| dekarl | superm1: hmm, I wonder how it worked for them in the first place. the 0.25 mythweb package has never worked for me since installing vanilla Mythbuntu 11.04 | 00:15 |
|---|---|---|
| superm1 | dekarl: yeah i dunno. i mean it looks like it should all be correct now | 00:27 |
| superm1 | maybe everyone with the problems manually made changes to symlink into /var/www/html? | 00:27 |
| superm1 | is that a default directory used for apache perhaps? | 00:28 |
| dekarl | I'd love to have most of the issues fixed by 0.25-final but you can make an omelette without breaking eggs. | 00:30 |
| dekarl | s/can/can't/ | 00:30 |
| superm1 | yeah well this is why you do it before 0.25 is stable. people can't complain as loudly when stuff breaks along the way :) | 06:11 |
| dekarl | morning, I'm updating to the latest nightly now and will see if I can just remove/reinstall or have to fix something myself | 06:59 |
| superm1 | as in 20120216 build right? | 07:01 |
| dekarl | hmm, a bit | 07:15 |
| dekarl | some packages are still 20120215... mythtv-common, mythtv-transcode-util, mythtv-backend, mythtv-frontend, but others are 20120216 already | 07:16 |
| dekarl | which means I can't install mythweb which requires 20120216 of mythtv-common, ohh the joy of transactional consistency in software repositories :D | 07:17 |
| dekarl | the build log hints at our fixes having broken something so it failed http://paste.ubuntu.com/844055/ | 07:24 |
| Zinn | [paste.ubuntu.com] Ubuntu Pastebin | 07:24 |
| dekarl | superm1: seems like three "rm" without " || true" in debian/rules | 07:29 |
| superm1 | dekarl: oh you're on amd64 | 07:29 |
| superm1 | yeah it failed because arch all only happens on i386 | 07:29 |
| superm1 | the fix is either || true or rm -rf (doesn't fail on non-exist file) | 07:29 |
| dekarl | then its already fixed? (got rm -rf in the checkout but not in the log from 5 hours ago | 07:30 |
| superm1 | it is fixed if you do a build yourself yeah | 07:31 |
| superm1 | but it won't be fixed until next autobuild otherwise | 07:31 |
| dekarl | ahh, then it has to wait at least 36 hours :( | 07:31 |
| superm1 | i can try to kick off another build manually, but it has a tendency to be dependent upon the git hash incrementing | 07:33 |
| superm1 | so it might not work | 07:33 |
| dekarl | no worries, it has to wait due to me working and other appointments... nothing to do with the build or so | 07:39 |
| dekarl | much more important, should not forget to wear a dispensable tie for work, due to Old Maids' Day :) | 07:42 |
| === krups_v2 is now known as krups | ||
| Eclipse | Hi. I've just tried using the 11.04 mythbuntu livecd. I was given with the menu option to try/install. After selecting the `try' option, I'm now presented with an error: "Unable to load a failsafe session". Is there any way to rectify this? | 09:17 |
| Eclipse | -1s/11.04/11.10/ | 09:23 |
| superm1 | Eclipse: sounds like you might have a graphics card that isn't working in standard or failsafe modes | 15:46 |
| superm1 | is it a fairly new graphics card? | 15:46 |
| FabriceMG | the 0.25 on ppa don't compile for amd64 | 18:04 |
| superm1 | FabriceMG_: fixed in packaging, just waiting for next autobuild | 18:37 |
| superm1 | tgm4883: could you try to push another autobuild manually? | 18:41 |
| FabriceMG_ | thx superm1 | 18:55 |
| FabriceMG_ | my slave is down ( 2 days ) and my wife factor increases ! :) | 18:57 |
| superm1 | FabriceMG_: yeah it sounds like more people were already using 0.25 than any of us thought with how many are up in arms with the breakage the last few days :) | 18:58 |
| === FabriceMG_ is now known as FabriceMG | ||
| === kmcorbett_ is now known as kmcorbett | ||
| === kmcorbett_ is now known as kmcorbett | ||
| === kmcorbett_ is now known as kmcorbett | ||
| superm1 | amejia: you there? | 20:05 |
| superm1 | amejia: http://irc.mythtv.org/ircLog/channel/4/2012-02-16 you might want to read through the short discussion libav/ffmpeg. | 20:22 |
| Zinn | [irc.mythtv.org] Beirdobot, irc.freenode.net :: #mythtv | 20:22 |
| tgm4883 | superm1, building now | 21:01 |
| superm1 | thx | 21:02 |
| tgm4883 | superm1, would it be beneficial to add a way to just do a single version (eg. don't try to build 0.24 if we only want 0.25 built)? | 21:03 |
| superm1 | tgm4883: i think we added that recently didn't we? | 21:03 |
| tgm4883 | I haven't looked at the script, but I thought it built the latest version of the fixes branch anyway | 21:03 |
| tgm4883 | and just didn't push it to LP | 21:03 |
| tgm4883 | if we have that, I don't know how to do it | 21:04 |
| superm1 | tgm4883: it's the FORCED_REBUILD functionality | 21:05 |
| superm1 | eg FORCED_REBUILD=fixes/0.25 | 21:05 |
| superm1 | you just set that environment variable before calling the build process | 21:05 |
| tgm4883 | ah | 21:06 |
| superm1 | i wonder if we should start including the packaging revno in the version string though | 21:06 |
| superm1 | that would guarantee we could always do it | 21:06 |
| tgm4883 | the GIT rev? | 21:06 |
| superm1 | bzr rev | 21:06 |
| superm1 | of packaging branch | 21:06 |
| tgm4883 | ah | 21:06 |
| Eclipse | superm1: That was it. I appreciate your help. | 21:23 |
| superm1 | Eclipse: cool, guess it's good you had an older one sitting around? :) | 21:33 |
| Eclipse | I did indeed. | 21:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!