=== lool- is now known as lool [18:37] stgraber: bug 760884 has a patch that might be worth looking at [18:37] Launchpad bug 760884 in ubiquity "Change of proposed computer name causes error" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/760884 [18:39] bdmurray: the idea seems good, I'll have to test the implementation though [22:18] stgraber: Around? I'm seeing an odd issue with resolv.conf in our daily image. Some puppet info, my network for search, localhost for nameserver, and domain as buildd. [22:19] GrueMaster: Sounds like we're picking up the buildd's resolv.conf (and then resolvconf if mangling it) [22:19] infinity: Yea, that's what it looks like to me. [22:20] * GrueMaster is really not liking resolvconf lately. [22:20] Which could be an artifact of no longer writing a pristine one (at least, I'm guessing we no longer do, since if we did, resolvconf wouldn't kick in at all) [22:20] I had server issues this morning because of a resolvconf issue. And it is on 10.04.4. [22:21] Yeah, looks like this is a change made to live-build. [22:21] resolvconf shouldn't be intalled on 10.04.4, it wasn't supported back then and it was horrible [22:21] And I'm guessing there's a corresponding change to various installer bits that perhaps jasper and ac100-tarball need to cargo-cult. [22:21] Well, not sure how it got there, but it is on my server. [22:22] now, Steve made some changes lately to copy the content of /etc/resolv.conf to /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/tail on upgrades, maybe that bit doesn't work as expected on the build servers [22:22] GrueMaster: Potentially a recommends of some whacky universe package. Lots of stuff liked to recommend (and even sometimes depend) on resolvconf. [22:22] if you have /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/tail with some Canonical DC info, that's definitely a bug [22:23] stgraber: Well, live-build is copying the buildd resolv.conf to the chroot resolv.conf, so if that resolvconf postinst bit is then copying it to tail, that would do it. [22:23] stgraber: Yes, I do. [22:23] But it also wouldn't be arch-specific, then. [22:23] All images should have this bug. [22:25] they probably all do ;) it's been changed yesterday [22:25] Fun. [22:26] moved the discussion to #ubuntu-devel where slangasek is around [22:40] the preseed flags are all MODULE/FLAGNAME right? [22:41] so I should be able to figure out what a given flag actually does by just looking at the source for a given D-I module? [23:02] yes, looking in debian/.templates should give you some information