=== maxb_ is now known as maxb [02:01] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firestarter/+bug/932485 [02:01] Launchpad bug 932485 in firestarter (Ubuntu) "Firestarter breaks networking during bootup (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] [04:43] Could someone mark bug 893944 as Triaged for me? It looks like it has enough info. It's a lucid bug that I think is unlikely to be fixed, but I suppose that's a developer decision [04:43] Launchpad bug 893944 in gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) "Broken symlinks in /usr/share/gnome/help/user-guide/en_GB/ (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/893944 [04:52] mfisch, does it only affect lucid or is it still present? [06:02] psusi: looks like I missed you, sorry, I'll chec === TeTeT_ is now known as TeTeT === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Ursinha_ is now known as Guest37786 === Guest37786 is now known as Ursula === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch === joshuaAFK is now known as tobin === bladernr_ is now known as bladernr_afk === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback === bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_ === cweber10_ is now known as cweber10 === bigbash is now known as zz_bigbash [17:46] bug squad meeting in 15 minutes in #ubuntu-meeting [18:10] could someone check bug #920128 and make it public if possible? [18:31] bug 920128 [18:37] nailora: done [18:48] hm, first ubottu burns down and now ubot? [18:48] jpds: ^ [19:06] charlie-tca: thanks [19:07] You are welcome [20:19] found myself bug #792847 for which I think I found a upstream report (which got fixed). I cannot reproduce the bug, so I do not know whether it is indeed the correct upstream report... What do to? Leave status to 'New'? [20:20] no bug report? Well here is the manual version: (debianutils) run-parts does not seem to reap its children: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debianutils/+bug/792847 [21:14] Please someone else check for this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/933059 and confirm it thanks [21:14] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/933059 [21:14] bot dead? ;/ [21:15] bot is dead [21:15] poor bot [21:15] all the bots seem dead today [21:15] i got one off the most nasty bugs i could find on my laptop... [21:16] take some time and read my report /:) [21:17] Someone allrdy confirmed it :D was that you ? [21:17] No, let me see [21:17] oh thanks [21:17] launchpad decided there was another user, and confirmed it automatically [21:18] hi all! should this be reopened? bug 930291 [21:18] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-application/+bug/930291 [21:18] the fix fixed a different leak afaict [21:20] then you can reopen with a description explaining why :) [21:23] since there are some people active at the moment, I have also a question: [21:23] found myself bug #792847 for which I think I found a upstream report (which got fixed). I cannot reproduce the bug, so I do not know whether it is indeed the correct upstream report... What do to? Leave status to 'New'? [21:23] (debianutils) run-parts does not seem to reap its children: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debianutils/+bug/792847 [21:23] veger: that would take someone more familiar with debianutils to determine [21:24] so, since it is unsure whether the report is ok, leave the status? [21:24] and hope someone with more debianutil experience finds it? [21:25] yeah, usually. But do make sure to add a comment that you can not reproduce it [21:25] ok, I will add it === olaf is now known as Guest45251 [23:52] good evening [23:52] i have a question about bug #931135 [23:54] how i get the output of "/usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v /boot/grub" [23:58] an what does jibel man with "Try with --recheck." ? i use ubuntu/kubuntu since october 2011 and i dont understand the infos