my system?any suggestions? [13:38] I hope someone is around who knows what sets lightdm's background to the one the user is using? [13:42] pae error in desktop release. installed pae to kernel just to be sure -- no change. trying dvd as stated in wiki. === Guest12338 is now known as Aranel [13:43] anyone else having trouble with testdrive system? [13:47] yourfrinedisaac; I'm running 64bit so no problems for me [13:48] MrChrisDruif, are you using the desktop release of the dvd? [13:48] or the dvd* [13:49] MrChrisDruif, by the way i'm using the i386 [13:50] yourfrinedisaac; with pae I'm not surprised you're using i386 [13:51] And what is the difference between the desktop release and the dvd yourfrinedisaac ? [13:51] MrChrisDruif, according to the wiki there is a defference in the readiness. also what do you mean you're not surprised? [13:52] !PAE [13:52] To use more than ~3.2GB RAM on a 32bit system you can install the PAE-enabled kernel. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EnablingPAE for more info [13:52] That's why ^_^ [13:53] ubotto, I did that still having same error on desktop release. syncing dvd release. [13:54] yourfrinedisaac; ubottu only responded to my !PAE ( ubottu is a bot) [13:54] MrChrisDruif, lol okay [13:55] Ghehe ^_^ [13:55] MrChrisDruif, I saw the enabling pae info and followed instructions and rebooted. Still same error [13:56] * MrChrisDruif has no experience with PAE [13:56] Why mess with PAE if you can run x86_64 ^_^ [13:57] MrChrisDruif, my cpu says its 64bit but eont run 64 bit ubuntu [13:58] wont* [13:58] MrChrisDruif, go figure. right [13:58] Awkward [14:02] yourfrinedisaac; what does cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep cache_alignment give you? (or just cat /proc/cpuinfo ) [14:04] 64 [14:04] MrChrisDruif,64 [14:04] Awkward, what does it tell you when you try to install 64bit? [14:05] MrChrisDruif, use an appropriate kernel for your cpu [14:05] O_O [14:06] MrChrisDruif, I'm downloading the 64bit alpha top see what happens [14:08] MrChrisDruif, when it's finished i'll try it in virtualbox [14:10] MrChrisDruif, I'm wondering if since my 11.10 release is 32 bit if it is causing a confusion in virtualbox [14:10] Did you tell virtualbox that you wanted to install a 64 bit system? [14:11] MrChrisDruif, what do you mean it just asks for the iso location [14:11] From what I remember you can select what kind of system you want to install [14:12] E.g. Ubuntu 64 bit [14:12] MrChrisDruif, hmmm never saw that setting let me check [14:12] When you create the virtual drive [14:13] MrChrisDruif; ahhhh I see it. Nope never did that [14:13] ^_^ [14:13] Then it'll think you created a 32 bit machine ^_^ [14:14] MrChrisDruif; will this time lol [14:15] the processor needs hadrware support for virtualization to run 64bit guest, which is more than is needed to run 64bit os on the real hardware [14:43] how to install skype on 12.04 its not there in software center [14:44] !find skype partner [14:44] Found: skype [14:44] !info skype partner [14:44] skype (source: skype): VOIP and instant messaging client. In component main, is extra. Version 2.2.0.35-0maverick1 (partner), package size 23029 kB, installed size 29200 kB (Only available for i386 amd64) [14:44] aQute, in the partner repository [14:45] how to add that repo [14:45] !partner [14:45] Canonical's partner repositories provide packages a location for software vendors to publish applications. The repo itself can be added by running this in a !terminal: « sudo add-apt-repository "deb http://archive.canonical.com/ $(lsb_release -sc) partner" » [14:50] Is anyone other unable to install ia32-libs-multiarch because of dependencies problem ? [14:50] Hello! Will Ubuntu Precise release be able to disable Nvidia Optimus? [14:51] orated: Try searching in internet for some tool called Bumblebee [14:51] I did glosoli. Bumblebee is not working for me [14:52] orated: In btw i dont think it depends on ubuntu version, I think it depends if Nvidia will release driver with support [14:53] I meant to ask with reference to kernel used in precise. I read that 3.2 can fix optimus issues, hence asked [15:00] orated: hmm, worth trying then [15:42] hello [15:43] help me i would like install MS Access from Linux but I do not know as it to do [15:45] qw-Russian, please dont crosspost, you got an answer in #ubuntu [18:17] hey, I have ubuntu 10.04 and when I do update-manager -d it wants to go all the way to 12.04 alpha, how do I go to 11.10? [18:18] Almindor, you would need to do every step in between [18:18] bazhang: ok.. how? [18:18] bazhang: all the 10.04 -> x.x guides simply talk about update-manager -d doing the job [18:18] 10.04-10.10-11.04-11.10 [18:19] bazhang: yes... but how? or is the info about alpha only info and it will update one at a time? [18:19] Almindor, once it is released its a one step upgrade path between lts [18:19] Almindor, how much of a hurry are you in [18:19] bazhang: well.. I have max 2h [18:20] so today [18:20] well do you have a separate home partition? [18:20] so it's not possible to tell update-manager to update just one non-lts release? [18:20] no, default layout [18:21] well yes, but not with the -d command [18:21] thats development release [18:21] ok.. I don't really mind updaging one by one [18:21] as in alpha2 not released [18:21] yes [18:21] updating9 [18:21] more than 2 hours I'd say [18:21] damnit :) not my type of keyboard heh [18:22] I can do one update now, the second one later [18:22] but I need the machine workable [18:22] sure [18:22] make sure to check in the package manager that it looks for non-lts releases then [18:23] ok [18:23] and get it started, first to 10.10 [18:25] thanks, updating to 10.10 now [18:25] if there are any issues/questions in the meantime, be sure to ask. [18:26] in #ubuntu , of course [18:26] sure, thanks === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth [19:44] Anyone around with LightDM knowledge? === jussio1 is now known as jussi [20:52] hi there [20:57] Aloha bik-family [20:58] hello there, i'm running ubuntu natty 11.04 i want to upgrade to precise alpha but update-manager -d offers me oneiric. can i force it to choose precise? [20:58] vaioman: you can't skip releases when upgrading [20:58] vaioman; nope, you have to go through all of them [20:58] Ghehe [20:58] ah. too bad, thanks anyway [20:59] except LTS to LTS is possible [20:59] i'll start the oneiric upgrade then eww :) [21:01] That's true, but that is actually the same as normal release to normal release [21:01] vaioman; or fresh install. But that's up to you. [21:02] unfortunately i don't have any media avail here, i'll go with the big multiupgrade [21:02] Hi, can i ask something abbout Thunderbird in Precise P? [21:04] !ask | bik-family [21:04] bik-family: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) See also !patience [21:05] OK, I installed Ubuntu Precise P, all works perfect accept Thunderbird. I cant create accounts in it [21:06] Why not? What kind of errors did you get? [21:06] the first welcome screen offers to create an account thru TB, or make your own or skip and create later [21:07] None of the three things work, no errors [21:19] can I disable that email/IM indicator? [21:55] HI ALL A smal question, after updating 12.04, dragging the window border behaviour is changed. now double click and dan klik to release. bug or change. (bad one it it is) [22:09] ralph, could you rephrase that? [22:10] normally if you drag a window you double click and drag and release the mouse... now it stick... you have to click again to release the window from the mouse. [22:11] this happens after installing the latest updates today for 12.04 [22:11] before it was fine [22:12] I never double clicked to drag a window. [22:13] i mean double tab on mousepad [22:13] Ah. [22:13] sorry [22:13] I never used Unity on a notebook. No wonder why I'm so confused. [22:13] O-o [22:14] I mean laptop. [22:14] yes with a mouse is't just one click and release [22:15] i was wondering if this change is planned or just me, can't find anything on it on internet [22:21] hi guys, does anyone know if there is a reason why evince core dumps on me when in daily? [22:24] Bad build? [22:25] Daekdroom, what do you mean? i have all upgrades applied and evince just crashes with the message (core dumped) [22:25] eitch, and you're using an Alpha version of Ubuntu. Segmentation faults happen sometimes. [22:25] It should be fixed in the next evince update. [22:25] Daekdroom, sure, i know it can happen, was just wondering what i can do =) [22:26] First I'd try to check if there's a bug report filed in Launchpad. [22:31] Aww. He left. I suspect it was bug 932642 [22:31] Launchpad bug 932642 in utouch-geis "evince crashed with SIGSEGV in geis_bag_append()" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/932642 [22:41] is there any reason why the software center is gone (and has been for the last week)? [22:42] huayra: not being careful with dist-upgrade? (it is still installed here, others were complaining about losing it earlier) [22:47] problem solved... now it is working again (i did nothing) [22:48] yes last week if you did a update in uninstalled the software center [22:49] you can instal it again if you have synaptic or sudo apt-get instal software-center [22:50] sudo apt-get install software-center [22:51] trism & ralph: thank you [22:51] no problem ;-) [22:51] I come from the dpkg and dselect days, but have started to like to s-c and kind of missed it the last week :) [22:51] ( yamaica yah....) [23:20] Where Can I check what version of drivers Pangolin Precise has in it's repo ? [23:20] I mean ATI Catalyst version