[07:02] good morning all [07:02] morning dpm [07:03] ...and I head to bed [07:03] night! [07:03] hey jono, good night! [07:03] night! [20:28] morning [20:29] hey ajmitch [21:46] * ajmitch is happy at how much faster it is to build packages now [21:46] I've pushed tagplayer with some patches to lp:~ajmitch/+junk/extras-tagplayer [21:48] ajmitch: why is it faster? [21:48] highvoltage: SSD to replace my hard drive [21:49] it took ~45 min a couple of weeks ago to build a simple python package, because the hard drive was so very very slow [21:50] ajmitch: ah nice. [21:51] ok, I can see that I made a mistake with icon naming in that branch, don't try & build it yet :) [21:51] I switched to sssd a few months ago and any machine with a spinny disk just feels broken now [21:52] yeah, the difference is really noticeable [21:58] stgraber: what do you suggest for packages that ship apport hooks? [21:58] * ajmitch isn't sure if it's something standard in quickly or not [21:59] ajmitch: oh, hmm, well, it's susprising that they do and it doesn't make sense to have them in /opt but I think we'd need a policy change for that [21:59] tagplayer has: [21:59] -rw-r--r-- root/root 185 2012-02-17 10:55 ./etc/apport/crashdb.conf.d/tagplayer-crashdb.conf [21:59] if the filename doesn't matter, we could possibly change it to extras-tagplayer-crashdb.conf [21:59] oh wait, actually I think the policy change I got the TB to approve covers these [22:00] well, not explicitly, but they are covered as long as we agree with the apport guys on what the files should be called and make sure there can't be any conflict [22:00] right [22:00] (similar to the unity stuff and /usr/share/applications) [22:00] something to follow up with them on the file naming then [22:51] mhall119: I only see 0.2 of unity-community-lens in the scopes-packagers PPA, is that the one you want us to review? [22:52] mhall119: the comments say 0.3 [22:53] wendar: huh, I dput it and saw it building.... [22:53] mhall119: (I had started making the tweaks needed for ARB, but then noticed the comment, and want to make sure I get the latest version, so I'm not duplicating work you already did) [22:54] wendar: are the tweaks something I can make in my source package? [22:54] I want to use this as a template for others [22:54] mhall119: ah, might just be slow in the build queue [22:54] mhall119: yes, definitely, I was going to submit them to you as a patch [22:55] mhall119: if you'd rather, I could do it as a bzr branch, that's what I've been doing for a lot of others [22:55] wendar: I'm not even seeing it in the build queue, maybe I dput it to the wrong place [22:55] wendar: bzr branch and MP would be great [22:55] mhall119: what's the bzr repo? [22:56] https://code.launchpad.net/~mhall119/onehundredscopes/unity-community-lens [22:57] hmm, doesn't look like I dput version 0.3 at all....doing it now [22:57] it has some fixes to point things to /opt in that version [22:58] mhall119: yup, it's most of the way there, just a few small bits remaining [22:59] (and, actually, you may have caught all the bits now, I was looking at the 0.1 package in MyApps [22:59] before I saw the comment about 0.3) [23:00] wendar: I'm EOD, but feel free to PM me and I'll read it in the morning [23:00] or, I suppose, comment on it in myapps, there's a system for that isn't there? [23:00] mhall119: okay [23:00] mhall119: I'll work on a branch and you can review it tomorrow [23:01] mhall119: yes, I'll use the comment system, but that doesn't work terribly well for sharing code patches [23:01] thanks wendar! [23:23] wendar: file bugs, I know I need to file a few about developer-portal behaviour [23:24] having the initial comment only in the feedback tab isn't the most obvious place to look, for example :) [23:29] ajmitch: so far, I really like the pattern of working on branches, when they provide the info [23:30] branches provide a nice way to track the changes & be able to view the packaging online [23:31] even if it's just a ppa submission, bzr import-dsc should work [23:36] wendar: it'd be really nice to require submissions as a branch, but I think as a PPA is best, since it requires at least a source package [23:42] ajmitch: aye, and with a PPA, we know it builds, which is a plus [23:42] ajmitch: and, that's a good point, we can certainly create a bzr branch straight from a ppa, for sharing changes [23:45] mhall119: ah, yup, you did pick up some of the fixes in 0.2 and 0.3, great!