| dpm | good morning all | 07:02 |
|---|---|---|
| jono | morning dpm | 07:02 |
| jono | ...and I head to bed | 07:03 |
| jono | night! | 07:03 |
| dpm | hey jono, good night! | 07:03 |
| jono | night! | 07:03 |
| ajmitch | morning | 20:28 |
| stgraber | hey ajmitch | 20:29 |
| * ajmitch is happy at how much faster it is to build packages now | 21:46 | |
| ajmitch | I've pushed tagplayer with some patches to lp:~ajmitch/+junk/extras-tagplayer | 21:46 |
| highvoltage | ajmitch: why is it faster? | 21:48 |
| ajmitch | highvoltage: SSD to replace my hard drive | 21:48 |
| ajmitch | it took ~45 min a couple of weeks ago to build a simple python package, because the hard drive was so very very slow | 21:49 |
| highvoltage | ajmitch: ah nice. | 21:50 |
| ajmitch | ok, I can see that I made a mistake with icon naming in that branch, don't try & build it yet :) | 21:51 |
| highvoltage | I switched to sssd a few months ago and any machine with a spinny disk just feels broken now | 21:51 |
| ajmitch | yeah, the difference is really noticeable | 21:52 |
| ajmitch | stgraber: what do you suggest for packages that ship apport hooks? | 21:58 |
| * ajmitch isn't sure if it's something standard in quickly or not | 21:58 | |
| stgraber | ajmitch: oh, hmm, well, it's susprising that they do and it doesn't make sense to have them in /opt but I think we'd need a policy change for that | 21:59 |
| ajmitch | tagplayer has: | 21:59 |
| ajmitch | -rw-r--r-- root/root 185 2012-02-17 10:55 ./etc/apport/crashdb.conf.d/tagplayer-crashdb.conf | 21:59 |
| ajmitch | if the filename doesn't matter, we could possibly change it to extras-tagplayer-crashdb.conf | 21:59 |
| stgraber | oh wait, actually I think the policy change I got the TB to approve covers these | 21:59 |
| stgraber | well, not explicitly, but they are covered as long as we agree with the apport guys on what the files should be called and make sure there can't be any conflict | 22:00 |
| ajmitch | right | 22:00 |
| stgraber | (similar to the unity stuff and /usr/share/applications) | 22:00 |
| ajmitch | something to follow up with them on the file naming then | 22:00 |
| wendar | mhall119: I only see 0.2 of unity-community-lens in the scopes-packagers PPA, is that the one you want us to review? | 22:51 |
| wendar | mhall119: the comments say 0.3 | 22:52 |
| mhall119 | wendar: huh, I dput it and saw it building.... | 22:53 |
| wendar | mhall119: (I had started making the tweaks needed for ARB, but then noticed the comment, and want to make sure I get the latest version, so I'm not duplicating work you already did) | 22:53 |
| mhall119 | wendar: are the tweaks something I can make in my source package? | 22:54 |
| mhall119 | I want to use this as a template for others | 22:54 |
| wendar | mhall119: ah, might just be slow in the build queue | 22:54 |
| wendar | mhall119: yes, definitely, I was going to submit them to you as a patch | 22:54 |
| wendar | mhall119: if you'd rather, I could do it as a bzr branch, that's what I've been doing for a lot of others | 22:55 |
| mhall119 | wendar: I'm not even seeing it in the build queue, maybe I dput it to the wrong place | 22:55 |
| mhall119 | wendar: bzr branch and MP would be great | 22:55 |
| wendar | mhall119: what's the bzr repo? | 22:55 |
| mhall119 | https://code.launchpad.net/~mhall119/onehundredscopes/unity-community-lens | 22:56 |
| mhall119 | hmm, doesn't look like I dput version 0.3 at all....doing it now | 22:57 |
| mhall119 | it has some fixes to point things to /opt in that version | 22:57 |
| wendar | mhall119: yup, it's most of the way there, just a few small bits remaining | 22:58 |
| wendar | (and, actually, you may have caught all the bits now, I was looking at the 0.1 package in MyApps | 22:59 |
| wendar | before I saw the comment about 0.3) | 22:59 |
| mhall119 | wendar: I'm EOD, but feel free to PM me and I'll read it in the morning | 23:00 |
| mhall119 | or, I suppose, comment on it in myapps, there's a system for that isn't there? | 23:00 |
| wendar | mhall119: okay | 23:00 |
| wendar | mhall119: I'll work on a branch and you can review it tomorrow | 23:00 |
| wendar | mhall119: yes, I'll use the comment system, but that doesn't work terribly well for sharing code patches | 23:01 |
| mhall119 | thanks wendar! | 23:01 |
| ajmitch | wendar: file bugs, I know I need to file a few about developer-portal behaviour | 23:23 |
| ajmitch | having the initial comment only in the feedback tab isn't the most obvious place to look, for example :) | 23:24 |
| wendar | ajmitch: so far, I really like the pattern of working on branches, when they provide the info | 23:29 |
| ajmitch | branches provide a nice way to track the changes & be able to view the packaging online | 23:30 |
| ajmitch | even if it's just a ppa submission, bzr import-dsc should work | 23:31 |
| ajmitch | wendar: it'd be really nice to require submissions as a branch, but I think as a PPA is best, since it requires at least a source package | 23:36 |
| wendar | ajmitch: aye, and with a PPA, we know it builds, which is a plus | 23:42 |
| wendar | ajmitch: and, that's a good point, we can certainly create a bzr branch straight from a ppa, for sharing changes | 23:42 |
| wendar | mhall119: ah, yup, you did pick up some of the fixes in 0.2 and 0.3, great! | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!