[00:39] <cjwatson> Daviey: right, it's that way for performance
[00:39] <cjwatson> checksumming a directory full of ISOs takes a while ...
[00:39] <cjwatson> if somebody wants to change it, maybe testing whether a file is newer than the checksums file itself would be a good idea
[07:57] <micahg> does gdb-mingw-w64 need an FFe since it's being built against gdb 7.4 instead of 7.3 now?
[08:01] <doko> I won't think so
[08:02] <micahg> ok, syncing then :)
[10:15] <Riddell> cjwatson: I'm going to get rid of kubuntu-common seed unless you can think of a reason for it, it's not needed now that desktop and netbook is one image for kubuntu
[10:20] <Laney> what shall we do about tesseract?
[10:20] <Laney> it seems to be having a bit of a shaky start; in some ways I think the situation will be better in Q-cycle
[10:21] <Laney> but the developers clearly want it
[10:50] <tumbleweed> Laney: ocropus has "never had a stable release" (in their words) so maybe we should go for it?
[10:50] <tumbleweed> it'll need some archive-admin review for all the new language-support packages
[10:50] <Laney> possibly
[10:51] <Laney> jwilk is clearly not happy though
[10:51] <tumbleweed> no, he's very grumpy
[10:51] <Laney> so i assume he doesn't find ocropus that bad
[10:51] <tumbleweed> one assumes he likes it :)
[10:51] <tumbleweed> also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658478#23
[10:52] <Laney> yeah saw it
[10:52] <tumbleweed> there isn't an obvious answer here
[11:12] <jamespage> Daviey: as we discussed last week can I get a FFe for bug 930422 please
[11:13] <jamespage> hmm - no bot - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/930422
[11:23]  * tumbleweed goes looking for a bot
[11:24] <nigelb> jpds: ^^
[11:24] <nigelb> jpds: ubot died
[11:49] <Daviey> jamespage: looking
[11:50] <Daviey> jamespage: No plans for main, right?
[11:50] <jamespage> Daviey: no
[11:51] <Daviey> jamespage: is the packager interested in trying to get it into Debian?
[11:52] <jamespage> Daviey: I don't think so
[11:52] <jamespage> but TBH I've not had the conversation with him
[11:57] <Daviey> jamespage: ack'd
[11:57] <jamespage> Daviey: ta
[13:25] <mdeslaur> Is the publisher working? Why isn't libcryptui published to the archive yet?
[13:28] <infinity> mdeslaur: Because it's in NEW.
[13:28]  * infinity pokes.
[13:28] <mdeslaur> oh! right, there's a new binary package!
[13:28] <mdeslaur> duh :)
[13:28]  * infinity nods.
[13:29] <mdeslaur> infinity: can you denew it please&?
[13:29] <infinity> Already done.
[13:29] <mdeslaur> infinity: thanks!
[18:31] <mdeslaur> Could someone please grant me a FFe for LP: #862609...I need to upload a new package in Precise to fix it.
[18:35] <tumbleweed> ^ any archive-admin volunteers?
[18:52] <seb128> tumbleweed, I'm not sure archive admin can grant ffe, you need a rt member, though they might be hard to find today as it's an U.S holiday
[18:53] <tumbleweed> seb128: NEW packages need archive-admins to agree to review them
[18:53]  * tumbleweed is RT, but not an archive-admin
[18:54] <seb128> well, I'm fine reviewed it as an archive admin if somebody grants a ffe
[18:55]  * tumbleweed looks
[19:01] <tumbleweed> ah, ScottK beat me to it
[19:01] <ScottK> ;-)
[19:11] <cyphermox> Could someone please review bug 829673, I'd like an exception for this small UI change :)
[19:12] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 829673 in network-manager-applet "FFE: No easy way to turn the network menu on/off" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/829673
[19:31] <stgraber> ScottK: wow, I think it's the first time I got a FFe approved that quickly ;) thanks!
[19:32] <ScottK> No problem.  Seemed like an easy one.
[19:32] <stgraber> ScottK: I'll send the call for testing now. I already have the client and the relay tested, will run the tests on the server now and planning to upload on Wednesday.
[19:32] <ScottK> Great.
[19:45] <mdeslaur> ScottK: thanks for the ffe for seahorse-nautilus
[19:46] <ScottK> mdeslaur: You're welcome.
[19:46] <mdeslaur> seb128: I uploaded seahorse-nautilus now, could you please review and denew it?
[19:46] <seb128> mdeslaur, looking
[19:47] <mdeslaur> seb128: thanks
[19:47] <seb128> mdeslaur, thank you for working on that!
[19:47] <seb128> mdeslaur, that's not going to do it sorry :-(
[19:48] <seb128> mdeslaur, let's move to #ubuntu-desktop to not flood spam this channel
[19:48] <mdeslaur> seb128: sure
[20:06] <micahg> ScottK: that ipv6 thing for gimp looked like a feature :)
[20:07] <ScottK> micahg: OK. I read bugfix release.
[20:07] <ScottK> micahg: Go for it.
[20:07] <micahg> thanks